Joe the Plumber (Page 4)
-
No new posts
| Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2008-10-16 1:35 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberLet's all take a moment to stop and look at the big picture here. Does anyone know how many Americans depend on government-financed programs? The last time I checked, it was 100%. That's right, EVERYONE, regardless of income. Tax money isn't just being handed out to lazy people that don't want to work for a living. I don't know about you, but I certainly enjoy the benefits the government has provided me. How many of you or someone that you care about recieved federal funding for college? Gotten a flu shot from the health department? Visited an elderly relative in an assisted living facitlity? Recieved a Social Security check? Served in the military? THIS is how your money is being spent... it's not being forked over to a bunch of lazy bums that would rather sit on their butt than work.
|
|
2008-10-16 1:36 PM in reply to: #1747555 |
Master 1826![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbernjkeating - 2008-10-16 2:08 PM slake707 - 2008-10-16 1:48 PM I would love to live in a utopia where social programs can disappear and everyone can be rich if they really want it and work hard. Unfortunately that will never happen due to people not being able to just work a little harder.. or people not wanting to.. we live in a world with rich people, poor people and everyone in between, we have drug addicts, alcoholics, thieves, murderers and mentally insane, we also have people pulling 16 hr work days to make ends meet, putting the first kid ever into college.. so my honest question is all of you who are highly supportive of never taking "or stealing" a dime form a wealthier individual to fund programs that support all these different people.. how do you plan to deal with this problem? if your answer is voluntary contribution to charity.. please elaborate how this system would work, because right now most charities can barely keep their head above water, try adding a welfare charity it would crash in a minute.. I would love to hear a real workable solution Dont need a solution, we just have to stop making people fund others, period. Unfortunately, we live in a world where some arent going to have the best, or even much at all in life. It is one of the sadly ironic truths in life that is we have to accept, or at least, accept that we cant force others to do soemthing about it. I dont have a lot of extra cash myself, so I donate what I can and volunteer my time. But in the end, no one in the world owes anyone anything just because they are better off. I would say approaching one of the most challenging life problems with no solution is naive to think that it will magically solve itself. So the world I see if we cut all social programs. Some people currently on the program will be able to survive and live, maybe even have some success.. I personally think a small percentage of these individuals shouldn't be on the programs today... if so we should look at fixing the current system.. I think some people will turn to crime to further fund there life.. sounds like a great solution .. except who then funds the increase police force, prison system etc if the rich shouldn't pay anything to the poor? I am coming from a 3rd world perspective , where I have lived in a country where life is not respected and crime is common place.. trust me.. you don't want that lifestyle here.. and the third group will be unable to get decent medical care (or if they do we pay for it with higher insurance premiums), proper nutrition, safe house.. leading to a larger level of poverty in the poor and increased medical costs for you and I.. but no worries because there will be a bum on every street corner allowing for the donation optional program to flourish and the sick people relying on Medicare and other programs can find an early exit and relieve us of having to deal/pay for them |
2008-10-16 1:36 PM in reply to: #1747554 |
Expert 946![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Barrington Area, IL | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbertriturn - 2008-10-16 1:08 PM coredump - 2008-10-16 9:50 AM njkeating - 2008-10-16 9:43 AM tikicult - 2008-10-16 10:34 AM triOK - 2008-10-16 9:22 AM He IS registered to vote. They interviewed him this morning and he had his voter card in his hand. Link to story or video?Whether he is registered to vote or not, how does that take away from the point that Obama's taxing of people like him is ludicrous? If he makes say 300,000 instead of 250,000 under Obama's plan (39% vs. 36%) the difference in his taxes is $1500. 36% is okay, but 39% is ludicrous? Yes, 39% is ludicrous. Any % for one group that is more than another group is wrong. Taxes are compulsory charges levied by a government for the purpose of financing services performed for the common benefit. Basically, paying for stuff. A rich guy pays the same price for a gallon of milk that I do. Should he pay more than I do for the same service/product? Nope. Yes - the so-called rich (Obama fluctuates what this really is) actually don't get any of the social welfare crap that a TON of this money is spent on - and has been proven not to work anyway. |
2008-10-16 1:40 PM in reply to: #1747622 |
Expert 946![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Barrington Area, IL | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumbertriOK - 2008-10-16 1:35 PM Let's all take a moment to stop and look at the big picture here. Does anyone know how many Americans depend on government-financed programs? The last time I checked, it was 100%. That's right, EVERYONE, regardless of income. Tax money isn't just being handed out to lazy people that don't want to work for a living. I don't know about you, but I certainly enjoy the benefits the government has provided me. How many of you or someone that you care about recieved federal funding for college? Gotten a flu shot from the health department? Visited an elderly relative in an assisted living facitlity? Recieved a Social Security check? Served in the military? THIS is how your money is being spent... it's not being forked over to a bunch of lazy bums that would rather sit on their butt than work.
The Lazy in this country are getting MORE than their fair share- and Obama wants to give checks back to people who don't pay ANYTHING - they actually will get money for nothing - this is called WELFARE! Also - Social Security is NOT the government's money - it is MY money that they are forcing me to give to them! |
2008-10-16 1:47 PM in reply to: #1747649 |
Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberWolff27 - 2008-10-16 1:40 PM triOK - 2008-10-16 1:35 PM The Lazy in this country are getting MORE than their fair share- and Obama wants to give checks back to people who don't pay ANYTHING - they actually will get money for nothing - this is called WELFARE! Also - Social Security is NOT the government's money - it is MY money that they are forcing me to give to them! Let's all take a moment to stop and look at the big picture here. Does anyone know how many Americans depend on government-financed programs? The last time I checked, it was 100%. That's right, EVERYONE, regardless of income. Tax money isn't just being handed out to lazy people that don't want to work for a living. I don't know about you, but I certainly enjoy the benefits the government has provided me. How many of you or someone that you care about recieved federal funding for college? Gotten a flu shot from the health department? Visited an elderly relative in an assisted living facitlity? Recieved a Social Security check? Served in the military? THIS is how your money is being spent... it's not being forked over to a bunch of lazy bums that would rather sit on their butt than work.
I hear France is nice. Edited by triOK 2008-10-16 1:49 PM |
2008-10-16 1:50 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberOK.. seriously.... Just because someone is on welfare, doesn't make them lazy. And you know it. Like I said above. Yes, there are people that take advantage of the system, but that doesn't mean we should deny it to those that don't. |
|
2008-10-16 1:59 PM in reply to: #1747546 |
Expert 864![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Village of Lakewood, Illinois | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbernjkeating - 2008-10-16 1:05 PM AcesFull - 2008-10-16 1:57 PM My wife and I make less than $250K year, but not a whole lot less. Do I want to pay an additional $1500/year in taxes? No. Will it affect my lifestyle in any meaningful way? No. My sister and her husband are struggling. Both are have been gainfully and steadily employed for 20 years. They are also not the best with understanding money and finances, but have always paid their bills on time and in full. They bought a modest home with reasonable payments five years ago. Now that the interest rate has adjusted a few times, they are in over their heads and afraid that they may lose their home. Could they afford an additional $1500? Not a chance. Neither guy will tax my sister the extra $$. Obama MAY tax me the extra $$ (we will prolly hit the magic number in two or three years). I can live with that. I suspect very few people earning more than $250K couldn't live with that. No one is making the argument they couldnt live with it, it's whether it is right or not. I'm 26, working 2 jobs with an infant daughter. I'd rather work 18 jobs than be on government programs. I would like to thank all the tax payers for my family for when I was little I went to head start (government program) which helped my mother with expenses of child care, some assistance from the Government. I am the first in my family to earn a college degree on my mothers side. My grandfather had an eighth grade education and my grandmother and mother a high school education. Sometimes a little help when things are rough makes the whole difference. |
2008-10-16 2:09 PM in reply to: #1747627 |
Veteran 395![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Randolph, MA | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumberslake707 - 2008-10-16 2:36 PM njkeating - 2008-10-16 2:08 PM slake707 - 2008-10-16 1:48 PM I would love to live in a utopia where social programs can disappear and everyone can be rich if they really want it and work hard. Unfortunately that will never happen due to people not being able to just work a little harder.. or people not wanting to.. we live in a world with rich people, poor people and everyone in between, we have drug addicts, alcoholics, thieves, murderers and mentally insane, we also have people pulling 16 hr work days to make ends meet, putting the first kid ever into college.. so my honest question is all of you who are highly supportive of never taking "or stealing" a dime form a wealthier individual to fund programs that support all these different people.. how do you plan to deal with this problem? if your answer is voluntary contribution to charity.. please elaborate how this system would work, because right now most charities can barely keep their head above water, try adding a welfare charity it would crash in a minute.. I would love to hear a real workable solution Dont need a solution, we just have to stop making people fund others, period. Unfortunately, we live in a world where some arent going to have the best, or even much at all in life. It is one of the sadly ironic truths in life that is we have to accept, or at least, accept that we cant force others to do soemthing about it. I dont have a lot of extra cash myself, so I donate what I can and volunteer my time. But in the end, no one in the world owes anyone anything just because they are better off. I would say approaching one of the most challenging life problems with no solution is naive to think that it will magically solve itself. So the world I see if we cut all social programs. Some people currently on the program will be able to survive and live, maybe even have some success.. I personally think a small percentage of these individuals shouldn't be on the programs today... if so we should look at fixing the current system.. I think some people will turn to crime to further fund there life.. sounds like a great solution .. except who then funds the increase police force, prison system etc if the rich shouldn't pay anything to the poor? I am coming from a 3rd world perspective , where I have lived in a country where life is not respected and crime is common place.. trust me.. you don't want that lifestyle here.. and the third group will be unable to get decent medical care (or if they do we pay for it with higher insurance premiums), proper nutrition, safe house.. leading to a larger level of poverty in the poor and increased medical costs for you and I.. but no worries because there will be a bum on every street corner allowing for the donation optional program to flourish and the sick people relying on Medicare and other programs can find an early exit and relieve us of having to deal/pay for them You completely missed my point. I dont have a solution because there shouldnt be one. The problem is that life sucks sometimes and people dont have stuff. We, as people and the government, have absolutely no business in telling people to hand over money for the sake of giving it to someone else. You can say it is a more humane thing to do (and I would agree) but I dont want to live in a world with a Robin Hood style of government. |
2008-10-16 2:11 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Master 1895![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumber"We need to get rid of special interest money in Washington. To do this all elections need to be financed by the Gov't and each candidate gets the same amount and is held accountable for the spending of that money, any extra is returned. We need to put an end to getting elected because I outspent the other guy. " I just had this exact same conversation with someone while at lunch today. Doing this would finally make a truly fair election where the third party (and others) candidates can actually have their voices heard and have a fair chance at being elected. Unfortunately, the people in power now (Repubs and Dems) will never, ever allow that to happen because they will lose too much power. |
2008-10-16 2:15 PM in reply to: #1747752 |
Veteran 395![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Randolph, MA | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumberhamiltks10 - 2008-10-16 3:11 PM "We need to get rid of special interest money in Washington. To do this all elections need to be financed by the Gov't and each candidate gets the same amount and is held accountable for the spending of that money, any extra is returned. We need to put an end to getting elected because I outspent the other guy. " I just had this exact same conversation with someone while at lunch today. Doing this would finally make a truly fair election where the third party (and others) candidates can actually have their voices heard and have a fair chance at being elected. Unfortunately, the people in power now (Repubs and Dems) will never, ever allow that to happen because they will lose too much power. I dont really think it is the answer though. I like the idea in theory, but I dont like the idea of government funding these campaigns. You just know a "Campaign tax" would come out of it. More than anything, third parties need people to look at their choices and have an issue with them. The problem is, we are slowly becoming a nanny state and people are generally ok with it. As long as this is going on, nothing big will ever change. |
2008-10-16 2:23 PM in reply to: #1747714 |
Expert 892![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberAddysDaddy - 2008-10-16 11:59 AM I would like to thank all the tax payers for my family for when I was little I went to head start (government program) which helped my mother with expenses of child care, some assistance from the Government. I am the first in my family to earn a college degree on my mothers side. My grandfather had an eighth grade education and my grandmother and mother a high school education. Sometimes a little help when things are rough makes the whole difference. Similar situation here. My dad grew up with welfare help, had an 8th grade education, and then dropped out of school and went to work to help out his family (yeah, I know.... cry me a freakin' river!). He ended up spending 35+ years as a tool & dye maker. I'm the only one in my family (including sisters, cousins, grandparents, parents, etc.) to have a college education, which I achieved later in life. We are most definitely "hicks from the sticks". Without the government help back in the 40's & 50's, there's a pretty high probability I wouldn't be here today, which could be viewed as a good thing to some of you reading my posts. |
|
2008-10-16 2:30 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Giver 18427![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberBack on the subject of Joe: factchek sez: Update Oct. 16: ABC News reported the morning after the debate that Wurzelbacher admitted to a reporter that he won't actually make enough from his new plumbing business to pay Obama's higher tax rates. ABC said his admission "would seem to indicate that he would be eligible for an Obama tax cut." |
2008-10-16 2:35 PM in reply to: #1747800 |
Extreme Veteran 469![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberLJR - 2008-10-16 3:23 PM AddysDaddy - 2008-10-16 11:59 AM I would like to thank all the tax payers for my family for when I was little I went to head start (government program) which helped my mother with expenses of child care, some assistance from the Government. I am the first in my family to earn a college degree on my mothers side. My grandfather had an eighth grade education and my grandmother and mother a high school education. Sometimes a little help when things are rough makes the whole difference. Similar situation here. My dad grew up with welfare help, had an 8th grade education, and then dropped out of school and went to work to help out his family (yeah, I know.... cry me a freakin' river!). He ended up spending 35+ years as a tool & dye maker. I'm the only one in my family (including sisters, cousins, grandparents, parents, etc.) to have a college education, which I achieved later in life. We are most definitely "hicks from the sticks". Without the government help back in the 40's & 50's, there's a pretty high probability I wouldn't be here today, which could be viewed as a good thing to some of you reading my posts. Good for your dad for doing what was necessary to help his family. Chances are you would still be here, for me to get quotes from, without the governments help. Not to mention you are talking about 2 different eras. The 40's/50's and today. Edited by BIGNEW 2008-10-16 2:36 PM |
2008-10-16 2:42 PM in reply to: #1747743 |
Master 1826![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbernjkeating - 2008-10-16 3:09 PM You completely missed my point. I dont have a solution because there shouldnt be one. The problem is that life sucks sometimes and people dont have stuff. We, as people and the government, have absolutely no business in telling people to hand over money for the sake of giving it to someone else. You can say it is a more humane thing to do (and I would agree) but I dont want to live in a world with a Robin Hood style of government. Agreed 100% that people don't have a right to stuff.. but they do have a right to life and it is a governments responsibility to provide the best living environment for its people, all people rich and poor.. you cannot just have the poor people die off .. because of this right of life, there will always have to be taxes on the wealthier (meaning someone who has more than 0, not the millionaires) to create a livable society. A system based purely on donations cannot create that environment.. IMHO primarily due too greed.. exhibit A of that is our current economic environment.. |
2008-10-16 2:47 PM in reply to: #1747847 |
Expert 892![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberBIGNEW - 2008-10-16 12:35 PM Good for your dad for doing what was necessary to help his family. Chances are you would still be here, for me to get quotes from, without the governments help. Not to mention you are talking about 2 different eras. The 40's/50's and today. Chances are that without the government help my dad and his family would have left the Vermont farm when he was very young and moved to where the jobs were. Then he wouldn't have met my mom, hence me not being born... at least not to those two. Yes, they were 2 different eras, but folks still need help today. Always have, always will. Sorry for the thread hijack... back to Joe. Edited by LJR 2008-10-16 2:48 PM |
2008-10-16 2:51 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Master 1895![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberJust to clear things up....I don't think we should soley rely on charity. I understand why we pay taxes and am grateful for all of the wonderful things I have access to because of it. I just don't think the wealthy should be taxed more just because they have more money. Instead, government needs to stop being so wasteful with the money they already are getting from the tax payers. Set bugets and stick to them. Make cut-backs. Same stuff we've all ready seen posted in this forum today... Edited by hamiltks10 2008-10-16 2:53 PM |
|
2008-10-16 3:02 PM in reply to: #1747825 |
Pro 6838![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tejas | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumberrun4yrlif - 2008-10-16 2:30 PM Back on the subject of Joe: factchek sez: Update Oct. 16: ABC News reported the morning after the debate that Wurzelbacher admitted to a reporter that he won't actually make enough from his new plumbing business to pay Obama's higher tax rates. ABC said his admission "would seem to indicate that he would be eligible for an Obama tax cut." He should be happy then. It doesn't make the tax increase to "spread the wealth" go away though does it? I just wish our elected officials would concentrate on solving the problem. I guess it is a lot easier to argue about who about who's turn it is to pay for a problem than to actually correct the problem. |
2008-10-16 3:02 PM in reply to: #1747880 |
Expert 946![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Barrington Area, IL | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumberslake707 - 2008-10-16 2:42 PM njkeating - 2008-10-16 3:09 PM You completely missed my point. I dont have a solution because there shouldnt be one. The problem is that life sucks sometimes and people dont have stuff. We, as people and the government, have absolutely no business in telling people to hand over money for the sake of giving it to someone else. You can say it is a more humane thing to do (and I would agree) but I dont want to live in a world with a Robin Hood style of government. Agreed 100% that people don't have a right to stuff.. but they do have a right to life and it is a governments responsibility to provide the best living environment for its people, all people rich and poor.. you cannot just have the poor people die off .. because of this right of life, there will always have to be taxes on the wealthier (meaning someone who has more than 0, not the millionaires) to create a livable society. A system based purely on donations cannot create that environment.. IMHO primarily due too greed.. exhibit A of that is our current economic environment.. The "best" living enviornment???? The poor in the US live in houses/apartments that are larger than what the upper middle calss live in in London, Paris, and other major European cities. The average "poor" person in the US has 1 car and 2 tv's in their household as well. The government is NOT responsible for people being responsible and not spending every penny they earn. I have know many, including myself, who have worked tons of hours, 2 jobs and only spent on necessities - not wasted money on $100 Jordan shoes when they are collectng welfare. THE MONEY IS ALREADY THERE - THEY DON'T NEED TO TAKE MORE FROM US. People who believe that Obama will only tax people over $250k are kidding themselves - he loves to tax and has admitted to the socialist concept of wealth transfer. |
2008-10-16 3:10 PM in reply to: #1747847 |
Expert 864![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Village of Lakewood, Illinois | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberBIGNEW - 2008-10-16 2:35 PM LJR - 2008-10-16 3:23 PM Good for your dad for doing what was necessary to help his family. Chances are you would still be here, for me to get quotes from, without the governments help. Not to mention you are talking about 2 different eras. The 40's/50's and today.AddysDaddy - 2008-10-16 11:59 AM I would like to thank all the tax payers for my family for when I was little I went to head start (government program) which helped my mother with expenses of child care, some assistance from the Government. Similar situation here. My dad grew up with welfare help, had an 8th grade education, and then dropped out of school and went to work to help out his family (yeah, I know.... cry me a freakin' river!). He ended up spending 35+ years as a tool & dye maker. I'm the only one in my family (including sisters, cousins, grandparents, parents, etc.) to have a college education, which I achieved later in life. We are most definitely "hicks from the sticks". Without the government help back in the 40's & 50's, there's a pretty high probability I wouldn't be here today, which could be viewed as a good thing to some of you reading my posts.
I am the first in my family to earn a college degree on my mothers side. My grandfather had an eighth grade education and my grandmother and mother a high school education. Sometimes a little help when things are rough makes the whole difference. I took it as an improved opportunity to be successful and a productive TAX paying individual. My family is doing well without any assistance and I woul work very hard not to take any money. But if I HAD to I would and do whatever it took to chane my circumstances. |
2008-10-16 3:11 PM in reply to: #1747581 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
2008-10-16 3:15 PM in reply to: #1747622 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
|
2008-10-16 3:20 PM in reply to: #1747950 |
Master 1826![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberWolff27 - 2008-10-16 4:02 PM slake707 - 2008-10-16 2:42 PM The "best" living enviornment???? The poor in the US live in houses/apartments that are larger than what the upper middle calss live in in London, Paris, and other major European cities. The average "poor" person in the US has 1 car and 2 tv's in their household as well. The government is NOT responsible for people being responsible and not spending every penny they earn. I have know many, including myself, who have worked tons of hours, 2 jobs and only spent on necessities - not wasted money on $100 Jordan shoes when they are collectng welfare. THE MONEY IS ALREADY THERE - THEY DON'T NEED TO TAKE MORE FROM US. People who believe that Obama will only tax people over $250k are kidding themselves - he loves to tax and has admitted to the socialist concept of wealth transfer.
Agreed 100% that people don't have a right to stuff.. but they do have a right to life and it is a governments responsibility to provide the best living environment for its people, all people rich and poor.. you cannot just have the poor people die off .. because of this right of life, there will always have to be taxes on the wealthier (meaning someone who has more than 0, not the millionaires) to create a livable society. A system based purely on donations cannot create that environment.. IMHO primarily due too greed.. exhibit A of that is our current economic environment.. You are I are talking about two completely different things .. I am talking about a right to life wrt abolishing all social programs.. personally I think the bigger issue would be to correct programs to eliminate waste and people who shouldn't be on the program from using it. Do you really believe that all people using government assistance living in a huge apartment with 2 TVs and a nice car.. if so I would say you have a warped sense of reality .. there are all kinds.. and what you describe is someone that I feel should not necessarily receiving welfare... the previous discussion revolved around removing all taxes.. whihc IMHO would result in a poorer poor class, more in line with a 3rd world living environment which would impact the overall quality of life of all Americans, rich and poor. The government has a responsibility to maintain a quality of life in this country. Edited by slake707 2008-10-16 3:20 PM |
2008-10-16 3:24 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Expert 892![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberBack to Joe the plumber.... http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6062246.html Joe's an unlicensed plumber working for his buddy, who is ALSO an unlicensed plumber (not required by the state, but by Lucas County where they live & work). He's sure screwed now. With the spotlight on him and his buddy's biz, they're OUT of biz (until/unless they can get licensing in place), and the reporter-corps has sleuthed out the liens on Joe for unpaid taxes. I sure hope he's ENJOYING his 15 minutes of fame, because it is surely going to cost him (not just his livelihood, but possibly the friendship with the guy that employs him). SAY IT AIN'T SO, JOE! Edited by LJR 2008-10-16 3:25 PM |
2008-10-16 3:25 PM in reply to: #1747975 |
Champion 11989![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbersurfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:11 PM BIGNEW - 2008-10-16 1:17 PM I think our current tax system is antiquated and needs to be overhauled, loopholes, deductions, exemptions, and so on needs to be eliminated. I'm in favor of a combination flat tax and national sales tax. It is called the Fair Tax. I will continue to mention it until people realize that it is this mythical flat tax based on consumption that everyone seems to want. It has been proposed and if you want it tell your congressman if they haven't supported it: http://www.fairtax.org/cgi-bin/scorecard.cgi
I want a flat tax on income. Equal commitment but not equal giving. We all pay, oh, I don't know, say %10? No loopholes, no special categories, no elaborate tax codes. You earn a dollar you give Uncle Same 10 cents. Period. |
2008-10-16 3:29 PM in reply to: #1747501 |
Pro 6838![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tejas | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberLJR - 2008-10-16 12:53 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 10:51 AM I see a lot of reference to the poor not being poor by choice. There is a lot of truth in that. One point that hasn't been made though. I made a choice NOT to be poor. And you had the intellect and abilities to do what was needed to make that choice a reality. Not all are so fortunate...No, I chose to make it a reality. Intellect plays a part in it, but does not excuse anyone unless they are mentally challenged. Two of the most intelligent people I know are also two of the laziest people that I have ever come across in my life. One of them is in prison and the other one barely gets by. |
|
login




2008-10-16 1:35 PM




Barrington Area, IL


View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK