General Discussion Iron Distance Race Groups » Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 16
 
 
2013-03-04 5:54 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Member
45
25
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
Hey guys just found this thread. So stoked for this race.


2013-03-04 6:26 PM
in reply to: #4646194

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

rrrunner - 2013-03-04 2:42 PM Reading some race reports I see that people were using a headlamp for the ride to check in at T1 in the morning. Do I need to buy a headlamp?

 

It might be nice, but I've always found T1 to be fairly bright, and it lightens up pretty quickly.  There will be people with headlamps though.  If you are riding over from T2 though, you might want one (I hate riding in the morning, dark, crowded, bags, etc.)



Edited by ChrisM 2013-03-04 6:26 PM
2013-03-04 6:30 PM
in reply to: #4646252

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
kloofyroland - 2013-03-04 3:09 PM

ChrisM - 2013-03-04 11:58 AM Depending on the weather, I am thinking of riding the front part of the course on 3/16 with a short run, if anyone is interested.

I'm interested.  How long of a bike ride will that be?

Looking at my logs a couple years ago it's a little over 2 hours, about 42 miles, from the parking lots over the pier to Cristianitos just south of clemente.  Have to see what my coach says about the ride and perhaps a run, as I might like to extend it up Cristianitos to the northern gate of Pendleton



Edited by ChrisM 2013-03-04 6:34 PM
2013-03-05 11:48 AM
in reply to: #4646353

User image

Master
2760
20005001001002525
Los Angeles, CA
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
ChrisM - 2013-03-04 4:30 PM

Looking at my logs a couple years ago it's a little over 2 hours, about 42 miles, from the parking lots over the pier to Cristianitos just south of clemente.  Have to see what my coach says about the ride and perhaps a run, as I might like to extend it up Cristianitos to the northern gate of Pendleton

Cool!  What would you say should be the longest bike ride you can get in before tapering down?  I'm currently planning on a 70 miler (with about 4500ft elevation gain) 2 Saturdays before and start tapering down after that.  Is that too much?



Edited by kloofyroland 2013-03-05 11:54 AM
2013-03-05 11:54 AM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

Got the OK from the coach, so depending on weather (which looks OK for now, for what it's worth), March 16, I plan on riding at least the frontside of the course north, then return south, with a short run on the first few miles of the course.   Tentative plan would be to leave the parking lots on Mission and Pacific (hopefully, as this is T2, if not then the lots at Mission and Cleveland) at about 8 am, and head north, followed by probably a :30 run on the first couple miles of the course on the pier/strand, maybe down to the Wisconsin turn.

Course will not be turn by turn of the race day course as the base access will be different, but close enough for government work....

2013-03-05 11:58 AM
in reply to: #4647247

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
kloofyroland - 2013-03-05 9:48 AM
ChrisM - 2013-03-04 4:30 PM

Looking at my logs a couple years ago it's a little over 2 hours, about 42 miles, from the parking lots over the pier to Cristianitos just south of clemente.  Have to see what my coach says about the ride and perhaps a run, as I might like to extend it up Cristianitos to the northern gate of Pendleton

Cool!  What would you say should be the longest bike ride you can get in before tapering down?  I'm currently planning on a 70 miler (with about 4500ft elevation gain) 2 Saturdays before and start tapering down after that.  Is that too much?

Cycling is low impact so if you have the fitness the miles don't really impact you, I am doing the Solvang century this weekend, probably 2-3 hours the next two weeks with a week taper



2013-03-05 12:21 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Master
6595
50001000500252525
Rio Rancho, NM
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
Did anyone else notice that the map shows a clockwise swim this year? Thoughts?
2013-03-05 1:03 PM
in reply to: #4647292

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

rrrunner - 2013-03-05 10:21 AM Did anyone else notice that the map shows a clockwise swim this year? Thoughts?

Wow.  good eye!   It's a little confusing, the text on the main page says counterclockwise, but the pdf map text says clockwise, and the arrows show clockwise.   I pulled up the 2012 athlete guide and sure enough arrows were counterclockwise last year... Interesting.

Only thing it changes for me is that I liked to hug the right side on the return leg as far as they'd let me, and I really liked coming back right along the pier line.....

But as I breathe right primarily, this is probably better for me.



Edited by ChrisM 2013-03-05 1:32 PM
2013-03-05 1:38 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Master
6595
50001000500252525
Rio Rancho, NM
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

That was my first thought when I noticed the change. I've read reports where people say to stay right after the turnaround. If the swim was a bit long (per gps on some race reports) with that "short cut" in there how long will it be going clockwise?

2013-03-05 2:43 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
Someone confirmed on the other board with WTC that it's counterclockwise as usual
2013-03-05 2:53 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Master
6595
50001000500252525
Rio Rancho, NM
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

Cool. Thanks for checking on that!



2013-03-05 4:34 PM
in reply to: #4647535

User image

Master
2760
20005001001002525
Los Angeles, CA
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

ChrisM - 2013-03-05 12:43 PM Someone confirmed on the other board with WTC that it's counterclockwise as usual

Right side only breathers better get their practice on left side breathing! Wink

2013-03-05 5:03 PM
in reply to: #4647688

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
kloofyroland - 2013-03-05 2:34 PM

ChrisM - 2013-03-05 12:43 PM Someone confirmed on the other board with WTC that it's counterclockwise as usual

Right side only breathers better get their practice on left side breathing! Wink

harumph

2013-03-06 11:26 AM
in reply to: #4647535

User image

Extreme Veteran
648
50010025
Scottsdale
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

ChrisM - 2013-03-05 2:43 PM Someone confirmed on the other board with WTC that it's counterclockwise as usual

I cannot imagine how they would get a clockwise swim to work in the harbor.  Pushing the start waves out into the middle clears them from the swim waves coming into the boat ramp - having them tread water close to the dock would just be asking for a collision.

Someone asked about how long a ride before tapering - that really depends on you.  For some, longer aerobic rides are just part of on-going training, but that does not mean it is for you.  You undoubtedly have built a plan to prepare for the HIM distance - don't start questioning yourself now based on what others do.  Stick to your plan and adjust based on how YOU feel and the progress YOU are making.  Unless you have a coach, no one knows your fitness and situation better than you, so you and you alone should evaluate whether longer rides are going to be beneficial.

2013-03-06 11:37 AM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Member
45
25
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
Hey guys does anyone know the category climbs on this course? roughly?
2013-03-06 12:59 PM
in reply to: #4316851

User image

Member
96
252525
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
Anyone doing both Oceanside and Tahoe this year?  Looking for cycling buddies in northern california!!!!

Edited by Joetrujillo1978 2013-03-06 1:00 PM


2013-03-06 1:11 PM
in reply to: #4648604

User image

Member
96
252525
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

blackorcutt - 2013-03-06 9:37 AM Hey guys does anyone know the category climbs on this course? roughly?

 

I looked at my strava from last years race and the first 2 climbs are cat 4.  The first one is a bit steep but both climbs are nothing to worry about.  You will see people walking up the hills but they are very doable.  Don't sweat them.

2013-03-06 1:54 PM
in reply to: #4648812

User image

Member
45
25
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
Joetrujillo1978 - 2013-03-06 11:11 AM

blackorcutt - 2013-03-06 9:37 AM Hey guys does anyone know the category climbs on this course? roughly?

 

I looked at my strava from last years race and the first 2 climbs are cat 4.  The first one is a bit steep but both climbs are nothing to worry about.  You will see people walking up the hills but they are very doable.  Don't sweat them.

 

Thanks, Ive been training on a couple of steep hills cat 5 & 4 (classified by mapmytri.com). I'M new to cycling so it worries me a bit but was wondering what they were. Ill make sure to enjoy them. D

2013-03-06 2:01 PM
in reply to: #4648592

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
101abp40 - 2013-03-06 9:26 AM

ChrisM - 2013-03-05 2:43 PM Someone confirmed on the other board with WTC that it's counterclockwise as usual

I cannot imagine how they would get a clockwise swim to work in the harbor.  Pushing the start waves out into the middle clears them from the swim waves coming into the boat ramp - having them tread water close to the dock would just be asking for a collision.

Suppose they could just swap the entry/exit boat ramps, enter the water on the ramp to the left, short(er) swim to start, exit on boat ramp to the right (facing the water).   But it's academic anyway

2013-03-06 2:03 PM
in reply to: #4648891

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
blackorcutt - 2013-03-06 11:54 AM
Joetrujillo1978 - 2013-03-06 11:11 AM

blackorcutt - 2013-03-06 9:37 AM Hey guys does anyone know the category climbs on this course? roughly?

 

I looked at my strava from last years race and the first 2 climbs are cat 4.  The first one is a bit steep but both climbs are nothing to worry about.  You will see people walking up the hills but they are very doable.  Don't sweat them.

 

Thanks, Ive been training on a couple of steep hills cat 5 & 4 (classified by mapmytri.com). I'M new to cycling so it worries me a bit but was wondering what they were. Ill make sure to enjoy them. D

I don't put a whole lot of stock on the cats given by Strava, etc.  But that said, I might have put hill #1 as a cat 3 simply due to steepness, but 4 makes sense since it's really short.

As for hills 2 and 3, I am surprised 2 is even a 4.  I'd say a 5.  #3 is nothing.  total elevation over 56 miles is something like 2500 feet.  It's not a hilly course IMO.  Unless, of course, you destroy your legs on the frontside

2013-03-06 3:45 PM
in reply to: #4648913

User image

Member
96
252525
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
ChrisM - 2013-03-06 12:03 PM
blackorcutt - 2013-03-06 11:54 AM
Joetrujillo1978 - 2013-03-06 11:11 AM

blackorcutt - 2013-03-06 9:37 AM Hey guys does anyone know the category climbs on this course? roughly?

 

I looked at my strava from last years race and the first 2 climbs are cat 4.  The first one is a bit steep but both climbs are nothing to worry about.  You will see people walking up the hills but they are very doable.  Don't sweat them.

[/QUOTE

 

Thanks, Ive been training on a couple of steep hills cat 5 & 4 (classified by mapmytri.com). I'M new to cycling so it worries me a bit but was wondering what they were. Ill make sure to enjoy them. D

I don't put a whole lot of stock on the cats given by Strava, etc.  But that said, I might have put hill #1 as a cat 3 simply due to steepness, but 4 makes sense since it's really short.

As for hills 2 and 3, I am surprised 2 is even a 4.  I'd say a 5.  #3 is nothing.  total elevation over 56 miles is something like 2500 feet.  It's not a hilly course IMO.  Unless, of course, you destroy your legs on the frontside

I agree with the CAt 3 for the first climb.  That thing is steep, but quick. I think its under 300' of climbing for the first hill. 



2013-03-06 4:27 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Member
347
10010010025
Scottsdale, AZ
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread
What is everyone's nutrition plan for the race?  I'm still tinkering with a couple different options on the bike but hope to have it locked down in the next 10 days.
2013-03-06 4:31 PM
in reply to: #4649168

User image

Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

devilfan02 - 2013-03-06 2:27 PM What is everyone's nutrition plan for the race?  I'm still tinkering with a couple different options on the bike but hope to have it locked down in the next 10 days.

Been thinking about it but good idea to write it down....

A.M.  Bagel and coffee on the walk to T1
Gel about 20 minutes before swim, water

bike - 1 three hour Infinit bottle in speedfil and water on downtube to be replaced at second aid station

run - this is always tricky for me and I end up just taking stuff on the fly.....  need to work it out.  Before I've done a gel every 3d aid station, water and gatorade at every station, add coke 2/3 of the way through.  But it's not scientific.

2013-03-06 4:35 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Master
6595
50001000500252525
Rio Rancho, NM
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

I haven't figured out breakfast, always an issue when I travel for a race.

I'm doing Honey Stinger Waffles and gels on the bike, with water and PowerBar Perform (just tried it within the last few days).

On the run I'll do gels or chomps off the course, water and Perform as tolerated and coke if needed.

2013-03-06 5:02 PM
in reply to: #4260416

User image

Member
347
10010010025
Scottsdale, AZ
Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread

Chris - How have you liked the Infinit?  That's what I've been training with and it seems to be great.  That said, I have two concerns that you may be able to expand on -

1) I feel like I should eat more solid food on the bike (Powerbar, Cliff Bar, etc).

2) Many have said that Infinit has too high a concentration of carbohydrates.  What's your thought on this?

New Thread
General Discussion Iron Distance Race Groups » Ironman 70.3 California : Official Thread Rss Feed  
 
 
of 16