Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Obama considering an executive order on gun control Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 12
 
 
2013-01-11 11:47 AM
in reply to: #4573934

User image

Champion
17756
50005000500020005001001002525
SoCal
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 9:45 AM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 8:22 AM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 8:16 AM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 7:49 AM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 8:48 AM

In CA to legally transfer a gun you have to take it to a FFL and they do a background check on the gun and person during a 10 day waiting period just as if you were buying a new gun.

Those are pretty strict controls.  Do you have any idea what the murder rate is in Ca.?  I'm asking.....I don't know.  I'd be willing to bet it is just as high or higher than places with minimum gun control.

I rounded these numbers.

California has about 37,700,000 peeps in it

Total murders 1,800 just under 5 per 100,000 Not sure but it seems a little high for the national avg.

Total with firearms 1,200 just over 3 per 100,000 seems pretty close to the national average.

If you watch the video it's higher population more crime and we have a lot of densely populated areas. This is not to prove a point just pointing out facts like in the video.

I was just pulling the data together for the state. I did see the video, actually I've watched it a couple of times.

Maybe, instead of of a magazine size we should limit the number of people in cities?

China does that and I'm not a big fan of government control be it guns, marriage, or in the bedroom



2013-01-11 12:03 PM
in reply to: #4573907

User image

Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 9:28 AM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 8:59 AM

Agree.....I was just curious what the numbers were.  The thing is, we have REALLY good data on deaths in this country.  And the UCR report on crime is done with a great deal of diligence, so the numbers are good there too. 

As the debate over gun control goes on, it's good to have these numbers......because the gun control crowd will play to emotion constantly.....it's really all they have.  There is no data that backs up their call for more gun control.....in fact, all of the hard data, and the trend in armed criminal acts, shows just the opposite of what the gun control crowd wants people to believe.

The entire country had pretty strict gun-control laws in the early 90's....and the majority of states did not allow CCW as well. Now almost every state allows CCW, gun-control laws have been loosened everywhere compared to what it was, and we have nearly 50% fewer homicides and violent crimes, with the number of these crimes dropping every year.  This is not emotion, this is a fact.

We need to help fix the problem that causes violence and so far we (the right) haven’t done much to help it. So far all we do is complain about what the left is trying to do and saying it won't work or will cause higher taxes. If we really want a better country along with our rights like the 2A both sides need to come together to find something that will be a starting point to help the social issues that contribute to violent crime.

One of the problems I've seen is the way minors are treated in the legal system, especially in big cities. Until they reach the age of 18 they are treated as a minor and while this "sounds" good it sets them up for a great sales pitch by drug dealer (and I'm sure other criminal enterprises) that they basically get a free pass if they are caught with or selling drugs for the adult. They will basically just get a slap on the wrist if the officer even bothers to book them due to their age. If they are convicted, most of those records are sealed for minors. This policy does nothing but invite a bad element to prey on our youth, especially in the inner cities.

I've asked this question a number of times but have yet to get an answer. How many school shooting occurred prior to them being made a "gun free zone" and how many after.

Anyone who thinks making a school a gun free zone does anything to keep criminals from committing crimes with firearms in the school is an idiot, void of logical thought. They do more harm than good.

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

2013-01-11 12:13 PM
in reply to: #4573939

User image

Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 9:47 AM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 9:45 AM

 

Maybe, instead of of a magazine size we should limit the number of people in cities?

China does that and I'm not a big fan of government control be it guns, marriage, or in the bedroom

After seeing this I'm not so sure, China may be on to something.

2013-01-11 1:07 PM
in reply to: #4573907

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 11:28 AM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 8:59 AM

Agree.....I was just curious what the numbers were.  The thing is, we have REALLY good data on deaths in this country.  And the UCR report on crime is done with a great deal of diligence, so the numbers are good there too. 

As the debate over gun control goes on, it's good to have these numbers......because the gun control crowd will play to emotion constantly.....it's really all they have.  There is no data that backs up their call for more gun control.....in fact, all of the hard data, and the trend in armed criminal acts, shows just the opposite of what the gun control crowd wants people to believe.

The entire country had pretty strict gun-control laws in the early 90's....and the majority of states did not allow CCW as well. Now almost every state allows CCW, gun-control laws have been loosened everywhere compared to what it was, and we have nearly 50% fewer homicides and violent crimes, with the number of these crimes dropping every year.  This is not emotion, this is a fact.

We need to help fix the problem that causes violence and so far we (the right) haven’t done much to help it. So far all we do is complain about what the left is trying to do and saying it won't work or will cause higher taxes. If we really want a better country along with our rights like the 2A both sides need to come together to find something that will be a starting point to help the social issues that contribute to violent crime.

I'm all in as soon as the other side gives up the irrational idea that more gun control will equal less death.......it's absolutely wrong and I'm not wasting a minute of my time helping anything that has to do with taking guns away.



Edited by Left Brain 2013-01-11 1:09 PM
2013-01-11 1:13 PM
in reply to: #4573966

User image

Champion
17756
50005000500020005001001002525
SoCal
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

2013-01-11 1:16 PM
in reply to: #4574128

User image

Champion
17756
50005000500020005001001002525
SoCal
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 11:07 AM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 11:28 AM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 8:59 AM

Agree.....I was just curious what the numbers were.  The thing is, we have REALLY good data on deaths in this country.  And the UCR report on crime is done with a great deal of diligence, so the numbers are good there too. 

As the debate over gun control goes on, it's good to have these numbers......because the gun control crowd will play to emotion constantly.....it's really all they have.  There is no data that backs up their call for more gun control.....in fact, all of the hard data, and the trend in armed criminal acts, shows just the opposite of what the gun control crowd wants people to believe.

The entire country had pretty strict gun-control laws in the early 90's....and the majority of states did not allow CCW as well. Now almost every state allows CCW, gun-control laws have been loosened everywhere compared to what it was, and we have nearly 50% fewer homicides and violent crimes, with the number of these crimes dropping every year.  This is not emotion, this is a fact.

We need to help fix the problem that causes violence and so far we (the right) haven’t done much to help it. So far all we do is complain about what the left is trying to do and saying it won't work or will cause higher taxes. If we really want a better country along with our rights like the 2A both sides need to come together to find something that will be a starting point to help the social issues that contribute to violent crime.

I'm all in as soon as the other side gives up the irrational idea that more gun control will equal less death.......it's absolutely wrong and I'm not wasting a minute of my time helping anything that has to do with taking guns away.

This sounds like my Kids. I tell my girl she needs to be nicer to her brother and she says he's never nice to me.



2013-01-11 1:20 PM
in reply to: #4574128

User image

Pro
3906
20001000500100100100100
St Charles, IL
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 1:07 PM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 11:28 AM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 8:59 AM

Agree.....I was just curious what the numbers were.  The thing is, we have REALLY good data on deaths in this country.  And the UCR report on crime is done with a great deal of diligence, so the numbers are good there too. 

As the debate over gun control goes on, it's good to have these numbers......because the gun control crowd will play to emotion constantly.....it's really all they have.  There is no data that backs up their call for more gun control.....in fact, all of the hard data, and the trend in armed criminal acts, shows just the opposite of what the gun control crowd wants people to believe.

The entire country had pretty strict gun-control laws in the early 90's....and the majority of states did not allow CCW as well. Now almost every state allows CCW, gun-control laws have been loosened everywhere compared to what it was, and we have nearly 50% fewer homicides and violent crimes, with the number of these crimes dropping every year.  This is not emotion, this is a fact.

We need to help fix the problem that causes violence and so far we (the right) haven’t done much to help it. So far all we do is complain about what the left is trying to do and saying it won't work or will cause higher taxes. If we really want a better country along with our rights like the 2A both sides need to come together to find something that will be a starting point to help the social issues that contribute to violent crime.

I'm all in as soon as the other side gives up the irrational idea that more gun control will equal less death.......it's absolutely wrong and I'm not wasting a minute of my time helping anything that has to do with taking guns away.

So as a hypothetical, there was a national registry, and a person is convicted of domestic violence, and the government was able to use the registry to confiscate the guns of the convict.   You believe that if that were able to be done that there would be zero impact on violent crime rates?

2013-01-11 1:26 PM
in reply to: #4574144

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
coredump - 2013-01-11 2:20 PM

So as a hypothetical, there was a national registry, and a person is convicted of domestic violence, and the government was able to use the registry to confiscate the guns of the convict.   You believe that if that were able to be done that there would be zero impact on violent crime rates?

Just to clarify, I assume you mean the "registered guns" of the convict.

 



Edited by Goosedog 2013-01-11 1:26 PM
2013-01-11 2:30 PM
in reply to: #4574144

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
coredump - 2013-01-11 1:20 PM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 1:07 PM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 11:28 AM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 8:59 AM

Agree.....I was just curious what the numbers were.  The thing is, we have REALLY good data on deaths in this country.  And the UCR report on crime is done with a great deal of diligence, so the numbers are good there too. 

As the debate over gun control goes on, it's good to have these numbers......because the gun control crowd will play to emotion constantly.....it's really all they have.  There is no data that backs up their call for more gun control.....in fact, all of the hard data, and the trend in armed criminal acts, shows just the opposite of what the gun control crowd wants people to believe.

The entire country had pretty strict gun-control laws in the early 90's....and the majority of states did not allow CCW as well. Now almost every state allows CCW, gun-control laws have been loosened everywhere compared to what it was, and we have nearly 50% fewer homicides and violent crimes, with the number of these crimes dropping every year.  This is not emotion, this is a fact.

We need to help fix the problem that causes violence and so far we (the right) haven’t done much to help it. So far all we do is complain about what the left is trying to do and saying it won't work or will cause higher taxes. If we really want a better country along with our rights like the 2A both sides need to come together to find something that will be a starting point to help the social issues that contribute to violent crime.

I'm all in as soon as the other side gives up the irrational idea that more gun control will equal less death.......it's absolutely wrong and I'm not wasting a minute of my time helping anything that has to do with taking guns away.

So as a hypothetical, there was a national registry, and a person is convicted of domestic violence, and the government was able to use the registry to confiscate the guns of the convict.   You believe that if that were able to be done that there would be zero impact on violent crime rates?

That's not gun control for law abiding citizens, that's taking guns from criminalss.  Of course that's a good idea....which is why almost every state in the country takes guns from people who have orders of protection filed against them.  That's the type of law that can have an impact.  If you want to make it a federal offense.....fine with me, it's another tool for us to deal with violent people.

All this talk about magazine capacity, assault rifles, etc. is just garbage and "feel good" legislation.  Concentrate on PEOPLE who shouldn't have guns....not the guns.

2013-01-11 2:32 PM
in reply to: #4570405

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control

Interesting...

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-signs-law-giving-himself-bush-lifetime-secret-184305122--politics.html

But if they get rid of assault rifles I would assume they'd roll back this protection then right?

(for the record I don't have an issue with this but it could be seen as hypocritical.)

2013-01-11 3:15 PM
in reply to: #4574249

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 2:30 PM

coredump - 2013-01-11 1:20 PM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 1:07 PM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 11:28 AM
Left Brain - 2013-01-11 8:59 AM

Agree.....I was just curious what the numbers were.  The thing is, we have REALLY good data on deaths in this country.  And the UCR report on crime is done with a great deal of diligence, so the numbers are good there too. 

As the debate over gun control goes on, it's good to have these numbers......because the gun control crowd will play to emotion constantly.....it's really all they have.  There is no data that backs up their call for more gun control.....in fact, all of the hard data, and the trend in armed criminal acts, shows just the opposite of what the gun control crowd wants people to believe.

The entire country had pretty strict gun-control laws in the early 90's....and the majority of states did not allow CCW as well. Now almost every state allows CCW, gun-control laws have been loosened everywhere compared to what it was, and we have nearly 50% fewer homicides and violent crimes, with the number of these crimes dropping every year.  This is not emotion, this is a fact.

We need to help fix the problem that causes violence and so far we (the right) haven’t done much to help it. So far all we do is complain about what the left is trying to do and saying it won't work or will cause higher taxes. If we really want a better country along with our rights like the 2A both sides need to come together to find something that will be a starting point to help the social issues that contribute to violent crime.

I'm all in as soon as the other side gives up the irrational idea that more gun control will equal less death.......it's absolutely wrong and I'm not wasting a minute of my time helping anything that has to do with taking guns away.

So as a hypothetical, there was a national registry, and a person is convicted of domestic violence, and the government was able to use the registry to confiscate the guns of the convict.   You believe that if that were able to be done that there would be zero impact on violent crime rates?

That's not gun control for law abiding citizens, that's taking guns from criminalss.  Of course that's a good idea....which is why almost every state in the country takes guns from people who have orders of protection filed against them.  That's the type of law that can have an impact.  If you want to make it a federal offense.....fine with me, it's another tool for us to deal with violent people.

All this talk about magazine capacity, assault rifles, etc. is just garbage and "feel good" legislation.  Concentrate on PEOPLE who shouldn't have guns....not the guns.



Agreed. Sadly it's not difficult for felons to get their guns back after being released from prison.


2013-01-11 3:17 PM
in reply to: #4574133

User image

Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 11:13 AM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

Here was one thing I suggested. Maybe you missed it?

"One of the problems I've seen is the way minors are treated in the legal system, especially in big cities. Until they reach the age of 18 they are treated as a minor and while this "sounds" good it sets them up for a great sales pitch by drug dealer (and I'm sure other criminal enterprises) that they basically get a free pass if they are caught with or selling drugs for the adult. They will basically just get a slap on the wrist if the officer even bothers to book them due to their age. If they are convicted, most of those records are sealed for minors. This policy does nothing but invite a bad element to prey on our youth, especially in the inner cities."

2013-01-11 3:18 PM
in reply to: #4574330

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control

mr2tony - 2013-01-11 1:15 PM Agreed. Sadly it's not difficult for felons to get their guns back after being released from prison.

It's super easy to get an unregistered gun...  Cheaper than getting one from a dealer and less hassle probably.  Just depends on who your friends are and where you roll.

I grew up in a less than desirable neighborhood.  I could get one for a couple hundred bucks just my asking around.

2013-01-11 3:32 PM
in reply to: #4574339

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Kido - 2013-01-11 3:18 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-11 1:15 PM Agreed. Sadly it's not difficult for felons to get their guns back after being released from prison.

It's super easy to get an unregistered gun...  Cheaper than getting one from a dealer and less hassle probably.  Just depends on who your friends are and where you roll.

I grew up in a less than desirable neighborhood.  I could get one for a couple hundred bucks just my asking around.



Why ask around and pay if you can just get your old guns back for free? Felons who have guns, then commit crimes, go to prison and then get out, can lobby to get their guns back and in many cases are successful. They don't need to buy new guns, they just get their old guns back from wherever they're stored and they're again legally carrying despite the felony conviction of a violent crime.
2013-01-11 3:39 PM
in reply to: #4574372

User image

Elite
4435
2000200010010010010025
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
mr2tony - 2013-01-12 8:32 AM
Kido - 2013-01-11 3:18 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-11 1:15 PM Agreed. Sadly it's not difficult for felons to get their guns back after being released from prison.

It's super easy to get an unregistered gun...  Cheaper than getting one from a dealer and less hassle probably.  Just depends on who your friends are and where you roll.

I grew up in a less than desirable neighborhood.  I could get one for a couple hundred bucks just my asking around.

Why ask around and pay if you can just get your old guns back for free? Felons who have guns, then commit crimes, go to prison and then get out, can lobby to get their guns back and in many cases are successful. They don't need to buy new guns, they just get their old guns back from wherever they're stored and they're again legally carrying despite the felony conviction of a violent crime.
Then that's a law to be looked at - if you've been convicted of a felony with a firearm ever you give up your constitutional right to hear arms legally. Sure they will still get guns but....
2013-01-11 3:44 PM
in reply to: #4574372

User image

Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
mr2tony - 2013-01-11 1:32 PM
Kido - 2013-01-11 3:18 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-11 1:15 PM Agreed. Sadly it's not difficult for felons to get their guns back after being released from prison.

It's super easy to get an unregistered gun...  Cheaper than getting one from a dealer and less hassle probably.  Just depends on who your friends are and where you roll.

I grew up in a less than desirable neighborhood.  I could get one for a couple hundred bucks just my asking around.

Why ask around and pay if you can just get your old guns back for free? Felons who have guns, then commit crimes, go to prison and then get out, can lobby to get their guns back and in many cases are successful. They don't need to buy new guns, they just get their old guns back from wherever they're stored and they're again legally carrying despite the felony conviction of a violent crime.

I agree this should not be allowed to happen.

I'm going off of memory on what I'm going to say based on a history/documentary about the two guys in California who had fully auto AK's and hand guns that robbed a Bank of America and got into a firefight with LEO's that lasted for a long time, the Bad Guys had body armor and were truly in charge of the battlefield firing off thousands of rounds before they were taken down. In the story I recall that their attorney prior to this incident who was defending them for some other action petitioned the courts to get their guns back, (the ones used in the Band of America robbery) so they could sell them to pay their lawyer. 

The above, just seems like common sense NOT to let them have those firearms back.



2013-01-11 3:45 PM
in reply to: #4574392

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
jobaxas - 2013-01-11 3:39 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-12 8:32 AM
Kido - 2013-01-11 3:18 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-11 1:15 PM Agreed. Sadly it's not difficult for felons to get their guns back after being released from prison.

It's super easy to get an unregistered gun...  Cheaper than getting one from a dealer and less hassle probably.  Just depends on who your friends are and where you roll.

I grew up in a less than desirable neighborhood.  I could get one for a couple hundred bucks just my asking around.

Why ask around and pay if you can just get your old guns back for free? Felons who have guns, then commit crimes, go to prison and then get out, can lobby to get their guns back and in many cases are successful. They don't need to buy new guns, they just get their old guns back from wherever they're stored and they're again legally carrying despite the felony conviction of a violent crime.
Then that's a law to be looked at - if you've been convicted of a felony with a firearm ever you give up your constitutional right to hear arms legally. Sure they will still get guns but....


Exactly, they may get one but the government shouldn't allow it. At least make them work for it a little!!!
2013-01-11 4:11 PM
in reply to: #4574372

User image

Expert
3126
2000100010025
Boise, ID
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
mr2tony - 2013-01-11 2:32 PM
Kido - 2013-01-11 3:18 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-11 1:15 PM Agreed. Sadly it's not difficult for felons to get their guns back after being released from prison.

It's super easy to get an unregistered gun...  Cheaper than getting one from a dealer and less hassle probably.  Just depends on who your friends are and where you roll.

I grew up in a less than desirable neighborhood.  I could get one for a couple hundred bucks just my asking around.

Why ask around and pay if you can just get your old guns back for free? Felons who have guns, then commit crimes, go to prison and then get out, can lobby to get their guns back and in many cases are successful. They don't need to buy new guns, they just get their old guns back from wherever they're stored and they're again legally carrying despite the felony conviction of a violent crime.

So now you are arguing for Judge Control?

2013-01-11 6:29 PM
in reply to: #4574133

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 12:13 PM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again...legalize all drugs and stop funding criminal enterprises with billions of dollars. Not because getting cocaine and heroin legally is a good idea... it's because criminalization is a much much worse idea for society. There are already those addicted now, but why fund gangs and cartels?

Now as a society.. if we say, no, that is not the solution.... and the thousands and thousands of homicides attached to it including the innocent caught in the crossfire are acceptable... then stop telling me as a law abiding citizen that I have to give up my rights fro that. Stop telling me you care about "gun violence".

2013-01-11 6:51 PM
in reply to: #4574592

User image

Elite
4435
2000200010010010010025
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
powerman - 2013-01-12 11:29 AM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 12:13 PM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again...legalize all drugs and stop funding criminal enterprises with billions of dollars. Not because getting cocaine and heroin legally is a good idea... it's because criminalization is a much much worse idea for society. There are already those addicted now, but why fund gangs and cartels?

Now as a society.. if we say, no, that is not the solution.... and the thousands and thousands of homicides attached to it including the innocent caught in the crossfire are acceptable... then stop telling me as a law abiding citizen that I have to give up my rights fro that. Stop telling me you care about "gun violence".

. Really isn't everyone just after "stop the bad guys killing the good and the innocent". Stop bad guys having guns but allow good guys to defend themselves because the bad guys already have guns.
2013-01-11 7:47 PM
in reply to: #4574607

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
jobaxas - 2013-01-11 5:51 PM
powerman - 2013-01-12 11:29 AM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 12:13 PM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again...legalize all drugs and stop funding criminal enterprises with billions of dollars. Not because getting cocaine and heroin legally is a good idea... it's because criminalization is a much much worse idea for society. There are already those addicted now, but why fund gangs and cartels?

Now as a society.. if we say, no, that is not the solution.... and the thousands and thousands of homicides attached to it including the innocent caught in the crossfire are acceptable... then stop telling me as a law abiding citizen that I have to give up my rights fro that. Stop telling me you care about "gun violence".

. Really isn't everyone just after "stop the bad guys killing the good and the innocent". Stop bad guys having guns but allow good guys to defend themselves because the bad guys already have guns.

That's really it.. what sane reasonable person would not want to keep guns out of the hands of bad guys. I think I am pretty sane and reasonable, and a long time ago, I had no problem with "common sense" gun control. Who would be against that... but when you really look at it, there is no way to do that with out restricting the good guys.

Laws do not prevent crimes. PERIOD. End of discussion. If you are the type of person that says gee... I better not do that because I do not want to get in trouble and risk my freedom.... then you are not the type of person that is going to be a criminal. Criminals have no sense of consequence, and don't give a crap. They will do what they want and just try to stop them. So the only people gun control effects... are those that say, gee, I do not want to risk my liberties so I am going to follow those rules.... the people that ARE NOT the problem.

There is no way possible to keep guns IN the hands of the good, and keep them OUT of the hands that are bad. The only way possible is to keep them out of everyone's hands... but that is not 100% effective, and the way the Constitution is currently written, isn't Constitutional.



2013-01-11 7:51 PM
in reply to: #4574650

User image

Elite
4435
2000200010010010010025
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
powerman - 2013-01-12 12:47 PM
jobaxas - 2013-01-11 5:51 PM
powerman - 2013-01-12 11:29 AM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 12:13 PM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again...legalize all drugs and stop funding criminal enterprises with billions of dollars. Not because getting cocaine and heroin legally is a good idea... it's because criminalization is a much much worse idea for society. There are already those addicted now, but why fund gangs and cartels?

Now as a society.. if we say, no, that is not the solution.... and the thousands and thousands of homicides attached to it including the innocent caught in the crossfire are acceptable... then stop telling me as a law abiding citizen that I have to give up my rights fro that. Stop telling me you care about "gun violence".

. Really isn't everyone just after "stop the bad guys killing the good and the innocent". Stop bad guys having guns but allow good guys to defend themselves because the bad guys already have guns.

That's really it.. what sane reasonable person would not want to keep guns out of the hands of bad guys. I think I am pretty sane and reasonable, and a long time ago, I had no problem with "common sense" gun control. Who would be against that... but when you really look at it, there is no way to do that with out restricting the good guys.

Laws do not prevent crimes. PERIOD. End of discussion. If you are the type of person that says gee... I better not do that because I do not want to get in trouble and risk my freedom.... then you are not the type of person that is going to be a criminal. Criminals have no sense of consequence, and don't give a crap. They will do what they want and just try to stop them. So the only people gun control effects... are those that say, gee, I do not want to risk my liberties so I am going to follow those rules.... the people that ARE NOT the problem.

There is no way possible to keep guns IN the hands of the good, and keep them OUT of the hands that are bad. The only way possible is to keep them out of everyone's hands... but that is not 100% effective, and the way the Constitution is currently written, isn't Constitutional.

and quite honestly it can't happen the guns are in everyone's hands now. If you were to have a gun amnesty where everyone hands over their guns and just say all law a icing citizens did that the bad guys wouldn't. So then you have bad guys armed with only law enforcement to protect you and I'm sure they are pretty stretched already. It's not the answer when a country already has that many guns. Next?!

Edited by jobaxas 2013-01-11 7:52 PM
2013-01-11 7:58 PM
in reply to: #4574133

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 12:13 PM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

So then BA, what is your measure for success? Zero crime? I'm being serious. The stats show that violent crimes have dropped 50% in 20 years. We must be doing something right. I'm not going to say it is because we have more guns... but it is absolutely false that gun control as been a factor because we have more guns and less control than ever.

So if we could identifiy what those things are and focus our attention on them maybe we could drop in another 50%. Which is great.... but at the end of the day, there is just going to be those that will not follow the rules. And they will get what they want at the expense of another. By the stats, we are actually doing better than other countries. Our violent crime rates are lower. I'm just not sure if we have got as good as we can, or if there is more room for improvement.

2013-01-11 8:13 PM
in reply to: #4574661

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
powerman - 2013-01-11 8:58 PM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 12:13 PM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

So then BA, what is your measure for success? Zero crime? I'm being serious. The stats show that violent crimes have dropped 50% in 20 years. We must be doing something right. I'm not going to say it is because we have more guns... but it is absolutely false that gun control as been a factor because we have more guns and less control than ever.

So if we could identifiy what those things are and focus our attention on them maybe we could drop in another 50%. Which is great.... but at the end of the day, there is just going to be those that will not follow the rules. And they will get what they want at the expense of another. By the stats, we are actually doing better than other countries. Our violent crime rates are lower. I'm just not sure if we have got as good as we can, or if there is more room for improvement.

One of the huge factors is simply demographics. The cohort of people who generally commit violent crimes, young males, has grown smaller as successive generations after the baby boom have gotten smaller.

2013-01-11 8:41 PM
in reply to: #4574674

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Obama considering an executive order on gun control
trinnas - 2013-01-11 7:13 PM
powerman - 2013-01-11 8:58 PM
Big Appa - 2013-01-11 12:13 PM
crusevegas - 2013-01-11 10:03 AM

BA, you said the right is doing nothing and I disagree with your assessment, crime in the USA has been steadily dropping since 1992 and gun ownership and people carrying firearms is up.

Countries where they have confiscated firearms show an increase in violent crime after the citizens are disarmed.

Here is some info that I have tried to find and have not been able to come up with and I think it's a big failure on those investigating the "problem" and the media. What medications were they on the years prior to the incident and what was their exposure to firearms in their childhood?

In addition I believe those who have taken the life of an animal, skinned it, removed it's intestines and other organs and consumed it as food have a higher respect for life than those that think meat is just something that comes from the grocery store. To throw meat away is to disrespect the life of that animal, be it a wild animal or a domestic one.

That does not address my post of what causes the crime in the first place and that does not improve our nation. I am all for the 2A and for open carry but I don't see that as a valid lasting deterrent because there is still crime. We need to address what is causing the crime in the first place and that is what we as a nation are failing at. We are looking at the end result of no guns or more guns but let’s fix the poverty and broken families in a way that makes the left and right happy. I know this is a farfetched thing to hope for but if we are truly an evolved nation I think if we try we can improve. If we do we won't have to worry about the left trying to take away our firearms.

So then BA, what is your measure for success? Zero crime? I'm being serious. The stats show that violent crimes have dropped 50% in 20 years. We must be doing something right. I'm not going to say it is because we have more guns... but it is absolutely false that gun control as been a factor because we have more guns and less control than ever.

So if we could identifiy what those things are and focus our attention on them maybe we could drop in another 50%. Which is great.... but at the end of the day, there is just going to be those that will not follow the rules. And they will get what they want at the expense of another. By the stats, we are actually doing better than other countries. Our violent crime rates are lower. I'm just not sure if we have got as good as we can, or if there is more room for improvement.

One of the huge factors is simply demographics. The cohort of people who generally commit violent crimes, young males, has grown smaller as successive generations after the baby boom have gotten smaller.

That's interesting.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Obama considering an executive order on gun control Rss Feed  
 
 
of 12