Subject: RE: Sexual Intercourse While Swinging From A Motel Chandelier: Employer Held Liable For InjuriesOriginally posted by jmk-brooklyn
I'm not surprised. WC is really lenient in the US as well. Basically, if you are injured at work (or traveling for work), short of intentionally injuring yourself, the injury will be covered under WC.
It seems outrageous, esp in cases like this, but the reality is that the law is intentionally set up to be as broad and lenient as possible and both sides are protected as a result. Employees don't have to worry about having to prove that their injury wasn't the result of their own or someone else's negligence, and employers don't have to worry about being sued for millions of dollars every time a worker drops a box on their toe. By having WC set up as the exclusive remedy, and also setting the bar really low in terms of the standard for paying outs WC claims keeps work-related injuries out of civil courts and saves everyone money.
Having said that, she should have claimed she was doing chin-ups or something.
oh so not true. I have cases that I have documented for patients that employer and insurer still fight - most recent:
patient works for consulting firm, away on a case - they are working so hard then rushing to airport - no time to eat etc - she faints (from dehydration low blood sugar etc ) hits head and gets concussion (all documented by ER ) comes home has post concussion issues and we are STILL fighting to get her paid for that time (she is not looking to have anything other than medical and lost wages paid )
|