Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) (Page 45)
-
No new posts
BT Development | Mentor Program Archives » Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) | Rss Feed |
Moderators: alicefoeller |
Reply CLOSED
|
|
2015-07-09 3:26 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Master 4452 | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by Asalzwed Remind me again, do HR zones need to be re calibrated? 5 zones is a lot. How big is the difference between zone 4 and 5? This should work for running too, though the actual HR numbers used may vary as threshold (100%) may vary some between them. Although there is some variation of zone definitions from one expert to the next, they largely try to say about the same thing. The difference between Z4 and Z5 is noteworthy though HR is not very good for Z5 work. The lag makes it hard to work with as the intervals are shorter. I-pace work, basically. Some try to use the peak to help see if they got there, but you can probably already see that pace is more helpful for much of the interval. Not sure I've really peaked past 106% much at all either. HR zones tend to be fairly stable, changing more along with larger life changes. It can move some as one becomes more (or less) active, like when starting out, but it shouldn't really move as much from there. Fitness can change substantially though. Change in age can do things too, namely lower them, but this takes quite a while to do. I've used the same for years though more recently (the past year) I've found things to work a little better by dropping just a bit. I had an interesting thing happen today actually. Last week, similar workout, same time of day, a little warmer, almost totally flat course. I was drifting into zone 5 on the zone 4 interval. I suspect dehydration, and slowed down some successfully. Today: I couldn't get my HR up into the correct zone. Same time of day, a little cooler, carried water for first hour, rolling course. Most of zone 2 intervals I was right on the cusp of zone 1/2; zone 3 intervals I was high zone 2, and zone 4--barely got there (although at this point we were running mostly downhill, so that one doesn't surprise me). Thoughts? Said it before, I'll say it again, I love this group! |
|
2015-07-09 3:29 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Master 4452 | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by Asalzwed Remind me again, do HR zones need to be re calibrated? 5 zones is a lot. How big is the difference between zone 4 and 5? This should work for running too, though the actual HR numbers used may vary as threshold (100%) may vary some between them. Although there is some variation of zone definitions from one expert to the next, they largely try to say about the same thing. The difference between Z4 and Z5 is noteworthy though HR is not very good for Z5 work. The lag makes it hard to work with as the intervals are shorter. I-pace work, basically. Some try to use the peak to help see if they got there, but you can probably already see that pace is more helpful for much of the interval. Not sure I've really peaked past 106% much at all either. HR zones tend to be fairly stable, changing more along with larger life changes. It can move some as one becomes more (or less) active, like when starting out, but it shouldn't really move as much from there. Fitness can change substantially though. Change in age can do things too, namely lower them, but this takes quite a while to do. I've used the same for years though more recently (the past year) I've found things to work a little better by dropping just a bit. So when you are establishing these zones and you get more fit, how do you adjust? Or do you need to? Sorry just thinking "aloud" here. Your hr is just reflecting how hard you are working so if you run x:xx pace in zone 3 and then get more fit, you could run x:xx now in say zone 4, therefore the pace for zone 3 would get faster...right? If I start at x:xx in zone 3, as I get more fit, I can now run x:xx in zone 2. I have to run y:yy to get into zone 3 now. **and I don't think that this ^^^ is what was happening in my run earlier--can't change that much in 1 week! |
2015-07-09 3:29 PM in reply to: IronOx |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by IronOx Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by IronOx Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by IronOx Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by IronOx Originally posted by Asalzwed first is long run, second is recovery. Originally posted by IronOx What's the purpose of having two?I run twice nearly every day. It's more about scheduling than sn exact amount of time for me. But it also depends on the purpose. If my second run is s quality session I want to be sure I'm recovered from the first. That recovery time will likely be pretty infividual.Question for those of you who run twice in a day--how long after the first run do you do the second one? I have two on my training plan for tomorrow, but it doesn't say how long between. Curious what plan this is that has running as the recovery activity, particularly the same day as the long run? ETA: When I've run twice, it's normally separated by the work day. I can definitely see how this structure can work really well. However, I am surprised to see it in an IM plan. Why? I mean to be honest I am too; it is the only one so far, and the only one I have seen in looking through the plan. Curious for your thoughts.
I can see how it would work well too, but it would for someone with more mileage. I had assumed that the descriptor of "long" meant for the long run, is that the case? Or is it just one is longer than the other? The surprise for me would be in the time crunch and having enough run volume in to where two runs is more beneficial. Also surprising was the use of running for recovery. For a runner fine, but swimming and cycling are also there for recovery. And likely do better at it since they are not load bearing. Running still can be done for recovery, but usually it takes being well adapted to a fair amount of volume before it's only for recovery, as opposed to just a lighter workout (which can have some recovery effects). Not sure if this is what you are asking, but first run of the day was the long run (supposed to be 2h14) and the second 40 min.
FIRST RUN OF THE DAY
Ok. Taking an educated guess here, but think it's more like breaking up a long run to some extent. Getting more used to a lot of running in one day. There is some quality in the first run. A bit of a surprise, but more of the welcome kind. It's also really big so you get used to doing it all together. The later run isn't really a recovery run like we had been thinking. At least I'm not seeing it as one. It does emphasize very easy, but it's still 40' long and you're probably going to be fairly exhausted. So the point is to help get used to keep on going when really tired. Pushing the pace is not the goal. Just being on your feet and running at all is. Okay, gotcha. Thanks. It does seem odd that it is the only one though--despite having done two other long runs of the same--they were just maybe 10 and 20 min shorter. (the Zone 3 parts were shorter by 5 and 10 minutes). Is it the length (40') that moves it from a recovery run to a 'time on your feet' in your opinion? I would say so. But time on your feet is almost a discredit to the adaptations a 40' easy run provide. I imagine you are saying that as a general term (I think I have used it to.) So yeah. And then of course you have to see the overall training stress of having done run #1 earlier in the day. |
2015-07-09 3:30 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Master 6595 Rio Rancho, NM | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by Asalzwed Sorry, I am a little slow with this HR stuff. But the more and more I think about it the more it seems to make sense. I just love that it seems to self-adjust for things like altitude, elevation gain, outside stress, heat etc. Interestingly, when I was in Chas-town last weekend my HR was crazy low. However my "feels like" was maxed out, I couldn't have pushed any more because the muggy was pushing back. |
2015-07-09 3:35 PM in reply to: rrrunner |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by rrrunner Originally posted by Asalzwed Sorry, I am a little slow with this HR stuff. But the more and more I think about it the more it seems to make sense. I just love that it seems to self-adjust for things like altitude, elevation gain, outside stress, heat etc. Interestingly, when I was in Chas-town last weekend my HR was crazy low. However my "feels like" was maxed out, I couldn't have pushed any more because the muggy was pushing back. wuss.
No, just kidding. That is interesting. I would not think this would be the case. However, I have not used one so everything from me here is speculation and things I have read. |
2015-07-09 3:54 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Member 2689 Denver, CO | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by Asalzwed Remind me again, do HR zones need to be re calibrated? 5 zones is a lot. How big is the difference between zone 4 and 5? This should work for running too, though the actual HR numbers used may vary as threshold (100%) may vary some between them. Although there is some variation of zone definitions from one expert to the next, they largely try to say about the same thing. The difference between Z4 and Z5 is noteworthy though HR is not very good for Z5 work. The lag makes it hard to work with as the intervals are shorter. I-pace work, basically. Some try to use the peak to help see if they got there, but you can probably already see that pace is more helpful for much of the interval. Not sure I've really peaked past 106% much at all either. HR zones tend to be fairly stable, changing more along with larger life changes. It can move some as one becomes more (or less) active, like when starting out, but it shouldn't really move as much from there. Fitness can change substantially though. Change in age can do things too, namely lower them, but this takes quite a while to do. I've used the same for years though more recently (the past year) I've found things to work a little better by dropping just a bit. That's a really helpful article. Thanks! |
|
2015-07-09 3:55 PM in reply to: rrrunner |
Master 4452 | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by rrrunner Originally posted by Asalzwed Sorry, I am a little slow with this HR stuff. But the more and more I think about it the more it seems to make sense. I just love that it seems to self-adjust for things like altitude, elevation gain, outside stress, heat etc. Interestingly, when I was in Chas-town last weekend my HR was crazy low. However my "feels like" was maxed out, I couldn't have pushed any more because the muggy was pushing back. That was sorta like mine today. Didn't feel maxed, but pushing somewhat. Not super humid/muggy though. |
2015-07-09 3:57 PM in reply to: IronOx |
Master 4452 | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) And I am in that fun part of the training plan where I am hungry all the time and want to gnaw on my own arm. |
2015-07-09 4:02 PM in reply to: 0 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by IronOx Okay, gotcha. Thanks. It does seem odd that it is the only one though--despite having done two other long runs of the same--they were just maybe 10 and 20 min shorter. (the Zone 3 parts were shorter by 5 and 10 minutes). Is it the length (40') that moves it from a recovery run to a 'time on your feet' in your opinion? It's a combination of a few things. Dropping the aerobic part low enough to not add any aerobic stress is likely several minutes/mi below an easy run pace. This Ryan Hall running 9+ min/mi, for example. Then there is load bearing nature of running. Need to be doing a number of miles fairly comfortably before there is little to no contribution to that. I don't have a good number for that, but generally age groupers aren't going to do enough. The bike doesn't have this part so much, so if the intensity is down enough, then 40' there could well be a recovery ride. I've done longer. It's still possible to go easy and feel better than when you started. There can be some recovery effects going on for some aspects, but that's in addition to building some stress in others. I consider it recovery when that is the only purpose to the workout. When no additional aerobic stress or time on feet stress is added. Edited by brigby1 2015-07-09 4:02 PM |
2015-07-09 4:04 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by Asalzwed Sorry, I am a little slow with this HR stuff. But the more and more I think about it the more it seems to make sense. I just love that it seems to self-adjust for things like altitude, elevation gain, outside stress, heat etc. A good thing about HR is that it takes everything into account. A bad thing about HR is that it takes everything into account. |
2015-07-09 4:09 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by Asalzwed Remind me again, do HR zones need to be re calibrated? 5 zones is a lot. How big is the difference between zone 4 and 5? This should work for running too, though the actual HR numbers used may vary as threshold (100%) may vary some between them. Although there is some variation of zone definitions from one expert to the next, they largely try to say about the same thing. The difference between Z4 and Z5 is noteworthy though HR is not very good for Z5 work. The lag makes it hard to work with as the intervals are shorter. I-pace work, basically. Some try to use the peak to help see if they got there, but you can probably already see that pace is more helpful for much of the interval. Not sure I've really peaked past 106% much at all either. HR zones tend to be fairly stable, changing more along with larger life changes. It can move some as one becomes more (or less) active, like when starting out, but it shouldn't really move as much from there. Fitness can change substantially though. Change in age can do things too, namely lower them, but this takes quite a while to do. I've used the same for years though more recently (the past year) I've found things to work a little better by dropping just a bit. So when you are establishing these zones and you get more fit, how do you adjust? Or do you need to? Sorry just thinking "aloud" here. Your hr is just reflecting how hard you are working so if you run x:xx pace in zone 3 and then get more fit, you could run x:xx now in say zone 4, therefore the pace for zone 3 would get faster...right? As you get more fit, the pace at a given HR will be faster even though HR will stay about the same in achieving the desired intensity. As one gets used to working out at all, this person might see their HR change some. Part of that is just inexperience in training, another is just going hard and getting the body firing like that. It does take some practice in learning how to absorb the lag of HR, which is one of the issues in using it, but that doesn't mean it's of no use. Just something to learn. |
|
2015-07-09 4:18 PM in reply to: IndoIronYanti |
Master 6595 Rio Rancho, NM | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Is it me or is THIS article completely useless? When I saw it I thought it would give me some insight as to whether i should be trying to change my T-Rex arms. Instead it tells me not to have them behind my back or on top of my head. Well no chit. People actually get paid to do this research?! How about looking at the various ways runners NATURALLY carry their arms?! |
2015-07-09 4:27 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Regular 980 Caerphilly, Wales, uk. | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Following on from that, and to answer one of Ben's queries to my plan going on to IM Wales. I said that I was keeping my HR to 150 bpm for my runs. Ben asked why 150 bpm. Well, that was the top of my zone 2 (Ben Greenfield testing protocol) and I was going to use my HR as 1. a limiter to make sure I didn't go too hard because I was increasing the volume so much ie putting a reign on intensity. and 2. Try to keep my runs aerobic, again to limit the chance of injury, but also to try to make the adaptions that come with zone 2 work(easy running). Basically base building. I completed a lactate heart rate threshold test again yesterday and had to adjust my zones up, probably due to the extra weight I'm carrying and the loss of fitness since I last tested. |
2015-07-09 4:48 PM in reply to: IronOx |
Member 2689 Denver, CO | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by IronOx And I am in that fun part of the training plan where I am hungry all the time and want to gnaw on my own arm. That usually equates to equal parts desire to gnaw and desire to sleep for me. SO much fun. |
2015-07-09 4:52 PM in reply to: laffinrock |
Master 4452 | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by laffinrock Originally posted by IronOx And I am in that fun part of the training plan where I am hungry all the time and want to gnaw on my own arm. That usually equates to equal parts desire to gnaw and desire to sleep for me. SO much fun. Oh, yes forgot about that part. In the corridor outside my office are 10 or so 'comfy' chairs for students to sit on while waiting for labs to open. I was thinking on the way in this morning that I could drag two into my office and put them together for a little sofa and have a nap.... |
2015-07-09 5:12 PM in reply to: IronOx |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Wooop woooooop, got my first restitution check! It was for 50 instead of the minimum 20 too. 49 months to go |
|
2015-07-09 5:35 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Member 2689 Denver, CO | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by Asalzwed Wooop woooooop, got my first restitution check! It was for 50 instead of the minimum 20 too. 49 months to go Ooh, fun! Whatcha gonna do with it? |
2015-07-09 6:15 PM in reply to: jmkizer |
Member 667 | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by jmkizer I think that the most important thing is to have a plan. The plan should be simple/uncomplicated. My plan
I'm stealing your bike SN list, k? I did plan on putting in an extra tube but I didn't think about CO2. I will have another baggie of cut-up Bonk Breakers to refill my Bento box with. I'm also adding a half of peanut butter and honey sandwich in case I forget to eat the first half of the course. If I don't have a wetsuit-legal swim I'm sneaking water wings into the water. Umm.. I mean I'm going to wear my swimsuit with my bra underneath and then change into my tri-top and my tri shorts. If it is wetsuit legal (please, keep raining every few days!!), I will wear my tri-top and my tri shorts underneath my sleeveless wetsuit. I will the tri top and shorts for the remainder of the race. As for the run, I will have a few GU packets with me in case the only have Strawberry GU on the course. Otherwise I'm living off the aid stations. |
2015-07-09 6:35 PM in reply to: IronOx |
Member 667 | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by IronOx And I am in that fun part of the training plan where I am hungry all the time and want to gnaw on my own arm. I'm so hungry I almost made my DH stop at McDonalds after my bike and run this afternoon. I settled for Starbucks Iced Tea (unsweetened because I can't stand sweet tea) and a piece of pumpkin bread until I could get home and eat the kitchen. |
2015-07-09 10:21 PM in reply to: Richardsdrr |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by Richardsdrr Following on from that, and to answer one of Ben's queries to my plan going on to IM Wales. I said that I was keeping my HR to 150 bpm for my runs. Ben asked why 150 bpm. Well, that was the top of my zone 2 (Ben Greenfield testing protocol) and I was going to use my HR as 1. a limiter to make sure I didn't go too hard because I was increasing the volume so much ie putting a reign on intensity. and 2. Try to keep my runs aerobic, again to limit the chance of injury, but also to try to make the adaptions that come with zone 2 work(easy running). Basically base building. I completed a lactate heart rate threshold test again yesterday and had to adjust my zones up, probably due to the extra weight I'm carrying and the loss of fitness since I last tested. I tend to hold my breath a sec when Greenfield's name comes up, but it might be ok here. The limiter part is ok, but make sure you use it as a limiter and not an average. The earlier post seemed like the latter. Think I see on your page where your various zones are? When you have a range like this to be in you might be better keeping it down some off of that upper end. More so because this is supposed to be easy work, so don't test the upper end so much. Save it for the harder days. And by keeping it "aerobic" you mean a more basic aerobic level? Zones 1-5 are all actually aerobic. The top of Z5 is your VO2max, which is the upper limit of aerobic processing. There aren't really adaptations that come specifically in Z2. There is a table linked earlier (Mary also quoted this) that shows this. It's more about benefits that come with more time just doing the activity. And to spend more time the intensity has to come down. And strange as it may sound, keeping this down can also help to give more time to absorb the work on the harder days, provided one doesn't overdo it. The harder days are the ones you want to push more, though you may want to note if easier effort days are feeling easier than they have been. And back to the hard work, you do want to pay attention to just how hard you're going. Up to about threshold things stay similar, but increase in the amount of adaptation per time spent. But past threshold things change. See that Table 2 again. There are a lot of things in the list, so just look at Threshold development and VO2max. From Z1 to Z5, but note particularly at Z4 to Z5. Note the number of checkmarks. |
2015-07-10 8:28 AM in reply to: brigby1 |
Extreme Veteran 2263 Ridgeland, Mississippi | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by Richardsdrr Following on from that, and to answer one of Ben's queries to my plan going on to IM Wales. I said that I was keeping my HR to 150 bpm for my runs. Ben asked why 150 bpm. Well, that was the top of my zone 2 (Ben Greenfield testing protocol) and I was going to use my HR as 1. a limiter to make sure I didn't go too hard because I was increasing the volume so much ie putting a reign on intensity. and 2. Try to keep my runs aerobic, again to limit the chance of injury, but also to try to make the adaptions that come with zone 2 work(easy running). Basically base building. I completed a lactate heart rate threshold test again yesterday and had to adjust my zones up, probably due to the extra weight I'm carrying and the loss of fitness since I last tested. I tend to hold my breath a sec when Greenfield's name comes up, but it might be ok here. The limiter part is ok, but make sure you use it as a limiter and not an average. The earlier post seemed like the latter. Think I see on your page where your various zones are? When you have a range like this to be in you might be better keeping it down some off of that upper end. More so because this is supposed to be easy work, so don't test the upper end so much. Save it for the harder days. And by keeping it "aerobic" you mean a more basic aerobic level? Zones 1-5 are all actually aerobic. The top of Z5 is your VO2max, which is the upper limit of aerobic processing. There aren't really adaptations that come specifically in Z2. There is a table linked earlier (Mary also quoted this) that shows this. It's more about benefits that come with more time just doing the activity. And to spend more time the intensity has to come down. And strange as it may sound, keeping this down can also help to give more time to absorb the work on the harder days, provided one doesn't overdo it. The harder days are the ones you want to push more, though you may want to note if easier effort days are feeling easier than they have been. And back to the hard work, you do want to pay attention to just how hard you're going. Up to about threshold things stay similar, but increase in the amount of adaptation per time spent. But past threshold things change. See that Table 2 again. There are a lot of things in the list, so just look at Threshold development and VO2max. From Z1 to Z5, but note particularly at Z4 to Z5. Note the number of checkmarks. This is all good stuff. Ben Greenfield does give out good info. You just have to watch out for his hard left turns into crazyland. |
|
2015-07-10 9:14 AM in reply to: rrrunner |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by rrrunner Originally posted by Asalzwed Sorry, I am a little slow with this HR stuff. But the more and more I think about it the more it seems to make sense. I just love that it seems to self-adjust for things like altitude, elevation gain, outside stress, heat etc. Interestingly, when I was in Chas-town last weekend my HR was crazy low. However my "feels like" was maxed out, I couldn't have pushed any more because the muggy was pushing back. Interesting. When it's hot and humid out, my HR is crazy high. |
2015-07-10 9:20 AM in reply to: 0 |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by fortissimo Originally posted by jmkizer I think that the most important thing is to have a plan. The plan should be simple/uncomplicated. My plan I'm stealing your bike SN list, k? I did plan on putting in an extra tube but I didn't think about CO2. I will have another baggie of cut-up Bonk Breakers to refill my Bento box with. I'm also adding a half of peanut butter and honey sandwich in case I forget to eat the first half of the course. If I don't have a wetsuit-legal swim I'm sneaking water wings into the water. Umm.. I mean I'm going to wear my swimsuit with my bra underneath and then change into my tri-top and my tri shorts. If it is wetsuit legal (please, keep raining every few days!!), I will wear my tri-top and my tri shorts underneath my sleeveless wetsuit. I will the tri top and shorts for the remainder of the race. As for the run, I will have a few GU packets with me in case the only have Strawberry GU on the course. Otherwise I'm living off the aid stations.
I hear you there! I plan on carrying two and living off the course from there. Edited to correct formatting Edited by jmkizer 2015-07-10 9:22 AM |
2015-07-10 9:28 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 6595 Rio Rancho, NM | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by rrrunner Originally posted by Asalzwed Sorry, I am a little slow with this HR stuff. But the more and more I think about it the more it seems to make sense. I just love that it seems to self-adjust for things like altitude, elevation gain, outside stress, heat etc. Interestingly, when I was in Chas-town last weekend my HR was crazy low. However my "feels like" was maxed out, I couldn't have pushed any more because the muggy was pushing back. Interesting. When it's hot and humid out, my HR is crazy high. I'm sure the low HR was my bodies reaction to "hey check out all this oxygen!" and "hey, it's flat!", but I did expect it to be higher based on percieved exertion. |
2015-07-10 9:32 AM in reply to: rrrunner |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) Originally posted by rrrunner Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by rrrunner Originally posted by Asalzwed Sorry, I am a little slow with this HR stuff. But the more and more I think about it the more it seems to make sense. I just love that it seems to self-adjust for things like altitude, elevation gain, outside stress, heat etc. Interestingly, when I was in Chas-town last weekend my HR was crazy low. However my "feels like" was maxed out, I couldn't have pushed any more because the muggy was pushing back. Interesting. When it's hot and humid out, my HR is crazy high. I'm sure the low HR was my bodies reaction to "hey check out all this oxygen!" and "hey, it's flat!", but I did expect it to be higher based on percieved exertion. I forgot that you live at altitude. You must have been crazy fast! |
BT Development | Mentor Program Archives » Mad Manatees 2015.3 CLOSED (or Poptarts? Pet pics?) | Rss Feed |
|
Manatee Mentors 2015.2 CLOSED (Poptarts? Pet pics?) Pages: 1 ... 104 105 106 107 | |||
Ryan Mac’s HIM Focus Group - CLOSED Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 | |||
TZCoaching tri getting started group! - CLOSED Pages: 1 2 3 4 | |||
Dominion's Sprint/Oly/70.3 Group--Closed Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 | |||
Mad Manatee Mentors CLOSED (Poptart/pet pic bribes?) Pages: 1 ... 97 98 99 100 |
|