Joe the Plumber (Page 5)
-
No new posts
| Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2008-10-16 3:31 PM in reply to: #1748030 |
Champion 11989![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbermdg2003 - 2008-10-16 4:29 PM LJR - 2008-10-16 12:53 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 10:51 AM I see a lot of reference to the poor not being poor by choice. There is a lot of truth in that. One point that hasn't been made though. I made a choice NOT to be poor. And you had the intellect and abilities to do what was needed to make that choice a reality. Not all are so fortunate...No, I chose to make it a reality. Intellect plays a part in it, but does not excuse anyone unless they are mentally challenged. Two of the most intelligent people I know are also two of the laziest people that I have ever come across in my life. One of them is in prison and the other one barely gets by.
Yes! Life is choice.
(which has nothing to do with pro-life or pro-choice) |
|
2008-10-16 3:31 PM in reply to: #1747880 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
2008-10-16 3:33 PM in reply to: #1747493 |
Expert 1170![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Southern Pines, NC | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbermdg2003 - 2008-10-16 1:51 PM pengy - 2008-10-16 12:24 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 12:12 PM I bet we could get the health care crisis in check if we regulated income for doctors. I say 90,000 a year max would probably work. Let the government regulate that income under a universal health care system. Let the government set prices doctors can charge for services. Wait, that sounds like socialism.... Stop trying to just make people angry. No one here is calling for socialism. I think DrPete's point is that you're all saying that we shouldn't "steal" from the rich, but at the same time you are offering no reasonable solution for those that are in a bad place; and do not be naive and continue to suggest charity is the solution... as if all the wealthy would become like the Grinch and feel their heart grow 10x in size the moment that taxes would be lowered on them. Hopefully none of you are so callous as to suggest that their poverty is their own problem and they're on their own...Just adding a little snarkiness and not trying to anger anyone. It is a solution to the health care situation in our country that nobody wants to toss out there. It would work and everyone in the country knows that. A better solution might be putting a cap on what doctors can charge for services. That way the doctor can still make more if he works more. An actual salary cap is an extreme that we do not want to resort to. But if we inch along a little at a time we can eventually reach full blown socialism in our country. We apply it in special circumstances a little at a time and we will get there quite unintentionally. I see a lot of reference to the poor not being poor by choice. There is a lot of truth in that. One point that hasn't been made though. I made a choice NOT to be poor. I am not one of the families that will be negatively affected by Senator Obama's proposed tax policies. But I fear the option to nibble that income level down exists. Left unchecked it can eventually get to me. That is a reason to oppose robinhood style of taxation. The reason that costs are so high is because HMO's short-change doctors and hospitals in the name of profit, reimbursing only for the bare minimum allowable by law for any given care. And if there's a single typographical error on any of the forms, guess what? You don't get paid. FWIW, I work in a socialized health care system (the US Military Health Care System) and I love it. I know that I can do what I know to be the right thing for my patients without having to worry about how it'll be coded, whether I'll be reimbursed, etc. etc. and I can treat a private the same way I would treat a 4-star general with the same problem. It's a great system in which to be a doctor, and there's a reason why military surgeons are so sought after when they leave the military--I'm already getting recruiting letters and I'm nowhere close to paying off my contract. But nobody wants a national health care system even though the only people getting rich off the system are insurance companies. |
2008-10-16 3:34 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Pro 6838![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tejas | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumber I love the "destroy Joe the plumber" tactic being employed to deflect the heat being applied to Senator Obama for making socialist statements. |
2008-10-16 3:39 PM in reply to: #1748030 |
Expert 892![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbermdg2003 - 2008-10-16 1:29 PM LJR - 2008-10-16 12:53 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 10:51 AM I see a lot of reference to the poor not being poor by choice. There is a lot of truth in that. One point that hasn't been made though. I made a choice NOT to be poor. And you had the intellect and abilities to do what was needed to make that choice a reality. Not all are so fortunate...No, I chose to make it a reality. Intellect plays a part in it, but does not excuse anyone unless they are mentally challenged. Two of the most intelligent people I know are also two of the laziest people that I have ever come across in my life. One of them is in prison and the other one barely gets by. Clearly you chose to make it a reality. Have all your choices come to fruition? Of course not. And I'm not excusing anyone. Just as you see some very bright folks who are lazy, I also see some very hard workers not making ends meet, and some lazy sob's who have millions. It's not so easy as "work hard and you will be rewarded". |
2008-10-16 3:40 PM in reply to: #1748017 |
Expert 946![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Barrington Area, IL | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbermrbbrad - 2008-10-16 3:25 PM surfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:11 PM BIGNEW - 2008-10-16 1:17 PM I think our current tax system is antiquated and needs to be overhauled, loopholes, deductions, exemptions, and so on needs to be eliminated. I'm in favor of a combination flat tax and national sales tax. It is called the Fair Tax. I will continue to mention it until people realize that it is this mythical flat tax based on consumption that everyone seems to want. It has been proposed and if you want it tell your congressman if they haven't supported it: http://www.fairtax.org/cgi-bin/scorecard.cgi
I want a flat tax on income. Equal commitment but not equal giving. We all pay, oh, I don't know, say %10? No loopholes, no special categories, no elaborate tax codes. You earn a dollar you give Uncle Same 10 cents. Period. I agree with this 1000%!! I know people who actually get every cent in federal tax back and then amazingly get money on top of that for child tax credits - WTF??? This same person spends their entire tax check on vacations, cars and other non-important things. Guess what - this same person now is getting foreclosed on. Why do the responsible have to keep paying for the mistakes and lack of common sense of others WHO PAY $0 TAXES???? I pay enough!!! |
|
2008-10-16 3:42 PM in reply to: #1748045 |
Expert 892![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbermdg2003 - 2008-10-16 1:34 PM I love the "destroy Joe the plumber" tactic being employed to deflect the heat being applied to Senator Obama for making socialist statements. Ummm... the thread topic is Joe the Plumber. I'm sure there are plenty of other opportunities for you to voice more on the "Socialist" agenda of Sen. Obama. Perhaps we're moving more towards socialism given the capitalistic climate we're in? Could this be the end of American Capitalism? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/09/AR2... The voters will speak on November 4th. Edited by LJR 2008-10-16 3:43 PM |
2008-10-16 3:43 PM in reply to: #1748045 |
Expert 946![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Barrington Area, IL | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbermdg2003 - 2008-10-16 3:34 PM I love the "destroy Joe the plumber" tactic being employed to deflect the heat being applied to Senator Obama for making socialist statements. Isn't it amazing! The media spends NO time looking into Tony Rezko - this is the worst of his alliances. Nothing on Bill Ayers, Farakhan, Wright, Franklin Raines, Jim Johnson - damn this guy hasn't even been in politics that long and he has a corrupt past. Somehow this is ignored but they need to beat up some guy who asked him a question. Bias no the libs are to stupid to see it. |
2008-10-16 3:46 PM in reply to: #1748070 |
Expert 892![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberWolff27 - 2008-10-16 1:43 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 3:34 PM I love the "destroy Joe the plumber" tactic being employed to deflect the heat being applied to Senator Obama for making socialist statements. Isn't it amazing! The media spends NO time looking into Tony Rezko - this is the worst of his alliances. Nothing on Bill Ayers, Farakhan, Wright, Franklin Raines, Jim Johnson - damn this guy hasn't even been in politics that long and he has a corrupt past. Somehow this is ignored but they need to beat up some guy who asked him a question. Bias no the libs are to stupid to see it. And the independents are stupid too? |
2008-10-16 3:51 PM in reply to: #1748070 |
Giver 18427![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberWolff27 - 2008-10-16 4:43 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 3:34 PM I love the "destroy Joe the plumber" tactic being employed to deflect the heat being applied to Senator Obama for making socialist statements. Isn't it amazing! The media spends NO time looking into Tony Rezko - this is the worst of his alliances. Nothing on Bill Ayers, Farakhan, Wright, Franklin Raines, Jim Johnson - damn this guy hasn't even been in politics that long and he has a corrupt past. None of those guys (to quote Fox News) "won the debate." Fox made Joe a celebrity and guess what? Celebrities get reported on. Especially when they're phonies. edit: I think it's pretty fair when McCain himself says Obama's tax plan is going to hurt Joe, to report that Obama's plan will actually help the guy. Assuming he's licensed and all. Edited by run4yrlif 2008-10-16 3:53 PM |
2008-10-16 3:52 PM in reply to: #1748036 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
|
2008-10-16 3:52 PM in reply to: #1748017 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
2008-10-16 3:55 PM in reply to: #1748084 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
2008-10-16 3:56 PM in reply to: #1748041 |
Extreme Veteran 469![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberDrPete - 2008-10-16 4:33 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 1:51 PM pengy - 2008-10-16 12:24 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 12:12 PM I bet we could get the health care crisis in check if we regulated income for doctors. I say 90,000 a year max would probably work. Let the government regulate that income under a universal health care system. Let the government set prices doctors can charge for services. Wait, that sounds like socialism.... Stop trying to just make people angry. No one here is calling for socialism. I think DrPete's point is that you're all saying that we shouldn't "steal" from the rich, but at the same time you are offering no reasonable solution for those that are in a bad place; and do not be naive and continue to suggest charity is the solution... as if all the wealthy would become like the Grinch and feel their heart grow 10x in size the moment that taxes would be lowered on them. Hopefully none of you are so callous as to suggest that their poverty is their own problem and they're on their own...Just adding a little snarkiness and not trying to anger anyone. It is a solution to the health care situation in our country that nobody wants to toss out there. It would work and everyone in the country knows that. A better solution might be putting a cap on what doctors can charge for services. That way the doctor can still make more if he works more. An actual salary cap is an extreme that we do not want to resort to. But if we inch along a little at a time we can eventually reach full blown socialism in our country. We apply it in special circumstances a little at a time and we will get there quite unintentionally. I see a lot of reference to the poor not being poor by choice. There is a lot of truth in that. One point that hasn't been made though. I made a choice NOT to be poor. I am not one of the families that will be negatively affected by Senator Obama's proposed tax policies. But I fear the option to nibble that income level down exists. Left unchecked it can eventually get to me. That is a reason to oppose robinhood style of taxation. The reason that costs are so high is because HMO's short-change doctors and hospitals in the name of profit, reimbursing only for the bare minimum allowable by law for any given care. And if there's a single typographical error on any of the forms, guess what? You don't get paid. FWIW, I work in a socialized health care system (the US Military Health Care System) and I love it. I know that I can do what I know to be the right thing for my patients without having to worry about how it'll be coded, whether I'll be reimbursed, etc. etc. and I can treat a private the same way I would treat a 4-star general with the same problem. It's a great system in which to be a doctor, and there's a reason why military surgeons are so sought after when they leave the military--I'm already getting recruiting letters and I'm nowhere close to paying off my contract. But nobody wants a national health care system even though the only people getting rich off the system are insurance companies. Don't forget the politicians who get rich from lobbyist payoffs. |
2008-10-16 3:57 PM in reply to: #1748091 |
Giver 18427![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbersurfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:52 PM mrbbrad - 2008-10-16 3:25 PM Why do you want to pay taxes on income? Why not get a paycheck with nothing taken out and then decide by your spending how much you give to uncle Sam? Also what about all of those people who don't have an income? They don't pay an income tax. That isn't fair if I have to pay. surfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:11 PM BIGNEW - 2008-10-16 1:17 PM I think our current tax system is antiquated and needs to be overhauled, loopholes, deductions, exemptions, and so on needs to be eliminated. I'm in favor of a combination flat tax and national sales tax. It is called the Fair Tax. I will continue to mention it until people realize that it is this mythical flat tax based on consumption that everyone seems to want. It has been proposed and if you want it tell your congressman if they haven't supported it: http://www.fairtax.org/cgi-bin/scorecard.cgi
I want a flat tax on income. Equal commitment but not equal giving. We all pay, oh, I don't know, say %10? No loopholes, no special categories, no elaborate tax codes. You earn a dollar you give Uncle Same 10 cents. Period. Here's the problem with a consumption tax: it discourages consumption. |
2008-10-16 3:57 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Pro 6838![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tejas | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberDr Pete, do you feel the concept of socialized medicine would work for the entire country? Could our government actually manage a system of this magnitude? The system you work in is considerably smaller and if I'm not mistaken funded by the government, but operated by whichever Armed Service branch in which you are commisioned. Does every branch of the service have it's own medical department or do all branches of the service answer to each other and work together toward the same common goal? This last question is irrelevant to the discussion, I'm just don't know the answer and was curious to find out. I think the insurance companies are a goatrope that are adding to the problem. So we remove them from the entire equation and let the government operate in this role. Do all these insurance people then become employees of the Govt or do they hit the street? I would really love to see free medical care for every person in this country. I am just reluctant to believe that the government could effectively manage a program of this size. |
|
2008-10-16 3:59 PM in reply to: #1748067 |
Elite 4564![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boise | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberLJR - 2008-10-16 3:42 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 1:34 PM I love the "destroy Joe the plumber" tactic being employed to deflect the heat being applied to Senator Obama for making socialist statements. Ummm... the thread topic is Joe the Plumber. I'm sure there are plenty of other opportunities for you to voice more on the "Socialist" agenda of Sen. Obama. Perhaps we're moving more towards socialism given the capitalistic climate we're in? Could this be the end of American Capitalism? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/09/AR2... The voters will speak on November 4th.
Calling the US economy capitalist is far from the truth. Might as well call it communist. |
2008-10-16 4:00 PM in reply to: #1746610 |
Extreme Veteran 412![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Texas | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberI can walk out of the office and put my hand on 3 people for sure (probably more) who have at least 2 different social security cards. They are making $14.00 per hr. and $75.00 per day for per diem, 2 of them just became fathers and it cost them $10.00 I'm sorry Ijust don't think this is what our taxes should be paying for Edited by Dwayne 2008-10-16 4:01 PM |
2008-10-16 4:00 PM in reply to: #1748115 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. Edited by surfwallace 2008-10-16 4:01 PM |
2008-10-16 4:01 PM in reply to: #1748067 |
Pro 6838![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tejas | Subject: RE: Joe the PlumberLJR - 2008-10-16 3:42 PM mdg2003 - 2008-10-16 1:34 PM I love the "destroy Joe the plumber" tactic being employed to deflect the heat being applied to Senator Obama for making socialist statements. Ummm... the thread topic is Joe the Plumber. I'm sure there are plenty of other opportunities for you to voice more on the "Socialist" agenda of Sen. Obama. Perhaps we're moving more towards socialism given the capitalistic climate we're in? Could this be the end of American Capitalism? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/09/AR2... The voters will speak on November 4th. Sorry if that came off as a shot at you personally. It wasn't. It's just my take on what I'm seeing and reading from the news outlets. |
2008-10-16 4:05 PM in reply to: #1748130 |
Expert 892![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbermdg2003 - 2008-10-16 2:01 PM Sorry if that came off as a shot at you personally. It wasn't. It's just my take on what I'm seeing and reading from the news outlets. Thanks, I appreciate it. No harm, no foul. Think I'll sit out for awhile, nonetheless. I'm creating my own headaches. Take care. |
|
2008-10-16 4:06 PM in reply to: #1748091 |
Master 1826![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbersurfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:52 PM Why do you want to pay taxes on income? Why not get a paycheck with nothing taken out and then decide by your spending how much you give to uncle Sam? because that is totally unrealistic.. greed is huge in people and created the mess we are currently in.. do you expect it to magically go away.. a quick poll of 5 coworkers netted me a total of $0 taxes collected for 08 .. great system
|
2008-10-16 4:06 PM in reply to: #1748127 |
Giver 18427![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbersurfwallace - 2008-10-16 5:00 PM run4yrlif - 2008-10-16 3:57 PM God forbid we all buy only what we need. However, I think you highly underestimate the power of the Joneses.surfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:52 PM mrbbrad - 2008-10-16 3:25 PM Why do you want to pay taxes on income? Why not get a paycheck with nothing taken out and then decide by your spending how much you give to uncle Sam? Also what about all of those people who don't have an income? They don't pay an income tax. That isn't fair if I have to pay. surfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:11 PM BIGNEW - 2008-10-16 1:17 PM I think our current tax system is antiquated and needs to be overhauled, loopholes, deductions, exemptions, and so on needs to be eliminated. I'm in favor of a combination flat tax and national sales tax. It is called the Fair Tax. I will continue to mention it until people realize that it is this mythical flat tax based on consumption that everyone seems to want. It has been proposed and if you want it tell your congressman if they haven't supported it: http://www.fairtax.org/cgi-bin/scorecard.cgi
I want a flat tax on income. Equal commitment but not equal giving. We all pay, oh, I don't know, say %10? No loopholes, no special categories, no elaborate tax codes. You earn a dollar you give Uncle Same 10 cents. Period. Here's the problem with a consumption tax: it discourages consumption. Maybe, but in an economy where the Dow drops 700 points on news consumer spending is down, a 30% sales tax might not be the best way to make things better. To me, adding $250 to the price of a flat screen TV might discourage me from buying one. |
2008-10-16 4:07 PM in reply to: #1748145 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
2008-10-16 4:10 PM in reply to: #1748152 |
Master 1826![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Joe the Plumbersurfwallace - 2008-10-16 5:07 PM slake707 - 2008-10-16 4:06 PM Your coworkers don't buy anything?surfwallace - 2008-10-16 4:52 PM Why do you want to pay taxes on income? Why not get a paycheck with nothing taken out and then decide by your spending how much you give to uncle Sam? because that is totally unrealistic.. greed is huge in people and created the mess we are currently in.. do you expect it to magically go away.. a quick poll of 5 coworkers netted me a total of $0 taxes collected for 08 .. great system
As stated above, consumption tax stifles economic growth, not enhances |
|
login




2008-10-16 3:31 PM




Philly 'burbs

View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK