Other Resources My Cup of Joe » selective abortion in Canada Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
selective abortion in Canada
OptionResults
yes I am surprised9 Votes - [29.03%]
no I am not surprised22 Votes - [70.97%]

2012-01-17 9:35 AM

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: selective abortion in Canada
A recent study in Canada has show that there is "a distorted ratio of male to female births in the Indo-Canadian community, particularly among couples that already have two daughters". I read in another article that the ration in some groups of having a son born to a couple with two girls was nearly 2 to 1.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2012/01/13/female-feticide-edit...

if true does this surprise you?

Makes for an interesting dynamic to add any abortion debate that centres around a woman's right to her own body. Contrast that with the following: "The SOGC feels strongly that it is the cultural values and norms in specific segments of the Canadian population that must change to ensure that females are not confronted with procedures and intolerant environments before or after they are born,"


2012-01-17 9:49 AM
in reply to: #3994740

User image

Master
4119
20002000100
Toronto
Bronze member
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
I heard discussion about this on CBC Radio this morning. It does surprise me.  But then i've never really thought about it.  When I think about it - it is definitely possible - given the very large populations of Indo-Canadians, especially, here where I live. It's a whole community that can be pretty isolated and where the traditional pressures of daughters exists in much the same way it would exist in Asia. 
2012-01-17 10:58 AM
in reply to: #3994782

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

It's not surprising.

But hey, if someone is pro choice
what business is it of theirs to impose
their morality on someone else.

If a woman chooses to abort a girl
simply because she's a girl
what's the problem? 

2012-01-17 11:59 AM
in reply to: #3994740

User image

Supersonicus Idioticus
2439
200010010010010025
Thunder Bay, ON
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
Not surprising.  Not because of the conclusions, but rather because there is a lot of discrepancy between the people who publish these articles and those that research them.
2012-01-17 12:21 PM
in reply to: #3994740

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

this is disgusting, and since i like to think most humans aren't horrible people, i find it very surprising.

 

[and yes i realize how judgmental this sounds, and i stand by it.  you don't carry a baby for 5 months then change your mind, no matter where you stand on the pro-choice spectrum.]



Edited by mehaner 2012-01-17 12:21 PM
2012-01-17 12:42 PM
in reply to: #3995177

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada


Edited by dontracy 2012-01-17 12:44 PM


2012-01-17 12:42 PM
in reply to: #3995177

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

Five months...
Four months...
One month...
One week...

What's the difference.

Who are we to judge what a woman
should do with her body?

 

 

2012-01-17 12:47 PM
in reply to: #3995248

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
dontracy - 2012-01-17 1:42 PM

Five months...
Four months...
One month...
One week...

What's the difference.

Who are we to judge what a woman
should do with her body?

What about the people who don't have access to ultrasounds?  They have to wait for the baby to be born before they can decide to dispose of it. 

Where do you draw the line?  I agree with Meh,.. disgusting to end a life because of it's sex.

2012-01-17 12:57 PM
in reply to: #3995262

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
TriRSquared - 

Where do you draw the line?  I agree with Meh,.. disgusting to end a life because of it's sex.

I don't know.
Seems like reproductive freedom
means reproductive freedom.

If you say a woman can't have an abortion
because of the fetus' sex
then where do you draw the line after that?

Slipper slope there. 

2012-01-17 12:59 PM
in reply to: #3995248

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
dontracy - 2012-01-17 1:42 PM

Five months...
Four months...
One month...
One week...

What's the difference.

Who are we to judge what a woman
should do with her body?

 

 

for the record, i'm pro-life, but i can't understand how anyone - even a pro-choicer - could think abortions this late in pregnancy for any reason (barring a life-threatening medical necessity) are OK. 

2012-01-17 1:06 PM
in reply to: #3995289

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

mehaner - for the record, i'm pro-life, but i can't understand how anyone - even a pro-choicer - could think abortions this late in pregnancy for any reason (barring a life-threatening medical necessity) are OK. 

Got it.

I didn't quote you because I wasn't challenging you personally about what you wrote.

I'm just sure that there are plenty of pro choice folks
who feel the same, so I thought it was an interesting thing to think about. 

 



2012-01-17 1:07 PM
in reply to: #3995262

User image

Payson, AZ
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
TriRSquared - 2012-01-17 10:47 AM
dontracy - 2012-01-17 1:42 PM

Five months...
Four months...
One month...
One week...

What's the difference.

Who are we to judge what a woman
should do with her body?

What about the people who don't have access to ultrasounds?  They have to wait for the baby to be born before they can decide to dispose of it. 

Where do you draw the line?  I agree with Meh,.. disgusting to end a life because of it's sex.

you say that with sarcasm, but in some countries that is how it is done.  Which method is preferred? 

2012-01-17 1:09 PM
in reply to: #3994740

User image

Payson, AZ
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
I can't believe I am agreeing with Don. Kiss  But, you are either pro-choice or not.  I disagree with what they do, but how is my believe any greater then theirs?  I'd tackle it with education and resources if I was that against it. 
2012-01-17 1:29 PM
in reply to: #3995318

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

bzgl40 - 2012-01-17 2:09 PM I can't believe I am agreeing with Don. Kiss 

See it doesn't hurt that much, does it?

I disagree with what they do, but how is my believe any greater then theirs?

Well, if yours is closer to the truth than theirs,
then maybe there's a way to test for it.

2012-01-17 1:34 PM
in reply to: #3994740

User image

Master
4119
20002000100
Toronto
Bronze member
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
I don't take it as anything in particular about abortion but about the cultural values that are carrying over to a country where there is a mismatch.   There are implications of there being too many males or females in society that we've only really seen the other way - after the world wars for example. As Kim said this is likely more about education and keeping tabs on the general population trends.
2012-01-17 1:52 PM
in reply to: #3995409

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

So those people require reeducation because 
they have screwed up values
and will abort girl babies because of it. 

Meanwhile, we're fine
even if we want to abort our babies
for really sound reasons. 
Not like those people.



2012-01-17 2:12 PM
in reply to: #3995454

User image

Payson, AZ
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
dontracy - 2012-01-17 11:52 AM

So those people require reeducation because 
they have screwed up values
and will abort girl babies because of it. 

Meanwhile, we're fine
even if we want to abort our babies
for really sound reasons. 
Not like those people.

Good point.  Difference being, education is really just a way of getting folks to look at things a different way.  Just like those who are opposed to abortion would try and convince someone who is pro-choice would try and educate me, regardless of my reason.  Education doesn't prevent anyone from doing what they wish.  Just provides them another way of looking at things and allowing them to make up their own mind.  Nothing is forced (not even the education)

2012-01-17 2:29 PM
in reply to: #3995521

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
bzgl40 - 

Good point.  Difference being, education is really just a way of getting folks to look at things a different way.  Just like those who are opposed to abortion would try and convince someone who is pro-choice would try and educate me, regardless of my reason.  Education doesn't prevent anyone from doing what they wish.  Just provides them another way of looking at things and allowing them to make up their own mind.  Nothing is forced (not even the education)

I understand.
I agree that people who think it's OK to abort girl babies
need to be educated.

I also want to apologize for my tone in my previous post.
That was terrible of me.
I'm sorry about that. 

2012-01-17 2:56 PM
in reply to: #3995286

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
dontracy - 2012-01-17 1:57 PM
TriRSquared - 

Where do you draw the line?  I agree with Meh,.. disgusting to end a life because of it's sex.

I don't know.
Seems like reproductive freedom
means reproductive freedom.

If you say a woman can't have an abortion
because of the fetus' sex
then where do you draw the line after that?

Slipper slope there. 

I didn't say they should be prevented.  However, it doesn't change the fact that if you abort a baby due to the sex of the baby that, in my eyes, you are a horrible person and murderer.



Edited by TriRSquared 2012-01-17 2:58 PM
2012-01-17 2:57 PM
in reply to: #3994740

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-01-17 3:03 PM
in reply to: #3994740

Master
2277
2000100100252525
Lake Norman, NC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

I have such strong opinions about this topic.  But if I'm not dumb enough to express them in person.  And even though there's the "cloak of Internet invisibility" here, I still think this is a subject best to just walk away from.

Which takes a TON of effort and self-control.  For the BFD to hold back his opinion and shut his mouth (fingers).  Mark this moment guys - It's an extremely rare occurence!

 



2012-01-17 3:04 PM
in reply to: #3995286

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
dontracy - 2012-01-17 1:57 PM
TriRSquared - 

Where do you draw the line?  I agree with Meh,.. disgusting to end a life because of it's sex.

I don't know.
Seems like reproductive freedom
means reproductive freedom.

If you say a woman can't have an abortion
because of the fetus' sex
then where do you draw the line after that?

Slipper slope there. 

It IS a slippery slope. But I think it is as much a mistake to dogmaticaly see ALL abortion as an evil as it is to see NONE of them as such. I believe abortions should be safe, legal, and rare. But to take your argument further, as the catholic church does, any form of contraception is problematic, since it potentially deprives a life. I'm not saying abortion should be seen as equivalent to contraception, but it is part of a total picture of control of one's reproductive life.

2012-01-17 3:06 PM
in reply to: #3995666

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

TriRSquared - 2012-01-17 3:56 PM

However, it doesn't change the fact that if you abort a baby due to the sex of the baby that, in my eyes, you are a horrible person and murderer.

Are there reasons that you would feel are acceptable, morally? 

What about things like financial considerations, parents that are addicts, parents that work insane schedules and feel that would prevent them from being good parents? 

 

 

 

 

2012-01-17 3:15 PM
in reply to: #3995690

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada

gearboy - But I think it is as much a mistake to dogmaticaly see ALL abortion as an evil as it is to see NONE of them as such.

Alright.

So what principles would you use to judge whether a 
particular abortion is evil or not?

(and we're talking about "direct" abortion
where the primary act is to kill the fetus

2012-01-17 3:15 PM
in reply to: #3995693

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: selective abortion in Canada
Goosedog - 2012-01-17 4:06 PM

TriRSquared - 2012-01-17 3:56 PM

However, it doesn't change the fact that if you abort a baby due to the sex of the baby that, in my eyes, you are a horrible person and murderer.

Are there reasons that you would feel are acceptable, morally? 

What about things like financial considerations, parents that are addicts, parents that work insane schedules and feel that would prevent them from being good parents?

I can justify abortions in cases of rape or when the life of the mother is at risk or other medial conditions that would cause the child to suffer at birth.

Your situations are a bit more gray.  I believe that people need to consider the consequences before they engage in an activity that might produce a life.  Of course consider the bell curve and we all know that's is futile. (You know the old phrase, you need a license to drive but not for a child...)

So that being said, I tend to not make judgements and keep out of arguments in situations like this.  However, if you are aborting a life solely because of the sex...  (in other words you'd keep it and love it if it was the sex you wanted) ... that's monstrous IMO.



Edited by TriRSquared 2012-01-17 3:15 PM
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » selective abortion in Canada Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3