Trainer Road FTP testing
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
2012-02-21 10:22 AM |
Veteran 275 Algonquin, IL | Subject: Trainer Road FTP testing So I finished my 6 week base program on Trainer Road (in 7 weeks due to schedule) and retested last night. My FTP went from 216 to 220 using the 8 minute test. I was bit disappointed as I felt I worked really hard, although the base program does say it’s more about aerobic and form development. On a better note, my cadence during the retest held at 96 for both 8 minute intervals putting out a bit more power than the baseline test, where my cadence was 88. I really did learn a lot about cadence and gearing on my bike during the base. Before, I was a “masher” which is probably why I fade on my runs. My question is did I do the testing correctly? The first time, TR set my target watts at 229 for the 8 minute intervals and I did 238/244 and was choppy. Last night, my target was 248 and I did 243/247 and it was definitely smoother. When testing, should I be going as high above target as possible while still able to complete the test? I love TR but I got used to doing rides and following the targeted power levels so last night I was more worried about matching the 248 number than going all out. Felt I had some more in the tank. |
|
2012-02-21 10:40 AM in reply to: #4058198 |
Pro 4528 Norwalk, Connecticut | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing when you get done with your test, you should wanna throw your bike out the window and hope a semi runs it over. if you still love your bike, you coulda went harder. So yes, you should be pushing as hard as you can for all 8 minutes and should be ready to crash hard at the end. FTP is designed to give you a target for your training, so if your FTP is too low, your training will be too easy, i personally don't think your FTP can be too high. here is a link to the 20min test i did last Thursday http://www.trainerroad.com/cycling/rides/28460 as you can see, i was higher than their prescribed level, and still had a little sprint at the end, i wanted to cut my bike up with a hacksaw when i was done, lol
|
2012-02-21 10:56 AM in reply to: #4058198 |
11 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing I just went through this not too long ago myself, and learned a few things. The virtual power can be affected by seemingly little things like your tire pressure, how tight the trainer is to your tire, etc. The guys at TrainerRoad talk about it here: http://www.trainerroad.com/virtual-power. I actually ended up buying a digital tire pressure gauge so I can ensure I'm always consistent with my setup. I thought I was, but it's amazing how much just a little bit of lost air when removing the pump from the tire can drop the tire pressure. I also ensure that I tighten the trainer down the same every time and always tighten it down in the same place on the tire (I just use the stem as my reference point). I hope that helps! |
2012-02-21 11:27 AM in reply to: #4058198 |
Member 194 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing cartman1966 - 2012-02-21 8:22 AM So I finished my 6 week base program on Trainer Road (in 7 weeks due to schedule) and retested last night. My FTP went from 216 to 220 using the 8 minute test. I was bit disappointed as I felt I worked really hard, although the base program does say it’s more about aerobic and form development. On a better note, my cadence during the retest held at 96 for both 8 minute intervals putting out a bit more power than the baseline test, where my cadence was 88. I really did learn a lot about cadence and gearing on my bike during the base. Before, I was a “masher” which is probably why I fade on my runs. My question is did I do the testing correctly? The first time, TR set my target watts at 229 for the 8 minute intervals and I did 238/244 and was choppy. Last night, my target was 248 and I did 243/247 and it was definitely smoother. When testing, should I be going as high above target as possible while still able to complete the test? I love TR but I got used to doing rides and following the targeted power levels so last night I was more worried about matching the 248 number than going all out. Felt I had some more in the tank. Yes, you should be going as hard as possible. Those lines are kind of a minimum during the tests. You might want to give it a day's rest and try the test again. |
2012-02-21 11:51 AM in reply to: #4058198 |
Champion 7136 Knoxville area | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing I guess my biggest question is... what lead you to believe that "being a masher" killed your run? I would assume bike (and run) fitness is what killed your run...
... just saying, when I do a FTP test, I certainly can't keep close to a 100rpm cadence and hit my peak power... but ymmv. |
2012-02-21 12:05 PM in reply to: #4058198 |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing cartman1966 - 2012-02-21 11:22 AM So I finished my 6 week base program on Trainer Road (in 7 weeks due to schedule) and retested last night. My FTP went from 216 to 220 using the 8 minute test. I was bit disappointed as I felt I worked really hard, although the base program does say it’s more about aerobic and form development. On a better note, my cadence during the retest held at 96 for both 8 minute intervals putting out a bit more power than the baseline test, where my cadence was 88. I really did learn a lot about cadence and gearing on my bike during the base. Before, I was a “masher” which is probably why I fade on my runs. My question is did I do the testing correctly? The first time, TR set my target watts at 229 for the 8 minute intervals and I did 238/244 and was choppy. Last night, my target was 248 and I did 243/247 and it was definitely smoother. When testing, should I be going as high above target as possible while still able to complete the test? I love TR but I got used to doing rides and following the targeted power levels so last night I was more worried about matching the 248 number than going all out. Felt I had some more in the tank. Yes, it's all-out 100% effort that can be sustained for the test. But keep in mind if you are doing the 8 minute test your power is supposed to be within 10% for both tests or you didn't pace right. Last FTP test I did was about 2 weeks ago and I felt like I didn't have another 15 seconds left in me at the end. I just about fell off the bike when it was over. |
|
2012-02-21 12:17 PM in reply to: #4058198 |
Veteran 275 Algonquin, IL | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing Thanks all. I know about tire pressure/trainer tension which I check before each ride. My issue seems to lie with being a novice biker. TR has helped me greatly this offseason as before, I would go downstairs and just pedal away with no structure. I honestly did not know what 6x8' @90% FTP meant until I could see it graphically in TR. I became a slave to matching the suggested power displayed in the GUI so that's what I did last night. I knew it was wrong but I couldn't help my self. Looks like another FTP test is in order! To explain my "masher" comment, before I really learned about cadence/gearing/power, I would slip into the biggest gear I could push to reach my power levels, even if my cadence was only 60-70. Now I can hold 90+ on cadence and meet power targets and my legs feel "fresher". This past Saturday, I did 1.5 hours on TR (Beacon), then went out and did a fast (for me) 3.4 mile run. In the past, my legs would have been cooked. I can always improve bike/run fitness. |
2012-02-21 12:24 PM in reply to: #4058464 |
Member 194 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing Cadence is a personal thing. If you feel better at 96 RPM then you'll probably perform better. Some guys have high cadence, some have low. Chrissie does like 80-85 and she does OK . I think Crowie is around 90+ and he does OK . It's good to try a bunch of difference cadences and see how you perform/feel/run on all of them. Sounds like Cartman just feels better at a higher cadence. I certainly do. |
2012-02-25 10:42 AM in reply to: #4058198 |
Veteran 275 Algonquin, IL | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing Bump.Did the FTP test again today and kicked its a$$. Thanks for the advice everyone. I again am most happy I held 95 and 96 for my cadence during the 8 minute tests. You are the man Nate! Beginning FTP = 216 6 week early base program New FTP = 251 http://www.trainerroad.com/cycling/rides/31880 Edited by cartman1966 2012-02-25 11:12 AM |
2012-02-25 10:57 AM in reply to: #4058396 |
Master 1793 Essex Jct, VT | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing Leegoocrap - 2012-02-21 12:51 PM
... just saying, when I do a FTP test, I certainly can't keep close to a 100rpm cadence and hit my peak power... but ymmv. x2 To get max power for my tests my cadence usually dips to 85-86 rpm. I burn out if my cadence is too high, and just can't push those extra watts out. |
2012-02-25 12:26 PM in reply to: #4058233 |
Veteran 186 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing Rudedog55 - 2012-02-21 11:40 AM when you get done with your test, you should wanna throw your bike out the window and hope a semi runs it over. if you still love your bike, you coulda went harder. So yes, you should be pushing as hard as you can for all 8 minutes and should be ready to crash hard at the end. FTP is designed to give you a target for your training, so if your FTP is too low, your training will be too easy, i personally don't think your FTP can be too high. here is a link to the 20min test i did last Thursday http://www.trainerroad.com/cycling/rides/28460 as you can see, i was higher than their prescribed level, and still had a little sprint at the end, i wanted to cut my bike up with a hacksaw when i was done, lol
Rude, you still had enough energy to want to hacksaw your bike and throw it out of a window? You didn't go hard enough. ;-) OP: Congrats on the big improvements. Some of it may be familiarity with the testing and knowing your limits better, but it also shows that hard work and training unlocks potential. Sometimes it's scary what we're capable of. -J |
|
2012-02-25 2:35 PM in reply to: #4065963 |
Member 194 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing Holy $h%t!! That's a HUGE improvement, way to go! Don't expect gains like that every FTP test. I'm glad if I go up 5-10 watts! . If you made gains like that every time you'd be on Garmin-Cervelo in no time. Way to go man! We just show you some numbers, you did all the hard work! Can't wait to see how this translates into bike spit times in your races this year. You'll have to keep us updated. |
2012-02-25 4:00 PM in reply to: #4058485 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-02-25 4:34 PM in reply to: #4058198 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing Crowie (and a number of pros) seem to be 80-85ish as well. Off-hand, I can think of a long-course one who is higher, but I'm sure someone does. |
2012-02-25 7:28 PM in reply to: #4066188 |
Veteran 275 Algonquin, IL | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing npearson99 - 2012-02-25 2:35 PM Holy $h%t!! That's a HUGE improvement, way to go! Don't expect gains like that every FTP test. I'm glad if I go up 5-10 watts! . If you made gains like that every time you'd be on Garmin-Cervelo in no time. Way to go man! We just show you some numbers, you did all the hard work! Can't wait to see how this translates into bike spit times in your races this year. You'll have to keep us updated. Oh I won't. I think karlaj brought up a good point that familiarity probably played a part too. My initial FTP might have been low since I am new to training with power. I am just glad my work paid off with a measureable gain. My reward is now the workouts get harder. |
2012-02-25 7:30 PM in reply to: #4066290 |
Member 194 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing I wonder what Lance will ride at when he does Kona this year. (I say "when" because I believe he will qualify). Will he stick with his normal high TT cadence or do something lower? Fun stuff to think about . |
|
2012-02-25 11:33 PM in reply to: #4066434 |
Veteran 186 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing cartman1966 - 2012-02-25 8:28 PM My reward is now the workouts get harder. Bingo. You earned the right to train harder. That new FTP will slap you around for a few weeks, but man, you're going to be a beast come summertime. j |
2012-02-26 12:52 AM in reply to: #4058198 |
Pro 5361 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing The TR workouts are terrific. I'm no expert on cycling training and building a base, but it seems to me that the TR basic plan, which has just 3 workouts per week, with a rest day between each one and a total of only 3:30 per week- is woefully insignificant in volume. I find that nearly all of their individual workouts are terrific. At least the one's I've done; but it wouldn't hurt to add some long 3-4 hr rides and more sustained 85-95% LT effort to those 3 interval sessions. no? |
2012-02-26 9:45 AM in reply to: #4066635 |
Veteran 186 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing morey000 - 2012-02-26 1:52 AM The TR workouts are terrific. I'm no expert on cycling training and building a base, but it seems to me that the TR basic plan, which has just 3 workouts per week, with a rest day between each one and a total of only 3:30 per week- is woefully insignificant in volume. I find that nearly all of their individual workouts are terrific. At least the one's I've done; but it wouldn't hurt to add some long 3-4 hr rides and more sustained 85-95% LT effort to those 3 interval sessions. no? Morey, no doubt some 3-4 hr sweetspot sessions would boost fitness. I don't think any of the programs say "do this and only this", so if you can handle big hrs/wk on the bike, go get 'em tiger. But I think those programs are designed for the beginner-novice. Alot of folks do 3 rides a week, and this gets them good TSS for those 3 rides (somewhere in the 220-300/wk range). But if you find volume to be specifically limiting, why? I don't really agree/disagree, just wondering the context for your argument. -J |
2012-02-26 10:04 AM in reply to: #4066635 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-02-26 10:25 AM in reply to: #4058198 |
Veteran 523 East Greenbush | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing I am just starting trainer road this week. I plan to do the 3 workouts from trainer road and then the long ride according to my training plan. In other words Ill be on the trainer doing the trainer road workouts instead of the workouts prescibed by my plan and the the 4th ride will be my long ride which will on the trainer until the weather gets nice. Once the weather gets nice it will be outdoors. |
|
2012-02-26 11:34 AM in reply to: #4066635 |
Member 194 | Subject: RE: Trainer Road FTP testing morey000 - 2012-02-25 10:52 PM The TR workouts are terrific. I'm no expert on cycling training and building a base, but it seems to me that the TR basic plan, which has just 3 workouts per week, with a rest day between each one and a total of only 3:30 per week- is woefully insignificant in volume. I find that nearly all of their individual workouts are terrific. At least the one's I've done; but it wouldn't hurt to add some long 3-4 hr rides and more sustained 85-95% LT effort to those 3 interval sessions. no? It all depends on your fitness level and experience. Check out this blog post from our coach Chad. http://blog.trainerroad.com/ask-chad-volume-in-training-plans/ We also realize that we need a wider array of training plans. We just added 15 new workouts this weekend that will be part of our Advanced Build plan. That's a new plan with 6 hours a week of structured intervals. We also have some options to tack on extra work. We'll be looking to fill out our entire library with beginner/intermediate/advanced plans along with some specific ones like Crit and cyclecross. Edited by npearson99 2012-02-26 11:36 AM |