Ironman Arizona : Official Thread (Page 40)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2012-10-15 11:47 AM in reply to: #4454116 |
Veteran 784 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread travesty - 2012-10-15 12:37 PM I do want to ask the group this question - just how bad are the winds (typically) for this race? Are they in our face or at our sides? Gusty? And about how strong? Expect it to be anywhere from mildly gusty to brutal wind out on the Beeline, depending on the day we get. A lot of times it seems to blow across the road, but a headwind is not unheard of.
I'll take a crosswind over a headwind all day....haha |
|
2012-10-15 11:50 AM in reply to: #4454094 |
Regular 138 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread Zero2Athlete - 2012-10-15 12:26 PM Decent weekend, but my 18 miler HURT. It was my 2nd 18 miler...the first time wasn't so bad. Didn't start to hurt until 16, then it wasn't so bad. Last night it started hurting at 14, and when I hit 18 and stopped running, it actually hurt way worse to walk. Not real sure of the difference, other than less sleep 2 nights before. First attempt, I rode 70 miles saturday and swam 2.4 Sunday morning before my afternoon run. This attempt, I rode 100 saturday and swam only 2 miles in the morning. Run was very late as I waited out predicted storms. Could be a lot of things---sleep, nutrition, weather, or just an off day. I did 100 on saturday and ran 14 on sunday and my legs were definitely tired by the end. Those 30 miles in your legs the day before could definitely make a difference. Also it is most likely just accumulated fatigue. Not sure what the weeks leading up to each work out have been like, but being in the peak of training our bodies are getting pretty worn down. |
2012-10-15 11:53 AM in reply to: #4453896 |
Veteran 249 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread erin116 - 2012-10-15 9:35 AM Jorgito22 - 2012-10-15 9:21 AM I had a descent weekend considering I was really unmotived earlier in the week in which I took some days off. Friday I got in a 17.55 mile run in 2.5 hours with a hour bike on the trainer later in the night, than yesterday I had an epic battle with the wind on my 5.5 hour ride (89.1miles) followed with a 1 hour run (7.17miles). Man but on the bike I decided to do loops again and on the way out I was going 10 -13 mph (due to the strongest head wind I have faced to date) and than on the way back I was doing 19-21mph.....the final loop going out was super tough, I was getting mentally tired and seeing 10 mph an hour in Aero, was def not helping the cause, but I just kept thinking that this is what Arizona is going to feel like so lets get through it I had a similar ride on Saturday. Except, I was doing one giant loop and as I got to the top of it the winds switched directions on me, so it was in my face almost the entire day! It was horrible. One particularly awful 10 mile stretch took me almost 50 minutes! I do want to ask the group this question - just how bad are the winds (typically) for this race? Are they in our face or at our sides? Gusty? And about how strong? Assuming there is not a storm system blowing through (which is very rare for AZ in November) the winds are extremely predictiable. They will be blowing out of the E/SE lightly up until around 9:30AM - 10:00AM. The winds will then switch to blowing from the SW. What this means is you have a headwind on the way out for 1 - 2 laps. I ride out there every weekend in October and November and it is like this every single time I ride. |
2012-10-15 1:01 PM in reply to: #4453501 |
Extreme Veteran 694 Highlands Ranch, Colorado | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread rcntly4298 - 2012-10-14 7:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-13 6:04 PM People put way too much emphasis on their long run into ironman. Go back the last 8 weeks and tell us your weekly run volume each week. Much better picture if you are ready. Running 3 plus hours in training is crazy. Ran a hilly 18 in 2:36 today in the cold and rain. Good confidence builder. However now I'm not sure how much farther I want to go on the run. I'd love to hit 20 miles (~3 hours) but I'm worried about injuries. My knees were a bit stiff by the end of today's run and I've been dealing with this since I signed up for Arizona. Not sure if it's worth the risk. Is 18 and 2:36 enough? Here are my past 9 weeks of running, starting with this past week... 4:38:26 32.69 miles |
2012-10-15 1:06 PM in reply to: #3911896 |
Extreme Veteran 557 Woodland Hills, CA | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread Woo, I'm entering a recovery week! I'll be racing Soma on Sunday and keeping my plan for total domination. Weekend went well. Saturday was about 119 miles on the bike during the day and a 5 mile recovery run in the evening. Sunday was a 2 mile swim in the morning and a 22 mile mid-day run. That's my 3rd 20+ mile run (plus one 19 miler). I'll do one more run over 20 then another around 18. |
2012-10-15 1:19 PM in reply to: #4454254 |
Veteran 249 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread FF Stock - 2012-10-15 1:01 PM rcntly4298 - 2012-10-14 7:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-13 6:04 PM People put way too much emphasis on their long run into ironman. Go back the last 8 weeks and tell us your weekly run volume each week. Much better picture if you are ready. Running 3 plus hours in training is crazy. Ran a hilly 18 in 2:36 today in the cold and rain. Good confidence builder. However now I'm not sure how much farther I want to go on the run. I'd love to hit 20 miles (~3 hours) but I'm worried about injuries. My knees were a bit stiff by the end of today's run and I've been dealing with this since I signed up for Arizona. Not sure if it's worth the risk. Is 18 and 2:36 enough? Here are my past 9 weeks of running, starting with this past week... 4:38:26 32.69 miles With this run volume, I would not recommend running anything close to 2 hours in training. You are asking for serious problems if you keep running long with this sort of volume. I would continue to build you run mileage about 5 - 10% per week up until 2 weeks out of the race. Keep your long run no more than 30% of your weekly volume. |
|
2012-10-15 1:45 PM in reply to: #3911896 |
Veteran 239 Austin | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread Just checking in - Designated cone-picker-upper here. It has been a lousy few weeks, training wise... Labor Day weekend, I was supposed to be the bike portion of the Austin Triathlon relay with Bar92 on Monday. Saturday, we go out for a training ride and not 15 minutes into the ride, I manage to find a pocket of gravel. Almost had it recovered when the rear wheel slipped back down the steep edge of the recently re-paved road, and I couldn't manage to get the front straightened up. This was a crash to the left side (so I balanced out the right-side crash from Galveston 2011) but I banged the right knee against the bike pretty hard, just below where they pulled the veins for my triple bypass. doc said I bruised the bone, which takes longer to heal apparently than a break or a fracture. Fortunately the only damage to the bike was that I destroyed both aero shifters. (Bar92 and my replacement team DID take 1st place, by the way!) Thought I had the training back on track after that, but a week ago today, I woke up with a knife in my back...rhetorically. What I thought (hoped) was a muscle strain turned into a 6mm kidney stone, which was surgically removed Tuesday. So up until today, my ride has been the couch and the lounger. So at this point, I am spray painting a wagon in IronHeart Racing colors so I can pick up the cones along the run course. I will get the swim and bike done, but DFL is within my grasp. Bib 2723 |
2012-10-15 2:01 PM in reply to: #4454340 |
Extreme Veteran 566 Southern California | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread triplebypat - 2012-10-15 11:45 AM It has been a lousy few weeks, training wise... Sorry to hear all that. Complaining about losing my two water bottles this morning just won't fly now. I hope you can continue to heal up. |
2012-10-15 6:08 PM in reply to: #3911896 |
Expert 1544 Alexandria, MN | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread Nice swim today, 5000 yards including 5x500 @ 1:30/hundred after my warm up. I think I'm ready for the swim, now to get my bike and run in order. |
2012-10-15 6:34 PM in reply to: #4454814 |
Veteran 930 Morgan Hill, California | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread Climbinggonzo - 2012-10-15 4:08 PM Nice swim today, 5000 yards including 5x500 @ 1:30/hundred after my warm up. I think I'm ready for the swim, now to get my bike and run in order. I think I'm the mirror of that. Feel like bike and run will get there, swim . . . hmmm. Will be interesting. Nice job on that swim. That should set you up for a good day. |
2012-10-15 6:47 PM in reply to: #4454292 |
Expert 932 Chandler, AZ | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread rcntly4298 - 2012-10-15 11:19 AM FF Stock - 2012-10-15 1:01 PM With this run volume, I would not recommend running anything close to 2 hours in training. You are asking for serious problems if you keep running long with this sort of volume. I would continue to build you run mileage about 5 - 10% per week up until 2 weeks out of the race. Keep your long run no more than 30% of your weekly volume. rcntly4298 - 2012-10-14 7:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-13 6:04 PM People put way too much emphasis on their long run into ironman. Go back the last 8 weeks and tell us your weekly run volume each week. Much better picture if you are ready. Running 3 plus hours in training is crazy. Ran a hilly 18 in 2:36 today in the cold and rain. Good confidence builder. However now I'm not sure how much farther I want to go on the run. I'd love to hit 20 miles (~3 hours) but I'm worried about injuries. My knees were a bit stiff by the end of today's run and I've been dealing with this since I signed up for Arizona. Not sure if it's worth the risk. Is 18 and 2:36 enough? Here are my past 9 weeks of running, starting with this past week... 4:38:26 32.69 miles I'm actually afraid to see what you'll say about my running numbers... I've been plagued by running injuries for the last 8 months and have already accepted the fact that I will not be IM run ready. I've adapted a run/walk strategy (5:1) and will get myself across that finish line one way or another. (my long run pace is between 9:30 & 9:50/mi) My longest runs so far have been 2:45:00 and I'm doing about 17 miles. I'm following a plan by Matt Fitzgerald pretty close when able and the run volumes are much lower than what's mentioned above. I have a recovery week and HIM this weekend and then one more long week capped by a 2:50:00 run which will end up being about 18 miles...Here are my last 8 weeks of running. Could I bother you for your recommendation? 3:11- 19.87 mi 1:26- 9.09 mi (rested foot) 3:38- 22.49 mi 3:03- 20.36 mi 3:50- 25.03 mi 1:39- 11.48 mi (rested foot) 3:25- 21.87 mi 2:22- 16.41 (raced) My plan never has me going close to 30 miles in a week... |
|
2012-10-15 7:36 PM in reply to: #4454292 |
Elite 3687 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread rcntly4298 - 2012-10-15 1:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-15 1:01 PM rcntly4298 - 2012-10-14 7:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-13 6:04 PM People put way too much emphasis on their long run into ironman. Go back the last 8 weeks and tell us your weekly run volume each week. Much better picture if you are ready. Running 3 plus hours in training is crazy. Ran a hilly 18 in 2:36 today in the cold and rain. Good confidence builder. However now I'm not sure how much farther I want to go on the run. I'd love to hit 20 miles (~3 hours) but I'm worried about injuries. My knees were a bit stiff by the end of today's run and I've been dealing with this since I signed up for Arizona. Not sure if it's worth the risk. Is 18 and 2:36 enough? Here are my past 9 weeks of running, starting with this past week... 4:38:26 32.69 miles With this run volume, I would not recommend running anything close to 2 hours in training. You are asking for serious problems if you keep running long with this sort of volume. I would continue to build you run mileage about 5 - 10% per week up until 2 weeks out of the race. Keep your long run no more than 30% of your weekly volume. I do respect what you have to say but I totally disagree with you here. If you are saying the long run should only be 30% of the total volume for the week then that is equal to a 60 mile running week just to equal an 18 mile long run. Very, very few people training for an IM are running anywhere near 60 miles a week. I have done 4 different plans and am coached by a former pro this year and I am averaging about 25 miles a week. My biggest week will be around 35 with a long run of 17-18 miles. Pretty tough standards you set for those not on the pointy end of abilities. |
2012-10-15 8:14 PM in reply to: #4454954 |
Extreme Veteran 1986 Cypress, TX | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread mndiver - 2012-10-15 7:36 PM rcntly4298 - 2012-10-15 1:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-15 1:01 PM With this run volume, I would not recommend running anything close to 2 hours in training. You are asking for serious problems if you keep running long with this sort of volume. I would continue to build you run mileage about 5 - 10% per week up until 2 weeks out of the race. Keep your long run no more than 30% of your weekly volume. rcntly4298 - 2012-10-14 7:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-13 6:04 PM People put way too much emphasis on their long run into ironman. Go back the last 8 weeks and tell us your weekly run volume each week. Much better picture if you are ready. Running 3 plus hours in training is crazy. Ran a hilly 18 in 2:36 today in the cold and rain. Good confidence builder. However now I'm not sure how much farther I want to go on the run. I'd love to hit 20 miles (~3 hours) but I'm worried about injuries. My knees were a bit stiff by the end of today's run and I've been dealing with this since I signed up for Arizona. Not sure if it's worth the risk. Is 18 and 2:36 enough? Here are my past 9 weeks of running, starting with this past week... 4:38:26 32.69 miles I do respect what you have to say but I totally disagree with you here. If you are saying the long run should only be 30% of the total volume for the week then that is equal to a 60 mile running week just to equal an 18 mile long run. Very, very few people training for an IM are running anywhere near 60 miles a week. I have done 4 different plans and am coached by a former pro this year and I am averaging about 25 miles a week. My biggest week will be around 35 with a long run of 17-18 miles. Pretty tough standards you set for those not on the pointy end of abilities.
100% agree with that post. While I do agree that frequency probably trumps volume - it's just not in the cards for many of us. I'd love to run 5x per week but just can't devote that kind of time. I have three runs per week. I basically do a medium run, medium run and long run each week. This week is an 8, 8, 16 so my long run is 50% of my weekly volume. Is what it is. Edited by GMAN 19030 2012-10-15 8:20 PM |
2012-10-15 10:09 PM in reply to: #4454954 |
Veteran 249 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread mndiver - 2012-10-15 7:36 PM rcntly4298 - 2012-10-15 1:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-15 1:01 PM rcntly4298 - 2012-10-14 7:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-13 6:04 PM People put way too much emphasis on their long run into ironman. Go back the last 8 weeks and tell us your weekly run volume each week. Much better picture if you are ready. Running 3 plus hours in training is crazy. Ran a hilly 18 in 2:36 today in the cold and rain. Good confidence builder. However now I'm not sure how much farther I want to go on the run. I'd love to hit 20 miles (~3 hours) but I'm worried about injuries. My knees were a bit stiff by the end of today's run and I've been dealing with this since I signed up for Arizona. Not sure if it's worth the risk. Is 18 and 2:36 enough? Here are my past 9 weeks of running, starting with this past week... 4:38:26 32.69 miles With this run volume, I would not recommend running anything close to 2 hours in training. You are asking for serious problems if you keep running long with this sort of volume. I would continue to build you run mileage about 5 - 10% per week up until 2 weeks out of the race. Keep your long run no more than 30% of your weekly volume. I do respect what you have to say but I totally disagree with you here. If you are saying the long run should only be 30% of the total volume for the week then that is equal to a 60 mile running week just to equal an 18 mile long run. Very, very few people training for an IM are running anywhere near 60 miles a week. I have done 4 different plans and am coached by a former pro this year and I am averaging about 25 miles a week. My biggest week will be around 35 with a long run of 17-18 miles. Pretty tough standards you set for those not on the pointy end of abilities. Yes, that is exactly what I am saying and it has nothing to do whatsoever with being at the pointy end of the field. It has to do with reality. If you consistantly have a long run that is well above that 30% weekly volume, the vast majority of poeple will get injured. And saying you dont have time (not directed at you) is not a reason to say a method is right or wrong. Find the time to run an extra 15 minutes day. Or how about shave 1 hour or 1.5 hours of your total weekly swimming and biking and apply to running. 6 runs per week with an increase of 5 - 10% per week and the long run no more than 30% of weekly volume. Not only does it prevent injury, but you will also get a hell of lot faster. It takes awhile to build up to the 50 range, but it is worth the time. l |
2012-10-15 10:44 PM in reply to: #4454895 |
Veteran 249 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread JasenGuy - 2012-10-15 6:47 PM rcntly4298 - 2012-10-15 11:19 AM FF Stock - 2012-10-15 1:01 PM With this run volume, I would not recommend running anything close to 2 hours in training. You are asking for serious problems if you keep running long with this sort of volume. I would continue to build you run mileage about 5 - 10% per week up until 2 weeks out of the race. Keep your long run no more than 30% of your weekly volume. rcntly4298 - 2012-10-14 7:19 PM FF Stock - 2012-10-13 6:04 PM People put way too much emphasis on their long run into ironman. Go back the last 8 weeks and tell us your weekly run volume each week. Much better picture if you are ready. Running 3 plus hours in training is crazy. Ran a hilly 18 in 2:36 today in the cold and rain. Good confidence builder. However now I'm not sure how much farther I want to go on the run. I'd love to hit 20 miles (~3 hours) but I'm worried about injuries. My knees were a bit stiff by the end of today's run and I've been dealing with this since I signed up for Arizona. Not sure if it's worth the risk. Is 18 and 2:36 enough? Here are my past 9 weeks of running, starting with this past week... 4:38:26 32.69 miles I'm actually afraid to see what you'll say about my running numbers... I've been plagued by running injuries for the last 8 months and have already accepted the fact that I will not be IM run ready. I've adapted a run/walk strategy (5:1) and will get myself across that finish line one way or another. (my long run pace is between 9:30 & 9:50/mi) My longest runs so far have been 2:45:00 and I'm doing about 17 miles. I'm following a plan by Matt Fitzgerald pretty close when able and the run volumes are much lower than what's mentioned above. I have a recovery week and HIM this weekend and then one more long week capped by a 2:50:00 run which will end up being about 18 miles...Here are my last 8 weeks of running. Could I bother you for your recommendation? 3:11- 19.87 mi 1:26- 9.09 mi (rested foot) 3:38- 22.49 mi 3:03- 20.36 mi 3:50- 25.03 mi 1:39- 11.48 mi (rested foot) 3:25- 21.87 mi 2:22- 16.41 (raced) My plan never has me going close to 30 miles in a week... My recommendation is to read this thread.... http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=1612485;search_string=r... If I was working with you at this point, I would have you stop doing any sort of long runs. This does not surprise me one bit "I've been plagued by running injuries for the last 8 months and have already accepted the fact that I will not be IM run ready" based on your run mileage and the fact you are doing such long runs. I dont like to sugar coat, so I am going to be direct with you. That running volume is not even close to what you should be doing if you want to actually run the marathon in an Ironman. I would suggest getting through the race with your run/walk strategy and then start a consistant running program like Barry Ps leading up to your next race. I have worked with multiple people using this method and it has created huge success with every single one of them. 2 examples from both ends of the spectrum: 1) Lady who ran once or twice a week for maybe a total of 6 or 7 miles and then did classes at the gym 5 days a week. Not overweight and in good health. Initial goal was to run (no walking) a 10K with no time goal. Started her out running a total of 8 miles per week over 6 runs. She was averaging roughly 11:30/miles. Fast forward about 4 months and she is running 30 miles per week and just completed her first 10K in under a hour. Most importantly she had zero running injuries and got a hell of a lot faster. 2) Started working with a guy who completed his first ironman in November of last year. He finished around 20th in his age group and had a run split of 3:39. His run training leading up to that race was all in the 30 - 40 miles per week and then with huge long runs leading up to the race. He dealt with many IT band and other running related issues leading up to the race. I started working with him in the beginning of this year in preparation for IMWI. I had him run 6 times per week with a total of 15 miles in the beginning. We slowly built his run up to 55 miles before race day. His longest run was 16.5 miles. He ran a 3:19 and finished 3rd in his age group and is going to Kona. Barry Ps system works for anyone. Make time to run 6 times per week. Edited by rcntly4298 2012-10-15 10:50 PM |
2012-10-15 10:55 PM in reply to: #3911896 |
Extreme Veteran 694 Highlands Ranch, Colorado | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread Yea I appreciate the advice and I think my 18 mile, 2:36 run will probably be my longest. But I too did the math right away and came up with the same thought: I have to be putting in 60 miles/week to be able to do an 18 mile long run? I mean, I'm kind of proud of my run volume! Especially in light of my knee issues. So I'll probably be capping my long run at 2:30, add the rest into bricks and hopefully have a successful day. |
|
2012-10-15 10:58 PM in reply to: #3911896 |
Extreme Veteran 694 Highlands Ranch, Colorado | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread I do agree however that repetition is a huge key to staying injury free. Even if it's just a few miles. My offseason will be dedicated to getting to that point. BTW- who is Barry P? |
2012-10-15 11:14 PM in reply to: #3911896 |
Expert 932 Chandler, AZ | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread I agree with you and I don't need anything sugar coated...I'm here to learn from the experience of the other athletes. I admit I don't know how to come back from an injury...I play it by how I feel and try to meet the requirements of my plan. I haven't gone through the links that were post on slowtwitch yet, but running more frequently makes plenty of sense. In your opinion, would I get the same benefit from adding two 45 minute runs during the week and then cutting 1.5 hours from my long run on Sunday?? |
2012-10-16 8:10 AM in reply to: #4454292 |
Veteran 379 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread I know this has been discussed already, but I am at the point where I am wondering about doing a 70.3 last week of October. I did it last year before doing AZ as my first IM ever. This will be my second IM. Last year I did the 70.3 to be sure I had everything in good order before taking on the big day and found it was really necessary, and helpful. The thing is, there is that recover week, week .5. that week is meant to be the big volume training week. ...for this reason I have contemplated not doing it. On the other hand, it would be a great brick under race conditions -- and well, I did spend the money. My training has been a bit different this year and I expect to knock two hours off last year's time. Being more consistent and closely dedicated to a training program makes it hard to deviate, but I also feel I have gotten much faster this year because I have done more races as part of my training - and so this is why I contemplate doing it. thoughts? |
2012-10-16 9:00 AM in reply to: #3911896 |
Member 49 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread For those of you that live near tempe... Are these temps normal for this time of year? I've been checking the water temp ever few days and its still in the mid to upper 70's for tempe town lake... Just wondering if you guys think itll actually drop to low 60's in the next 5 weeks |
2012-10-16 9:24 AM in reply to: #4455462 |
Veteran 379 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread JMarkel9 - 2012-10-16 9:00 AM For those of you that live near tempe... Are these temps normal for this time of year? I've been checking the water temp ever few days and its still in the mid to upper 70's for tempe town lake... Just wondering if you guys think itll actually drop to low 60's in the next 5 weeks
last year it was in the 70s five weeks out and dropped FAST to put us at a lovely low 60s race day |
|
2012-10-16 10:07 AM in reply to: #3911896 |
Veteran 784 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread FYI: Race director will be answering questions on IM facebook page at 3pm today...... |
2012-10-16 4:28 PM in reply to: #3911896 |
Expert 1544 Alexandria, MN | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread I asked on facebook about pre-clipping shoes on the bike race morning and was told you may not preclip, they must be in your transition bag. I'm at a loss for words, that's simply dumb. |
2012-10-16 5:05 PM in reply to: #4456538 |
Veteran 379 | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread Climbinggonzo - 2012-10-16 4:28 PM I asked on facebook about pre-clipping shoes on the bike race morning and was told you may not preclip, they must be in your transition bag. I'm at a loss for words, that's simply dumb. as a former transition area volunteer, I am going to have to defend the no-clip rule as a very smart one. when you go to transition, they help you out handing you your transition bag and grabbing your bike for you. --unlike all other distances, the volunteers help you with the transition itself. can you imagine how upset you will be if a preclipped shoe is bumped by another athlete in the morning, or a rubber band breaks, or even bumped by a volunteer. regardless of what happened, a volunteer will end up catching the heat (and they do catch plenty of heat from some athletes). god forbid the shoe falls off a preclipped pedal. also, it is a safety issue that they have decided is not worth the risk v. the benefit. the reality is, nobody can pre-clip so you don't lose time compared to anyone else, and you actually get help in transition so the no pre-clip is a small price to pay that will not affect your overall transition time.
|
2012-10-16 5:06 PM in reply to: #4456538 |
Extreme Veteran 601 Cold Spring, NY | Subject: RE: Ironman Arizona : Official Thread So, this got me reading the rules on transition items. I'm a little concerned with my helmet. It can't stay with the bike before or after the bike leg, right? So its in you swim-to-bike bag, then you stick it in your run bag? My aero helmet seems to have a very flimsy tail. I keep it in a hard case when its not hung from the bars in transition. When i volunteered at NY/NJ those bags were really getting tossed/piled up and just poorly handled. Any suggestions? Can you hand the helmet off with your bike after? If so, i guess you could just keep it in a case until T1. Edited by bdenehy 2012-10-16 5:07 PM |
|