Smoke-Free Campus
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2011-06-13 10:08 AM |
Master 1920 Ann Arbor, MI | Subject: Smoke-Free Campus Starting July 1st, the University of Michigan will institute a campus-wide smoking ban. Smoking will not be allowed anywhere on University property. Yes- that means outside. Smokers can light up in their car, on university property, with the windows up, but this ban includes areas that are used to tailgate before UM football games. Story here: http://www.freep.com/article/20110612/NEWS06/106120466/Lighting-up-... Michigan outlawed smoking in bars only 2 years ago, so this outdoor ban is a bold step (set into action in 2009). Being a controversial topic, I'm just interested to hear COJ's thoughts! |
|
2011-06-13 10:13 AM in reply to: #3546034 |
Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus Madison city has been smoke-free for a few years (albeit people are still disgruntled). How bad is the smoking scene around there? Looks like you and Ryan will have to settle with using the patch or chewing Nicorette. Edited by 1stTimeTri 2011-06-13 10:15 AM |
2011-06-13 10:16 AM in reply to: #3546034 |
Melon Presser 52116 | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus I like it. I think smokers have the right to smoke on their own property, and only if it doesn't waft to anyone else's. It's a bit like Mills libertarianism ... you have the right to do what you want insofar as it doesn't harm others ... If you suffer or die of second-hand smoke inhalation, I'd say that's pretty effen harmful. |
2011-06-13 10:24 AM in reply to: #3546034 |
Champion 7347 SRQ, FL | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus While I agree with smoking bans in enclosed places (like restaurants, bars, sporting events etc..) I think these "no smoking in public" bans are going a bit too far. Now I HATE the smell of smokers. But really, how hard is it to move a couple of feet to get out of the way of the smoke? |
2011-06-13 10:26 AM in reply to: #3546059 |
Veteran 1097 Elizabethtown, KY | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus TriAya - 2011-06-13 11:16 AM I like it. I think smokers have the right to smoke on their own property, and only if it doesn't waft to anyone else's. It's a bit like Mills libertarianism ... you have the right to do what you want insofar as it doesn't harm others ... If you suffer or die of second-hand smoke inhalation, I'd say that's pretty effen harmful. Interesting. I'm generally anti-smoking, but this comment got me to thinking. Does this mean I should only light up the fire pit on days when there is zero wind? Sometimes, at night, there's a temperature inversion where the smoke travels up a couple dozen feet or so, and then travels horizontally. We live on 1.8 acres, but I'm sure neighbors could likely smell it. |
2011-06-13 10:32 AM in reply to: #3546088 |
Master 1920 Ann Arbor, MI | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus TriRSquared - 2011-06-13 11:24 AM While I agree with smoking bans in enclosed places (like restaurants, bars, sporting events etc..) I think these "no smoking in public" bans are going a bit too far. Now I HATE the smell of smokers. But really, how hard is it to move a couple of feet to get out of the way of the smoke? It is really hard to avoid smokers at entrances/exits to buildings- you don't know until it's too late (when you are leaving the building), or, there is no way around because you have to use the door. Also, there are a lot of sidewalks, specifically by the hospital, where smokers congregate, and there is literally no way around them- unless you go walk in the middle of the road. Just to argue, because I really do think it's an interesting debate- I'm curious why I should have to move out of the way of a smoker- what gives them the right to pollute my air? |
|
2011-06-13 10:43 AM in reply to: #3546034 |
Supersonicus Idioticus 2439 Thunder Bay, ON | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. |
2011-06-13 10:56 AM in reply to: #3546132 |
Science Nerd 28760 Redwood City, California | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 11:43 AM Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. The hospital I work at just enforced a campus-wide smoking ban, including outside. It is wonderful! No more walking out of the entrance and into a cloud full of a smoke. For the most part, everyone now follows it. Employees go across the street and direct visitors to do the same. Every once in awhile, people are smoking and they get told they have to move. It's worked out way better than I thought it would. |
2011-06-13 10:59 AM in reply to: #3546132 |
Master 1920 Ann Arbor, MI | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 11:43 AM Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. That's one weird part about this ban- they've specifically stated they won't be handing out tickets- just using UM disciplinary procedures to enforce it. Strange, but it may be the Universities way to make it less controversial. @1TT- smoking is present, especially around the hospital, so much so that I'll never run near there. Is the ban effective in Madison? |
2011-06-13 11:00 AM in reply to: #3546034 |
Champion 10668 Tacoma, Washington | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus Awesome. I support it. |
2011-06-13 11:03 AM in reply to: #3546132 |
Expert 1149 CenTex | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 10:43 AM Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. I am not a smoker and don't have much of an issue with restricting public areas where people can smoke but this statement seems a bit far-fetched to me. I would think that it would take a much stronger heat source than a cigarette to ignite an oxygen tank. |
|
2011-06-13 11:16 AM in reply to: #3546034 |
Extreme Veteran 3177 | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus I am all for it, but then I have a family history of smoking related illness/disease/death as well as working in the Oncology secter so I see the results of smoking every day. (I know most people associate it with Lung cancer but it actually has a wide array of cancers that it can increase a persons risk of getting, including Skin cancers, bladders cancer, and I believe some gynecological cancers - though that is out of my area so not too sure on the last one). My hospital campus is smoke free for patients or workers/volunteers. If a worker is caught smoking within, I think, 50 feet of the campus (not the building or an entrance) they can and have been fired for violating rules. (not sure what happens to patients but I know it is enforced). My alma Mater was in the process, when I was a senior, of making our campus smoke free. Luckily as a private Lutheran University we would not have to put up with much scrutiny and the majority of Alumni/students/board members were for it from what I knew. I am hoping it spreads and many individual institutions choose to do this. I am not necessarily a fan of banning smoking in certain public places like parks etc where there is going to be plenty of space and open air but Washington already had a ban in place of no smoking within 25 feet of any public building entrence/exit/or window that could open. |
2011-06-13 11:29 AM in reply to: #3546088 |
Master 1903 Portland, Oregon | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus TriRSquared - 2011-06-13 8:24 AM While I agree with smoking bans in enclosed places (like restaurants, bars, sporting events etc..) I think these "no smoking in public" bans are going a bit too far. Now I HATE the smell of smokers. But really, how hard is it to move a couple of feet to get out of the way of the smoke? First, Yay for the ban! We recently were at a hospital where there was a property-wide ban and it was great. No cloud at entrances or downwind of people in the parking lot. And it IS hard to 'get out of the way' of smoke. We run in our neighborhood down the middles of a residential streets and quite often we will get a nice big lungful of someone's ciggy smoke. When they are smoking on their porch. Not in the car at the street, but 35 feet away on their porch. There's not much more I can do to stay away from people's front porches than run down the middle of the street. (let's save the argument as to whether I should be running there...) My MIL was visiting and she smokes. She would go out to our arbor (as opposed to the back porch) which was nice of her, but the smoke still followed her back in the house, wafted in through the windows, etc. After 3 days, I could smell it in my house when I came in. Ugh. I'd give a lot to have a magic not-want-to-smoke wand.
|
2011-06-13 11:32 AM in reply to: #3546190 |
Supersonicus Idioticus 2439 Thunder Bay, ON | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus cornchexs - 2011-06-13 12:03 PM So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 10:43 AM Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. I am not a smoker and don't have much of an issue with restricting public areas where people can smoke but this statement seems a bit far-fetched to me. I would think that it would take a much stronger heat source than a cigarette to ignite an oxygen tank. You could be right, however I know this has happened for propane tanks. In Toronto a couple years back, notices in my apartment were posted advising residents not to throw cigarette buts from their balcony. This was in the wake of a huge blaze that started when someone's cigarette but ignited a barbeque propane tank. Oxygen might not be as volatile, but one of my relative's house no longer has any lit flames out of fear for his tank. Sorry to side track. I am just trying to pad my post count until I hit 2000 |
2011-06-13 11:42 AM in reply to: #3546110 |
Master 2725 Washington, DC Metro | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus jazz82482 - 2011-06-13 11:32 AM TriRSquared - 2011-06-13 11:24 AM It is really hard to avoid smokers at entrances/exits to buildings- you don't know until it's too late (when you are leaving the building), or, there is no way around because you have to use the door. Also, there are a lot of sidewalks, specifically by the hospital, where smokers congregate, and there is literally no way around them- unless you go walk in the middle of the road. Just to argue, because I really do think it's an interesting debate- I'm curious why I should have to move out of the way of a smoker- what gives them the right to pollute my air? While I agree with smoking bans in enclosed places (like restaurants, bars, sporting events etc..) I think these "no smoking in public" bans are going a bit too far. Now I HATE the smell of smokers. But really, how hard is it to move a couple of feet to get out of the way of the smoke? Agreed, it is very hard to get out of the way of smokers, not to mention the fact that I agree with the "why should I have to" mentality. Smoking is banned indoors where I live but outside bars/restaurants its allowed. I always love when I see a table of folks together and then someone gets up from the table and moves next to me to smoke. I'm the first one to call them out on it. I get dirty looks but who cares... you don't want to bother your friends with your smoking but you'll come over by me to do it. |
2011-06-13 11:45 AM in reply to: #3546256 |
Pro 6767 the Alabama part of Pennsylvania | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 12:32 PM cornchexs - 2011-06-13 12:03 PM You could be right, however I know this has happened for propane tanks. In Toronto a couple years back, notices in my apartment were posted advising residents not to throw cigarette buts from their balcony. This was in the wake of a huge blaze that started when someone's cigarette but ignited a barbeque propane tank. Oxygen might not be as volatile, but one of my relative's house no longer has any lit flames out of fear for his tank. Sorry to side track. I am just trying to pad my post count until I hit 2000 So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 10:43 AM Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. I am not a smoker and don't have much of an issue with restricting public areas where people can smoke but this statement seems a bit far-fetched to me. I would think that it would take a much stronger heat source than a cigarette to ignite an oxygen tank. Oxygen is highly flammable. The issue is not quite as simple as "will the tank blow up", and more that oxygen is being used. It is not just sitting in a tank. Here's my anecdote: Many years ago, when I was a lab tech, there was a patient on nasal O2 (the little plastic tube that puts oxygen right into the nose). Her pastor gave her a cigarette despite all the "Flammable" and "No Smoking" signs in her room. She died a horrible death when the oxygen ignited, setting her on fire in the hospital bed. Occasionally (rarely), in an operating room, the electric cauterization ignites oxygen, resulting in an emergency. |
|
2011-06-13 11:53 AM in reply to: #3546295 |
Master 2380 Beijing | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus gearboy - 2011-06-12 12:45 PM So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 12:32 PM cornchexs - 2011-06-13 12:03 PM You could be right, however I know this has happened for propane tanks. In Toronto a couple years back, notices in my apartment were posted advising residents not to throw cigarette buts from their balcony. This was in the wake of a huge blaze that started when someone's cigarette but ignited a barbeque propane tank. Oxygen might not be as volatile, but one of my relative's house no longer has any lit flames out of fear for his tank. Sorry to side track. I am just trying to pad my post count until I hit 2000 So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 10:43 AM Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. I am not a smoker and don't have much of an issue with restricting public areas where people can smoke but this statement seems a bit far-fetched to me. I would think that it would take a much stronger heat source than a cigarette to ignite an oxygen tank. Oxygen is highly flammable. The issue is not quite as simple as "will the tank blow up", and more that oxygen is being used. It is not just sitting in a tank. Here's my anecdote: Many years ago, when I was a lab tech, there was a patient on nasal O2 (the little plastic tube that puts oxygen right into the nose). Her pastor gave her a cigarette despite all the "Flammable" and "No Smoking" signs in her room. She died a horrible death when the oxygen ignited, setting her on fire in the hospital bed. Occasionally (rarely), in an operating room, the electric cauterization ignites oxygen, resulting in an emergency. Minor point. Oxygen does NOT burn. Oxygen enables other things to burn. Shut off the Oxygen, the fire will die down. (not extinguish....there is Oxygen in the air obviously.) In the presence of pure oxygen, some things will burn MUCH more quickly than they normally would, which CAN result in an explosion, or at least a "flare up." |
2011-06-13 12:00 PM in reply to: #3546243 |
Veteran 1097 Elizabethtown, KY | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus ell-in-or - 2011-06-13 12:29 PM TriRSquared - 2011-06-13 8:24 AM While I agree with smoking bans in enclosed places (like restaurants, bars, sporting events etc..) I think these "no smoking in public" bans are going a bit too far. Now I HATE the smell of smokers. But really, how hard is it to move a couple of feet to get out of the way of the smoke? First, Yay for the ban! We recently were at a hospital where there was a property-wide ban and it was great. No cloud at entrances or downwind of people in the parking lot. And it IS hard to 'get out of the way' of smoke. We run in our neighborhood down the middles of a residential streets and quite often we will get a nice big lungful of someone's ciggy smoke. When they are smoking on their porch. Not in the car at the street, but 35 feet away on their porch. There's not much more I can do to stay away from people's front porches than run down the middle of the street. (let's save the argument as to whether I should be running there...) My MIL was visiting and she smokes. She would go out to our arbor (as opposed to the back porch) which was nice of her, but the smoke still followed her back in the house, wafted in through the windows, etc. After 3 days, I could smell it in my house when I came in. Ugh. I'd give a lot to have a magic not-want-to-smoke wand.
So would you support an automobile ban? Or a coal-burning power plant ban? Or a BBQ ban? Just being outside is a risk to your health. Then again, so is holing yourself up inside 24/7. At some point, you just have to accept the risks and move forward. |
2011-06-13 12:04 PM in reply to: #3546034 |
Master 1970 Somewhere on the Tennessee River | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus The college I work at has had the smoke free campus in effect for a year. Faculty and staff can be reprimanded if caught smoking. I'm not sure about the sanctions for students. Before the smoking ban we had designated places for smoking. Very few smokers used them. Most would smoke at the entrance to buildings and if one was coming or going, especially right after class or right before it then one would have to run the gauntlet of smokers. The ban has caused a few to be inconvenienced, but has benefited more that it has hurt. I am a militant anti-smoker and a libertarian. This smoking thing has always been a dilemma for me. Individual rights are important; but, in this case, so are group rights. That said, I do breathe easier at work now. |
2011-06-13 12:30 PM in reply to: #3546034 |
Pro 4277 Parker, CO | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus I'm a non-smoker and I know very people that do smoke. That said, laws/regulations telling people that they cannot smoke outdoors just goes too far in my opinion. |
2011-06-13 12:37 PM in reply to: #3546110 |
Champion 7347 SRQ, FL | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus jazz82482 - 2011-06-13 11:32 AM It is really hard to avoid smokers at entrances/exits to buildings- you don't know until it's too late (when you are leaving the building), or, there is no way around because you have to use the door. I'd be OK with keeping them away from entrances as well. But say on a bench, 100 yards in the middle of a common area? That's just getting silly. I'm curious why I should have to move out of the way of a smoker- what gives them the right to pollute my air? What gives that automobile the right to pollute your air? Or that lady's perfume that you are allergic to? Etc etc etc...It's a slippery slope. Edited by TriRSquared 2011-06-13 12:39 PM |
|
2011-06-13 2:18 PM in reply to: #3546034 |
Expert 839 Central Mass | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus jazz82482 - 2011-06-13 8:08 AM Starting July 1st, the University of Michigan will institute a campus-wide smoking ban... As an alumni, legacy, former employee, son and grandson of former employees, I'm all for it. My dad worked for UofM for 25+ years. If they would have instituted this many years ago, maybe he would have been forced to quit and have lived longer than 54. |
2011-06-13 3:43 PM in reply to: #3546034 |
Member 143 Oklahoma City, OK | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus The company I work for has a segregated smoking area, and also allows people to smoke in their car. But last January they announced they will be going to a smoke-free campus on January 1st of 2012. In giving a one year notice, they are encouraging all smokers to consider quitting smoking and offering support for anyone wanting to. The response from smokers has been pretty negative, and I imagine as we get closer to D-Day it will get worse. |
2011-06-13 3:57 PM in reply to: #3546180 |
Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus jazz82482 - 2011-06-13 10:59 AM So Fresh So Clean - 2011-06-13 11:43 AM Overkill. At the local hospital (and I think all hospitals in my province) there is a campus wide smoking ban. In addition to adverse health effects, smoking could ignite and explode oxygen tanks! AND YET PEOPLE ARE CHAIN SMOKING RIGHT OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE!! A campus wide smoking ban is just too hard to enforce, even with the $300 fine that goes with it. Set the rules so that you don't have to work too hard to enforce them, or they won't be enforced at all. That's one weird part about this ban- they've specifically stated they won't be handing out tickets- just using UM disciplinary procedures to enforce it. Strange, but it may be the Universities way to make it less controversial. @1TT- smoking is present, especially around the hospital, so much so that I'll never run near there. Is the ban effective in Madison?Wait, I better clarify since I was wrong - the smoking ban in the city is for inside buildings/businesses, especially in restaurants and bars, and NOT a city-wide ban for outdoors, too. Smoking is not banned outside - people are allowed to smoke outside a business in a designated smoking area outside the building, or away from the building. |
2011-06-13 4:56 PM in reply to: #3546968 |
Master 2380 Beijing | Subject: RE: Smoke-Free Campus Sooner Tri Guy - 2011-06-12 4:43 PM The company I work for has a segregated smoking area, and also allows people to smoke in their car. But last January they announced they will be going to a smoke-free campus on January 1st of 2012. In giving a one year notice, they are encouraging all smokers to consider quitting smoking and offering support for anyone wanting to. The response from smokers has been pretty negative, and I imagine as we get closer to D-Day it will get worse. I'm guessing that our work will get to this same place eventually... but for right now we have little heated smoking huts on 2 sides of the building. I'd like to see a full-campus ban. HOWEVER, I justify my long lunch runs by saying that "if they can pay them to smoke an hour a day, they can pay me to run an hour a day." So, I'll lose that little mental victory. But I'll still run at lunch. |
|