Other Resources My Cup of Joe » NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 7
 
 
2012-12-21 3:13 PM
in reply to: #4544573

User image

Master
2802
2000500100100100
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
powerman - 2012-12-21 3:08 PM
kevin_trapp - 2012-12-21 1:35 PM

Virginia Tech, like most universities, has it's own armed police department.  It didn't stop what happened.  If an armed officer at your kid's school makes you sleep better at night, great.  But it's a knee jerk reaction to a horrific crime.

Exactly... just like more knee jerk gun laws that do nothing. Just like more knee jerk penalties that do nothing. Just like more knee jerk commitments for mentally ill.Just like more knee jerk speeches about getting tough on crime. And more knee jerk reactions like TSA and Homeland defense and the Patriot Act.

Why are we even bothering? Let's just do nothing. Think of all the money we would save.

Tax ALL gun sales at the same rate as cigarettes (biggest single reason for lower cigarette use).  Think of all the revenue we'd generate and the many fewer guns added to the already huge pile!



2012-12-21 3:20 PM
in reply to: #4544583

User image

Champion
17756
50005000500020005001001002525
SoCal
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
ejshowers - 2012-12-21 1:13 PM
powerman - 2012-12-21 3:08 PM
kevin_trapp - 2012-12-21 1:35 PM

Virginia Tech, like most universities, has it's own armed police department.  It didn't stop what happened.  If an armed officer at your kid's school makes you sleep better at night, great.  But it's a knee jerk reaction to a horrific crime.

Exactly... just like more knee jerk gun laws that do nothing. Just like more knee jerk penalties that do nothing. Just like more knee jerk commitments for mentally ill.Just like more knee jerk speeches about getting tough on crime. And more knee jerk reactions like TSA and Homeland defense and the Patriot Act.

Why are we even bothering? Let's just do nothing. Think of all the money we would save.

Tax ALL gun sales at the same rate as cigarettes (biggest single reason for lower cigarette use).  Think of all the revenue we'd generate and the many fewer guns added to the already huge pile!

Leaving a right to only the privileged that can afford it.

We tax other thing from the bill of rights also? Want to use your freedom of speech sure $100.

2012-12-21 3:24 PM
in reply to: #4544458

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
idahocraig - 2012-12-21 2:41 PM

Actually just read the estimated cost is 5.4 billion.  but why are we arguing about money.  Is this about money or protecting our kids.  I am sure we can find that money somewhere like I said in my post I am willing to have my taxes raised to do it.  My kids safety at school is worth it.

Well, I guess you and the PTA need to start up a bake sale.  I will go right ahead and not beat around the bush.  It's not worth the money spent.  $5.4 billion to potentially save 2 lives, no way.  It was a horrible horrible thing that happened.  But look at the math and it was a VERY VERY small partial percentage of all the students, staff and people at schools in the entire USA.

Whether one wants to believe it or not, our kids ARE safe in the schools as thing are.  Are they 100% safe, NO and they never will be!  You can put 10 armed guards at every school and kids will still have the same chance of getting killed (simply looking at a % of school days vs kids vs tragedies).

This would be nothing more than a TSA for schools so parents, like air passengers, can FEEL safer. 

2012-12-21 3:25 PM
in reply to: #4544221

User image

Champion
6999
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
killers are going to kill.  its why suicide bombers are so hard to stop.  best way to stop them is to give them a reason not to do it.
2012-12-21 3:27 PM
in reply to: #4544590

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
Marvarnett - 2012-12-21 4:24 PM
idahocraig - 2012-12-21 2:41 PM

Actually just read the estimated cost is 5.4 billion.  but why are we arguing about money.  Is this about money or protecting our kids.  I am sure we can find that money somewhere like I said in my post I am willing to have my taxes raised to do it.  My kids safety at school is worth it.

Well, I guess you and the PTA need to start up a bake sale.  I will go right ahead and not beat around the bush.  It's not worth the money spent.  $5.4 billion to potentially save 2 lives, no way.  It was a horrible horrible thing that happened.  But look at the math and it was a VERY VERY small partial percentage of all the students, staff and people at schools in the entire USA.

Whether one wants to believe it or not, our kids ARE safe in the schools as thing are.  Are they 100% safe, NO and they never will be!  You can put 10 armed guards at every school and kids will still have the same chance of getting killed (simply looking at a % of school days vs kids vs tragedies).

This would be nothing more than a TSA for schools so parents, like air passengers, can FEEL safer. 

Yes, thank you.  Well put!

2012-12-21 3:27 PM
in reply to: #4544557

User image

Veteran
698
500100252525
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer

I've read the posts, so a few comments and observations:

1. Saying that a shooting occurred when there was a cop present, and that proves that the idea is useless, is like suggesting that police departments be dismantled. After all, crime still occurs, right? No, there are no guarantees, but if this stops a few, then it was worth it. Just like my bike lock is not guaranteed to stop a thief, but there is a good chance that the thief will try a different target.

2. Yes, one day there will be security at malls, churches, etc. Synagogues sometimes have them, because they are already a target. Don't like it? Me neither, but guns exist, people who will use them exist, and wishing otherwise will not change that fact.

3. In addition to the cop at the front door, you make that the only possible entrance, with the guard having some form of protection, or at least clear view who is coming in. In addition, the school can have a roster of parents who are added to the guard duty. Depending on the size of the school, each parent will give a few hours every month or two. Yes, I know, we don't like that either, but again, if it saves lives, I'll live with it.

4. Yes, there is a solution for someone trying to set off a bomb. Shoot him in the head, not center mass, and s/he won't.

 

Times have changed. There are many reasons, but it doesn't really change a few simple truths. There are guns. Lot's of them. They will not be taken away from those that have them legally, and those that have them illegally, are not about to turn them in. There are people who are willing to use them, because they are nut's, trying to make a point, ideological reasons, religious reasons, and a few more that I haven't thought of. Passing a few more laws to say that it is illegal to commit mass murder wont work.

Sadly the solution is to decide on priorities, spend a lot of money, and hopefully be equipped to deal with the problem when it arises. Don't like the idea? Me neither. But until someone can come up with a better one that actually has a chance of working, we will probably have to go with this one.

I grew up in Israel. I grew up with security at schools, malls, theaters, school trips, etc. EVERY generation of parents wished with all their hearts that their children will not need to experience this. And hopefully, one day that will be true (hey, without hope, why bother getting out of bed in the morning?). However, I am very and truly sad to be of the opinion that this need will spread, not decline.



Edited by r1237h 2012-12-21 3:31 PM


2012-12-21 3:30 PM
in reply to: #4544591

User image

Veteran
698
500100252525
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer

chirunner134 - 2012-12-21 1:25 PM killers are going to kill.  its why suicide bombers are so hard to stop.  best way to stop them is to give them a reason not to do it.

 

Nice idea, but not possible.

2012-12-21 3:31 PM
in reply to: #4544580

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
jmk-brooklyn - 2012-12-21 3:12 PM
crusevegas - 2012-12-21 3:02 PM

What would make the most sense to me would be to remove the ridiculous designation of a gun free zone and allow school employees who are willing and able to legally carry a concealed weapon to do so.

I’m not comfortable with that. Unless they’re also going to have to be certified that they’re properly trained to use their weapon in a combat setting, I wouldn’t feel better about having random school personnel carrying guns on school property. A bunch of poorly-trained teachers opening fire in a crowded school full of kids has as much chance of making a situation worse as it does of improving it.

 Yeah, arming teachers is risky. Think of a teacher breaking up a fight. Kid reaches in and grabs the gun from teacher's concealed carry and pops a round into someone. A kid taking the teacher's gun from a handbag when he/she's not looking. Armed teachers isn't gonna work.

2012-12-21 3:38 PM
in reply to: #4544595

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
r1237h - 2012-12-21 4:27 PM

I've read the posts, so a few comments and observations:

1. Saying that a shooting occurred when there was a cop present, and that proves that the idea is useless, is like suggesting that police departments be dismantled. After all, crime still occurs, right? No, there are no guarantees, but if this stops a few, then it was worth it. Just like my bike lock is not guaranteed to stop a thief, but there is a good chance that the thief will try a different target.

2. Yes, one day there will be security at malls, churches, etc. Synagogues sometimes have them, because they are already a target. Don't like it? Tough. Me neither, but guns exist, people who will use them exist, and wishing otherwise will not change that fact.

3. In addition to the cop at the front door, you make that the only possible entrance, with the guard having some form of protection, or at least clear view who is coming in. In addition, the school can have a roster of parents who are added to the guard duty. Depending on the size of the school, each parent will give a few hours every month or two. Yes, I know, we don't like that either, but again, if it saves lives, I'll live with it.

4. Yes, there is a solution for someone trying to set off a bomb. Shoot him in the head, not center mass, and s/he won't.

 

Times have changed. There are many reasons, but it doesn't really change a few simple truths. There are guns. Lot's of them. They will not be taken away from those that have them legally, and those that have them illegally, are not about to turn them in. There are people who are willing to use them, because they are nut's, trying to make a point, ideological reasons, religious reasons, and a few more that I haven't thought of. Passing a few more laws to say that it is illegal to commit mass murder wont work.

Sadly the solution is to decide on priorities, spend a lot of money, and hopefully be equipped to deal with the problem when it arises. Don't like the idea? Me neither. But until someone can come up with a better one that actually has a chance of working, we will probably have to go with this one.

I grew up in Israel. I grew up with security at schools, malls, theaters, school trips, etc. EVERY generation of parents wished with all their hearts that their children will not need to experience this. And hopefully, one day that will be true (hey, without hope, why bother getting out of bed in the morning?). However, I am very and truly sad to be of the opinion that this need will spread, not decline.

And when it happens again only this time the guard is shot first?  What will you do then?  What law will you make, what policy will you put in place?  And what lunatic will find a way around it.  This is not Isreal and though tragic Newton is an abberation.  You cannot stop all abberations and maintain anything that even resembles a free society.  I am sorry but on some level this is the price we pay; evil exists and sometimes we will be made to suffer for it.  Kneejerk policies to assuage our fears and our hurts will not stop it from happening again.

 

2012-12-21 3:44 PM
in reply to: #4544573

User image

Veteran
1019
1000
St. Louis
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
powerman - 2012-12-21 3:08 PM
kevin_trapp - 2012-12-21 1:35 PM

Virginia Tech, like most universities, has it's own armed police department.  It didn't stop what happened.  If an armed officer at your kid's school makes you sleep better at night, great.  But it's a knee jerk reaction to a horrific crime.

Exactly... just like more knee jerk gun laws that do nothing. Just like more knee jerk penalties that do nothing. Just like more knee jerk commitments for mentally ill.Just like more knee jerk speeches about getting tough on crime. And more knee jerk reactions like TSA and Homeland defense and the Patriot Act.

Why are we even bothering? Let's just do nothing. Think of all the money we would save.

Well, at least I agree with your first paragraph.

We're talking about 3 isolated mass school shootings over a 13 year period. As horrific and devastating as they each were, you have better odds of winning the powerball than you do of having something like this happen to your kid's school. But by all means, let's have the feds throw billions of dollars at this. They're real good at fixin' things. Let's take police off the streets where the criminals, and put them in the schools so that parents can sleep a little better. 

2012-12-21 3:46 PM
in reply to: #4544502

User image


169
1002525
, Oregon
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
kevin_trapp - 2012-12-21 1:11 PM
jford2309 - 2012-12-21 1:59 PM
mr2tony - 2012-12-21 1:49 PM
TriRSquared - 2012-12-21 1:46 PM
mr2tony - 2012-12-21 2:40 PM
mdg2003 - 2012-12-21 1:29 PM

mr2tony - 2012-12-21 12:56 PM People talk about the hypothetical `A police officer would've stopped him.' a lot. And then there's reality: Columbine had an armed police officer on duty that day.

And it occured in the middle of a Federal assault weapons ban.

Thankfully, or they may have had assault weapons.

Sigh... deep breath.  First, none of them are AW.  Selective fire to be an AW.  Please use the terms correctly.

Secondly, one of the guns used at Columbine, a 9mm TEC-DC9, was actually part of the Clinton AW ban.  So a banned gun was used in a shooting.

Imagine that.  Banning the sale of a gun does not prevent them from being used in a crime.

Fair enough. Still doesn't change the fact that the armed police officer didn't stop them from killing 13 people.

 

do you know why he didn't? He wasn't on campus when they attacked.

Their plan was to be killed by LE, they never planned on coming out of Columbine alive. They wanted to be gunned down by LE. Someone with a plan to kill is going to kill unless they are stopped

Yes he was.  He was sitting in his patrol car in one of the school's parking lots.  He even got in a shootout with Harris.   

So Harris was shooting at him rather than unarmed students sounds like it may have saved some lives.  Less time and bullets to kill unarmed kids.  Huh maybe he did not stop it but slowed it down.  Just a thought.



2012-12-21 4:09 PM
in reply to: #4544614

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer

I understand how this could be an idea...  (and this may have been mentioned already, I didn't read 7 pages).

I still wonder, are teachers and guards ammune to snapping and/or mental issues?

So some armed guard starts to get stressed/depress in a bad marriage, finds out his wife is cheating on him and wants a divorce and using the kids as leverage...  has nothing to live for and maybe something to prove...

Or an armed teacher or principle?

In the past, the shooters have to target a school and go there.  No you have people with guns AT the school?

It may be a solution, but it's a BAD one, IMO.  Sad we would even have to consider it.  Guns at schools and around kids is just a bad idea...

 

As a side note.  I think it made national news, but a US Marine decided he would stand outside his girls school just in uniform (not armed).  Thinking just the uniform itself would/could keep any bad guys from thinking about going in.  I don't think it did anything, but I was proud of him for at least doing it.

2012-12-21 4:10 PM
in reply to: #4544604

User image

Veteran
698
500100252525
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
trinnas - 2012-12-21 1:38 PM
r1237h - 2012-12-21 4:27 PM

I've read the posts, so a few comments and observations:

1. Saying that a shooting occurred when there was a cop present, and that proves that the idea is useless, is like suggesting that police departments be dismantled. After all, crime still occurs, right? No, there are no guarantees, but if this stops a few, then it was worth it. Just like my bike lock is not guaranteed to stop a thief, but there is a good chance that the thief will try a different target.

2. Yes, one day there will be security at malls, churches, etc. Synagogues sometimes have them, because they are already a target. Don't like it? Tough. Me neither, but guns exist, people who will use them exist, and wishing otherwise will not change that fact.

3. In addition to the cop at the front door, you make that the only possible entrance, with the guard having some form of protection, or at least clear view who is coming in. In addition, the school can have a roster of parents who are added to the guard duty. Depending on the size of the school, each parent will give a few hours every month or two. Yes, I know, we don't like that either, but again, if it saves lives, I'll live with it.

4. Yes, there is a solution for someone trying to set off a bomb. Shoot him in the head, not center mass, and s/he won't.

 

Times have changed. There are many reasons, but it doesn't really change a few simple truths. There are guns. Lot's of them. They will not be taken away from those that have them legally, and those that have them illegally, are not about to turn them in. There are people who are willing to use them, because they are nut's, trying to make a point, ideological reasons, religious reasons, and a few more that I haven't thought of. Passing a few more laws to say that it is illegal to commit mass murder wont work.

Sadly the solution is to decide on priorities, spend a lot of money, and hopefully be equipped to deal with the problem when it arises. Don't like the idea? Me neither. But until someone can come up with a better one that actually has a chance of working, we will probably have to go with this one.

I grew up in Israel. I grew up with security at schools, malls, theaters, school trips, etc. EVERY generation of parents wished with all their hearts that their children will not need to experience this. And hopefully, one day that will be true (hey, without hope, why bother getting out of bed in the morning?). However, I am very and truly sad to be of the opinion that this need will spread, not decline.

And when it happens again only this time the guard is shot first?  What will you do then?  What law will you make, what policy will you put in place?  And what lunatic will find a way around it.  This is not Isreal and though tragic Newton is an abberation.  You cannot stop all abberations and maintain anything that even resembles a free society.  I am sorry but on some level this is the price we pay; evil exists and sometimes we will be made to suffer for it.  Kneejerk policies to assuage our fears and our hurts will not stop it from happening again.

 

 

No problem. Then we can adopt your method. Accept that shooting and attacks will occur and increase, and just hope they happen to someone else.

2012-12-21 4:11 PM
in reply to: #4544604

User image

Expert
3126
2000100010025
Boise, ID
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
trinnas - 2012-12-21 2:38 PM
r1237h - 2012-12-21 4:27 PM

I've read the posts, so a few comments and observations:

1. Saying that a shooting occurred when there was a cop present, and that proves that the idea is useless, is like suggesting that police departments be dismantled. After all, crime still occurs, right? No, there are no guarantees, but if this stops a few, then it was worth it. Just like my bike lock is not guaranteed to stop a thief, but there is a good chance that the thief will try a different target.

2. Yes, one day there will be security at malls, churches, etc. Synagogues sometimes have them, because they are already a target. Don't like it? Tough. Me neither, but guns exist, people who will use them exist, and wishing otherwise will not change that fact.

3. In addition to the cop at the front door, you make that the only possible entrance, with the guard having some form of protection, or at least clear view who is coming in. In addition, the school can have a roster of parents who are added to the guard duty. Depending on the size of the school, each parent will give a few hours every month or two. Yes, I know, we don't like that either, but again, if it saves lives, I'll live with it.

4. Yes, there is a solution for someone trying to set off a bomb. Shoot him in the head, not center mass, and s/he won't.

 

Times have changed. There are many reasons, but it doesn't really change a few simple truths. There are guns. Lot's of them. They will not be taken away from those that have them legally, and those that have them illegally, are not about to turn them in. There are people who are willing to use them, because they are nut's, trying to make a point, ideological reasons, religious reasons, and a few more that I haven't thought of. Passing a few more laws to say that it is illegal to commit mass murder wont work.

Sadly the solution is to decide on priorities, spend a lot of money, and hopefully be equipped to deal with the problem when it arises. Don't like the idea? Me neither. But until someone can come up with a better one that actually has a chance of working, we will probably have to go with this one.

I grew up in Israel. I grew up with security at schools, malls, theaters, school trips, etc. EVERY generation of parents wished with all their hearts that their children will not need to experience this. And hopefully, one day that will be true (hey, without hope, why bother getting out of bed in the morning?). However, I am very and truly sad to be of the opinion that this need will spread, not decline.

And when it happens again only this time the guard is shot first?  What will you do then?  What law will you make, what policy will you put in place?  And what lunatic will find a way around it.  This is not Isreal and though tragic Newton is an abberation.  You cannot stop all abberations and maintain anything that even resembles a free society.  I am sorry but on some level this is the price we pay; evil exists and sometimes we will be made to suffer for it.  Kneejerk policies to assuage our fears and our hurts will not stop it from happening again.

 

I agree with this and I wonder if the NRA might not have preferred to say this but knew they would be blasted for "downplaying" the death of 20 kids.

2012-12-21 4:12 PM
in reply to: #4544630

User image

Champion
6999
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
r1237h - 2012-12-21 4:10 PM

No problem. Then we can adopt your method. Accept that shooting and attacks will occur and increase, and just hope they happen to someone else.

Why are they going to increase?

2012-12-21 4:12 PM
in reply to: #4544629

User image

Veteran
698
500100252525
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:09 PMI still wonder, are teachers and guards ammune to snapping and/or mental issues?

So some armed guard starts to get stressed/depress in a bad marriage, finds out his wife is cheating on him and wants a divorce and using the kids as leverage...  has nothing to live for and maybe something to prove...

Or an armed teacher or principle?

 

Couldn't this happen with a cop, or a soldier? Perhaps a secret service or FBI agent?



2012-12-21 4:14 PM
in reply to: #4544634

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
r1237h - 2012-12-21 2:12 PM
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:09 PMI still wonder, are teachers and guards ammune to snapping and/or mental issues?

So some armed guard starts to get stressed/depress in a bad marriage, finds out his wife is cheating on him and wants a divorce and using the kids as leverage...  has nothing to live for and maybe something to prove...

Or an armed teacher or principle?

 

Couldn't this happen with a cop, or a soldier? Perhaps a secret service or FBI agent?

Of course.  And I'm sure it does.

2012-12-21 4:19 PM
in reply to: #4544633

User image

Veteran
698
500100252525
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
chirunner134 - 2012-12-21 2:12 PM
r1237h - 2012-12-21 4:10 PM

No problem. Then we can adopt your method. Accept that shooting and attacks will occur and increase, and just hope they happen to someone else.

Why are they going to increase?

A few obvious reasons come to mind.

As mentioned in some late threads, the mental health care leaves room for improvement. In fact, it seems to have gotten worse. So if they aren't locked up, there are those that are a potential problem.

Easier to get a gun and shoot up a school/mall then to hijack a plane. And what better way to protest an action in Iraq then shoot up a school in nowhere, USA (yes, this is sarcasm). Actually better, by the way, since this will make everyone afraid, since the attacks aren't only in big cities.

 

Violence to prove an ideological or religious point happens. Easy access to weapons makes it, well, easier.

 

No doubt a few more that haven't occurred to me.

 

2012-12-21 4:20 PM
in reply to: #4544637

User image

Veteran
698
500100252525
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:14 PM
r1237h - 2012-12-21 2:12 PM
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:09 PMI still wonder, are teachers and guards ammune to snapping and/or mental issues?

So some armed guard starts to get stressed/depress in a bad marriage, finds out his wife is cheating on him and wants a divorce and using the kids as leverage...  has nothing to live for and maybe something to prove...

Or an armed teacher or principle?

 

Couldn't this happen with a cop, or a soldier? Perhaps a secret service or FBI agent?

Of course.  And I'm sure it does.

 

So we take all the weapons away? Or just don't trust the security guard at school?

2012-12-21 4:24 PM
in reply to: #4544642

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
r1237h - 2012-12-21 2:20 PM
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:14 PM
r1237h - 2012-12-21 2:12 PM
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:09 PMI still wonder, are teachers and guards ammune to snapping and/or mental issues?

So some armed guard starts to get stressed/depress in a bad marriage, finds out his wife is cheating on him and wants a divorce and using the kids as leverage...  has nothing to live for and maybe something to prove...

Or an armed teacher or principle?

 

Couldn't this happen with a cop, or a soldier? Perhaps a secret service or FBI agent?

Of course.  And I'm sure it does.

 

So we take all the weapons away? Or just don't trust the security guard at school?

Guess what, the answer was right in my post, if you wanted to read the whole thing and not just a selection.

2012-12-21 4:31 PM
in reply to: #4544580

User image

Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
jmk-brooklyn - 2012-12-21 1:12 PM
crusevegas - 2012-12-21 3:02 PM

What would make the most sense to me would be to remove the ridiculous designation of a gun free zone and allow school employees who are willing and able to legally carry a concealed weapon to do so.

I’m not comfortable with that. Unless they’re also going to have to be certified that they’re properly trained to use their weapon in a combat setting, I wouldn’t feel better about having random school personnel carrying guns on school property. A bunch of poorly-trained teachers opening fire in a crowded school full of kids has as much chance of making a situation worse as it does of improving it.

If you could provide some statistical reference to back up this claim?

or

Is this just your emotional response?

You do realize that in most states to get a CCW you have to pass a certification after proper training.

I just don't understand the mindset that says I want to forbid you by law from defending yourself.



2012-12-21 4:47 PM
in reply to: #4544650

User image

Extreme Veteran
1648
100050010025
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
crusevegas - 2012-12-21 3:31 PM

If you could provide some statistical reference to back up this claim?

or

Is this just your emotional response?

You do realize that in most states to get a CCW you have to pass a certification after proper training.

I just don't understand the mindset that says I want to forbid you by law from defending yourself.

I think in my state the certification is slightly more stringent than getting a club card for the local grocery store.  Not sure I consider that proper training for someone to protect my child- vs. say a police academy or military training.

2012-12-21 4:54 PM
in reply to: #4544650

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
crusevegas - 2012-12-21 4:31 PM

jmk-brooklyn - 2012-12-21 1:12 PM
crusevegas - 2012-12-21 3:02 PM

What would make the most sense to me would be to remove the ridiculous designation of a gun free zone and allow school employees who are willing and able to legally carry a concealed weapon to do so.

I’m not comfortable with that. Unless they’re also going to have to be certified that they’re properly trained to use their weapon in a combat setting, I wouldn’t feel better about having random school personnel carrying guns on school property. A bunch of poorly-trained teachers opening fire in a crowded school full of kids has as much chance of making a situation worse as it does of improving it.

If you could provide some statistical reference to back up this claim?

or

Is this just your emotional response?

You do realize that in most states to get a CCW you have to pass a certification after proper training.

I just don't understand the mindset that says I want to forbid you by law from defending yourself.



I don't understand the mindset of someone who feels they're safer in the presence of many guns rather than fewer guns. We all have our opinions.

There's no statistical evidence that says a teacher carrying a gun would or wouldn't do anything to prevent a mass murder because teachers thus far haven't been allowed to carry guns. In Texas I think they're already allowed to carry guns if they want in some towns. Some people think it improves safety whereas others think it diminishes safety. My guess is if it went to court the people who want to make it legal for teachers to carry concealed would bear the burden of proof. And what happens the first time a teacher shoots an unarmed student who's involved in a fight or some sort of fracas on campus in the name of security? That will be UGLY.



Edited by mr2tony 2012-12-21 4:54 PM
2012-12-21 5:06 PM
in reply to: #4544221

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
And that's why trained security is a good idea, not "tone deaf" as some of the reports are saying about Wayne LaPierre. Training teachers to do something they are not suited for is a bad idea. Training former police or military to protect kids is easier.

2012-12-21 5:28 PM
in reply to: #4544645

User image

Veteran
698
500100252525
Subject: RE: NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:24 PM
r1237h - 2012-12-21 2:20 PM
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:14 PM
r1237h - 2012-12-21 2:12 PM
Kido - 2012-12-21 2:09 PMI still wonder, are teachers and guards ammune to snapping and/or mental issues?

So some armed guard starts to get stressed/depress in a bad marriage, finds out his wife is cheating on him and wants a divorce and using the kids as leverage...  has nothing to live for and maybe something to prove...

Or an armed teacher or principle?

 

Couldn't this happen with a cop, or a soldier? Perhaps a secret service or FBI agent?

Of course.  And I'm sure it does.

 

So we take all the weapons away? Or just don't trust the security guard at school?

Guess what, the answer was right in my post, if you wanted to read the whole thing and not just a selection.

 

Guess what. I re-read your post, and I am apparently just too dumb to understand the answer. Can you explain it, using simple one syllable words, please?

 

Thanks.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » NRA: Armed guards for schools is the answer Rss Feed  
 
 
of 7