How important is it??
-
No new posts
| Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
2008-10-29 9:23 PM |
Pro 4828![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The Land of Ice and Snow | Subject: How important is it??I'm wondering how important high intensity speedwork stuff is. I'm doing my first HIM next summer and will get coaching for it, but just wondered about this. I know I will never podium, really just want to finish strong. If one just wants to finish is it really necessary to put in a lot of intense zone 4 and 5 stuff?? Or is it enough to put in the time and distance? Can you guess that I'm a zone 2 kinda gal?? |
|
2008-10-29 9:35 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
2008-10-29 9:39 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
Sneaky Slow 8694![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Herndon, VA, | Subject: RE: How important is it??aquagirl - 2008-10-29 10:23 PM If one just wants to finish is it really necessary to put in a lot of intense zone 4 and 5 stuff?? Or is it enough to put in the time and distance? I finished my first HIM this year in my goal of sub-6, and I did exactly zero intense zone 4 and 5 stuff, outside of races. |
2008-10-29 9:44 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
Extreme Veteran 662![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Sunny San Diego | Subject: RE: How important is it??If you can do one race a month while you're training for your HIM that should be sufficient zone 4/5 training for you. |
2008-10-29 9:46 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
Extreme Veteran 518![]() Sault Ste. Marie | Subject: RE: How important is it??give as hard as you can...... make it hurt!! Intervals, and high intensity speedwork increase your body's ability to process oxygen! Therefore you can go longer at "any" pace! Simplified 2 cents. |
2008-10-29 9:56 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
Champion 5312![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Calgary | Subject: RE: How important is it??With my limited knowledge I will advise as follows. If you just want to finish, no need to do speed work. I get what you mean by you call yourself a zone 2 kinda girl. I love zone 2. Not sure what you mean by finishing strong. If you mean you don't want to fall across the finish line and have to be carried to the medical tent then all you have to do is train the distance+some extra in each sport and race smart and take your time. I did next to no speed work in my training for my half and my IM, I zoned 2 if my work out was a 30 minute run or a 9 hour bike ride. I finished what I concidered strong, meaning my body was in good shape, I was smiling and I could go for a hike the day after both my half and my IM. That being said I did my half in 7 hours and my IM in 14 1/2 hours. Now I am figuring out how to go fast, I think it will include training out of zone 2. Good luck!
|
|
2008-10-30 6:43 AM in reply to: #1774792 |
Pro 4828![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The Land of Ice and Snow | Subject: RE: How important is it??Thanks all!! So I guess SOME interval training will help. To be honest I really don't mind speedwork during run and bike...its during the swim that I hate it with a passion. |
2008-10-30 1:22 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
8763![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boulder, Colorado | Subject: RE: How important is it??aquagirl - 2008-10-29 8:23 PM I'm wondering how important high intensity speedwork stuff is. I'm doing my first HIM next summer and will get coaching for it, but just wondered about this. I know I will never podium, really just want to finish strong. If one just wants to finish is it really necessary to put in a lot of intense zone 4 and 5 stuff?? Or is it enough to put in the time and distance? Can you guess that I'm a zone 2 kinda gal?? Reasons you should do speedwork no matter distance you are racing: 1. You are teaching your body to work at a higher capacity aerobically, then you would have otherwise. |
2008-10-30 1:42 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
Coach 10487![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boston, MA | Subject: RE: How important is it??To add of what Mike R said: Increasing your metabolic fitness which is usually optimized at your threshold pace (more specifically @ Maximum Lactate Steady State) is essential for endurance athletes as it allows them to carry over a greater power (or pace) over time. It also correlates very well with performance, usually the greater the power/pace at threshold the better the potential to perform over time (duration) of course with proper training. Some of the training adaptations achieved training at tempo (usually know as Z3), Threshold (usually refer to Z4) and Vo2 max (usually refer to Z5): Increase in muscle mitochondria enzymes, lactate threshold, muscle glycogen, inter-conversion of fast twitch muscle fibers IIb to IIa, increased plasma volume, muscle capillarization, increase stroke/maximal cardiac output, etc. That been said; there is a delicate balance between how much intensity you should shoot for each sport and when you should do it. This has to be planned based on your main event of the season and you sport weaknesses. Also while swim and bike adding these intensities can be less stressful on the body for running the build up should be much slower given the wear and tear the body is exposed to. Doing too much too soon of intensities sessions could be a quick recipe for injury. You also have to realize that you can’t work all at once; it is more efficient and easier to handle the total load by planning different cycles with different focus. i.e. work 6 weeks on increasing threshold, next 6 weeks on VO2 max, etc. Finally the time main even will dictate when to add what sort of intensity training. An athlete training for an IM would benefit from this early in the plan as the main race get closer and the training switches to specific training Z4 or Z5 training won’t be as important as Z2-Z3. OTOH, someone training for an Oly could work on endurance (Z2-Z3) and VO2 max early on the season and as the main race gets closer the focus should switch to Z4 specific training. |
2008-10-30 2:37 PM in reply to: #1775054 |
Not a Coach 11473![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Media, PA | Subject: RE: How important is it??aquagirl - 2008-10-30 7:43 AM ...its during the swim that I hate it with a passion. That's actually the area where you should be doing the MOST of it. |
2008-10-31 3:35 PM in reply to: #1776385 |
Regular 75![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: How important is it??JohnnyKay - 2008-10-30 2:37 PM aquagirl - 2008-10-30 7:43 AM ...its during the swim that I hate it with a passion. That's actually the area where you should be doing the MOST of it.
Why? Seriously, I'm not trying to be argumentative I'd like to know. |
|
2008-10-31 4:13 PM in reply to: #1779182 |
8763![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boulder, Colorado | Subject: RE: How important is it??1. Its easier on your body than the other two sports. 2. Anything you don't like to do is probably going to help you since it's probably a weakness. Its easy to do the things we are good at, but Champions train thier weaknesses. |
2008-10-31 4:23 PM in reply to: #1779283 |
Regular 75![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: How important is it??mikericci - 2008-10-31 4:13 PM 1. Its easier on your body than the other two sports. 2. Anything you don't like to do is probably going to help you since it's probably a weakness. Its easy to do the things we are good at, but Champions train thier weaknesses. True. But since the swim is so much shorter than the other disciplines, I've always heard that you should spend the majority of your time trying to improve the run and bike. That's assuming that you've reached a level of proficiency at swimming, where your technique is serviceable and you're, let's say, MOP. Obviously, this would not hold true for elites or highly competitive age groupers.
|
2008-10-31 6:46 PM in reply to: #1774792 |
Master 2460![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: How important is it??From my experience with running, the amt of speedwork seems to vary a bit depending on your physical makeup, but in general, nonelite runners seem to improve a lot more by increasing lower-intensity volume (significantly) versus increasing speedwork intensity and/or frequency over a nominal level such as once every 1-2 weeks. If you're doing NO speedwork, sure you will likely benefit from it, and quite rapidly, in fact. However, those gains (VO2/lactate type gains) are known to taper off very quickly - weeks, in fact. Lots of "off the couch" athletes misinterpret their initial rapid gains in VO2 to be real aerobic gains, and get frustrated when after 6-12 weeks, they can't seem to improve at all on the same low-volume program. Still, the best path to definite long-term improvement for endurance events like 5k+ races and triathlons is volume. (For nonelites.) If you run or bike literally double the volume of your next competitor who is of similar age and genetic endowment, there will be literally no type of interval training they can do to overcome the gap. My 5k PR from age 18-30, while running 30mpw on average (peak 40mpw): 20:30 regardless of what type of hardcore intervals I did. (Even up to 3x/wk.) Avg running pace was 7:15-7:45/mi My 5k from age 30+ while running 60+mpw on average: 18:40. Maximum of one speedworkout per week. Average pace 8:30-9:00min/mile, which is a LOT slower than my prior running pace. Take race results from even longer races such as half marathons and 15ks, and the differences are so huge you can't even compare. (Like 30 minutes on the HM.) My take from the running perspective: One speedwork session every 1-2 weeks is definitely enough, even for AG wins and top 5% finishes. Much more important is consistent volume. Edited by agarose2000 2008-10-31 6:47 PM |
2008-10-31 6:56 PM in reply to: #1779430 |
Coach 10487![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boston, MA | Subject: RE: How important is it??agarose2000 - 2008-10-31 6:46 PM you lost me a little, you seem to believe training gains are made with increase in volume when in fact training adaptations occur due to training load which = volume + intensity. It is true that beginners will be safer by focus on lower intensity greater volume AT FIRST but if you want to increase your performance you have to increase your power or threshold pace and you have to train at that intensity there is no way around it. From my experience with running, the amt of speedwork seems to vary a bit depending on your physical makeup, but in general, nonelite runners seem to improve a lot more by increasing lower-intensity volume (significantly) versus increasing speedwork intensity and/or frequency over a nominal level such as once every 1-2 weeks. If you're doing NO speedwork, sure you will likely benefit from it, and quite rapidly, in fact. However, those gains (VO2/lactate type gains) are known to taper off very quickly - weeks, in fact. Lots of "off the couch" athletes misinterpret their initial rapid gains in VO2 to be real aerobic gains, and get frustrated when after 6-12 weeks, they can't seem to improve at all on the same low-volume program. Still, the best path to definite long-term improvement for endurance events like 5k+ races and triathlons is volume. (For nonelites.) If you run or bike literally double the volume of your next competitor who is of similar age and genetic endowment, there will be literally no type of interval training they can do to overcome the gap. My 5k PR from age 18-30, while running 30mpw on average (peak 40mpw): 20:30 regardless of what type of hardcore intervals I did. (Even up to 3x/wk.) Avg running pace was 7:15-7:45/mi My 5k from age 30+ while running 60+mpw on average: 18:40. Maximum of one speedworkout per week. Average pace 8:30-9:00min/mile, which is a LOT slower than my prior running pace. Take race results from even longer races such as half marathons and 15ks, and the differences are so huge you can't even compare. (Like 30 minutes on the HM.) My take from the running perspective: One speedwork session every 1-2 weeks is definitely enough, even for AG wins and top 5% finishes. Much more important is consistent volume. Also it is incorrect to state that VO2 or threshold gains are known to 'taper off' quickly. If by that you mean that you stop making gains at that intensity in a short period of time, that is incorrect. They will level off only if the load remains the same or until you reach your max potential and for that it will take a lot of training. Anyway, to avoid any of this usually training plans follow periodization. |
2008-10-31 9:12 PM in reply to: #1779295 |
Expert 810![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Southeast | Subject: RE: How important is it??cshecmia - 2008-10-31 5:23 PM mikericci - 2008-10-31 4:13 PM 1. Its easier on your body than the other two sports. 2. Anything you don't like to do is probably going to help you since it's probably a weakness. Its easy to do the things we are good at, but Champions train thier weaknesses. True. But since the swim is so much shorter than the other disciplines, I've always heard that you should spend the majority of your time trying to improve the run and bike. That's assuming that you've reached a level of proficiency at swimming, where your technique is serviceable and you're, let's say, MOP. Obviously, this would not hold true for elites or highly competitive age groupers. Some of the benefits of intense training that Jorge mentioned carry over from one sport to another. E.g., an intense session swimming can (among other things) increase stroke volume, and this helps running and biking. So, if you can get some of those benefits with a lower impact and lower risk of injury, seems like a good thing to me. Oh, and it isn't only champions who train their weaknesses. Some of us mediocre athletes try to do that too... |
|
2008-11-01 8:09 AM in reply to: #1779295 |
Champion 9407![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: How important is it??cshecmia - 2008-10-31 6:23 PM True. But since the swim is so much shorter than the other disciplines, I've always heard that you should spend the majority of your time trying to improve the run and bike. That's assuming that you've reached a level of proficiency at swimming, where your technique is serviceable and you're, let's say, MOP. Obviously, this would not hold true for elites or highly competitive age groupers. To Mike's point, if you are swimming you might as well be doing some harder efforts; there is little point in your typical triathlete just putting in lots of zone 2 swimming. The reason is that very few triathletes will ever approach the weekly volume required to benefit from a ton of zone 2 swimming so they might as well do some harder work for the limited time in the pool. IMO, the majority of time a triathlete spends in the pool should be near race effort (except wu, cd and drills). Further, as far as a level of proficiency at swimming, I don't think any triathlete should stop working on the swim. Since most 12yo girls that do club (or even just summer) swimming would hammer almost all triathletes, putting your swim into maintainance is a mistake for most (unless your swim is far and away your strongest sport). Shane |
2008-11-01 8:58 AM in reply to: #1779817 |
Expert 810![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Southeast | Subject: RE: How important is it??gsmacleod - 2008-11-01 9:09 AM cshecmia - 2008-10-31 6:23 PM True. But since the swim is so much shorter than the other disciplines, I've always heard that you should spend the majority of your time trying to improve the run and bike. That's assuming that you've reached a level of proficiency at swimming, where your technique is serviceable and you're, let's say, MOP. Obviously, this would not hold true for elites or highly competitive age groupers. To Mike's point, if you are swimming you might as well be doing some harder efforts; there is little point in your typical triathlete just putting in lots of zone 2 swimming. The reason is that very few triathletes will ever approach the weekly volume required to benefit from a ton of zone 2 swimming so they might as well do some harder work for the limited time in the pool. IMO, the majority of time a triathlete spends in the pool should be near race effort (except wu, cd and drills). Further, as far as a level of proficiency at swimming, I don't think any triathlete should stop working on the swim. Since most Shane Agree 100% And I fixed that last part. ('me" refers to me, not you!) |
2008-11-01 9:41 AM in reply to: #1779874 |
Regular 75![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: How important is it??mdickson68 - 2008-11-01 8:58 AM gsmacleod - 2008-11-01 9:09 AM cshecmia - 2008-10-31 6:23 PM True. But since the swim is so much shorter than the other disciplines, I've always heard that you should spend the majority of your time trying to improve the run and bike. That's assuming that you've reached a level of proficiency at swimming, where your technique is serviceable and you're, let's say, MOP. Obviously, this would not hold true for elites or highly competitive age groupers. To Mike's point, if you are swimming you might as well be doing some harder efforts; there is little point in your typical triathlete just putting in lots of zone 2 swimming. The reason is that very few triathletes will ever approach the weekly volume required to benefit from a ton of zone 2 swimming so they might as well do some harder work for the limited time in the pool. IMO, the majority of time a triathlete spends in the pool should be near race effort (except wu, cd and drills). Further, as far as a level of proficiency at swimming, I don't think any triathlete should stop working on the swim. Since most Shane Agree 100% And I fixed that last part. ('me" refers to me, not you!)
I wasn't offended. 12 y.o. girls kick my @ss all the time in the pool. Now I understand better. Thank you for the explanation. |
login




2008-10-29 9:23 PM



The Land of Ice and Snow



View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK