Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 (Page 34)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller |
Reply CLOSED
|
|
2013-01-21 1:25 PM in reply to: #4588069 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 jlruhnke - 2013-01-21 1:23 PM lisac957 - 2013-01-21 1:20 PM jlruhnke - 2013-01-21 1:17 PM Yeah I had similar experiences with online dating. A lot of hit or miss. When I first did it I was really discouraged in the lack of responses I was getting. When I did end up getting a date out of it, I had a lot of conversations like this: me: I have to get going, I am getting up early to go for a bike ride. her: where are you going? me: out to Afton State Park and back. her: (puzzled look) That is like 25 miles away. What are you going to do when you get out there? me: Probably get some water, go to the bathroom, and come home. her: (even more puzzled look) Have fun with that. me: Thanks. I will. Not sure how that's different than 'real world' dating..?
Most real world dating I have done was with girls I met running or biking so they were probably doing the same thing. So why did you set up a date with someone who didn't share your interests? Just for variety? |
|
2013-01-21 1:26 PM in reply to: #4588067 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 lisac957 - 2013-01-21 11:23 AM Muskrat37 - 2013-01-21 1:20 PM lisac957 - 2013-01-21 11:15 AM Muskrat37 - 2013-01-21 1:03 PM The only sites that are even remotely worth any time is OKCupid and Plenty of Fish. Why? Because they are free! We've been round on this before and I know your mind is MADE UP! But MY experience is the opposite. You get what you pay for and people are not nearly as "serious" on the free sites. This made me laugh. I suspect our experiences are "opposite" because you are the pretty lady that get's bombarded by emails and you have your pick of the litter. My point was that I've had way more successful experiences on a "pay" site than the free ones. I've sent my share of unanswered winks and emails - but instead of taking my ball and going home I just moved on! I wasn't trying to start anything. Point taken - pretty women have more success on pay sites than middle aged divorced men starting over at 40+ |
2013-01-21 1:28 PM in reply to: #4588075 |
Member 522 Saint Paul, MN | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 lisac957 - 2013-01-21 1:25 PM jlruhnke - 2013-01-21 1:23 PM lisac957 - 2013-01-21 1:20 PM jlruhnke - 2013-01-21 1:17 PM Yeah I had similar experiences with online dating. A lot of hit or miss. When I first did it I was really discouraged in the lack of responses I was getting. When I did end up getting a date out of it, I had a lot of conversations like this: me: I have to get going, I am getting up early to go for a bike ride. her: where are you going? me: out to Afton State Park and back. her: (puzzled look) That is like 25 miles away. What are you going to do when you get out there? me: Probably get some water, go to the bathroom, and come home. her: (even more puzzled look) Have fun with that. me: Thanks. I will. Not sure how that's different than 'real world' dating..?
Most real world dating I have done was with girls I met running or biking so they were probably doing the same thing. So why did you set up a date with someone who didn't share your interests? Just for variety? We had other shared interests, just not early Saturday morning bike rides apparently. |
2013-01-21 1:32 PM in reply to: #4588073 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 DeVinci13 - 2013-01-21 11:24 AM Good advice so far, keep it coming. Thanks DeannaS, that is a great response. As a woman, I thought the last thing you would want after running a marathon or finishing up a tri is some guying trying to hit on you. I have also noticed that most women when doing sports (especially mtb biking races) they remove most jewellery so I can't judge the marriage status. I asked at one race and she said she was married. But, if that is the worse that happens I guess that isn't too bad. But, I live in a smaller city and you see the same women at most of the events, so I don't want to get the reputation of some leering old man on the prowl at events. I have been trying fitness-singles.com. From what I have seen so far, at least the woman are very active and seem to be a bit more honest about their exercise levels, and the photos reflect that. I don't have kids, and don't want to have kids. I don't want or need to get married again, I don't need any financial support. I am just looking for someone to spend time with. I have spent a lot of time travelling these last couple of years and I literally have thousands of pictures of scenery, castles, places, stuff, but none with me in them. I am finding that I miss the companionship, the basic talking with another person. The simple "how was your day" type of stuff. I have a great quote from Mens Health of all places that sums it up perfectly. "The bottom line is that both women and men are stronger when they have a safe, loving relationship to turn to. If you want to go out into the world, having someone watching your back and taking care of you at home-there's nothing better than that" That pretty much sums it up for me. Not sure if it applies to all women, but the woman I asked out told me later that she thought it was a total compliment that I found her attractive when she was not at her best. (no makeup and all sweaty from just finishing her race). I have tried fitness singles also... same result. The site is a great idea, but the main issue there is that they just don't have a lot of people on the site, which in my opinion makes the odds of a date on that site even less for us guys. |
2013-01-21 2:18 PM in reply to: #4588052 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2013-01-21 2:49 PM in reply to: #4162190 |
Expert 1028 Detroit, MI. Kinda. | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 I understand how awkward it isito try and learn how to date after being married forever - I was 34 when I got my freedom. I tried Eharmony for a while... never got a single match worth going on a date with. A few dates off of the free sites, but I dunno. I think I'm just better at mingling with people at group functions. I've found going to meetup events is a great way to meet people...not all romantic, but I have a lot of friends I've met from there. Checkout meetup.com if you haven't - not technically a dating site, but the majority of people at those are sinlge and regardless, you can find groups with people with similar interests in just about anything, or start your own. (I started a rock climbing group that now has over 400 members). |
|
2013-01-21 2:57 PM in reply to: #4588088 |
Expert 1028 Detroit, MI. Kinda. | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 Muskrat37 - 2013-01-21 2:32 PM I have tried fitness singles also... same result. The site is a great idea, but the main issue there is that they just don't have a lot of people on the site, which in my opinion makes the odds of a date on that site even less for us guys. I began to try it, but was turned off by what felt like a little bit of schemery. As I recall, they'd tell youh haw many people were suitable, but they couldn't recieve your message unless they upgraded. Knowing full well that probably the great majority of profile were fake/useless from people just poking around for freem I didn't want to pay the...$40/month? I think it was. It'd be a great idea if they found a way to make it free or $10/month or somthing. As mentioned already, the other sites are full of girls who think they are "very active" because they weed their garden and walk around art shows. |
2013-01-22 12:42 PM in reply to: #4588141 |
Pro 3730 NorCal | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 Teejaay - 2013-01-21 12:18 PM lisac957 - 2013-01-21 12:15 PM Muskrat37 - 2013-01-21 1:03 PM The only sites that are even remotely worth any time is OKCupid and Plenty of Fish. Why? Because they are free! We've been round on this before and I know your mind is MADE UP! But MY experience is the opposite. You get what you pay for and people are not nearly as "serious" on the free sites. I would agree that people are not as serious on the free sights but I really think age has something to do with "online dating" not working so well. Us 40 or overs are used to the "old fashioned" way of meeting people and the whole getting to know someone via text, email, chat thing is beyond weird to me. I've done it. And it's okay but to many people rely on it as the only way to communicate. I am phone and face to face person. I've not had ANY luck with online dating at all. Zilch. But have with just meeting people and being more open to being around new people in groups, trying new things, etc. I'm not over 40, but most of the men I have gone out with are. I hate having a millions ways to communicate! So many of them will ask me to exchange personal email addresses, Skype, FB, GChat or IM. I tell them I'm not interested in a penpal and if they want to have a conversation let's talk on the phone. If they are not up for that, I move on. If you can't have a conversation over the phone, you most likely will not have one in person. |
2013-01-22 12:48 PM in reply to: #4589531 |
Master 2099 Madison, WI | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 AbbieR - 2013-01-22 12:42 PM If you can't have a conversation over the phone, you most likely will not have one in person. Really? I couldn't disagree more. I hate phone conversations with a passion. But, I love talking to people in person. So much of communication is about body language, which is completely lost on the phone. I actually love texting/emails/IM's, even though I'm in that "over 40" crowd. It's much more natural for me to shoot a quick written thought to someone with a "let's discuss later in person" than it is to call someone up. I happen to be the kind of person that often needs a little time to absorb, so the text now/talk later is the perfect approach for me. I know it wouldn't be for everyone, though. I think the key is finding someone that has a communication style that meshes well with your own. |
2013-01-22 12:52 PM in reply to: #4162190 |
Member 522 Saint Paul, MN | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 I tend to be more comfortable with the text now/talk later approach. I am really not a fan of talking on the phone. |
2013-01-22 1:16 PM in reply to: #4589531 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
|
2013-01-22 1:21 PM in reply to: #4589541 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2013-01-22 1:25 PM in reply to: #4589547 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 jlruhnke - 2013-01-22 12:52 PM I tend to be more comfortable with the text now/talk later approach. I am really not a fan of talking on the phone. Same here, and I'm a communications professional Different strokes. |
2013-01-22 1:43 PM in reply to: #4589619 |
Champion 12759 Chicago | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 lisac957 - 2013-01-22 1:25 PM jlruhnke - 2013-01-22 12:52 PM I tend to be more comfortable with the text now/talk later approach. I am really not a fan of talking on the phone. Same here, and I'm a communications professional Different strokes. Non-phone talker here too! Love to text. |
2013-01-22 1:57 PM in reply to: #4589653 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2013-01-22 2:35 PM in reply to: #4162190 |
Chatham Ontario | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 text messages seem to take away some of the pressure of having an answer or a response right now. It does allow me to answer when I have time and a chance. But Ideally I like to talk in person. In fact I can't shut up sometimes, I hate silence. I don't like to talk to the point the other person can't get a word in edge wise. I sat next to that guy who was on a date this weekend. I was so happy when his food showed up so he could shut up and the poor girl across from him finally got a few words in. I have to be able to have a conversation with the other person and they need to reciprocate with conversation. They also need to deal with my weird sense of humor and my banter. If it is nothing but texting it drives me nuts. Although either it is the age or the walls text messaging takes down. I am finding women to be way more flirty then I remember. They seem to be more flirty over texting then in person. Must be because I am not over 40 good thing I will only be 39 this year. I have 1 year to get my act together. LOL or I won't find a girl in their 30s.
|
|
2013-01-22 3:10 PM in reply to: #4589603 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 Teejaay - 2013-01-22 11:16 AM AbbieR - 2013-01-22 11:42 AM Teejaay - 2013-01-21 12:18 PM lisac957 - 2013-01-21 12:15 PM Muskrat37 - 2013-01-21 1:03 PM The only sites that are even remotely worth any time is OKCupid and Plenty of Fish. Why? Because they are free! We've been round on this before and I know your mind is MADE UP! But MY experience is the opposite. You get what you pay for and people are not nearly as "serious" on the free sites. I would agree that people are not as serious on the free sights but I really think age has something to do with "online dating" not working so well. Us 40 or overs are used to the "old fashioned" way of meeting people and the whole getting to know someone via text, email, chat thing is beyond weird to me. I've done it. And it's okay but to many people rely on it as the only way to communicate. I am phone and face to face person. I've not had ANY luck with online dating at all. Zilch. But have with just meeting people and being more open to being around new people in groups, trying new things, etc. I'm not over 40, but most of the men I have gone out with are. I hate having a millions ways to communicate! So many of them will ask me to exchange personal email addresses, Skype, FB, GChat or IM. I tell them I'm not interested in a penpal and if they want to have a conversation let's talk on the phone. If they are not up for that, I move on. If you can't have a conversation over the phone, you most likely will not have one in person. In my experience that has been the case! I am a talker. I love quick wit and banter and humor. I want INTERACTIVE conversation. Not the .. I text you four words and you text me five words back an hour later. Or I email you and you have "time" to craft the most perfect charming response. Ugh. Just talk to me. Making plans or asking me out via text, chat, email ... no date. If you cannot pick up the phone and use your words well over the phone .. I can promise you that it will not go any better face to face. I'm calling Chadster - AKA Muskrat37 - out here but we've become pals and we have chatted on the phone many times. He is a delight to talk to on the phone. He's very funny. Smart. Open. His personality really carries over. I am sure that he is like that in real life and would be a lot of fun on a date (not for me though, he's way too young and skinny for me) WOW T.J. - thank you for the glowing endorsement, and the compliment! I think I will just put your email address in my dating profile and let prospective dates talk to you. Had to make sure I added my screen name because not too many people on BT know my real name, and I wanted to make sure all the single ladies reading this would know who you were talking about! FWIW - I like all kinds of communication. I will text / chat / email / talk on the phone or meet almost anyone, anywhere to talk over a cup of coffee or a sandwich. and...... right back atcha' - you are also a great person to talk to communicate with (via all means), and I have enjoyed getting to know you. |
2013-01-22 3:58 PM in reply to: #4589825 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2013-01-22 7:46 PM in reply to: #4589926 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 Teejaay - 2013-01-22 1:58 PM Muskrat37 - 2013-01-22 2:10 PM Teejaay - 2013-01-22 11:16 AM AbbieR - 2013-01-22 11:42 AM Teejaay - 2013-01-21 12:18 PM lisac957 - 2013-01-21 12:15 PM Muskrat37 - 2013-01-21 1:03 PM The only sites that are even remotely worth any time is OKCupid and Plenty of Fish. Why? Because they are free! We've been round on this before and I know your mind is MADE UP! But MY experience is the opposite. You get what you pay for and people are not nearly as "serious" on the free sites. I would agree that people are not as serious on the free sights but I really think age has something to do with "online dating" not working so well. Us 40 or overs are used to the "old fashioned" way of meeting people and the whole getting to know someone via text, email, chat thing is beyond weird to me. I've done it. And it's okay but to many people rely on it as the only way to communicate. I am phone and face to face person. I've not had ANY luck with online dating at all. Zilch. But have with just meeting people and being more open to being around new people in groups, trying new things, etc. I'm not over 40, but most of the men I have gone out with are. I hate having a millions ways to communicate! So many of them will ask me to exchange personal email addresses, Skype, FB, GChat or IM. I tell them I'm not interested in a penpal and if they want to have a conversation let's talk on the phone. If they are not up for that, I move on. If you can't have a conversation over the phone, you most likely will not have one in person. In my experience that has been the case! I am a talker. I love quick wit and banter and humor. I want INTERACTIVE conversation. Not the .. I text you four words and you text me five words back an hour later. Or I email you and you have "time" to craft the most perfect charming response. Ugh. Just talk to me. Making plans or asking me out via text, chat, email ... no date. If you cannot pick up the phone and use your words well over the phone .. I can promise you that it will not go any better face to face. I'm calling Chadster - AKA Muskrat37 - out here but we've become pals and we have chatted on the phone many times. He is a delight to talk to on the phone. He's very funny. Smart. Open. His personality really carries over. I am sure that he is like that in real life and would be a lot of fun on a date (not for me though, he's way too young and skinny for me) WOW T.J. - thank you for the glowing endorsement, and the compliment! I think I will just put your email address in my dating profile and let prospective dates talk to you. Had to make sure I added my screen name because not too many people on BT know my real name, and I wanted to make sure all the single ladies reading this would know who you were talking about! FWIW - I like all kinds of communication. I will text / chat / email / talk on the phone or meet almost anyone, anywhere to talk over a cup of coffee or a sandwich. and...... right back atcha' - you are also a great person to talk to communicate with (via all means), and I have enjoyed getting to know you. I was gonna say I'm too old and fat for you but thought I'd keep it about you not me! LOL! You are neither too old, nor too fat for me. If you were, we wouldn't be engaged! |
2013-01-22 8:49 PM in reply to: #4590234 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 Muskrat37 - 2013-01-22 7:46 PM engaged! That escalated quickly. Not get outta this thread, lovebirds! |
2013-01-22 9:49 PM in reply to: #4590336 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
|
2013-01-23 12:07 AM in reply to: #4162190 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 You ladies crack me up. T.J. - I will bring a flower to our wedding! Lisa - we have an "open" relationship, so we are still allowed to play in this thread. |
2013-01-23 6:13 AM in reply to: #4590503 |
Master 2099 Madison, WI | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 Funny little side diversion... a friend of mine just re-started this tumbler about really bad first contacts on dating sites. I figure many of us could submit: http://awkwardovertures.tumblr.com |
2013-01-23 6:49 AM in reply to: #4162190 |
New user 98 East Tennessee | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 That Teejaay - Muskrat37 exchange reminded me of a friend of mine when he said "My girlfriend hates it when I sneak up on her. According to her lawyer, she also hates it when I call her my girlfriend". |
2013-01-23 8:54 AM in reply to: #4590424 |
Champion 12759 Chicago | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Ver 2.0 Teejaay - 2013-01-22 9:49 PM lisac957 - 2013-01-22 7:49 PM Whoa. Whoa. Whoa there. He never gave me a single flower ...deals off! Muskrat37 - 2013-01-22 7:46 PM engaged! That escalated quickly. Not get outta this thread, lovebirds! Again TJ showing how high maintenance you are......tssst tssst (shaking head). Edited by NRG42 2013-01-23 8:54 AM |
|