General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Drafting in the Olympics Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 5
 
 
2008-08-05 2:51 PM

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: Drafting in the Olympics

I was watching an Olympic qualifying triathlon recently on TV and was suprised to learn that drafting is legal in the Olympics. 

Geesh, for years I've told people "drafting is illegal in triathlons" and now I have to caveat that and with "except the Olympics"?

~Mike



2008-08-05 2:54 PM
in reply to: #1583341

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics

ITU rules.  Those races are all draft legal and they use different bikes with restrictions on how far the aero bars can extend.  The really "fast" races where the best of the best slug it out are the ITU races and the fields are separated by seconds usually, not minutes like in long course stuff.

There have been quite a few threads in the last few weeks about draft legal ITU racing.

2008-08-05 2:54 PM
in reply to: #1583341

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
Rogillio - 2008-08-05 4:51 PM

I was watching an Olympic qualifying triathlon recently on TV and was suprised to learn that drafting is legal in the Olympics. 

Geesh, for years I've told people "drafting is illegal in triathlons" and now I have to caveat that and with "except the Olympics"?

~Mike

Actually you need the caveat of "except the Olympics and any ITU elite race."

Also, depending on where you live, there may be a draft legal series of races; here in Canada we have an elite junior series where the athletes get to race the sprint distance under ITU rules.

Shane

2008-08-05 3:19 PM
in reply to: #1583341

User image

Regular
113
100
Memphis, TN
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics

I personally don't like ITU and Olympic drafting. I feel that it takes away the advantage of being a strong swimmer and puts too much emphisis on running. It seems that at the elite level with these ITU races that it comes down to who is the best runner.

 Just my opinion though.

2008-08-05 3:23 PM
in reply to: #1583477

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
hubcitytriguy - 2008-08-05 3:19 PM

I personally don't like ITU and Olympic drafting. I feel that it takes away the advantage of being a strong swimmer and puts too much emphisis on running. It seems that at the elite level with these ITU races that it comes down to who is the best runner.

 Just my opinion though.

yeah I agree, those elite ITU are just posers who can only run, I mean come one; who can call him/herself an elite triathlete when they can only swim sub 18 min for 1.5K and ride sub 60-55 min for 40K just to able to run sub 32 min for a 10k... Posers I am telling, it is what they are, POSERS!  (yes, that should go on red italic font )
2008-08-05 7:37 PM
in reply to: #1583492

User image

Expert
908
500100100100100
Niskayuna, New York
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics

I once overheard someone make a great point that they don't want age groupers drafting for safety reasons. Imagine a bunch of amateurs riding that close together.. it would just be one crash after another.

I'm sure this isn't the only reason, but it makes alot of sense to only let the elites ride that tight



2008-08-05 7:59 PM
in reply to: #1583492

Expert
810
500100100100
Southeast
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
amiine - 2008-08-05 4:23 PM
hubcitytriguy - 2008-08-05 3:19 PM

I personally don't like ITU and Olympic drafting. I feel that it takes away the advantage of being a strong swimmer and puts too much emphisis on running. It seems that at the elite level with these ITU races that it comes down to who is the best runner.

Just my opinion though.

yeah I agree, those elite ITU are just posers who can only run, I mean come one; who can call him/herself an elite triathlete when they can only swim sub 18 min for 1.5K and ride sub 60-55 min for 40K just to able to run sub 32 min for a 10k... Posers I am telling, it is what they are, POSERS! (yes, that should go on red italic font )

Did he say that they are posers, or that they are poor athletes?  I thought the claim was that drafting "puts too much emphasis on running".  This seems a fair issue to raise.  I don't know whether drafting really does do that, but it isn't stupid or silly to wonder whether it does.

2008-08-05 8:10 PM
in reply to: #1583341

Extreme Veteran
1030
100025
West Windsor, NJ
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
Drafting removes a whole dimension of the race...why work hard in the swim...or for that matter, work hard in the bike. It makes zero sense to jump out in front until the aero doesnt matter..which is the run. It sort of diminishes the sport IMHO.
2008-08-05 8:34 PM
in reply to: #1584070

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.

Edited by JeepFleeb 2008-08-05 8:48 PM
2008-08-05 9:06 PM
in reply to: #1584047

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
mdickson68 - 2008-08-05 7:59 PM
amiine - 2008-08-05 4:23 PM
hubcitytriguy - 2008-08-05 3:19 PM

I personally don't like ITU and Olympic drafting. I feel that it takes away the advantage of being a strong swimmer and puts too much emphisis on running. It seems that at the elite level with these ITU races that it comes down to who is the best runner.

Just my opinion though.

yeah I agree, those elite ITU are just posers who can only run, I mean come one; who can call him/herself an elite triathlete when they can only swim sub 18 min for 1.5K and ride sub 60-55 min for 40K just to able to run sub 32 min for a 10k... Posers I am telling, it is what they are, POSERS! (yes, that should go on red italic font )

Did he say that they are posers, or that they are poor athletes?  I thought the claim was that drafting "puts too much emphasis on running".  This seems a fair issue to raise.  I don't know whether drafting really does do that, but it isn't stupid or silly to wonder whether it does.

if he/you thinks they are poor athletes I am not sure if that would be either amusing or concerning. While the emphasis might seem it is on running I hope you are at least a bit aware of the amazing racing ability these guys have in order to to swim the 1.5k under 20 min (18 min really) and bike under 1 hr so this 'runners' can then post a sub 32 min 10K.

People tend to believe the swim/bike are not as important but that is just a misconception about ITU racing. This guys are the best swimmers in the sport (fact) very strong cyclists and amazing runners, IOW the most complete TRIathletes around.

A fact of this is the results of these ITU guys/gals jumping onto long course scene and dominating the 70.3 distance and even IM: Potts, Alexander, Carfree, McGlone cleaning the 70.3 distance and guys like Lessing, Macca, Jones that began and exceled at ITU racing and now are IM champions/winners, plus Alexander, McGlone finishing 2nd on their 1st visit to Kona.

Furthermore this 'poor athletes' also dominate the non-drafting short course races against the 'true' triathletes who don't do draft-legal racing Examples of this are Kemper, Reed, Potts, Snowsill, Bennet, etc winning Alcatraz, lifetimefitness, St. Anthony, etc. Now, based on the information presented would you still believe think that ITU racing is just a swim/bike warm up followed by a 10K race? (an usual description of this format by some)

2008-08-05 9:09 PM
in reply to: #1584070

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
JohnAgs3 - 2008-08-05 8:10 PM Drafting removes a whole dimension of the race...why work hard in the swim...or for that matter, work hard in the bike. It makes zero sense to jump out in front until the aero doesnt matter..which is the run. It sort of diminishes the sport IMHO.
I rest my case...


2008-08-05 9:31 PM
in reply to: #1583492

Master
1741
100050010010025
Chapel Hill, NC
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
yeah I agree, those elite ITU are just posers who can only run, I mean come one; who can call him/herself an elite triathlete when they can only swim sub 18 min for 1.5K and ride sub 60-55 min for 40K just to able to run sub 32 min for a 10k... Posers I am telling, it is what they are, POSERS! (yes, that should go on red italic font )


I agree (and made it bolded, too)! Takes away all advantage of being a great biker, too. If draft legal ever happens in USAT races, I'll be finding a new sport
2008-08-05 9:31 PM
in reply to: #1584070

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics

JohnAgs3 - 2008-08-05 9:10 PM Drafting removes a whole dimension of the race...why work hard in the swim...or for that matter, work hard in the bike. It makes zero sense to jump out in front until the aero doesnt matter..which is the run. It sort of diminishes the sport IMHO.

Wow ....... I hate to sound like this, but you really just don't get it .......

Jorge pretty much summed it up in his posts, so no need to elaborate.

2008-08-05 9:38 PM
in reply to: #1583341

Veteran
306
100100100
Dallas
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
Hey! ! !  I was watching the Hy-Vee Tri last weekend on the tube, and I decided they just needed to get rid of the Swim and Bike portion of the Tri, and just make it a 10K foot race.  Everyone ended up at T2 within 30 seconds of each other. . . .    Wow, how exciting is that? ? ? ?
2008-08-05 9:48 PM
in reply to: #1584257

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics

shamgar7 - 2008-08-05 10:38 PM Hey! ! ! I was watching the Hy-Vee Tri last weekend on the tube, and I decided they just needed to get rid of the Swim and Bike portion of the Tri, and just make it a 10K foot race. Everyone ended up at T2 within 30 seconds of each other. . . . Wow, how exciting is that? ? ? ?

Isn't that the definition of exciting... a close race??  Would you rather than they had been spaced out evenly, a minute apart? 

2008-08-05 10:01 PM
in reply to: #1583492

Expert
1231
100010010025
B'ham
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
amiine - 2008-08-05 1:23 PM
hubcitytriguy - 2008-08-05 3:19 PM

I personally don't like ITU and Olympic drafting. I feel that it takes away the advantage of being a strong swimmer and puts too much emphisis on running. It seems that at the elite level with these ITU races that it comes down to who is the best runner.

 Just my opinion though.

yeah I agree, those elite ITU are just posers who can only run, I mean come one; who can call him/herself an elite triathlete when they can only swim sub 18 min for 1.5K and ride sub 60-55 min for 40K just to able to run sub 32 min for a 10k... Posers I am telling, it is what they are, POSERS!  (yes, that should go on red italic font )

Dude, you seem really angry lately.  Just sayin'



2008-08-05 10:07 PM
in reply to: #1584276

Master
1826
100050010010010025
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
newleaf - 2008-08-05 10:48 PM

shamgar7 - 2008-08-05 10:38 PM Hey! ! ! I was watching the Hy-Vee Tri last weekend on the tube, and I decided they just needed to get rid of the Swim and Bike portion of the Tri, and just make it a 10K foot race. Everyone ended up at T2 within 30 seconds of each other. . . . Wow, how exciting is that? ? ? ?

Isn't that the definition of exciting... a close race?? Would you rather than they had been spaced out evenly, a minute apart?

Nah it would have been better if someone won by 5 minutes, with second coming in 10 minutes ahead of third.. now that is excitement!! 

2008-08-05 10:26 PM
in reply to: #1584245

Pro
4339
2000200010010010025
Husker Nation
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
keyone - 2008-08-05 9:31 PM

yeah I agree, those elite ITU are just posers who can only run, I mean come one; who can call him/herself an elite triathlete when they can only swim sub 18 min for 1.5K and ride sub 60-55 min for 40K just to able to run sub 32 min for a 10k... Posers I am telling, it is what they are, POSERS! (yes, that should go on red italic font )


I agree (and made it bolded, too)! Takes away all advantage of being a great biker, too. If draft legal ever happens in USAT races, I'll be finding a new sport

The red italic font is the "sarcastic" font.
2008-08-06 7:25 AM
in reply to: #1584334

Master
1741
100050010010025
Chapel Hill, NC
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
Bripod - 2008-08-05 11:26 PM
The red italic font is the "sarcastic" font.


Oops!
2008-08-06 7:43 AM
in reply to: #1584105

Expert
810
500100100100
Southeast
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
JeepFleeb - 2008-08-05 9:34 PM

JohnAgs3 - 2008-08-05 8:10 PM
Drafting removes a whole dimension of the race...why work hard in the swim...

Becuase if you're not in that first pack out of the water and starting the bike, you just lost the race. If you have to do a ton of work to bridge the gap to get into first pack, you're not going to have enough left to compete on the run. You just lost the race.

...or for that matter, work hard in the bike. It makes zero sense to jump out in front until the aero doesnt matter..which is the run. It sort of diminishes the sport IMHO.

You've still gotta hold onto the pack. No one is sitting 2nd wheel and just coasting along from start to finish. ITU courses tend to be lots of loops and very technical. If you can't corner and accelerate to stay in the pack with every corner, you just lost the race.

Leading the bike in ITU racing is all about strategy. It's about pushing the pack so other people will have to work too hard to keep up with you but not so hard that you'll end up bonking later. It's one of the most beautiful sights in all of sport, IMHO.

Thanks.  That answers the question nicely.  It wasn't my post, but I was having similar thoughts, and you explained it very well.

Just to be clear regarding some other posts:  questioning whether  the structure of the event emphasizes one of these athletes' AMAZING athletic abilities over others, does not in any way question the AMAZINGNESS of their AMAZING abilities nor the need to be AMAZING in all three areas in order to win.  I think we all get that they are AMAZING athletes. These are just two separate issues, and I'm pretty sure OP was asking the structure question, and not the "don't these guys just suck?" question.

2008-08-06 7:43 AM
in reply to: #1583341

Champion
8936
50002000100050010010010010025
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics

Seems like the folks who aren't exposed to ITU races routinely don't really get what good triathletes these guys are.  For some reason, bike drafting = bad automatically in the mind of some because of the rules we adhere to in nondraft legal races.  I'd encourage you guys to find some ITU races on TV and record them (if you have a DVR, just search for triathlon and you'll find some).  Watch the Olympic race too.

They HAVE to be good swimmers, or they're not in the front pack of bikes.

They HAVE to be good cyclists given the technical courses they face and the speeds they ride them at.

They HAVE to be good runners as the race comes down to a 10K between those who survive the first 2 together.

 

 

 



2008-08-06 8:29 AM
in reply to: #1584293

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
cadmus - 2008-08-05 10:01 PM
amiine - 2008-08-05 1:23 PM
hubcitytriguy - 2008-08-05 3:19 PM

I personally don't like ITU and Olympic drafting. I feel that it takes away the advantage of being a strong swimmer and puts too much emphisis on running. It seems that at the elite level with these ITU races that it comes down to who is the best runner.

 Just my opinion though.

yeah I agree, those elite ITU are just posers who can only run, I mean come one; who can call him/herself an elite triathlete when they can only swim sub 18 min for 1.5K and ride sub 60-55 min for 40K just to able to run sub 32 min for a 10k... Posers I am telling, it is what they are, POSERS!  (yes, that should go on red italic font )

Dude, you seem really angry lately.  Just sayin'

just lately?  naaaa, that is just call sarcasm...

But seriously, we could debate whether someone likes the ITU format or not, whether someone believes IM athletes are better than ITU athletes, etc and that's cool, we can like different things. What is risky IMO is to present uninformed opinions about ITU racing when it is clear some of those providing such opinions are not really familiar with the format, the capabilities of these athletes and what it takes to win one of these. Stating something like "ITU racing diminishes the advantage for strong swimmers" is just plain silly...

2008-08-06 9:59 AM
in reply to: #1583341

Extreme Veteran
576
500252525
Bethpage, New York
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
http://www.triathlon.org/?call=TWpreg==

ITU  (draft legal) races online. If you're not sitting on the edge of your seat while watching these...check for a pulse.

Edited by tri_sport19 2008-08-06 9:59 AM
2008-08-06 10:09 AM
in reply to: #1584970

Pro
4339
2000200010010010025
Husker Nation
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics
tri_sport19 - 2008-08-06 9:59 AM

http://www.triathlon.org/?call=TWpreg==

ITU (draft legal) races online. If you're not sitting on the edge of your seat while watching these...check for a pulse.

Where the heck is Javier Gomez? I enjoyed watching him last year but I didn't see him at the Hy-Vee triathlon and he wasn't at Kitzbeuhel either apparently, even though Ivan Rana was at both.
2008-08-06 10:12 AM
in reply to: #1585003

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: Drafting in the Olympics

Bripod - 2008-08-06 12:09 PM

Where the heck is Javier Gomez? I enjoyed watching him last year but I didn't see him at the Hy-Vee triathlon and he wasn't at Kitzbeuhel either apparently, even though Ivan Rana was at both.

He raced in Vancouver but I think he was then planning to spend the rest of the season getting ready for the Olympics.  He pretty convincingly blew up the field in Vancouver so it appears he is (was) in good form.

However, here's hoping Simon Whitfield can pull it off!

Shane



Edited by gsmacleod 2008-08-06 10:17 AM
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Drafting in the Olympics Rss Feed  
 
 
of 5