Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Election night predictions Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2012-11-05 12:05 PM

User image

Master
2447
200010010010010025
White Oak, Texas
Subject: Election night predictions

Post your predictions here lets see who can guess the best.  Post your overall electoral prediction and keep a copy of your state by state picks for bragging rights.

Link to electorial College Calculator

I predict 330 Romney  to 208 Obama



Edited by CBarnes 2012-11-05 12:06 PM


2012-11-05 12:11 PM
in reply to: #4484367

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Election night predictions
Romney 321/217
2012-11-05 12:12 PM
in reply to: #4484367

User image

Master
2802
2000500100100100
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Subject: RE: Election night predictions

In Nate Silver I trust:  Obama 307, Romney 231

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

2012-11-05 12:33 PM
in reply to: #4484367

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: Election night predictions
Obama 271 - Romney 267
2012-11-05 12:37 PM
in reply to: #4484367

User image

Master
1584
1000500252525
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Election night predictions
Obama 281 to 257.  Among the swing states:

(D) - NH, PA, MI, WI, NV, OH, IA
(R) - NC, VA, CO, FL
2012-11-05 12:39 PM
in reply to: #4484367

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Election night predictions
Obama 275 - Romney 263


2012-11-05 12:39 PM
in reply to: #4484367

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Election night predictions
I predict I will get bored and/or disgusted with all the coverage and will seek solace in my DVR, On Demand, or the NFL Network
2012-11-05 12:47 PM
in reply to: #4484367

User image

Veteran
582
500252525
Golden, CO
Subject: RE: Election night predictions

Obama 290, Romney 248

VA, NC , and FL to Romney.  All other swing states to Obama.

2012-11-05 12:52 PM
in reply to: #4484433

User image

Extreme Veteran
502
500
Tucson
Subject: RE: Election night predictions

mrbbrad - 2012-11-05 10:39 AM I predict I will get bored and/or disgusted with all the coverage and will seek solace in my DVR, On Demand, or the NFL Network

 

Yep

2012-11-05 12:59 PM
in reply to: #4484388

User image

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: Election night predictions
ejshowers - 2012-11-05 12:12 PM

In Nate Silver I trust:  Obama 307, Romney 231

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/



I'm not sure it's possible to couch a "prediction" much more than Nate Silver:

"We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1."

  • ..so, Obama will win IF the R/D turnout is even or more Dem's turn out. IF more Republicans turn out, he will lose. Brilliant.

  • 2012-11-05 1:03 PM
    in reply to: #4484367

    Iron Donkey
    38643
    50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
    , Wisconsin
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    One winner.


    2012-11-05 1:19 PM
    in reply to: #4484367

    User image

    Pro
    4313
    20002000100100100
    McKinney, TX
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions


    We should have learned from the Redskins/Carolina game yesterday that Romney will win.....cuz that's how it's trended when the Redskins lose at home the Sunday before Election day.

    IJS.....in NFL I trust.

    2012-11-05 1:21 PM
    in reply to: #4484367

    User image

    Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions

    269/269

    Tie baby!!! And then hilarity will ensue.

    My wife told me a statistic that Electoral College Voters have gone against their state 11 times and that because it's not required for them to vote a particular way, the ramifications were only that they weren't selected the next time around.  Expect some of that if there's a tie.

    Romney/Biden 2012...

     

    2012-11-05 1:22 PM
    in reply to: #4484464

    User image

    Veteran
    582
    500252525
    Golden, CO
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 11:59 AM
    ejshowers - 2012-11-05 12:12 PM

    In Nate Silver I trust:  Obama 307, Romney 231

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

    I'm not sure it's possible to couch a "prediction" much more than Nate Silver: "We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1." ...so, Obama will win IF the R/D turnout is even or more Dem's turn out. IF more Republicans turn out, he will lose. Brilliant.

    Totally unfair.  Silver makes very clear predictions.  He clearly predicts an Obama victory and he estimates the number of electoral votes for Obama (307).  He then goes farther and puts a statistical probability to an Obama victory - 86.3%.

    Your Silver quote was taken out of context.  He also predicts that Obama will win 50.6% of the popular vote.

    Disagree with his conclusions or his methodology if you want, but Silver's analysis is about as far from "couching" as you can get. 

     

     

    2012-11-05 1:27 PM
    in reply to: #4484526

    User image

    Pro
    9391
    500020002000100100100252525
    Omaha, NE
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    GomesBolt - 2012-11-05 1:21 PM

    269/269

    Tie baby!!! And then hilarity will ensue.

    My wife told me a statistic that Electoral College Voters have gone against their state 11 times and that because it's not required for them to vote a particular way, the ramifications were only that they weren't selected the next time around.  Expect some of that if there's a tie.

    Romney/Biden 2012...

     

    Yikes, i think that would be even worse than a drawn out recount in one state.

    2012-11-05 1:28 PM
    in reply to: #4484367

    User image

    Master
    1970
    10005001001001001002525
    Somewhere on the Tennessee River
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions

    I predict that it does not matter who wins, the U.S will survive and go about it's daily business. 

    Mountains, mole hills, split hairs, and all that.   I also predict that the sun will come up in the morning rising in the east.  

     

    I miss Pat Paulsen.   *Sigh*



    Edited by MadMathemagician 2012-11-05 1:31 PM


    2012-11-05 1:29 PM
    in reply to: #4484535

    User image

    Champion
    6056
    500010002525
    Menomonee Falls, WI
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    moneyman - 2012-11-05 1:22 PM

    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 11:59 AM
    ejshowers - 2012-11-05 12:12 PM

    In Nate Silver I trust:  Obama 307, Romney 231

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

    I'm not sure it's possible to couch a "prediction" much more than Nate Silver: "We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1." ...so, Obama will win IF the R/D turnout is even or more Dem's turn out. IF more Republicans turn out, he will lose. Brilliant.

    Totally unfair.  Silver makes very clear predictions.  He clearly predicts an Obama victory and he estimates the number of electoral votes for Obama (307).  He then goes farther and puts a statistical probability to an Obama victory - 86.3%.

    Your Silver quote was taken out of context.  He also predicts that Obama will win 50.6% of the popular vote.

    Disagree with his conclusions or his methodology if you want, but Silver's analysis is about as far from "couching" as you can get. 

     

     



    The quote is Silver's complete tweet in explanation of his "prediction". Spin it how you see fit.

    IMO, if you're going to make a prediction, you don't get to qualify it with a bunch of "IF's". The "IF's" ARE the prediction.





    2012-11-05 1:37 PM
    in reply to: #4484526

    User image

    Veteran
    582
    500252525
    Golden, CO
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    GomesBolt - 2012-11-05 12:21 PM

    269/269

    Tie baby!!! And then hilarity will ensue.

    My wife told me a statistic that Electoral College Voters have gone against their state 11 times and that because it's not required for them to vote a particular way, the ramifications were only that they weren't selected the next time around.  Expect some of that if there's a tie.

    Romney/Biden 2012...

     

    My daughter found this great video that describes the tie-breaker procedures.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHEDXzOfENI

    It could be John Boehner, acting president.

     

    2012-11-05 1:51 PM
    in reply to: #4484577

    User image

    Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    moneyman - 2012-11-05 2:37 PM
    GomesBolt - 2012-11-05 12:21 PM

    269/269

    Tie baby!!! And then hilarity will ensue.

    My wife told me a statistic that Electoral College Voters have gone against their state 11 times and that because it's not required for them to vote a particular way, the ramifications were only that they weren't selected the next time around.  Expect some of that if there's a tie.

    Romney/Biden 2012...

     

    My daughter found this great video that describes the tie-breaker procedures.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHEDXzOfENI

    It could be John Boehner, acting president.

    If that happens, my prediction is that he cries.  He's quite an emotional guy...

    2012-11-05 1:55 PM
    in reply to: #4484561

    User image

    Veteran
    582
    500252525
    Golden, CO
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 12:29 PM
    moneyman - 2012-11-05 1:22 PM
    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 11:59 AM
    ejshowers - 2012-11-05 12:12 PM

    In Nate Silver I trust:  Obama 307, Romney 231

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

    I'm not sure it's possible to couch a "prediction" much more than Nate Silver: "We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1." ...so, Obama will win IF the R/D turnout is even or more Dem's turn out. IF more Republicans turn out, he will lose. Brilliant.

    Totally unfair.  Silver makes very clear predictions.  He clearly predicts an Obama victory and he estimates the number of electoral votes for Obama (307).  He then goes farther and puts a statistical probability to an Obama victory - 86.3%.

    Your Silver quote was taken out of context.  He also predicts that Obama will win 50.6% of the popular vote.

    Disagree with his conclusions or his methodology if you want, but Silver's analysis is about as far from "couching" as you can get. 

     

     

    The quote is Silver's complete tweet in explanation of his "prediction". Spin it how you see fit. IMO, if you're going to make a prediction, you don't get to qualify it with a bunch of "IF's". The "IF's" ARE the prediction.

    Wow.  Silver writes 1,000 words a day and tweets all day long, and you reduce his work to one 140 character tweet

    2012-11-05 2:03 PM
    in reply to: #4484611

    User image

    Champion
    6056
    500010002525
    Menomonee Falls, WI
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    moneyman - 2012-11-05 1:55 PM

    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 12:29 PM
    moneyman - 2012-11-05 1:22 PM
    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 11:59 AM
    ejshowers - 2012-11-05 12:12 PM

    In Nate Silver I trust:  Obama 307, Romney 231

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

    I'm not sure it's possible to couch a "prediction" much more than Nate Silver: "We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1." ...so, Obama will win IF the R/D turnout is even or more Dem's turn out. IF more Republicans turn out, he will lose. Brilliant.

    Totally unfair.  Silver makes very clear predictions.  He clearly predicts an Obama victory and he estimates the number of electoral votes for Obama (307).  He then goes farther and puts a statistical probability to an Obama victory - 86.3%.

    Your Silver quote was taken out of context.  He also predicts that Obama will win 50.6% of the popular vote.

    Disagree with his conclusions or his methodology if you want, but Silver's analysis is about as far from "couching" as you can get. 

     

     

    The quote is Silver's complete tweet in explanation of his "prediction". Spin it how you see fit. IMO, if you're going to make a prediction, you don't get to qualify it with a bunch of "IF's". The "IF's" ARE the prediction.

    Wow.  Silver writes 1,000 words a day and tweets all day long, and you reduce his work to one 140 character tweet



    Actually, he did that himself.

    If Silver wants to say Obama wins and does it with 307 electoral votes and by winning the popular vote, fine. Leave it at that. Don't throw in a bunch of "IF's" afterward. Plant your flag on your prediction or don't make one. That's all I'm saying.







    2012-11-05 2:06 PM
    in reply to: #4484611

    User image

    Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    moneyman - 2012-11-05 2:55 PM
    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 12:29 PM
    moneyman - 2012-11-05 1:22 PM
    scoobysdad - 2012-11-05 11:59 AM
    ejshowers - 2012-11-05 12:12 PM

    In Nate Silver I trust:  Obama 307, Romney 231

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

    I'm not sure it's possible to couch a "prediction" much more than Nate Silver: "We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1." ...so, Obama will win IF the R/D turnout is even or more Dem's turn out. IF more Republicans turn out, he will lose. Brilliant.

    Totally unfair.  Silver makes very clear predictions.  He clearly predicts an Obama victory and he estimates the number of electoral votes for Obama (307).  He then goes farther and puts a statistical probability to an Obama victory - 86.3%.

    Your Silver quote was taken out of context.  He also predicts that Obama will win 50.6% of the popular vote.

    Disagree with his conclusions or his methodology if you want, but Silver's analysis is about as far from "couching" as you can get. 

     

     

    The quote is Silver's complete tweet in explanation of his "prediction". Spin it how you see fit. IMO, if you're going to make a prediction, you don't get to qualify it with a bunch of "IF's". The "IF's" ARE the prediction.

    Wow.  Silver writes 1,000 words a day and tweets all day long, and you reduce his work to one 140 character tweet

    Having worked with PHD Statisticians, I see the problem here.  You're both right.

    Silver is giving a statistical probability for his answer and giving the assumptions as part of his prediction. 

    Scoob is saying "Why not just pick a number like 298/240 and stand by it."

    Statisticians like Silver are effective in stuff like baseball where they have hundreds of opportunities for their models to play out.  162 games, 4 at bats per game and player X will hit .312 with a .800 OBPs.  In renewable energy, we use them to predict the output of a facility.  When they're off by 2-3%, they just say "it's an El Nino year" because they're predicting the outcome of 40 continuous years.

    But in an election, you have one thing you're trying to predict, so your assumptions matter because those assumptions aren't as easy as baseball assumptions (indoors, daytime, player on 2nd, 2 outs, 4th inning, right handed pitcher, etc, etc). 

    I think Karl Rove, Joe Trippi, et al who are making their specific numerical predictors are doing so on a pure gut feel like all of us are. 

    But Nate Silver is explaining the assumptions that go into his model.  If the sun comes-up on Wednesday and we have a winner and it doesn't match his assumptions, he can say "Well, the electorate changed from my assumptions, but if we adjust the electorate, the scale shows that I was dead-on." 

    Fact is it's all guessing on this election.  If anyone makes a prediction, it's not made based on data, it's made based on hunchism and biased by your own self conscious.  That's why I said it'll be a tie.  I'm really rooting for a tie...

    2012-11-05 2:16 PM
    in reply to: #4484367

    User image

    Pro
    9391
    500020002000100100100252525
    Omaha, NE
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions

    Along the lines of what Scoob posted earlier regarding the election all coming down to turnout.  I'm subscribing to the notion that the polls are inaccurate because they're counting on a significant Democrat turnout similar to 2008 (D+5 or greater).

    I just saw this article.  It's a partisan source, but quotes Rasmussen data predicting a R+6 turnout:

    http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2012/11/05/Why-the-Polls-are-Wrong-Poll-Shows-Electorate-is-R-6

    2012-11-05 2:19 PM
    in reply to: #4484367

    User image

    Pro
    6767
    500010005001001002525
    the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions

    I predict that within a week, schools and banks will be shut down while soldiers are marching in our streets!

    Here's my proof....

    2012-11-05 2:26 PM
    in reply to: #4484652

    User image

    Veteran
    582
    500252525
    Golden, CO
    Subject: RE: Election night predictions
    tuwood - 2012-11-05 1:16 PM

    Along the lines of what Scoob posted earlier regarding the election all coming down to turnout.  I'm subscribing to the notion that the polls are inaccurate because they're counting on a significant Democrat turnout similar to 2008 (D+5 or greater).

    I just saw this article.  It's a partisan source, but quotes Rasmussen data predicting a R+6 turnout:

    http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2012/11/05/Why-the-Polls-are-Wrong-Poll-Shows-Electorate-is-R-6

    FWIW, Rasmussen has been one of the least accurate polling organizations over the last couple of election cycles. 

    http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2012/Info/rasmussen.html

    New Thread
    Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Election night predictions Rss Feed  
     
     
    of 2