What is legal in the water.
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() First - I have resisted the Wetsuit on principle (cost and ability). Second - I am not here to bash wetsuits. I would never say never to getting one but currently don't have one I don't expect to use one. -I actually just searched Amazon for deals but didn't pull the trigger. I understand they are legal but exactly what is legal? At most local races I go to they don't care what kind you have -they only check water temp. People wear things that have pontoons and jet packs (OK I am exaggerating) BUT on USAT website it is almost the opposite - they give a specific list of suits and say for use in any water temperature" If wetsuits are legal -are those webbed gloves? I would think they would be illegal but last mont someone had them on at a sprint in ohio. How bout the footies? Why not just wear fins - as long as we are assisting our swim ability? Can you wear fins? I don't see a rule forbidding them. It is rough enough in tris that you can buy more speed in the bike portion - do we really need to dump more money into the swim? I feel a little guilty that I jumped from a $200 bike to a $1000 bike in '09. I do go faster now. Great I spent $800 to get there. (well I do train too but let' face it - it is still me) How much faster could I go if I had a $400 wetsuit and a $6000 bike? Even in the run there is some money factor - I have a separate pair of shoes for racing and yanks laces - so that is $70 over the cost of training shoes. Someone posted an '80's style tri - I'd like to see something similar - more like a poor man's tri -no wetsuits, no carbon, no TT bikes, 20-25 lb min weight, no racing flats. Other limits apply. There is a race co. locally that has a MT bike div which gives the first timers and fitness people a chance to place but I wish they would expand the category to include any 30 pound plus bike. -Note the Mt bike div is on the same streets as the reg race - and the Mt bikes are typically your Huffy types. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Hmmm.....I live in Canada and have been OWS since April. I *heart* my wetsuit. Having said that my HIM last week was in warm water temps that were only a couple of degrees away from a non wetsuit swim. I would have been ok with that , do not need the suit to swim the distance. But you cannot beat a wetsuit for extending your open water swim season! |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Wetsuit are allowed up to a temp of 78 degrees for AG. Nothing that helps your forward motion is allowed - no apehand things, no fins. booties are allowed but they would inhibit you not help so even wicked cold races I have not worn them. Having done Mooseman in June when the water was 58 degrees, I am very happy that wetsuit and neoprene cap are allowed! I would have been fine if Timberman had not allowed wetsuits - in fact I had the discussion with my swim coach yesterday that I feel like I swim better without - her reply is that I probably do from the point of view of how form feels as my float is in a good place. But that a wetsuit will make me faster as you are swimming downhill - but it will feel weird (which is what I really noticed at Walden Pond the other day when I swam with and without). Those of us who live in the Northeast (and the likes of Helen up in Canada aka the frozen tundra) are rather grateful that wetsuits are allowed as our season is short enough as it is! |
![]() ![]() |
Resident Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() You really need to go back and read the USAT competitive rules again. Some of the things you mention are expressly prohibited (artificial propulsion devisces including but not limited to gloves and fins, Section 4.9) |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() As a tri newb & recent wetsuit convert, I understand where bruehoyt is coming from. My wife (cold water swimmer from N Michigan & current tri spectator) firmly believes wetsuits are "cheating". I have read and re-read USAT rules. Swimming Conduct-Rule 4.9's intent appears clear enough. No "artificial propulsion device, inc but not limited to fins, gloves, paddles, or floating devices of any kind....". Yet triathletes & wetsuit makers openly discuss how wetsuits make 'em faster- more buoyant & even (supposedly) more propulsive. As but 1 example- Orca advertises "Hydrolift Buoyancy Cells" and "AquaTread" forearm panels which "generate increased power". Other makers make similar claims for their products. This all sure seems a far stretch from the original intent- to allow wetsuits to protect the triathlete from hypothermia. bruehoyt- You made a huge jump in performance going from $200 MTB to $1000 road bike. Might think about adding an inexpensive clip-on aerobar (Profile Design Airstryke is durable & under $90). Going from there to $6000 bike yields very fractional gains, except for style points. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bruehoyt - 2009-08-29 12:04 PM BUT on USAT website it is almost the opposite - they give a specific list of suits and say for use in any water temperature" If wetsuits are legal -are those webbed gloves? I would think they would be illegal but last mont someone had them on at a sprint in ohio. How bout the footies? Why not just wear fins - as long as we are assisting our swim ability? Can you wear fins? I don't see a rule forbidding them. Section 4.9- No fins, hand paddles, etc. John |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bruehoyt - 2009-08-29 12:04 PM I feel a little guilty that I jumped from a $200 bike to a $1000 bike in '09. I do go faster now. Great I spent $800 to get there. (well I do train too but let' face it - it is still me) How much faster could I go if I had a $400 wetsuit and a $6000 bike? Going from a $1000 tri frame to a $6000 tri frame may or may not make you a little bit faster. The wetsuit will make you a little faster depending on your form, the main thing about them is they let you work a little less to maintain the same speed. It's a series of diminishing returns. If you have reached the point where you cannot personally improve, then maybe look at "buying" speed. but, you can also do it smart. A disc cover for $99 give almost the same benefit as a $1500 disc wheel. an aero helmet ($75 used) is one of the biggest "bang for the buck" upgrades. Cheapo clipons if you don't have them, etc. Yeah, it does suck a bit that you can buy speed, but I lovepassing the money people because I work harder on my midline equipment. ![]() John |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Sorry but I don't understand the issue. Races are wetsuit legal or not per USAT. I spent $80 on my wetsuit, you can buy them new for $99 at Xterra. Yes they make you a little faster but a $6000 carbon bike or $1300 race wheels would make me faster and shave way more time (being that the bike portion is usually much longer than the swim). |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ahhh 4.9 - tnx |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() another questionif sec 4.9 says "no [yadayadayada] or floating devices of any kind" and wetsuits are used for buoyancy - isn't it contradictory to allow them? |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Wetsuits are legal as per the rules. If you don't want to buy one it's your choice, personally I don't get why you don't want to spend 99$ or more but what can I say. But don't question if it should be legal or not ... It is legal! Edited by rlejeune 2009-08-29 6:52 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Resident Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bruehoyt - 2009-08-29 6:37 PM another questionif sec 4.9 says "no [yadayadayada] or floating devices of any kind" and wetsuits are used for buoyancy - isn't it contradictory to allow them? Not if you have a whole 'nother section that defines them as legal. |
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() | ![]() I Love my wetsuite, I spent 300 dollars on a wetsuite at a tri shop, but would rather swim in my older bodyglove which cost just a little over 100 dollars... You can find them cheap. And I love my 2600 dollar fuji bike. Even with that euipment I'm still slower then most.... Im just having fun |
![]() ![]() |
Frugal Gear Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() to wetsuit, or not wetsuit is a question, which one is a different one. As for the should or not, I did a 4 suit video review for BT last year. I know, no matter which suit I wear of the 6 I have had the privilage to test/own, I am faster in the water with a wetsuit. This summer, I intentionaly trained without a wetsuit for 2 reasons. First the water temp in the puddle I train in got up above 80, and I will not wear a wetsuit in those temps. The other reason is I feel swimming in OW without a suit helps with finding flaws in my swim stroke and makes me a better overall swimmer when I do wear a suit. I was up to 1:40 faster on a 800 yard swim with a wetsuit on this summer. As for marketing issues of things like "propultion" things on forarms etc, they are legal from a USAT stand point. Also, depending on the company, they all have a take that there vesion is the best/fastest. If I remember correctly, DeSoto has tested catch surfaces, and they feel they disturb too much water and are no faster if not slower than those that do. On the other hand, ProMotion swears by theres. I have worn both, and to be honest, I did not find one suit far faster than anouther. What I did find was some were more comfortable, fit better, and allowed me to have the best form I could in the water. Yes it would be nice if we could all have/afford the best stuff. The auto racing world used to have (and may still have) the IROC racing series where selected drivers from NASCAR, Indy and other styles of racing drew straws each week to determine which of the neutraly prepared identical race cars they would be driving in would be. This is kind of like the idea of weight limits for bikes etc.Interesting concept, but I can not see Norman Stadler on my Trek Pilot road bike. For that matter Chrissy Welington was winning on the P2, a mid line version of her bike, so as Lance Armstrong said, "it's not about the bike". Go fast goodies help, but the end of the day, our results on the course are what we put into the sport. A sad addition to the go fast debate is the ecconomics that have helped our sport grow. Without all the inovation from companies pushing the envelope, and trying to help people "buy speed" we would most likely not seen the explosion of growth in our sport. The sponsor dollars help the overall sport grow, weather we like it or not. Enough with my rant, now go out and enjoy the race
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bruehoyt - 2009-08-29 4:37 PM another questionif sec 4.9 says "no [yadayadayada] or floating devices of any kind" and wetsuits are used for buoyancy - isn't it contradictory to allow them? Wetsuits are not used for bouyancy. They are used for cold water temperatures. It's only the (generally) poor swimming status of most triathletes that means they are also used for bouyancy. Plus, for an ex fish, 78 is not cold. For a non or pool only swimmer at public pools, 78 is cold. It's all a matter of perspective. John |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Ontherun makes a GREAT point about Wellington. Her P2, while not entry-level, is a fraction of the cost of many other bikes top contenders were riding at Kona. At some point it's about the engine, not the $$$ spent. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tkd.teacher - 2009-08-29 2:27 PM Yeah, it does suck a bit that you can buy speed, but I lovepassing the money people because I work harder on my midline equipment. ![]() John One of the reasons I've avoided yet buying a P2 or such. People just love passing those and I'd definitely be a candidate. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Sometimes, they're mandatory. The following is excerpted from Triathlon Canada rules for AG'ers: D.2 Wetsuit Use The use of wetsuits will be determined by the following tables. c) For Age Group Competitors: Swim Length Forbidden above: Mandatory below: Maximum stay in water 0 - 1500m 22o C 14o C 1 h 10 min 1501-3000m 23o C 15o C 1 h 40 min 3000-4000m 24o C 16o C 2 h 15 min |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() the bear - 2009-08-29 8:25 PM thank you for defining contradictorybruehoyt - 2009-08-29 6:37 PM another questionif sec 4.9 says "no [yadayadayada] or floating devices of any kind" and wetsuits are used for buoyancy - isn't it contradictory to allow them? Not if you have a whole 'nother section that defines them as legal. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tkd.teacher - 2009-08-29 11:01 PM Wetsuits are not used for bouyancy. That statement is false - in virtually every ad for a wetsuit the buoyancy level is indicated and usually this is a selling point. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() rlejeune - 2009-08-29 7:51 PMWetsuits are legal as per the rules. If you don't want to buy one it's your choice, personally I don't get why you don't want to spend 99$ or more but what can I say. Wow that's enlightening! Oh btw- if your answer provides no insight - you can just not post.But don't question if it should be legal or not ... It is legal! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Ontherun - 2009-08-29 9:45 PM A sad addition to the go fast debate is the ecconomics that have helped our sport grow. Without all the inovation from companies pushing the envelope, and trying to help people "buy speed" we would most likely not seen the explosion of growth in our sport. The sponsor dollars help the overall sport grow, weather we like it or not. great point and very true and thanks for the video |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() on the flip side, should racing flats, tri shorts, or tri bikes be allowed? why not just ride a mountain bike? |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() newbz - 2009-08-30 12:57 PMon the flip side, should racing flats, tri shorts, or tri bikes be allowed? why not just ride a mountain bike? yeah, i mentioned the racing flats. but the wetsuit is more like rollerblades - it isn't just reducing friction - it is actually taking away work by planing the swimmer.Also - you know how HFP has the MT Bkie div. It is there for the entry level athletes not mountain bike enthusiasts (considering it is on paved roads) why not have a general bike limit rather than just lumping it as Mt Bikes. Maybe make it a weight class based on honor syst like Clydesdale and Athena? There is a lot of equip involved in a tri - i would love to have an economically level playing fiel but my original post center more around why it is legal not it's cost. specifically it's buoyancy factor since it contradicts USAT's own rule of no floatation devices. I could see a speedsuit like worn in the olympics being legal - (frustratingly expensive - but at least not buoyant) |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() In my opinion its You against the clock. Everything else is irrelevant. Wetsuits, bikes, Shoes ect.. Sure I'd like to have the best,, but who wouldn't.. as a realist what are you trying to prove? That your just as fast as the guy with a wetsuit. Well then prove it. It still is down to mechanics and form. |
|