login
Accepting applications
-
No new posts
 2006-06-15 12:30 PM |
Pro  3673      MAC-opolis |  Subject: Accepting applicationsI am officially accepting applications for the next future ex-GF. If you or someone you know is interested, please forward their resume with references to this thread. Please no heroin addicts, ex GF's of mob members, or chicks who think they are being targeted by aliens...everyone else may apply. |
| 2006-06-15 12:50 PM in reply to: #455350 |
Pro 4578 Vancouver, BC | Subject: RE: Accepting applications Do they have to be the GF first? |
| 2006-06-15 12:51 PM in reply to: #455350 |
COURT JESTER 12230 ROCKFORD, IL | Subject: RE: Accepting applications |
| 2006-06-15 1:01 PM in reply to: #455350 |
Master 1827 Tampa, Fl | Subject: RE: Accepting applications Would you buy a future ex-gf a Cervelo P3? If so consider me applied. Edited by ROBIT79 2006-06-15 1:02 PM |
| 2006-06-15 1:42 PM in reply to: #455385 |
Pro 3673 MAC-opolis | Subject: RE: Accepting applications jeng - 2006-06-15 1:50 PM Do they have to be the GF first? Good point. I suppose someone could apply directly for the ex-GF position and skip the unpleasantries ***ociated with the GF part. |
| 2006-06-15 1:44 PM in reply to: #455525 |
Pro 5153 Helena, MT | Subject: RE: Accepting applications bmacmanus - 2006-06-15 11:42 AM jeng - 2006-06-15 1:50 PM Do they have to be the GF first? Good point. I suppose someone could apply directly for the ex-GF position and skip the unpleasantries ***ociated with the GF part. The editor is on turbo today! ***ociated? le? sheesh! For the record, that was as sociated and ti tle Edited by kimj81 2006-06-15 1:45 PM |
| 2006-06-15 1:45 PM in reply to: #455350 |
Master 1827 Tampa, Fl | Subject: RE: Accepting applications I am offended by the word ***ociated. And I don't like it when I have to ***emble something too. Edited by ROBIT79 2006-06-15 1:47 PM |
| 2006-06-15 1:47 PM in reply to: #455525 |
Champion 11641 Fairport, NY | Subject: RE: Accepting applications bmacmanus - 2006-06-15 2:42 PM jeng - 2006-06-15 1:50 PM Do they have to be the GF first? Good point. I suppose someone could apply directly for the ex-GF position and skip the unpleasantries ***ociated with the GF part. re: ***sociated It was unintentional. We're working on it. Trying to make the filter a little smarter. Then I have to disable welshy's pic uploading access. |
| 2006-06-15 1:47 PM in reply to: #455350 |
| Elite Veteran 1817 Cedar Rapids, Iowa | Subject: RE: Accepting applications Well, I'm happily married, too bad for you because if I was single, I would want to stay that way, so I would be anyone's future ex GF. However, I have a girlfriend who has in the past taken up with every variety of shallow, superficial, narcissistic, self absorbed jerk that they currently have on the market. But hey, they always have a lot of money, so there's that. She would not know (in the biblical sense) a NICE, DECENT guy if he (nicely) bit her on the a$$, so if you are one, she is SURE to be your future ex GF. Not sure how one would go about getting references, but I'll mention that you're looking. She does not do drugs, makes a great living, is funny, smart (Masters in international finance) and she is very HOT, or so all my male friends say. As far as I can tell, after knowing her all these years, her only flaw is that her taste in men is for $hit. |
| 2006-06-15 1:51 PM in reply to: #455536 |
Master 1827 Tampa, Fl | Subject: RE: Accepting applications marmadaddy - 2006-06-15 2:47 PM bmacmanus - 2006-06-15 2:42 PM jeng - 2006-06-15 1:50 PM Do they have to be the GF first? Good point. I suppose someone could apply directly for the ex-GF position and skip the unpleasantries ***ociated with the GF part. re: ***sociated It was unintentional. We're working on it. Trying to make the filter a little smarter. Then I have to disable welshy's pic uploading access. I saw this coming. |
| 2006-06-15 1:52 PM in reply to: #455536 |
Pro 5153 Helena, MT | Subject: RE: Accepting applications marmadaddy - 2006-06-15 11:47 AM bmacmanus - 2006-06-15 2:42 PM jeng - 2006-06-15 1:50 PM Do they have to be the GF first? Good point. I suppose someone could apply directly for the ex-GF position and skip the unpleasantries ***ociated with the GF part. re: ***sociated It was unintentional. We're working on it. Trying to make the filter a little smarter. Then I have to disable welshy's pic uploading access. Well, it's a good thing that bmac isn't ***epting ***lickations. (he he he) |
| 2006-06-15 1:53 PM in reply to: #455538 |
Pro 3673 MAC-opolis | Subject: RE: Accepting applications Tania - 2006-06-15 2:47 PM Well, I'm happily married, too bad for you because if I was single, I would want to stay that way, so I would be anyone's future ex GF. However, I have a girlfriend who has in the past taken up with every variety of shallow, superficial, narcissistic, self absorbed jerk that they currently have on the market. But hey, they always have a lot of money, so there's that. She would not know (in the biblical sense) a NICE, DECENT guy if he (nicely) bit her on the a$$, so if you are one, she is SURE to be your future ex GF. Not sure how one would go about getting references, but I'll mention that you're looking. She does not do drugs, makes a great living, is funny, smart (Masters in international finance) and she is very HOT, or so all my male friends say. As far as I can tell, after knowing her all these years, her only flaw is that her taste in men is for $hit. Most women get what they expect. That being said, she sounds perfect. |
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK