General Discussion Iron Distance Race Groups » Ironman Louisville : Official Thread Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 80
 
 
2009-07-07 4:47 PM
in reply to: #2267984

User image

Master
2301
2000100100100
Rogersville, Alabama
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
grit_nugget - 2009-07-07 1:54 PM

I was looking at my training plan (the Advanced Ironman) and surprised to see that there are only 4 runs over 2 hrs/13 miles and 7 rides over 4:30 hours/80 miles.  The beginner plan had almost double the number of that.  A little confusing and dissapointing since I really wanted to focus on my running as a major area to improved up and help get me under the 11 hour barrier.  I guess I should just be faithful to the plan and trust it will work out and keep me fresh for race day. 



Have you ridden the course lately?  What was your bike split last year?


2009-07-07 4:49 PM
in reply to: #2267984

User image

Champion
8540
50002000100050025
the colony texas
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
grit_nugget - 2009-07-07 1:54 PM

I was looking at my training plan (the Advanced Ironman) and surprised to see that there are only 4 runs over 2 hrs/13 miles and 7 rides over 4:30 hours/80 miles.  The beginner plan had almost double the number of that.  A little confusing and dissapointing since I really wanted to focus on my running as a major area to improved up and help get me under the 11 hour barrier.  I guess I should just be faithful to the plan and trust it will work out and keep me fresh for race day. 



 I think biking more would help your running to a great extent than the extra running would...

...
I"m not sure how many 100 mile rides I did last year.. I went more off of time,, I know I had a couple in the 90's and people were shocked that I didnt' do a few more miles to make it an even 100
2009-07-07 5:00 PM
in reply to: #2268522

User image

Master
2301
2000100100100
Rogersville, Alabama
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
Gaarryy - 2009-07-07 4:49 PM
grit_nugget - 2009-07-07 1:54 PM

I was looking at my training plan (the Advanced Ironman) and surprised to see that there are only 4 runs over 2 hrs/13 miles and 7 rides over 4:30 hours/80 miles.  The beginner plan had almost double the number of that.  A little confusing and dissapointing since I really wanted to focus on my running as a major area to improved up and help get me under the 11 hour barrier.  I guess I should just be faithful to the plan and trust it will work out and keep me fresh for race day. 



 I think biking more would help your running to a great extent than the extra running would...



Yeah in the words of a local Kona Qualifier,"It's not about the bike, but it kinda is."
2009-07-07 10:00 PM
in reply to: #1742108

New user
4

Orefield
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread

A question from a first timer,  IM, about fueling.  I will be using Accelerade, have been using it throughout training.  Is there cold water at the transition to fill fluid container prior to bike start.  I will have a concentrated bottle for refills along the course.  Or any suggestions would be appreciated.

2009-07-07 10:25 PM
in reply to: #2269035

User image

Champion
8540
50002000100050025
the colony texas
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
15 !!!!!
2009-07-07 11:30 PM
in reply to: #2269104

User image

Expert
815
500100100100
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread

Gaarryy - 2009-07-07 10:25 PM 15 !!!!!

Almost there!!!



2009-07-08 6:00 AM
in reply to: #2264056

User image

New user
4

Norfolk, Va
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
I think it's good to get the "time" in on the bike so you can train mentally and practice your nutrition. Distance can be a positve or negative benchmark. Depending on terrain, wind, training partners and bike maintenance, an 80 mile ride can turn into a 5-6 hour ride, just like a 100mile ride turning into a 5.5 hour ride. Nothing can do more damage mentally and physically then trying to push to 100miles in windy conditions when your low on fuel, feeling like crap. I tend to focus on time... but there is something satisfying about seeing 100+ miles on the computer.



So far i've done rides of 100, 80, 90.... Planning on 2 more of 80+ and one of 100+
2009-07-08 9:15 AM
in reply to: #2268551

User image

Extreme Veteran
495
100100100100252525
Horse Country
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread

I did the entire course with amymengel, David tri's and jboeve two weeks ago and plan to do it again probably 3 more times.  Last year I did a 5:42:40 bike (19.6 avg) and a 4:20:26 run (9:56 avg)... was hoping that I could cut down on the amount of time that I walked on the marathon and try to get that under 4 hours while keeping my bike the same.  Making up more time on the bike is a frightening proposition just because of the potential for an implosion on the run.

PS They have absolutely destroyed the IMKY website.  Its fantastically terrible now and you cant find your race results anymore!

 

BamaDC - 2009-07-07 6:00 PM
Gaarryy - 2009-07-07 4:49 PM
grit_nugget - 2009-07-07 1:54 PM

I was looking at my training plan (the Advanced Ironman) and surprised to see that there are only 4 runs over 2 hrs/13 miles and 7 rides over 4:30 hours/80 miles.  The beginner plan had almost double the number of that.  A little confusing and dissapointing since I really wanted to focus on my running as a major area to improved up and help get me under the 11 hour barrier.  I guess I should just be faithful to the plan and trust it will work out and keep me fresh for race day. 



 I think biking more would help your running to a great extent than the extra running would...



Yeah in the words of a local Kona Qualifier,"It's not about the bike, but it kinda is."



Edited by grit_nugget 2009-07-08 9:22 AM
2009-07-08 9:17 AM
in reply to: #2269035

User image

Extreme Veteran
495
100100100100252525
Horse Country
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread

I would get used to fluids being warm and expect nothing to be cold on race day.  I dont remember anything in transition ... I had all of my bottles pre-mixed the night before.  What you could always do is fill one bottle on race morning and leave the rest of your bottles with just the mix and wait until you hit an aid station and grab a bottle there.  Good chance they will have cold bottles of water out on the course.

blf116 - 2009-07-07 11:00 PM

A question from a first timer,  IM, about fueling.  I will be using Accelerade, have been using it throughout training.  Is there cold water at the transition to fill fluid container prior to bike start.  I will have a concentrated bottle for refills along the course.  Or any suggestions would be appreciated.

2009-07-08 9:51 AM
in reply to: #2269788

User image

Member
37
25
Denial
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
grit_nugget - 2009-07-08 10:15 AM

 Last year I did a 5:42:40 bike (19.6 avg) and a 4:20:26 run (9:56 avg)...

 




GN:
A question about mph averages in hill counrty:  Where I live it is very flat, just like IM-FL.  If we want to average 19.6, we ride around 20-21 for the 112 (never change a gear or sit up off the aerobars) and the stops, cornering, etc., takes the average down to 19.6.  I'm just wondering about how fast you bomb the downhills and ride the rollers in order to average over 19.  Obviously, if I climb one side at 10 and ride 30 down an equa-distant back side, then I average 20.  But I'm just wondering about this course, specifically, and around what speed you are spending most of your time.  In other words, are you seeing 25-30 on the downhills, or more like 40?  And seeing 10-12 on the climbs, or more like 7?  I'm just not that familiar with the hills on this course and what I should realistically be shooting for.

Any info you can give would be helpful.

Thanks,

2009-07-08 10:32 AM
in reply to: #1742108


86
252525
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
WEll tried to run again today a whopping 5 miles and had to stop  goign to have a great aquabike!   LOL Planning on taking Aleive just before the run to try and ward of the pain anyone recommend anything better?



2009-07-08 1:59 PM
in reply to: #2269888

User image

Regular
277
100100252525
Holland, MI
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
Georgian - 2009-07-08 10:51 AM
grit_nugget - 2009-07-08 10:15 AM

 Last year I did a 5:42:40 bike (19.6 avg) and a 4:20:26 run (9:56 avg)...

 




GN:
A question about mph averages in hill counrty:  Where I live it is very flat, just like IM-FL.  If we want to average 19.6, we ride around 20-21 for the 112 (never change a gear or sit up off the aerobars) and the stops, cornering, etc., takes the average down to 19.6.  I'm just wondering about how fast you bomb the downhills and ride the rollers in order to average over 19.  Obviously, if I climb one side at 10 and ride 30 down an equa-distant back side, then I average 20.  But I'm just wondering about this course, specifically, and around what speed you are spending most of your time.  In other words, are you seeing 25-30 on the downhills, or more like 40?  And seeing 10-12 on the climbs, or more like 7?  I'm just not that familiar with the hills on this course and what I should realistically be shooting for.

Any info you can give would be helpful.

Thanks,


Not to steal Garrett's thunder but I rode the course with him a couple weeks back and was wondering the same type(s) of things.  GN, please feel free to correct me brotha!

My experience was the following...

I, like you, live in a relatively flat area.  Have seen nothing like the hills that are on the IMKY course.  We rode the entire course and by the end averaged 18 MPH.  One of the first questions that I asked GN was what metric he placed the most emphasis on during the climbs (MPH, Cadence, etc. etc.).  He mentioned that he didn’t think that at any point he should drop below 10 MPH and he was interested in keeping his cadence at a higher level (which for me is 95-105).  I used this advice and felt like it worked really well. 

With the exception of maybe a couple hills I was able to stay seated for the vast majority of the climbs AND maintain a 10+ MPH/high cadence.  On the downhills I would say you probably average around 30-33 MPH with a couple exceptions where you will definitely hit 40+ with ease.  Like I said… that basically put me at an average of 18 MPH. 

Two places that you can pick up MPH that we didn’t really push b/c of the nature of the ride we were on (it being a training ride and for 2 of us, our first training ride with a substantial amount of hills) are the flats on the way out and probably the last 25-30 miles of the course where you can jump into the big chain ring and absolutely hammer. 

That’s my .02, hope it helps at least a little.  I have to say that I found the course to be challenging for sure but a LOT of fun and with beautiful scenery. 

2009-07-08 2:49 PM
in reply to: #1742108

User image

Veteran
269
1001002525
Macon, GA
Subject: Mike Reilly??
Did anyone ever confirm if Mike Reilly will be announcing this year in Louisville?

2009-07-08 6:09 PM
in reply to: #2270932

User image

Regular
277
100100252525
Holland, MI
Subject: RE: Mike Reilly??
tridawg72 - 2009-07-08 3:49 PM Did anyone ever confirm if Mike Reilly will be announcing this year in Louisville?



I'm pretty sure that Paul mentioned awhile back that Mike Reilly would be rocking the mic.  I sure hope so... if I can make it across the line it will be all the more sweet to hear MR tell me that I'm an Ironman! 
2009-07-08 8:53 PM
in reply to: #2270768

User image

Expert
713
500100100
Lake in the Hills, IL
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
jboeve - 2009-07-08 1:59 PM

Georgian - 2009-07-08 10:51 AM
grit_nugget - 2009-07-08 10:15 AM

 Last year I did a 5:42:40 bike (19.6 avg) and a 4:20:26 run (9:56 avg)...

 




GN:
A question about mph averages in hill counrty:  Where I live it is very flat, just like IM-FL.  If we want to average 19.6, we ride around 20-21 for the 112 (never change a gear or sit up off the aerobars) and the stops, cornering, etc., takes the average down to 19.6.  I'm just wondering about how fast you bomb the downhills and ride the rollers in order to average over 19.  Obviously, if I climb one side at 10 and ride 30 down an equa-distant back side, then I average 20.  But I'm just wondering about this course, specifically, and around what speed you are spending most of your time.  In other words, are you seeing 25-30 on the downhills, or more like 40?  And seeing 10-12 on the climbs, or more like 7?  I'm just not that familiar with the hills on this course and what I should realistically be shooting for.

Any info you can give would be helpful.

Thanks,


Not to steal Garrett's thunder but I rode the course with him a couple weeks back and was wondering the same type(s) of things.  GN, please feel free to correct me brotha!

My experience was the following...

I, like you, live in a relatively flat area.  Have seen nothing like the hills that are on the IMKY course.  We rode the entire course and by the end averaged 18 MPH.  One of the first questions that I asked GN was what metric he placed the most emphasis on during the climbs (MPH, Cadence, etc. etc.).  He mentioned that he didn’t think that at any point he should drop below 10 MPH and he was interested in keeping his cadence at a higher level (which for me is 95-105).  I used this advice and felt like it worked really well. 

With the exception of maybe a couple hills I was able to stay seated for the vast majority of the climbs AND maintain a 10+ MPH/high cadence.  On the downhills I would say you probably average around 30-33 MPH with a couple exceptions where you will definitely hit 40+ with ease.  Like I said… that basically put me at an average of 18 MPH. 

Two places that you can pick up MPH that we didn’t really push b/c of the nature of the ride we were on (it being a training ride and for 2 of us, our first training ride with a substantial amount of hills) are the flats on the way out and probably the last 25-30 miles of the course where you can jump into the big chain ring and absolutely hammer. 

That’s my .02, hope it helps at least a little.  I have to say that I found the course to be challenging for sure but a LOT of fun and with beautiful scenery. 




I was not the original poster to this but very helpful. Thanks.
2009-07-09 9:24 AM
in reply to: #2271428

User image

Extreme Veteran
427
10010010010025
St. Louis, MO
Subject: RE: Mike Reilly??
Yes, I have confirmed directly with Mike that he will be joining us in Louisville this year.......he , as usual, seemed at least as excited to be going there as all of us.....

Having Mike Reilly on the mic in that venue (4th Street Live) will absolutely ROCK! 

Paul


2009-07-09 9:35 AM
in reply to: #2271724

User image

Extreme Veteran
360
1001001002525
Jacksonville, FL
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
moabrunner - 2009-07-08 9:53 PM
jboeve - 2009-07-08 1:59 PM
Georgian - 2009-07-08 10:51 AM
grit_nugget - 2009-07-08 10:15 AM

 Last year I did a 5:42:40 bike (19.6 avg) and a 4:20:26 run (9:56 avg)...

 




GN:
A question about mph averages in hill counrty:  Where I live it is very flat, just like IM-FL.  If we want to average 19.6, we ride around 20-21 for the 112 (never change a gear or sit up off the aerobars) and the stops, cornering, etc., takes the average down to 19.6.  I'm just wondering about how fast you bomb the downhills and ride the rollers in order to average over 19.  Obviously, if I climb one side at 10 and ride 30 down an equa-distant back side, then I average 20.  But I'm just wondering about this course, specifically, and around what speed you are spending most of your time.  In other words, are you seeing 25-30 on the downhills, or more like 40?  And seeing 10-12 on the climbs, or more like 7?  I'm just not that familiar with the hills on this course and what I should realistically be shooting for.

Any info you can give would be helpful.

Thanks,


Not to steal Garrett's thunder but I rode the course with him a couple weeks back and was wondering the same type(s) of things.  GN, please feel free to correct me brotha!

My experience was the following...

I, like you, live in a relatively flat area.  Have seen nothing like the hills that are on the IMKY course.  We rode the entire course and by the end averaged 18 MPH.  One of the first questions that I asked GN was what metric he placed the most emphasis on during the climbs (MPH, Cadence, etc. etc.).  He mentioned that he didn’t think that at any point he should drop below 10 MPH and he was interested in keeping his cadence at a higher level (which for me is 95-105).  I used this advice and felt like it worked really well. 

With the exception of maybe a couple hills I was able to stay seated for the vast majority of the climbs AND maintain a 10+ MPH/high cadence.  On the downhills I would say you probably average around 30-33 MPH with a couple exceptions where you will definitely hit 40+ with ease.  Like I said… that basically put me at an average of 18 MPH. 

Two places that you can pick up MPH that we didn’t really push b/c of the nature of the ride we were on (it being a training ride and for 2 of us, our first training ride with a substantial amount of hills) are the flats on the way out and probably the last 25-30 miles of the course where you can jump into the big chain ring and absolutely hammer. 

That’s my .02, hope it helps at least a little.  I have to say that I found the course to be challenging for sure but a LOT of fun and with beautiful scenery. 

I was not the original poster to this but very helpful. Thanks.


This is my first post here, although I've been reading for a while.  IMKY will be my first IM, and like a few others, I live in very flat Florida (where the only hills are bridges).  This particular post is really informative.  Thanks.  I also watched the Heather Gollnick videos on YouTube - they seemed to give a pretty good preview of the bike course too. 
2009-07-09 10:58 AM
in reply to: #1742108

User image

Member
37
25
Denial
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread


The response was spot on, Josh.  Thanks.
Looks like several more "flatlanders" appreciated the description, as well.
I also read your ride description on your blog.  Good stuff.

I've talked to an '07 finisher who said the largest downhill on race-day was scary given the number of bikes on the road (both directions).  Apparently the more timid riders were cruising down at 30, while the more bold were hitting 40+.  That led to situations with bikes 3 or 4 wide on the downhill, passing at high speed, while weaving climbers 2-3 wide were struggling on the uphill just across the yellow line.  At least one rider went down, finishing the day in an ambulance. 

So on race day, I'll be sure to keep an eye out behind me before passing on the large downhills.  Bombing at 40 seems fast when passing someone at 35, but there may be someone doing 45 trying to pass me at the same time (Heather Gollnick said she could only hit 50, while the pro men hit 60).  Once I'm done with the big hill on the out/back, I'll be much more comfortable.

Big weekend ahead.  Train hard everyone.


  

2009-07-09 11:29 AM
in reply to: #2273065

User image

Master
2301
2000100100100
Rogersville, Alabama
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
Georgian - 2009-07-09 10:58 AM


The response was spot on, Josh.  Thanks.
Looks like several more "flatlanders" appreciated the description, as well.
I also read your ride description on your blog.  Good stuff.

I've talked to an '07 finisher who said the largest downhill on race-day was scary given the number of bikes on the road (both directions).  Apparently the more timid riders were cruising down at 30, while the more bold were hitting 40+.  That led to situations with bikes 3 or 4 wide on the downhill, passing at high speed, while weaving climbers 2-3 wide were struggling on the uphill just across the yellow line.  At least one rider went down, finishing the day in an ambulance. 

So on race day, I'll be sure to keep an eye out behind me before passing on the large downhills.  Bombing at 40 seems fast when passing someone at 35, but there may be someone doing 45 trying to pass me at the same time (Heather Gollnick said she could only hit 50, while the pro men hit 60).  Once I'm done with the big hill on the out/back, I'll be much more comfortable.

Big weekend ahead.  Train hard everyone.


  



The out and back portion is the most dangerous portion of the course.  Last year a lady hit the ditch at the bottom of the hill and before the bridge.  Looking back at my Garmin file I hit 47 at that downhill.  But I also hit 42 on the downhill before the turn onto the turn onto Ballard School Rd.  So don't let that turn sneek up on you.
2009-07-09 11:39 AM
in reply to: #2273178

User image

Extreme Veteran
427
10010010010025
St. Louis, MO
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
Excellent point about that turn onto Ballard School Rd.......we were following the Pro Men for IM Race radio LY and we watched Chris McDonald really have to crank the bike around to make that turn right off the downhill........it is a narrow entrance to a road that kinda falls away in the apex of the turn and not  much is gained by bombing into it since you pretty quickly head into a little uphill stretch.
2009-07-09 12:21 PM
in reply to: #1742108

User image

Expert
815
500100100100
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread

51 DAYS!!!!!!



2009-07-09 1:40 PM
in reply to: #1742108

User image

Extreme Veteran
495
100100100100252525
Horse Country
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread

Good assesment of the course from Josh.  This course has very little in the way of stop lights or stop signs so you can go for long stretches with no obstructions.  Other than River Road (the first and last 10 miles) and the section of the loop on 42 from 153 to 393 it will be non stop rollers, constantly changing gears, not a lot of out of the saddle work, but just enough to keep you constantly changing your pace and cadence.  Looking at my data from last year, this might give you some more details on the topology.

Total Time5:42:38100.0
Moving Time5:41:0399.5
Ascent1:28:5425.9
Descent0:59:0817.3
Flat3:13:0156.3
Stopped Time0:01:360.5

 

Distance DataTotal (mi )% of Total
Distance112.46100
Ascent22.6820.2
Descent24.4121.7
Flat65.3758.1

 

Elevation ChangeTotal (ft)
Total Elevation13,467
Elevation Gain6,749
Elevation Loss6,718
Net Elevation Change31


Edited by grit_nugget 2009-07-09 1:41 PM




(get.mb.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
get.mb.jpg (43KB - 14 downloads)
2009-07-09 1:59 PM
in reply to: #1742108

User image

Regular
277
100100252525
Holland, MI
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread

Alright… so I have a bad case of pre-race anxiety already.  Judging by the insane nightmares, constant daydreams, and ever-present worrying… it’s going to be a LONG 51 days.  That being said I took a moment this morning to sit down and do some brief “number crunching,” to help put my mind at ease.  I suppose that this is probably only interesting/relevant to 1st time IM’ers (such as myself) whose only goal is to finish the race. 

I broke down, by discipline what an IM would look like if you were to take the maximum amount of time (nearly) for each discipline as well as 30 minute transition times.  So here’s my breakdown.  If I’m wrong, my apologies.  Nonetheless, I find this to be semi-comforting. 

If you were to take 2’ 15” of the allotted 2’20” of swim time you would have to swim at a pace of 3:29/100m.  Seems doable.  Follow that with a leisurely 30” T1 time.  Once you hop on your bike you would have 7’ 15” until the 10 hour cut-off hits.  So, assume that you take nearly the entire time and finish in 7’ 10”.  To do this you ride at a pace of 15.62 MPH.  T2 is another 30” break.  Then to finish within the 17’ time limit you would have 6’ 35” which breaks down to 15:04/mile.

Of course none of this means anything come race day but who knows… maybe someone else will be encouraged by this in the same way I was!

2009-07-09 2:03 PM
in reply to: #1742108

User image

Regular
255
1001002525
PA
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
I don't know what to expect from this bike course.  I live in an area that has flat stretches of land with long slow inclines and some wicked crazy hills where out of the seat climbing is your only option.  I'm used to climbing relatively short but steep inclines and coasting a lot of down hills. (to get out of my development on bike is a 1 mile hill! (sucks for leaving, great for coasting home)  Just wondering about rollers?  Am I going to be really tired? ugh the suspense!
2009-07-09 2:08 PM
in reply to: #2273744

User image

Regular
255
1001002525
PA
Subject: RE: Ironman Louisville : Official Thread
jboeve - 2009-07-09 2:59 PM

Alright… so I have a bad case of pre-race anxiety already.  Judging by the insane nightmares, constant daydreams, and ever-present worrying… it’s going to be a LONG 51 days.  That being said I took a moment this morning to sit down and do some brief “number crunching,” to help put my mind at ease.  I suppose that this is probably only interesting/relevant to 1st time IM’ers (such as myself) whose only goal is to finish the race. 

I broke down, by discipline what an IM would look like if you were to take the maximum amount of time (nearly) for each discipline as well as 30 minute transition times.  So here’s my breakdown.  If I’m wrong, my apologies.  Nonetheless, I find this to be semi-comforting. 

If you were to take 2’ 15” of the allotted 2’20” of swim time you would have to swim at a pace of 3:29/100m.  Seems doable.  Follow that with a leisurely 30” T1 time.  Once you hop on your bike you would have 7’ 15” until the 10 hour cut-off hits.  So, assume that you take nearly the entire time and finish in 7’ 10”.  To do this you ride at a pace of 15.62 MPH.  T2 is another 30” break.  Then to finish within the 17’ time limit you would have 6’ 35” which breaks down to 15:04/mile.

Of course none of this means anything come race day but who knows… maybe someone else will be encouraged by this in the same way I was!




I too have tried to figure this out....for me its all about the bike.  I can't seem to keep a high pace on the bike no matter what.  I hope to maintain a 15 pace but with the heat, who knows?
My swim is the only saving grace.  If I take it easy and comfortable I should finish in 1:30...leaving me extra time on the bike.  Once I get to the run, well its just HTFU.  Its nice to know we are all feeling jittery!
New Thread
General Discussion Iron Distance Race Groups » Ironman Louisville : Official Thread Rss Feed  
 
 
of 80