A couple of things....
1
) I saw one tent at the high school-but that was later in the day Saturday. Probably OK for a cheap trip, but might do better to head up to Easton
(15-20 minutes away
) for one of the cheaper hotels there that has a fridge and microwave. And it would have been a hot and muggy night before race day. Of course, a BT camp out might be fun....
2
) I was signed up just for the swim
(preparing for B2B iron aquabike
). Despite going off course three times the first lap
(the start in the middle of the triangle--vs outside the buoy--really threw me
) I beat my goal time by more than three minutes. I bet my second lap was a good ten minutes faster than my first!
3
) I did a training ride after the swim, and was glad I wasn't out there for the whole 112. Not a speck of shade on the course, hot and windy. I noticed my speed picked up 30 seconds per mile and my heart rate dropped 20 bpm as soon as I turned out of the headwind.
4
) I agree that organizers could do a much better job with information. For example, the map they gave out had directions over a bridge that had clearly been closed for some time; instructions were for swimmers to park on side streets near the swim finish--got there and all the streets were posted no parking--parked blocks away only to find out that there was parking at the site; no water temps posted on the website night before or day of, not even at the swim start; no emails clearly detailing what to expect race day/on the course--eg, the white buoys in the middle of the triangle are the start line, you will then swim to outside of the first yellow buoy, etc. It also would have been nice to know in advance that the run transition/race finish did not have any food or drink for purchase.
All in all, though, I like smaller races, and this one strikes me as a good, first iron distance
(if you can handle the heat
), or a really good aquabike prep for IMs later in the season that have flat, windy courses.