did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?
-
No new posts
| General Discussion | Triathlon Talk » did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ? | Rss Feed |
| Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2008-09-30 2:24 PM |
Expert 938![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Lots of people on the aerohelmet thread were commenting it was rider/position specific whether or not there was any advantage to areohelmets. How about things not explicitly rider or position specific? Is there a thread or article outlining such things as advantages of wheels, tires, frames, ect comparing to athletes of varying levels of expertise? Golf Digest does this all the times with clubs. They compare clubs by using scratch handicap golfers up to 30 handicap golfers and compare results. To use a golfing example, you could give me Tiger Wood's clubs, and I'd still be a hack, probably worse off, because they are set up for him. However, give me square grooves, graphite, and proper spin/compression golf balls, and I'll be a better hack than with pro-level gear. Now, as far as tri-gear, I guess only specifically bike gear, is there a similar equipment comparison done anywhere? One specific personal example is I raced with Armadillo tires on my bike on Sunday. Would have changing the tires to "racing" tires made a hill of beans difference to a MOP biker such as myself? Can it be quantified? |
|
2008-09-30 2:33 PM in reply to: #1706816 |
Not a Coach 11473![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Media, PA | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Would it have made a difference? Yes. Can it be quantified? Not precisely. In some cases only very generally or even not at all. For your tires, if you use ones with lower rolling resistance, you will be faster. FOP, MOP, BOP, doesn't matter. Same for any aero doo dads (wheels, bikes, helmets, etc.). Some of the aero doo dads depend upon rider position, wind conditions, etc. so 'savings' may be greater or less than any kind of 'test' you might see. |
2008-09-30 3:32 PM in reply to: #1706816 |
Fishers, IN | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?I found this in a book Swim Bike Run (Wes Hobson et. al). Of course he fails to tell where it came from or even the distance over which he is referring to. I have found it in a cycling website as well and similar results for a 40TT (24.8miles) Aero bars 3.5 minutes, Aerobar end shifter 1.5, Aero drink system 0.5, Aero helmet 1, 18-mm tubulars @ 150 psi 0.5, Deep rim front wheen 1, Disc wheel 1.5, Aeor Frame 0.5
Best bang for buck is in the order they are listed. |
2008-09-30 4:06 PM in reply to: #1707006 |
Veteran 185![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wilmington, NC | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?+1 on above Edited by tiggere 2008-09-30 4:06 PM |
2008-09-30 5:07 PM in reply to: #1706816 |
Expert 686![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() oregon ave, | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?I overheard a conversation going on between a person and a rep from Zipp wheels this summer. The rep said that unless you average 20 MPH or above, the type of rim won't amount to any difference in time. |
2008-09-30 5:27 PM in reply to: #1707298 |
Cycling Guru 15134![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?mikep - 2008-09-30 6:07 PM I overheard a conversation going on between a person and a rep from Zipp wheels this summer. The rep said that unless you average 20 MPH or above, the type of rim won't amount to any difference in time. The rep is full of crap ......... |
|
2008-09-30 5:34 PM in reply to: #1707006 |
Champion 5345![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Carlsbad, California | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?rc63413 - 2008-09-30 1:32 PM I found this in a book Swim Bike Run (Wes Hobson et. al). Of course he fails to tell where it came from or even the distance over which he is referring to. I have found it in a cycling website as well and similar results for a 40TT (24.8miles) Aero bars 3.5 minutes, Aerobar end shifter 1.5, Aero drink system 0.5, Aero helmet 1, 18-mm tubulars @ 150 psi 0.5, Deep rim front wheen 1, Disc wheel 1.5, Aeor Frame 0.5
Best bang for buck is in the order they are listed. Here is a link to a reprint of that info from my LBS's Website: |
2008-09-30 5:37 PM in reply to: #1707328 |
Champion 5345![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Carlsbad, California | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Daremo - 2008-09-30 3:27 PM mikep - 2008-09-30 6:07 PM I overheard a conversation going on between a person and a rep from Zipp wheels this summer. The rep said that unless you average 20 MPH or above, the type of rim won't amount to any difference in time. The rep is full of crap ......... That does not even pass a simple sniff test. Drag increases exponentially as speed increases and is a smooth curve. (IE: It does not magically go from Zero to something at some arbitrary speed like 20 MPH) |
2008-09-30 5:53 PM in reply to: #1707335 |
Fishers, IN | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Thanks, that is the exact link that I was thinking of but could not remember where I had seen it. Great link, more detail than the book. |
2008-09-30 6:03 PM in reply to: #1707356 |
Cycling Guru 15134![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?What some would say (and I would not argue) is that at higher speeds aerodynamics becomes much more important as it relates to your effort. If you are pushing out 300+ watts and going 27+ mph (generic numbers), then any flaw in your position is going to be exagerated and the accompanying decrease in performance will be more noticeable. But aero helps everyone, from the 10mph cyclist to the 30 mph one. There are two things that slow you down when you ride ....... resistance from air, resistance from the friction of the ground. You find ways to overcome each of those, you go faster with the same amount of power. It's pretty straght forward actually ....... |
2008-09-30 10:37 PM in reply to: #1706816 |
Extreme Veteran 662![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Sunny San Diego | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Instead of thinking of how much faster you'll be using aero equipment and position, think of how much energy (watts) you'll save for the run. |
|
2008-10-01 6:48 AM in reply to: #1707858 |
Champion 8936![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?joker70 - 2008-09-30 10:37 PM Instead of thinking of how much faster you'll be using aero equipment and position, think of how much energy (watts) you'll save for the run. Why would you put out any less energy on the bike just because you're more aerodynamic? You just go faster for the same effort level. |
2008-10-01 6:53 AM in reply to: #1708080 |
Master 2946![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Centennial, CO | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?DerekL - 2008-10-01 5:48 AM joker70 - 2008-09-30 10:37 PM Instead of thinking of how much faster you'll be using aero equipment and position, think of how much energy (watts) you'll save for the run. Why would you put out any less energy on the bike just because you're more aerodynamic? You just go faster for the same effort level. Or go the same speed with less energy. Though who wouldn't want to go faster. |
2008-10-01 6:57 AM in reply to: #1708090 |
Champion 8936![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?velocomp - 2008-10-01 6:53 AM DerekL - 2008-10-01 5:48 AM joker70 - 2008-09-30 10:37 PM Instead of thinking of how much faster you'll be using aero equipment and position, think of how much energy (watts) you'll save for the run. Why would you put out any less energy on the bike just because you're more aerodynamic? You just go faster for the same effort level. Or go the same speed with less energy. Though who wouldn't want to go faster. Right, but who goes out there and says, "I'm going to bike this in 48 minutes" and adjusts their effort level for that? We go out and put out a certain level of effort that we feel is appropriate, and the speed/time takes care of itself. |
2008-10-01 7:06 AM in reply to: #1706816 |
Champion 9060![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Charlottesville, Virginia | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?I will do anything within the rules to get faster. If I have my aero helmet on and race wheels only to gain 3 seconds, so much the better. In short distance races 3 seconds can mean the difference between podium and not. Plain and simple. If if makes you go even 1 second faster why not use it. |
2008-10-01 7:50 AM in reply to: #1706816 |
New user 149![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?To Dale's point, if it makes you go faster why not use it for me its simple, money. Not to put your point down because with unlimited funds I'd have a P4 on order with a sweet set of Zipps. I read the original post as a "What is the best band for the buck" question. Lets face it everyone here can benefit from more training- that point is baked. What I have been trying to figure out and I'm sure others are as well is...With my current fitness level and all things being equal what gear/bike modifications can I wear/use to make myself look skinner to the wind/decrease rolling resistance? Less drag =faster times with the same effort or less drag=same time with less effort on the bike. For me and I'm sure a bunch of others on BT there is a tradeoff between performance and your bottom line. I'd be interested to see if someone has or could put together a performance matrix based on "seconds cut per dollar spent" for example ( i just made up these numbers)- if I pick up an aero helmet ($150) and save 15 seconds over an olympic ride I basically purchased each second at a cost of $10 each. Now If I was to add a set of Zipp 909's for $2,000 and save X time then my cost per second is 2000/x. This can be expanded to every piece of gear you could think of. I think the only hook to this is that every piece of gear will exhibit different characteristics on every person/course and even on a given day. So from what I have been able to gather in my short time here is that you can purchase speed/energy savings to an extent, and for most of us it will come with an associated dolar value, but its really up to the individual to decide on how much they are willing to spend on improvements that may have a performance improvement value. In my eyes, I know my engine needs a ton of work and for the forseable future I will be working on that to get faster before I get too hooked on saving seconds, I know with work in the saddle and on the roads I can still save minutes. Just my $.02 - Pls someone let me know if I'm off base
|
|
2008-10-01 8:09 AM in reply to: #1708200 |
Elite 2527![]() ![]() ![]() Armpit of Ontario | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?
If Sheldon's chart doesn't appear, try this link:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/aero/aerodynamics.htm and scroll to the table
|
2008-10-01 8:12 AM in reply to: #1706816 |
Elite 2527![]() ![]() ![]() Armpit of Ontario | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?As to the actual aero savings 'fast rider vs. slow rider", Cervelo does a good job explaining in a slide presentation titled AERO SAVINGS here:
http://www.cervelo.com/content.aspx?t=Company&i=WhitePapers
|
2008-10-01 8:38 AM in reply to: #1708257 |
New user 149![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Work is a little slow today so to answer my own post.... Using some Info found in this thread I put together a performance matrix based on "seconds cut per dollar spent" for example - if I pick up an aero helmet ($150) and save 40 seconds over a 40KM TT at 20MPH ride I basically purchased each second at a cost of $3.75 each. Now If I was to add a set of Zipp 909's for $2,000 and save 122S then my cost per second is 2000/122= $16.40 per second. This can be expanded to every piece of gear you could think of.- Below I use some of the information based on the above link to some great information about aerodynamics/weight. I left some blank as we each have our own specific frames and each one performs differently but I though this was a good start.
Approximate time savings at 20 mph over a distance of 40Km are: Seconds Avg price Price per second gained Aero frameset 90 $2,000 $22.22 Aero shifting 100 $80 $0.80 Deep V front Wheel 64 $900 $14.06 Rear Disk wheel 58 $1,100 $18.97 Aero helmet vs. conventional 40 $150 $3.75 Aero drinking 30 $35 $1.17 Aero Fork 26 $400 $15.38 19mm tires 16 $90 $5.63 Totals 424 $4,755 $11.21 Above information is from the Nytro link- could one assume that the faster you go the more time you will save since drag is a function of the square of speed?
Edited by bm1981 2008-10-01 8:57 AM |
2008-10-01 9:31 AM in reply to: #1708095 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
2008-10-01 9:41 AM in reply to: #1708454 |
Champion 8936![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?JeepFleeb - 2008-10-01 9:31 AM DerekL - 2008-10-01 6:57 AM Right, but who goes out there and says, "I'm going to bike this in 48 minutes" and adjusts their effort level for that? We go out and put out a certain level of effort that we feel is appropriate, and the speed/time takes care of itself. I do. I don't say I want XX:XX time, but I know the pack I want to be in and will adjust my effort as needed. If I want to be in the first pack off the bike and I'm in the 2nd pack coming out of the water, that aero equipment helps me go faster at that hard effort. Once I catch the 1st pack and all I have to do is sit 3 bike lengths behind them until T2, that aero equipment allows me to use less watts and still stay with them. Yes, but you're a freak. |
|
2008-10-01 10:21 AM in reply to: #1708317 |
Not a Coach 11473![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Media, PA | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?bm1981 - 2008-10-01 9:38 AM could one assume that the faster you go the more time you will save since drag is a function of the square of speed? | No. Slower riders save more time (simply because they are riding for longer). Percentage gains rise with speed. |
2008-10-01 10:23 AM in reply to: #1708317 |
Not a Coach 11473![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Media, PA | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Don't know why I can't see my reply above. So here it is again: No. Slower riders save more time (simply because they are riding for longer). Percentage gains rise with speed. |
2008-10-01 11:04 AM in reply to: #1706816 |
Elite 2527![]() ![]() ![]() Armpit of Ontario | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?![]() |
2008-10-01 11:21 AM in reply to: #1706816 |
Champion 9060![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Charlottesville, Virginia | Subject: RE: did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ?Good posts Sty. We should sticky some of these posts, this discussion comes up all the time and this one has some really good info in it. I guess I look at my bike like an ongoing project. My wife and children won't let me afford to buy the bike and parts I want/need in one purchase so I pickup what I can when I can. I have saved a ton of money buying off e-bay/ST/BT/Craigslist. |
| General Discussion | Triathlon Talk » did not want to hijack the aerohelmet thread, so here goes my ? | Rss Feed |
|
login




2008-09-30 2:24 PM





Media, PA

View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK