login
TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. (Page 51)
-
No new posts
|
 2012-04-12 1:37 PM in reply to: #4135028 |
Champion  17756      SoCal |  Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion.One trick pony, that is all you have to offer. |
| 2012-04-12 1:38 PM in reply to: #4146520 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Big Appa - 2012-04-12 2:37 PM One trick pony, that is all you have to offer. I actually did just laugh out loud. |
| 2012-04-12 1:38 PM in reply to: #4146516 |
Champion 17756 SoCal | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 11:36 AM I used to forbid my then pre-teen daughter from watching Dawson's Creek. She's 26 and still bitter  Kinda sounds like TAN |
| 2012-04-12 1:41 PM in reply to: #4146410 |
Veteran 441 Maine | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. mr2tony - 2012-04-12 2:16 PM Yeesh wondering if the guys all talked about tying someone up and DPing them, and it was a woman, how well that'd go over. Can't you guys let a new person at least introduce themselves before starting in with the innuendo? You jumped the gun so hastily that you didn't even know it was a woman. It's fun amongst friends but if you don't know the person it just comes off as creepy and not everybody likes it. Some people are OK with it and join in and it's all good fun but if someone doesn't, we'll never see them again and TAN becomes ``that weird thread with all the innuendo.'' I mean, it already is, but can we at least TRY to be a little more subtle? I found that the lack of subtly was what made the thread interesting to me. It was a bit refreshing. |
| 2012-04-12 1:42 PM in reply to: #4146528 |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Big Appa - 2012-04-12 2:38 PM mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 11:36 AM I used to forbid my then pre-teen daughter from watching Dawson's Creek. She's 26 and still bitter Kinda sounds like TAN No need for you to be bitter Cord. |
| 2012-04-12 1:44 PM in reply to: #4146498 |
| Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. mr2tony - 2012-04-12 11:32 AM trinnas - 2012-04-12 1:28 PM Hey I have no problem with the topics at hand -- I'm one of the worst offenders on BT when it comes to innuendo and trashy toilet humor but you have to at least admit that saying you're going to tie someone up and that they're cool if they're into DP MIGHT be a little off-putting for someone who hasn't been around for a while like we all have. Especially after their FIRST POST IN TAN!lisac957 - 2012-04-12 2:22 PM mr2tony - 2012-04-12 1:16 PM Yeesh wondering if the guys all talked about tying someone up and DPing them, and it was a woman, how well that'd go over. Can't you guys let a new person at least introduce themselves before starting in with the innuendo? You jumped the gun so hastily that you didn't even know it was a woman. It's fun amongst friends but if you don't know the person it just comes off as creepy and not everybody likes it. Some people are OK with it and join in and it's all good fun but if someone doesn't, we'll never see them again and TAN becomes ``that weird thread with all the innuendo.'' I mean, it already is, but can we at least TRY to be a little more subtle? Couldn't agree more. and of course the whole pages worth of commentary on taking a dump this morning wasn't weird. I thought it was the thread about nudity. |
| 2012-04-12 1:45 PM in reply to: #4146488 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. trinnas - 2012-04-12 1:30 PM mr2tony - 2012-04-12 2:28 PM NRG42 - 2012-04-12 1:18 PM So you'd rather be known as ``that weird thread with all the innuendo'' and not a welcoming fun place for new people? I know of several former regulars who avoid this thread at all costs because it's too racy. So, in other words, it's become `TAN for people who like to talk about sex and make innuendo.' Which is fine, but I dunno, I think it'd be fun to talk about other things from time to time.mr2tony - 2012-04-12 1:16 PM Yeesh wondering if the guys all talked about tying someone up and DPing them, and it was a woman, how well that'd go over. Can't you guys let a new person at least introduce themselves before starting in with the innuendo? You jumped the gun so hastily that you didn't even know it was a woman. It's fun amongst friends but if you don't know the person it just comes off as creepy and not everybody likes it. Some people are OK with it and join in and it's all good fun but if someone doesn't, we'll never see them again and TAN becomes ``that weird thread with all the innuendo.'' I mean, it already is, but can we at least TRY to be a little more subtle? short answer NO And I will reiterate why is your junk and better or any different from anyone else's junk except that it is your junk and you approve of it. You're missing the point. I am asking that you don't jump on the new people the second they walk into TAN. What is wrong with saying hello and maybe, I dont know, finding out if they're male or female before asking them if they like DP and then threatening to tie them up? I do NOT do that. Because if I did, as a guy, I'd be not only creepy but probably would get kicked off BT. You have tunnel vision. Take a step back and look at it from an outsider's point of view. You will see that it's not just me. A lot of people who used to post here don't anymore and I've been told by some that it's creepy and all innuendo and they're not comfortable with that. I'm not trying to create trouble, I'm trying to improve TAN and make it more welcoming to new (and old) people. |
| 2012-04-12 1:46 PM in reply to: #4146544 |
Champion 17756 SoCal | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. How about we start a "Come overly flirt thread" and everyone could go at it and not one person would complain. TAN in its basic form is meant for BSing. So really if the people that like the flirting why not just make a thread for it? Seems like a logical solution or compromise were everyone that goes into the thread knows what is going on. |
| 2012-04-12 1:48 PM in reply to: #4146516 |
Pro 4742 Sarasota FL | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 2:36 PM I used to forbid my then pre-teen daughter from watching Dawson's Creek. She's 26 and still bitter I wasn't allowed to watch it either, but when I was in college it was syndicated and I've since seen every episode. I will never admit that my mom was right, but a lot of the stuff that was on the show was way over my matuirty level for high school. I didn't turn into a super freak until college. Now, Rick James is my homeboy. |
| 2012-04-12 1:48 PM in reply to: #4146575 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. A pedestrian got hit by a truck in our business park parking lot. Cops were here for a while taking pictures and measuring and stuff. They took the victim off in an ambulance. Think it was a woman. Sure hope she's ok. |
| 2012-04-12 1:48 PM in reply to: #4146575 |
Expert 3145 Scottsdale, AZ | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Big Appa - 2012-04-12 12:46 PM How about we start a "Come overly flirt thread" and everyone could go at it and not one person would complain. TAN in its basic form is meant for BSing. So really if the people that like the flirting why not just make a thread for it? Seems like a logical solution or compromise were everyone that goes into the thread knows what is going on. I'm not sure why but the word "flirt" has always struck me as odd. There has to be a better word than flirt? |
| 2012-04-12 1:50 PM in reply to: #4135028 |
Expert 962 | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Hey when is a blog no longer new? How long can a person call it their new blog? I'm asking ummm....for a friend. |
| 2012-04-12 1:50 PM in reply to: #4146579 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Nicole83 - 2012-04-12 2:48 PM mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 2:36 PM I used to forbid my then pre-teen daughter from watching Dawson's Creek. She's 26 and still bitter I wasn't allowed to watch it either, but when I was in college it was syndicated and I've since seen every episode. I will never admit that my mom was right, but a lot of the stuff that was on the show was way over my matuirty level for high school. I didn't turn into a super freak until college. Now, Rick James is my homeboy.
Thank you Nicole. Thank you. I feel somewhat vindicated... and my daughter wasn't even in HS in '98 when it first started. |
 2012-04-12 1:50 PM in reply to: #4146573 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2012-04-12 1:50 PM in reply to: #4135028 |
| Seattle | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Well, I think there are points to each side. I do think sometimes the innuendos go over the top and when it is page after page it's a little obnoxious, but what is the solution? No flirting in TAN? That's extreme. I am not saying anyone suggested that but how do you manage it? |
| 2012-04-12 1:51 PM in reply to: #4146590 |
| Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Teejaay - 2012-04-12 2:50 PM mr2tony - 2012-04-12 11:45 AM trinnas - 2012-04-12 1:30 PM You're missing the point. I am asking that you don't jump on the new people the second they walk into TAN. What is wrong with saying hello and maybe, I dont know, finding out if they're male or female before asking them if they like DP and then threatening to tie them up? I do NOT do that. Because if I did, as a guy, I'd be not only creepy but probably would get kicked off BT. You have tunnel vision. Take a step back and look at it from an outsider's point of view. You will see that it's not just me. A lot of people who used to post here don't anymore and I've been told by some that it's creepy and all innuendo and they're not comfortable with that. I'm not trying to create trouble, I'm trying to improve TAN and make it more welcoming to new (and old) people. mr2tony - 2012-04-12 2:28 PM NRG42 - 2012-04-12 1:18 PM So you'd rather be known as ``that weird thread with all the innuendo'' and not a welcoming fun place for new people? I know of several former regulars who avoid this thread at all costs because it's too racy. So, in other words, it's become `TAN for people who like to talk about sex and make innuendo.' Which is fine, but I dunno, I think it'd be fun to talk about other things from time to time.mr2tony - 2012-04-12 1:16 PM Yeesh wondering if the guys all talked about tying someone up and DPing them, and it was a woman, how well that'd go over. Can't you guys let a new person at least introduce themselves before starting in with the innuendo? You jumped the gun so hastily that you didn't even know it was a woman. It's fun amongst friends but if you don't know the person it just comes off as creepy and not everybody likes it. Some people are OK with it and join in and it's all good fun but if someone doesn't, we'll never see them again and TAN becomes ``that weird thread with all the innuendo.'' I mean, it already is, but can we at least TRY to be a little more subtle? short answer NO And I will reiterate why is your junk and better or any different from anyone else's junk except that it is your junk and you approve of it. Who you calling old people? I'd vote for you if you were running for some sort of office. Hey, you keep bringing up your Denny's discount... |
| 2012-04-12 1:52 PM in reply to: #4146588 |
| Pro 4742 Sarasota FL | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 2:50 PM Nicole83 - 2012-04-12 2:48 PM mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 2:36 PM I used to forbid my then pre-teen daughter from watching Dawson's Creek. She's 26 and still bitter I wasn't allowed to watch it either, but when I was in college it was syndicated and I've since seen every episode. I will never admit that my mom was right, but a lot of the stuff that was on the show was way over my matuirty level for high school. I didn't turn into a super freak until college. Now, Rick James is my homeboy.
Thank you Nicole. Thank you. I feel somewhat vindicated... and my daughter wasn't even in HS in '98 when it first started. Neither was I. I'm only a year older than your daughter. |
| 2012-04-12 1:53 PM in reply to: #4146586 |
| Expert 3145 Scottsdale, AZ | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. dsand97 - 2012-04-12 12:50 PM Hey when is a blog no longer new? How long can a person call it their new blog? I'm asking ummm....for a friend. When more than 10 people have viewed it? I've considered starting one but I dunno, it kind of seems cliche? I'm sure I will anyways as I tend to think I'm more interesting, funny and important than I really am. |
| 2012-04-12 1:53 PM in reply to: #4146588 |
| Expert 962 | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 1:50 PM Nicole83 - 2012-04-12 2:48 PM mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 2:36 PM I used to forbid my then pre-teen daughter from watching Dawson's Creek. She's 26 and still bitter I wasn't allowed to watch it either, but when I was in college it was syndicated and I've since seen every episode. I will never admit that my mom was right, but a lot of the stuff that was on the show was way over my matuirty level for high school. I didn't turn into a super freak until college. Now, Rick James is my homeboy.
Thank you Nicole. Thank you. I feel somewhat vindicated... and my daughter wasn't even in HS in '98 when it first started. I watched Dawson's creek once, yes it was for a girl, no it didn't help me get any pizza and yes thats the the reason I sport this awesome glass eye in my left socket. |
| 2012-04-12 1:53 PM in reply to: #4146580 |
| Champion 17756 SoCal | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. mrbbrad - 2012-04-12 11:48 AM A pedestrian got hit by a truck in our business park parking lot. Cops were here for a while taking pictures and measuring and stuff. They took the victim off in an ambulance. Think it was a woman. Sure hope she's ok. Wow that sucks, how did he/she get hit? |
| 2012-04-12 1:54 PM in reply to: #4146586 |
| Regular 262 Toronto, Ontario | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. dsand97 - 2012-04-12 2:50 PM Hey when is a blog no longer new? How long can a person call it their new blog? I'm asking ummm....for a friend. I think your friend's signature would be just as exciting without the "new" in it |
| 2012-04-12 1:54 PM in reply to: #4146591 |
| Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Asalzwed - 2012-04-12 1:50 PM Well, I think there are points to each side. I do think sometimes the innuendos go over the top and when it is page after page it's a little obnoxious, but what is the solution? No flirting in TAN? That's extreme. I am not saying anyone suggested that but how do you manage it? We're all adults here, except Cord, so can't we be self-policing? Really, I am not trying to destroy TAN, I helped create it (been around since like TAN 5 or something crazy) but I feel it's gotten out of hand and we're not getting many new people. Some is fine but when you're talking about DPing and tying up someone the moment they wander in, that seems over the top. All I'm asking is that people at least say `hi' to someone before offering to go S&M on them! |
| 2012-04-12 1:55 PM in reply to: #4146583 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2012-04-12 1:56 PM in reply to: #4146605 |
| Expert 962 | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. thebigb - 2012-04-12 1:53 PM dsand97 - 2012-04-12 12:50 PM Hey when is a blog no longer new? How long can a person call it their new blog? I'm asking ummm....for a friend. When more than 10 people have viewed it? I've considered starting one but I dunno, it kind of seems cliche? I'm sure I will anyways as I tend to think I'm more interesting, funny and important than I really am. I as well amigo. But my facebook status updates were exceeding maximum length and stupid twitter would only give me 140 characters. Therefore a blog was the answer. |
| 2012-04-12 1:58 PM in reply to: #4146590 |
| Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: TAN #167 SponTANeous Combustion. Teejaay - 2012-04-12 1:50 PM mr2tony - 2012-04-12 11:45 AM trinnas - 2012-04-12 1:30 PM You're missing the point. I am asking that you don't jump on the new people the second they walk into TAN. What is wrong with saying hello and maybe, I dont know, finding out if they're male or female before asking them if they like DP and then threatening to tie them up? I do NOT do that. Because if I did, as a guy, I'd be not only creepy but probably would get kicked off BT. You have tunnel vision. Take a step back and look at it from an outsider's point of view. You will see that it's not just me. A lot of people who used to post here don't anymore and I've been told by some that it's creepy and all innuendo and they're not comfortable with that. I'm not trying to create trouble, I'm trying to improve TAN and make it more welcoming to new (and old) people. mr2tony - 2012-04-12 2:28 PM NRG42 - 2012-04-12 1:18 PM So you'd rather be known as ``that weird thread with all the innuendo'' and not a welcoming fun place for new people? I know of several former regulars who avoid this thread at all costs because it's too racy. So, in other words, it's become `TAN for people who like to talk about sex and make innuendo.' Which is fine, but I dunno, I think it'd be fun to talk about other things from time to time.mr2tony - 2012-04-12 1:16 PM Yeesh wondering if the guys all talked about tying someone up and DPing them, and it was a woman, how well that'd go over. Can't you guys let a new person at least introduce themselves before starting in with the innuendo? You jumped the gun so hastily that you didn't even know it was a woman. It's fun amongst friends but if you don't know the person it just comes off as creepy and not everybody likes it. Some people are OK with it and join in and it's all good fun but if someone doesn't, we'll never see them again and TAN becomes ``that weird thread with all the innuendo.'' I mean, it already is, but can we at least TRY to be a little more subtle? short answer NO And I will reiterate why is your junk and better or any different from anyone else's junk except that it is your junk and you approve of it. Who you calling old people? I'd vote for you if you were running for some sort of office. Is it because I'm a minority and you want to seem PC? And we're not old. We're experienced! |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK