Other Resources My Cup of Joe » TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
CLOSED
 
 
of 64
 
 
2010-08-03 9:20 AM
in reply to: #3020550

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


OK...it's one thing to argue that helmets aren't necessary for some riders (which i don't agree with but you can have your silly arguments)...but that the helmet causes more damage?  that's just redonkulous.


2010-08-03 9:20 AM
in reply to: #3020552

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
trinnas - 2010-08-03 9:19 AM

NRG42 - 2010-08-03 10:08 AM
trinnas - 2010-08-03 9:06 AM Cheri!!!
I missed out on your question yesterday did you find any good answers???


Nothing that I wanted to put on my list  


That's too bad, it's always good to have a goal.  Laughing


Very goal driven myself! 

2010-08-03 9:21 AM
in reply to: #3020550

User image

Extreme Veteran
6066
500010002525
Montreal, QC
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


What?  Are you kidding me?  Why do governments, governing bodies, etc. spend millions of dollars to test, develop, engineer and build helmets, and in many places require them to be worn?  What are they saying to say that they may cause more damage??? 
2010-08-03 9:22 AM
in reply to: #3020556

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
meherczeg - 2010-08-03 10:20 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


OK...it's one thing to argue that helmets aren't necessary for some riders (which i don't agree with but you can have your silly arguments)...but that the helmet causes more damage?  that's just redonkulous.


Yep.  Check out this crazy website: http://cyclehelmets.org/index.html
2010-08-03 9:22 AM
in reply to: #3020550

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


That's beyond silly that's stupid.  I've seen the results of not wearing a helmet on a motorcycle and it's not pretty.  Slamming your head against concrete or pavement your head will loose, either on a motorcycle or on a bike.

2010-08-03 9:24 AM
in reply to: #3020566

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
LockOut - 2010-08-03 10:21 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


What?  Are you kidding me?  Why do governments, governing bodies, etc. spend millions of dollars to test, develop, engineer and build helmets, and in many places require them to be worn?  What are they saying to say that they may cause more damage??? 


No idea.  It's completely ridiculous.  There's some study that shows that kids who wear helmets are 4 times more likely to get facial injuries or something.


2010-08-03 9:25 AM
in reply to: #3000079

User image

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Gotta go. MWAH
2010-08-03 9:25 AM
in reply to: #3020571

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
trinnas - 2010-08-03 10:22 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


That's beyond silly that's stupid.  I've seen the results of not wearing a helmet on a motorcycle and it's not pretty.  Slamming your head against concrete or pavement your head will loose, either on a motorcycle or on a bike.



That was my point!  I don't know if they don't bike quickly enough or what, but it's just not a chance I would ever take.
2010-08-03 9:27 AM
in reply to: #3020578

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:24 AM
LockOut - 2010-08-03 10:21 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


What?  Are you kidding me?  Why do governments, governing bodies, etc. spend millions of dollars to test, develop, engineer and build helmets, and in many places require them to be worn?  What are they saying to say that they may cause more damage??? 


No idea.  It's completely ridiculous.  There's some study that shows that kids who wear helmets are 4 times more likely to get facial injuries or something.


I'd much prefer that to BRAIN DAMAGE.
2010-08-03 9:29 AM
in reply to: #3020593

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
meherczeg - 2010-08-03 10:27 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:24 AM
LockOut - 2010-08-03 10:21 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


What?  Are you kidding me?  Why do governments, governing bodies, etc. spend millions of dollars to test, develop, engineer and build helmets, and in many places require them to be worn?  What are they saying to say that they may cause more damage??? 


No idea.  It's completely ridiculous.  There's some study that shows that kids who wear helmets are 4 times more likely to get facial injuries or something.


I'd much prefer that to BRAIN DAMAGE.


No kidding!!!
2010-08-03 9:31 AM
in reply to: #3020593

User image

Extreme Veteran
6066
500010002525
Montreal, QC
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
meherczeg - 2010-08-03 10:27 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:24 AM
LockOut - 2010-08-03 10:21 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 10:19 AM I hang out on a knitting forum too and am in an arguement about wearing helmets.  People are trying to convince me it's not necessary and may cause more damage.  Apparently, there's no "proof" that helmets help in a crash.  It's silly.


What?  Are you kidding me?  Why do governments, governing bodies, etc. spend millions of dollars to test, develop, engineer and build helmets, and in many places require them to be worn?  What are they saying to say that they may cause more damage??? 


No idea.  It's completely ridiculous.  There's some study that shows that kids who wear helmets are 4 times more likely to get facial injuries or something.


I'd much prefer that to BRAIN DAMAGE.


I think you bring up a good point, Meh.  We may all be talking about different things here.  Do helmets make you less likely to get injured while biking?  I will concede that, maybe they don't.  A helmet won't stop, for example, Crowny's wife from breaking her wrist.  It won't stop a kid's face from getting scraped on the ground.  It will, however, prevent MAJOR, LIFE ALTERING injuries, like brain damage.  This is the ONLY logical argument that I can fathom. 


2010-08-03 9:46 AM
in reply to: #3000079

User image

Champion
5171
50001002525
Racine, WI
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Drive by TAN..............hope all are well!!
2010-08-03 10:11 AM
in reply to: #3020648

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy

aidana - 2010-08-03 10:46 AM Drive by TAN..............hope all are well!!

 

hola, bonita!

2010-08-03 10:15 AM
in reply to: #3000079

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
I was going to order one of the new Kindles and they are already sold out.  I can order now and won't get it until September.  Not so bad.  Guess I shouldn't have waited so long.
2010-08-03 10:32 AM
in reply to: #3020737

User image

Extreme Veteran
6066
500010002525
Montreal, QC
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Artemis - 2010-08-03 11:15 AM I was going to order one of the new Kindles and they are already sold out.  I can order now and won't get it until September.  Not so bad.  Guess I shouldn't have waited so long.


Wow, that was fast!  Is this the cheaper, WiFi only version?  I'm considering it when it comes to Canada.  I just don't know how much I would use it.  I'm not much of a reader, but I could see myself doing it more if I had one.  I just don't know!!! 
2010-08-03 10:34 AM
in reply to: #3020779

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
LockOut - 2010-08-03 11:32 AM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 11:15 AM I was going to order one of the new Kindles and they are already sold out.  I can order now and won't get it until September.  Not so bad.  Guess I shouldn't have waited so long.


Wow, that was fast!  Is this the cheaper, WiFi only version?  I'm considering it when it comes to Canada.  I just don't know how much I would use it.  I'm not much of a reader, but I could see myself doing it more if I had one.  I just don't know!!! 


Both versions.  I'm looking at ordering the WiFi only version.  My husband has a first gen Kindle with the 3g.  We've never used it!

Also discovered I can get a $75 giftcard for Amazon using credit card rewards points.  That will make it much cheaper!!


2010-08-03 10:42 AM
in reply to: #3000079

User image

Champion
6742
5000100050010010025
The Green Between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
why not just use the Kindle you have?
2010-08-03 10:47 AM
in reply to: #3020818

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
FishrCutB8 - 2010-08-03 11:42 AM why not just use the Kindle you have?


That version doesn't have PDF support (the new one does) and I want to be able to carry my 20 science papers on a Kindle rather than on paper.  I'm killing way too many trees.  Plus, my husband goes up to DC a few days each week for work and takes his, so it would be nice to have my own.
2010-08-03 11:04 AM
in reply to: #3020846

User image

Extreme Veteran
6066
500010002525
Montreal, QC
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Artemis - 2010-08-03 11:47 AM
FishrCutB8 - 2010-08-03 11:42 AM why not just use the Kindle you have?


That version doesn't have PDF support (the new one does) and I want to be able to carry my 20 science papers on a Kindle rather than on paper.  I'm killing way too many trees.  Plus, my husband goes up to DC a few days each week for work and takes his, so it would be nice to have my own.


How much are they selling for in the US? 
2010-08-03 11:05 AM
in reply to: #3020909

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
LockOut - 2010-08-03 12:04 PM
Artemis - 2010-08-03 11:47 AM
FishrCutB8 - 2010-08-03 11:42 AM why not just use the Kindle you have?


That version doesn't have PDF support (the new one does) and I want to be able to carry my 20 science papers on a Kindle rather than on paper.  I'm killing way too many trees.  Plus, my husband goes up to DC a few days each week for work and takes his, so it would be nice to have my own.


How much are they selling for in the US? 


$139 for the wifi only and $189 for the wifi + 3g
2010-08-03 11:07 AM
in reply to: #3000079

User image

Master
1436
100010010010010025
Wilmington
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy

Hola Tanner-ruski`s and Ugh meh(i kid I kid)

Busy day at work. So hi all and bye



2010-08-03 11:15 AM
in reply to: #3000079

User image

Expert
1111
1000100
Katy, TX
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
hello TAN.  drive by.

I realized least night that my inspection sticker has been expired since june.

how is that for being aware of my surroundings, I didnt even realize it until I was talking to a state trooper who was leaning on my truck. our boys are on the same football team, and we were just b.s.ing...then I looked at my windshield and wondered why my registration and inspection had different numbers on them.

nice.
2010-08-03 11:16 AM
in reply to: #3000079

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
Why does everyone insist on working today??  I need something to do. 
2010-08-03 11:20 AM
in reply to: #3020953

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
NRG42 - 2010-08-03 12:16 PM Why does everyone insist on working today??  I need something to do. 


Search the internet for things to add to your list. 
2010-08-03 11:22 AM
in reply to: #3020953

User image

Extreme Veteran
6066
500010002525
Montreal, QC
Subject: RE: TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy
NRG42 - 2010-08-03 12:16 PM Why does everyone insist on working today??  I need something to do. 


Trust me, it's NOT by choice... 
New Thread
CLOSED
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » TAN 113 TANtamount to Anarchy Rss Feed  
 
 
of 64