General Discussion Triathlon Talk » what it means to be an ironman Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 8
 
 
2012-01-17 9:12 PM
in reply to: #3993950

User image

Extreme Veteran
863
5001001001002525
West Michigan
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman

I think we can all admit that it's very difficult to reach race intensity in training.  How many of us started the swim to fast because we were surrounded by others?  How many of us ran to fast to T1 and then almost fall on our face taking wetsuit off?  How many take off on the run too fast with all the cheering fans?

Doing an triathlon on your own, is just a very big brick workout.  There are just too many external factors that can hinder (help ) your performance at a race.    

As for calling them an "Ironman", I don't care.  If I was pressed for an answer, I'd say no.  He's qualified, just hasn't participated. 



2012-01-17 9:23 PM
in reply to: #3996196

User image

Master
1793
1000500100100252525
Essex Jct, VT
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Rogillio - 2012-01-17 9:08 PM

I just remembered why I opened this thread to begin with....the subject line is intriguing:  What does it mean to be an ironman?  

In my opinon, not much.  It's a race.  It's not a degree or professional accredation or a title.  Its just a race that you did.  It's not like you won the Congressional Medal of Honor for courage under fire where you were shot and wounded by an IED.....you finished a race.  :-)

But people like to put labels on themselves.....let's see, if one does an ironman when they are 20, are they an "ironman" for the rest of their life?  What if they gain 400 lbs and are confined to the couch.  Do you still greet them as Don Ironman while you kiss their finisher medal? 

People don't call themselves ironman anyway!   No one says, "Hi, I'm Mike and I'm an ironman."  I don't sign documents at work: Rogillio, Ironman.  I don't answer the phone, "Rogillio here, ironman! what can I do for you?"  When my boss introduces me to someone he does not say, "This is Ironman Rogillio, one of the finest engineers in the company...."

 

 

He probably doesn't say that because you're only a mediocre engineer.

2012-01-17 11:16 PM
in reply to: #3996196

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Rogillio - 2012-01-17 8:08 PM

I just remembered why I opened this thread to begin with....the subject line is intriguing:  What does it mean to be an ironman?  

In my opinon, not much.  It's a race.  It's not a degree or professional accredation or a title.  Its just a race that you did.  It's not like you won the Congressional Medal of Honor for courage under fire where you were shot and wounded by an IED.....you finished a race.  :-)

But people like to put labels on themselves.....let's see, if one does an ironman when they are 20, are they an "ironman" for the rest of their life?  What if they gain 400 lbs and are confined to the couch.  Do you still greet them as Don Ironman while you kiss their finisher medal? 

People don't call themselves ironman anyway!   No one says, "Hi, I'm Mike and I'm an ironman."  I don't sign documents at work: Rogillio, Ironman.  I don't answer the phone, "Rogillio here, ironman! what can I do for you?"  When my boss introduces me to someone he does not say, "This is Ironman Rogillio, one of the finest engineers in the company...." 

 

Nice!!! LOL

In the end, nobody cares.  As stated above, it's NOT a title.

And in the interest of carrying the thread into subsequent pages, I have to admit that I am one of those who thinks that it is Swim/Bike/RUN......and people who go into it with the idea of walking the "run" portion should be excluded.  Yep, I know that it's hard to define "walking".....but let's be realistic....many "Ironman" finishers walk a majority of the "RUN"

Personally, I don't care if that's your goal, GREAT for you, seriously!! And I certainly hold no animousity toward anyone who does......but if I ever HAVE to give my opinion of what I think "Ironman" means, then it doesn't include walking.



Edited by Left Brain 2012-01-17 11:18 PM
2012-01-18 6:32 AM
in reply to: #3996452

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Left Brain - 2012-01-17 11:16 PM

Rogillio - 2012-01-17 8:08 PM

I just remembered why I opened this thread to begin with....the subject line is intriguing:  What does it mean to be an ironman?  

In my opinon, not much.  It's a race.  It's not a degree or professional accredation or a title.  Its just a race that you did.  It's not like you won the Congressional Medal of Honor for courage under fire where you were shot and wounded by an IED.....you finished a race.  :-)

But people like to put labels on themselves.....let's see, if one does an ironman when they are 20, are they an "ironman" for the rest of their life?  What if they gain 400 lbs and are confined to the couch.  Do you still greet them as Don Ironman while you kiss their finisher medal? 

People don't call themselves ironman anyway!   No one says, "Hi, I'm Mike and I'm an ironman."  I don't sign documents at work: Rogillio, Ironman.  I don't answer the phone, "Rogillio here, ironman! what can I do for you?"  When my boss introduces me to someone he does not say, "This is Ironman Rogillio, one of the finest engineers in the company...." 

 

Nice!!! LOL

In the end, nobody cares.  As stated above, it's NOT a title.

And in the interest of carrying the thread into subsequent pages, I have to admit that I am one of those who thinks that it is Swim/Bike/RUN......and people who go into it with the idea of walking the "run" portion should be excluded.  Yep, I know that it's hard to define "walking".....but let's be realistic....many "Ironman" finishers walk a majority of the "RUN"

Personally, I don't care if that's your goal, GREAT for you, seriously!! And I certainly hold no animousity toward anyone who does......but if I ever HAVE to give my opinion of what I think "Ironman" means, then it doesn't include walking.



But that's what makes you better than everybody else, that you never walked during the marathon portion of all the Ironman races you've done. Without that you'd just be a normal human and not an Ironman.

I think the point that people are missing, and I'm sure you'll agree, is that those who swim slow or don't average 20mph on the bike or don't run the whole thing or don't finish in under 12 hours aren't really ironman. Heck, if you did a non-branded full-distance triathlon, can you really call yourself an ironman? I didn't think so. Posers.
2012-01-18 6:45 AM
in reply to: #3993950

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon.

Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated.

As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

2012-01-18 7:35 AM
in reply to: #3996601

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 7:45 AM As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Inapplicable.  It's clear ol' pappy did not frequent internet discussion forums.  If he did, he would realize the folly in his wisdom.

 

 

 

 

 



2012-01-18 8:25 AM
in reply to: #3996703

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Goosedog - 2012-01-18 7:35 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 7:45 AM As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Inapplicable.  It's clear ol' pappy did not frequent internet discussion forums.  If he did, he would realize the folly in his wisdom.

 

My ol' pappy used to say, "Michael (he always called me Michael, not Mike), if you're not in bed by 11 o'clock.....well then, just come on home."

OK, not really applicable to triathlons but the reference to pappy brought a tear to my eye....

 

 

 

 

2012-01-18 8:35 AM
in reply to: #3996788

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Rogillio - 2012-01-18 9:25 AM

My ol' pappy used to say, "Michael (he always called me Michael, not Mike), if you're not in bed by 11 o'clock.....well then, just come on home."

OK, not really applicable to triathlons but the reference to pappy brought a tear to my eye....

Are you sure?  He might have been telling you that if you can't go sub-14ish, you aren't really an Ironman.

 

 

 

2012-01-18 8:37 AM
in reply to: #3996810

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Goosedog - 2012-01-18 8:35 AM

Rogillio - 2012-01-18 9:25 AM

My ol' pappy used to say, "Michael (he always called me Michael, not Mike), if you're not in bed by 11 o'clock.....well then, just come on home."

OK, not really applicable to triathlons but the reference to pappy brought a tear to my eye....

Are you sure?  He might have been telling you that if you can't go sub-14ish, you aren't really an Ironman.

 

 

 



If me ol' pappy was a real triathlete he'd say ``Tony, if you're not home by 7 p.m., don't bother.''
2012-01-18 8:41 AM
in reply to: #3993950

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman

In case any of you don't remember what to call yourself...

http://youtu.be/B03dFMG8nR4

Been posted before, but it's always funny and appropriate.

2012-01-18 8:42 AM
in reply to: #3996813

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 9:37 AM  If me ol' pappy was a real triathlete he'd say ``Tony, if you're not home by 7 p.m., don't bother.''

That's a good point.  Mine would have said, "Boy, they give awards to everyone except the losers.  Don't be a loser."  Love that old man.

 

 

 



2012-01-18 8:44 AM
in reply to: #3996788

User image

Champion
7136
5000200010025
Knoxville area
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Rogillio - 2012-01-18 9:25 AM
Goosedog - 2012-01-18 7:35 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 7:45 AM As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Inapplicable.  It's clear ol' pappy did not frequent internet discussion forums.  If he did, he would realize the folly in his wisdom.

 

My ol' pappy used to say, "Michael (he always called me Michael, not Mike), if you're not in bed by 11 o'clock.....well then, just come on home."

OK, not really applicable to triathlons but the reference to pappy brought a tear to my eye....

 

 

Oh wow, this brings back memories. My pappy used to say "Chris, go get me another beer."

 

that really stuck with me.

2012-01-18 8:57 AM
in reply to: #3996601

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing



Edited by Left Brain 2012-01-18 8:58 AM
2012-01-18 9:06 AM
in reply to: #3996864

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 8:57 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing

 

What about the guy who only averages 12 mph on the bike and just barely under the bike cut off?  If he then ran the marathon is he more of an ironman than the guys who hammed the bike at 23 mph and walked some of the marathon?  :-)

Or what about the gal who takes 2:19 to finish the swim because she was doing the breast stroke and floating on her back.....but then runs like a Kenyan and has a 3 hr marathon split...is she an ironman?

 

2012-01-18 9:11 AM
in reply to: #3996890

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Rogillio - 2012-01-18 9:06 AM
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 8:57 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing

 

What about the guy who only averages 12 mph on the bike and just barely under the bike cut off?  If he then ran the marathon is he more of an ironman than the guys who hammed the bike at 23 mph and walked some of the marathon?  :-)

Or what about the gal who takes 2:19 to finish the swim because she was doing the breast stroke and floating on her back.....but then runs like a Kenyan and has a 3 hr marathon split...is she an ironman?

 

I have no idea........I only know what I want to do.  I think the biggest reason I train alone is that I don't care what other people do.  I'm racing one guy. 

2012-01-18 9:13 AM
in reply to: #3996864

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 8:57 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing



I can tell you from experience that I figured I'd RUN the whole thing too. I was on about an 8:45-9 minute/mile pace until mile 18 and it started to hurt. Hit mile 20 and I was sure I was going to hurl so I slowed further and eventually walked from 22-24. At mile 24 I got more food and took a five-minute break at the aid station. It's way tougher to do than it is to say.

And why is it limited to just running. By your rationale, anybody who doesn't swim a sub-1:15/100 swim or bike a sub-5 bike (or whatever what some feel are fast times) shouldn't call themselves an ironman.


2012-01-18 9:19 AM
in reply to: #3994700

User image

Veteran
344
10010010025
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman

TheClaaaw - 2012-01-17 9:16 AM Well, I am counting my homebrew Doughboy triathlon from November as an actual olympic. I don't know if you have to be nerdy enough to create a webpage and file a race report. Of course, olympic-distance finisher doesn't have the same ring to it as IM.

It only counts if you have a t-shirt made!

2012-01-18 9:33 AM
in reply to: #3996912

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
mr2tony - 2012-01-18 9:13 AM
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 8:57 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing

I can tell you from experience that I figured I'd RUN the whole thing too. I was on about an 8:45-9 minute/mile pace until mile 18 and it started to hurt. Hit mile 20 and I was sure I was going to hurl so I slowed further and eventually walked from 22-24. At mile 24 I got more food and took a five-minute break at the aid station. It's way tougher to do than it is to say. And why is it limited to just running. By your rationale, anybody who doesn't swim a sub-1:15/100 swim or bike a sub-5 bike (or whatever what some feel are fast times) shouldn't call themselves an ironman.

 

Bro....I can't make this more clear.....people can call themselves "Supreme Commander"" for all I care.  For ME, I'll be dissapointed if I walk any of the marathon portion, that's not what I'm training for. FWIW - I can't see me ever calling myself an Ironman, any more than I can see me calling myself a Marathoner.  This is just something I am working toward, a goal I made, it won't define me, standing alone, any more than anything else I've ever done.  In the end, if things go well, someone someday will be able to say that I completed an Ironman race.....that's all.

BTW - congrats on your race!

2012-01-18 9:37 AM
in reply to: #3996968

User image

Champion
7136
5000200010025
Knoxville area
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 10:33 AM

 

Brah....I can't make this more clear.....people can call themselves "Supreme Commander"" for all I care.  For ME, I'll be dissapointed if I walk any of the marathon portion, that's not what I'm training for. FWIW - I can't see me ever calling myself an Ironman, any more than I can see me calling myself a Marathoner.  This is just something I am working toward, a goal I made, it won't define me, standing alone, any more than anything else I've ever done.  In the end, if things go well, someone someday will be able to say that I completed an Ironman race.....that's all.

BTW - congrats on your race!

fixed

2012-01-18 9:55 AM
in reply to: #3996968

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 9:33 AM
mr2tony - 2012-01-18 9:13 AM
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 8:57 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing

I can tell you from experience that I figured I'd RUN the whole thing too. I was on about an 8:45-9 minute/mile pace until mile 18 and it started to hurt. Hit mile 20 and I was sure I was going to hurl so I slowed further and eventually walked from 22-24. At mile 24 I got more food and took a five-minute break at the aid station. It's way tougher to do than it is to say. And why is it limited to just running. By your rationale, anybody who doesn't swim a sub-1:15/100 swim or bike a sub-5 bike (or whatever what some feel are fast times) shouldn't call themselves an ironman.

 

Bro....I can't make this more clear.....people can call themselves "Supreme Commander"" for all I care.  For ME, I'll be dissapointed if I walk any of the marathon portion, that's not what I'm training for. FWIW - I can't see me ever calling myself an Ironman, any more than I can see me calling myself a Marathoner.  This is just something I am working toward, a goal I made, it won't define me, standing alone, any more than anything else I've ever done.  In the end, if things go well, someone someday will be able to say that I completed an Ironman race.....that's all.

BTW - congrats on your race!

 

Don't set yourself up for disappointment.  I've seen the pros walking and they still finish in 9 hrs!

There is no "shame" in walking.  An IM is all about energy management and pacing.  The idea is to push yourself on the bike as much as you can w/o spending too much and having nothing left for the run.  If you are too conservative on the bike, you might be able to run the entire marathon but still have a slower finish time than had you pushed harder on the bike and allowed for a few walk breaks.

Having said that, I had a goal of running the entire 26 miles of my first marathon.  I would not even allow myself to walk thru the water stations!  I ran non-stop for 24 miles and then simply had to take a walk break.  I was disappointed that I'd 'walked' part of my marathon but in the years that followed I found that strategic walk breaks (like thru the aid stations) actually resulted in a better overall performance. 

 

2012-01-18 10:06 AM
in reply to: #3997034

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
Rogillio - 2012-01-18 9:55 AM

Left Brain - 2012-01-18 9:33 AM
mr2tony - 2012-01-18 9:13 AM
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 8:57 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing

I can tell you from experience that I figured I'd RUN the whole thing too. I was on about an 8:45-9 minute/mile pace until mile 18 and it started to hurt. Hit mile 20 and I was sure I was going to hurl so I slowed further and eventually walked from 22-24. At mile 24 I got more food and took a five-minute break at the aid station. It's way tougher to do than it is to say. And why is it limited to just running. By your rationale, anybody who doesn't swim a sub-1:15/100 swim or bike a sub-5 bike (or whatever what some feel are fast times) shouldn't call themselves an ironman.

 

Bro....I can't make this more clear.....people can call themselves "Supreme Commander"" for all I care.  For ME, I'll be dissapointed if I walk any of the marathon portion, that's not what I'm training for. FWIW - I can't see me ever calling myself an Ironman, any more than I can see me calling myself a Marathoner.  This is just something I am working toward, a goal I made, it won't define me, standing alone, any more than anything else I've ever done.  In the end, if things go well, someone someday will be able to say that I completed an Ironman race.....that's all.

BTW - congrats on your race!

 

Don't set yourself up for disappointment.  I've seen the pros walking and they still finish in 9 hrs!

There is no "shame" in walking.  An IM is all about energy management and pacing.  The idea is to push yourself on the bike as much as you can w/o spending too much and having nothing left for the run.  If you are too conservative on the bike, you might be able to run the entire marathon but still have a slower finish time than had you pushed harder on the bike and allowed for a few walk breaks.

Having said that, I had a goal of running the entire 26 miles of my first marathon.  I would not even allow myself to walk thru the water stations!  I ran non-stop for 24 miles and then simply had to take a walk break.  I was disappointed that I'd 'walked' part of my marathon but in the years that followed I found that strategic walk breaks (like thru the aid stations) actually resulted in a better overall performance. 

 



I agree with this. Sadly a lot of people won't allow themselves the walk breaks and end up with a DNF and wonder why. The body will let you know if you need to walk it out and if it does, you should listen and let the ego slide.


2012-01-18 10:38 AM
in reply to: #3993950

User image

Runner
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
I had never seen or heard the term "marathoner" until this site. If someone runs a 5K, do we call him/her a 5Ker?

Lots of focus on labels. Labels, in my opinion, are not good. A person should not believe in labels, he should believe in himself. I quote John Lennon: "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me." A good point there. After all, he was the walrus. I could be the walrus.
2012-01-18 10:38 AM
in reply to: #3995019

User image

Extreme Veteran
389
100100100252525
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
trishie - 2012-01-17 11:13 AM
synthetic - 2012-01-17 11:52 AM

I did it myself, I dont want to be called an ironman ..13:53. I just wanted to see if I can do it. The slow time was attributed to traffic on the bike, and im a poor swimmer.

 

IMO An ironman is someone who finished in under 12 hours... anything higher even though official IM race should be called walkingman

Crud! Can I still keep my tattoo???

 

I look at it this way, if you like ford cars, you can keep your ford tattoo , cause you liek the BRAND... doesnt mean your a ford  car driver

2012-01-18 10:40 AM
in reply to: #3997139

User image

Pro
5761
50005001001002525
Bartlett, TN
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
synthetic - 2012-01-18 10:38 AM
trishie - 2012-01-17 11:13 AM
synthetic - 2012-01-17 11:52 AM

I did it myself, I dont want to be called an ironman ..13:53. I just wanted to see if I can do it. The slow time was attributed to traffic on the bike, and im a poor swimmer.

 

IMO An ironman is someone who finished in under 12 hours... anything higher even though official IM race should be called walkingman

Crud! Can I still keep my tattoo???

 

I look at it this way, if you like ford cars, you can keep your ford tattoo , cause you liek the BRAND... doesnt mean your a ford  car driver

 

I will giveaway free Jford tattoos if anyone is interested!

2012-01-18 11:36 AM
in reply to: #3997064

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: what it means to be an ironman
mr2tony - 2012-01-18 10:06 AM
Rogillio - 2012-01-18 9:55 AM
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 9:33 AM
mr2tony - 2012-01-18 9:13 AM
Left Brain - 2012-01-18 8:57 AM

mr2tony - 2012-01-18 6:45 AM Wait, Left Brain, I recall you saying something in another thread about a HIM being tougher than a marathon or vice-versa or something. But in that thread you'd indicated that you hadn't yet done a full-distance triathlon. Is that correct? That you haven't yet done one and you're saying that people who walk the marathon portion of a full-distance triathlon can't call themselves ironmen? And here I thought you were more of a man than me. I feel so cheated. As me ol' pappy used to say, `Don't criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his mocassins.'

Yeah, I thought a Marathon was MUCH harder then an HIM.  And nope, I haven't ventured a full IM yet.....I started with a 5 year plan to get there, with a finish time in my head.  I'm on track for it, and I don't want to walk any of the Marathon portion.  Like I said, I could have used the pink font in my entire post because I don't really give a rats arse who walks and who doesn't or what they call themselves.  For me, I want to swim/bike/RUN an Ironman race.  But when I do, I'm gonna come up with a better name than "Ironman" to call myself. Laughing

I can tell you from experience that I figured I'd RUN the whole thing too. I was on about an 8:45-9 minute/mile pace until mile 18 and it started to hurt. Hit mile 20 and I was sure I was going to hurl so I slowed further and eventually walked from 22-24. At mile 24 I got more food and took a five-minute break at the aid station. It's way tougher to do than it is to say. And why is it limited to just running. By your rationale, anybody who doesn't swim a sub-1:15/100 swim or bike a sub-5 bike (or whatever what some feel are fast times) shouldn't call themselves an ironman.

 

Bro....I can't make this more clear.....people can call themselves "Supreme Commander"" for all I care.  For ME, I'll be dissapointed if I walk any of the marathon portion, that's not what I'm training for. FWIW - I can't see me ever calling myself an Ironman, any more than I can see me calling myself a Marathoner.  This is just something I am working toward, a goal I made, it won't define me, standing alone, any more than anything else I've ever done.  In the end, if things go well, someone someday will be able to say that I completed an Ironman race.....that's all.

BTW - congrats on your race!

 

Don't set yourself up for disappointment.  I've seen the pros walking and they still finish in 9 hrs!

There is no "shame" in walking.  An IM is all about energy management and pacing.  The idea is to push yourself on the bike as much as you can w/o spending too much and having nothing left for the run.  If you are too conservative on the bike, you might be able to run the entire marathon but still have a slower finish time than had you pushed harder on the bike and allowed for a few walk breaks.

Having said that, I had a goal of running the entire 26 miles of my first marathon.  I would not even allow myself to walk thru the water stations!  I ran non-stop for 24 miles and then simply had to take a walk break.  I was disappointed that I'd 'walked' part of my marathon but in the years that followed I found that strategic walk breaks (like thru the aid stations) actually resulted in a better overall performance. 

 

I agree with this. Sadly a lot of people won't allow themselves the walk breaks and end up with a DNF and wonder why. The body will let you know if you need to walk it out and if it does, you should listen and let the ego slide.

 

It's not about ego and I never said I'd be ashamed of walking (for a previous poster).  I have my reasons, they are personal.  If all I wanted to do is finish an Ironman I would have already done that.  I made a 5 year plan.......before I do an Ironman I will have ran 4 marathons, 5 HIM's, and many sprints and Oly's.  I have no intention of walking any of the run.  I certainly understand that anything can/may happen on any given day.  I'm training to run it all.

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » what it means to be an ironman Rss Feed  
 
 
of 8