Evacuate Earth
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2013-01-02 7:07 PM |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: Evacuate Earth NatGeo had a great show on the other day "Evacuate Earth". The premise is that a Neutron Star is tearing across the galaxy on its way to our solar system and we have to evacuate a number of humans to keep the human race alive. YouTube has the full show here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFgJ7Hss1VA&sns=em They hypothesized that we would build a massive ship that would rotate (for simulated gravity) and then we'd pick a star that had a planet we thought we could colonize and we'd go.Some of the concepts I thought were good were that we could do so much more as a planet than we are currently doing but we don't have a reason to do it. So if a neutron star was bearing down, we could come up with ideas, test them out, and that would lead to new ideas. What do you think the biggest issues would be? They went in depth on a selection process of who got to go and how they thought that would go down. I wondered how you'd get people to work to get the evacuation ship launched and built without people just giving up. "If I ain't going, I ain't digging in the mines" and so on. What does BT think? Does anyone think they'd get chosen? I'm quite certain I would not be on the list... |
|
2013-01-02 8:32 PM in reply to: #4558884 |
Expert 763 Behind you | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth NatGeo used to be all about b00bs to spark readers interests (at least my dad), and now they will come up with whatever tad bit of information to live on peoples fears. I'd rather watch Honey Boo Boo meats Moonshiners than anything with NatGeo anymore. |
2013-01-02 9:53 PM in reply to: #4559007 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth TeamAngel - 2013-01-02 6:32 PM NatGeo used to be all about b00bs to spark readers interests (at least my dad), and now they will come up with whatever tad bit of information to live on peoples fears. I'd rather watch Honey Boo Boo meats Moonshiners than anything with NatGeo anymore. I hope you meant meets. Seriously, the way you get everyone to work is to hold a lottery and not announce the winners until the ship is ready to go. WTC uses this this method to get people (including me) to train and sign up for more events to validate Kona lottery slots if you are one of the chosen few. |
2013-01-02 9:58 PM in reply to: #4558884 |
Elite 6387 | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth All good things must come to an end. We are just not that important. What do we do when the Universe colapses? |
2013-01-02 10:42 PM in reply to: #4559113 |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth popsracer - 2013-01-02 10:53 PM TeamAngel - 2013-01-02 6:32 PM NatGeo used to be all about b00bs to spark readers interests (at least my dad), and now they will come up with whatever tad bit of information to live on peoples fears. I'd rather watch Honey Boo Boo meats Moonshiners than anything with NatGeo anymore. I hope you meant meets. Seriously, the way you get everyone to work is to hold a lottery and not announce the winners until the ship is ready to go. WTC uses this this method to get people (including me) to train and sign up for more events to validate Kona lottery slots if you are one of the chosen few. So your fee just to enter the lottery would pay for the ship, right? And then you pay if you get accepted. Just like WTC! |
2013-01-03 10:43 AM in reply to: #4559161 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-01-02 10:42 PM popsracer - 2013-01-02 10:53 PM TeamAngel - 2013-01-02 6:32 PM NatGeo used to be all about b00bs to spark readers interests (at least my dad), and now they will come up with whatever tad bit of information to live on peoples fears. I'd rather watch Honey Boo Boo meats Moonshiners than anything with NatGeo anymore. I hope you meant meets. Seriously, the way you get everyone to work is to hold a lottery and not announce the winners until the ship is ready to go. WTC uses this this method to get people (including me) to train and sign up for more events to validate Kona lottery slots if you are one of the chosen few. So your fee just to enter the lottery would pay for the ship, right? And then you pay if you get accepted. Just like WTC!
You couldn't do a straight-up lottery. You'd have to have full genetic testing first to make sure you don't have any pre-disposition for crazies or genetic ailments (diabetes for instance). So you have to qualify to be in the lottery in the first place. I actually think WTC could play a role. If you finish IM Kona in 12 hours or less, you're automatically on the ship because you have shown yourself to be physically fit and able to endure the long journey... |
|
2013-01-03 10:44 AM in reply to: #4558884 |
Elite 4435 | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth I like earth I'm not going anywhere if its over that's fine I've had fun. |
2013-01-03 10:47 AM in reply to: #4558884 |
Master 4101 Denver | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth You could do what The Simpsons did and have a decoy ship. If you get on board and are seated next to Tom Arnold and Rosie O'Donnell watch out. |
2013-01-03 10:48 AM in reply to: #4559872 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth drewb8 - 2013-01-03 10:47 AM You could do what The Simpsons did and have a decoy ship. If you get on board and are seated next to Tom Arnold and Rosie O'Donnell watch out. ^^Snerk They didn't discuss multiple ships which I thought was a bad idea. Put all your eggs (or humans) in one basket? |
2013-01-03 10:50 AM in reply to: #4559869 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth jobaxas - 2013-01-03 10:44 AM I like earth I'm not going anywhere if its over that's fine I've had fun. So would you keep working? Would you be willing to pick up the slack for the people who said "Forget about this work stuff. I'm staying here and having fun!" They have a 75 year timeline which means most of us will be dead by the time the ship launched anyway so it would have no real bearing on the first generation's lives. And if you're born in year 35, you already knew it was coming. |
2013-01-03 10:52 AM in reply to: #4559880 |
Master 4101 Denver | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth GomesBolt - 2013-01-03 9:48 AM It seems like you'd want to send out some smaller, faster probes ahead of time too to scout out the target planet. It would suck to get there and find out it's uninhabitable.drewb8 - 2013-01-03 10:47 AM You could do what The Simpsons did and have a decoy ship. If you get on board and are seated next to Tom Arnold and Rosie O'Donnell watch out. ^^Snerk They didn't discuss multiple ships which I thought was a bad idea. Put all your eggs (or humans) in one basket? |
|
2013-01-03 11:01 AM in reply to: #4558884 |
Expert 2192 Greenville, SC | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth i think the biggest problem would be getting international and commercial support for this to happen. telling apple to quit wasting resources on new iProducts because we need to build a big ship would off a lot of 15yo's and the shareholders of the company. like someone mentioned this would take 75 years, so the initial generation probably wouldn't give a crap, and this is probably true based on current opposition to green energy and emission laws; if it problem won't directly effect them, they don't care. another problem is most of the world's population belongs to some religion that has some end of the world prophecy where everything turns out well for the believers. so they won't care either because its the will of their god. |
2013-01-03 11:27 AM in reply to: #4559923 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth Clempson - 2013-01-03 11:01 AM i think the biggest problem would be getting international and commercial support for this to happen. telling apple to quit wasting resources on new iProducts because we need to build a big ship would off a lot of 15yo's and the shareholders of the company. like someone mentioned this would take 75 years, so the initial generation probably wouldn't give a crap, and this is probably true based on current opposition to green energy and emission laws; if it problem won't directly effect them, they don't care. another problem is most of the world's population belongs to some religion that has some end of the world prophecy where everything turns out well for the believers. so they won't care either because its the will of their god. Maybe they should have a WTC legacy program type rule. If you do a lot of work, you buy one of your descendants spots on the ship. That way the current generation is securing a spot for their ungrateful grandchildren... |
2013-01-03 11:28 AM in reply to: #4559893 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth drewb8 - 2013-01-03 10:52 AM GomesBolt - 2013-01-03 9:48 AM It seems like you'd want to send out some smaller, faster probes ahead of time too to scout out the target planet. It would suck to get there and find out it's uninhabitable.drewb8 - 2013-01-03 10:47 AM You could do what The Simpsons did and have a decoy ship. If you get on board and are seated next to Tom Arnold and Rosie O'Donnell watch out. ^^Snerk They didn't discuss multiple ships which I thought was a bad idea. Put all your eggs (or humans) in one basket? They'd definitely need a huge ship to give you gravity somewhat like Earth's gravity. Then you could have scout ships that go ahead and then come-back. |
2013-01-03 11:37 AM in reply to: #4559887 |
Elite 4435 | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth GomesBolt - 2013-01-04 3:50 AM if they need admin I will work yeah!jobaxas - 2013-01-03 10:44 AM I like earth I'm not going anywhere if its over that's fine I've had fun. So would you keep working?  Would you be willing to pick up the slack for the people who said "Forget about this work stuff.  I'm staying here and having fun!" They have a 75 year timeline which means most of us will be dead by the time the ship launched anyway so it would have no real bearing on the first generation's lives.  And if you're born in year 35, you already knew it was coming. |
2013-01-03 12:48 PM in reply to: #4559862 |
Expert 839 Central Mass | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth GomesBolt - 2013-01-03 8:43 AM BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-01-02 10:42 PM popsracer - 2013-01-02 10:53 PM TeamAngel - 2013-01-02 6:32 PM NatGeo used to be all about b00bs to spark readers interests (at least my dad), and now they will come up with whatever tad bit of information to live on peoples fears. I'd rather watch Honey Boo Boo meats Moonshiners than anything with NatGeo anymore. I hope you meant meets. Seriously, the way you get everyone to work is to hold a lottery and not announce the winners until the ship is ready to go. WTC uses this this method to get people (including me) to train and sign up for more events to validate Kona lottery slots if you are one of the chosen few. So your fee just to enter the lottery would pay for the ship, right? And then you pay if you get accepted. Just like WTC!
You couldn't do a straight-up lottery. You'd have to have full genetic testing first to make sure you don't have any pre-disposition for crazies or genetic ailments (diabetes for instance). So you have to qualify to be in the lottery in the first place. I actually think WTC could play a role. If you finish IM Kona in 12 hours or less, you're automatically on the ship because you have shown yourself to be physically fit and able to endure the long journey... Naturally, you'd have to take the Dr. Strangelove principle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iesXUFOlWC0 (skip to 1:30) The actual construction of the ship is small potatoes. The US has 1,010,000 tonnes of ocean going ships in the form of just 10 aircraft carriers. A 1 million ton (2 billion lbs) space ship could be pretty big. Today, assuming you could get it off the planet, you could do it in a couple years easy, with only mobilizing ship builders - not even getting into other manufacturing labour. Make it a generational ship, and you don't need new propulsion technology - getting air, heat, and fuel would be bigger issues. So, then you'd have to sell to people that in 75 years, your grandkids will get on a ship that they'll die on. Maybe their grandkids will get to some place to land... |
|
2013-01-03 1:34 PM in reply to: #4560150 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth scorpio516 - 2013-01-03 12:48 PM Naturally, you'd have to take the Dr. Strangelove principle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iesXUFOlWC0 (skip to 1:30) The actual construction of the ship is small potatoes. The US has 1,010,000 tonnes of ocean going ships in the form of just 10 aircraft carriers. A 1 million ton (2 billion lbs) space ship could be pretty big. Today, assuming you could get it off the planet, you could do it in a couple years easy, with only mobilizing ship builders - not even getting into other manufacturing labour. Make it a generational ship, and you don't need new propulsion technology - getting air, heat, and fuel would be bigger issues. So, then you'd have to sell to people that in 75 years, your grandkids will get on a ship that they'll die on. Maybe their grandkids will get to some place to land... Did you mean at 3:47? That's the real important part of the plan... But the video does bring-up another point. What if some countries decided to launch their own life-boat? China and Russia can probably build just as good a space ship as we could. |
2013-01-03 1:38 PM in reply to: #4560268 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth GomesBolt - 2013-01-03 2:34 PM What if some countries decided to launch their own life-boat? China and Russia can probably build just as good a space ship as we could. Ever seen Episode II?
|
2013-01-03 1:41 PM in reply to: #4560268 |
Expert 2192 Greenville, SC | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth GomesBolt - 2013-01-03 2:34 PM What if some countries decided to launch their own life-boat? China and Russia can probably build just as good a space ship as we could. as someone who works in aerospace... no, no they could not. we would need all their resources and manufacturing though, so they would have to be on board. |
2013-01-03 1:44 PM in reply to: #4560291 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth Clempson - 2013-01-03 1:41 PM GomesBolt - 2013-01-03 2:34 PM What if some countries decided to launch their own life-boat? China and Russia can probably build just as good a space ship as we could. as someone who works in aerospace... no, no they could not. we would need all their resources and manufacturing though, so they would have to be on board. I didn't say they'd be able to survive on the ship very long. Just that they could build their own ship... |
2013-01-03 2:10 PM in reply to: #4558884 |
Master 2277 Lake Norman, NC | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth Fun question! I would definitely NOT get chosen since I had cancer and would probably be deemed "genetically undesirable". Issues I could think of many off the top of my head... mass of a single ship (or multiple smaller ships), water, air, etc., etc. But I'm going to focus on just ONE: Everyone would be LONG dead before they got there. In fact, their children and children's children would all be dead. It would take about 60 generations to make the distance... Take the BEST case scenario - the closest possible Earth-like planet is in fact Earth-like and habitable. That would be Gliese581c orbiting the star Gliese 581 in the constellation Libra. It's about 20.3 light-years away (How many years it would take to get there at the speed of light). That's about 119 TRILLION miles. You don't power a spacecraft continuously (not enough fuel, no matter what the type, even ion-drive). You get it up to speed and let it drift at that speed towards the target. It takes about 7 months for a small rover craft to travel approximate 142 million miles to Mars. No humans on that rocket, so they don't need to worry about g-forces affecting people and can just slam the throttle down. That's flying at around 30,000 miles per hour. Let's say we invented some super-space-drive (forget Warp-drive, faster-than-light, it's not possible). And that could move our Earth Evac Ship 225 times faster, at 6,750,000 miles per hour. That's FAST! Almost 7 MILLION miles per hour!!! Now we're at 1% the speed of light. We're really blasting our way through space towards our salvation and new planet... At that speed, it will take just over TWO THOUSAND YEARS to get there! You might say that in that time we could continually upgrade and invent ways to move the ship faster... But the ship would most likely have long-since been destroyed from the internal war(s) for power that took place. Science facts are a b!tch, ain't they?
|
|
2013-01-03 2:11 PM in reply to: #4560300 |
Master 1780 Boynton Beach, FL | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth And you are missing the private enterprise ships (Sir Branson VI will surely be involved on that). You pay and if not selected on the main lottery at least have a way off the pending doom. The private developer will surely occupy many spots on the ship, but they will need the money, resources, and connections of their paying customers. And if you plan ahead, you could follow the main ship (like a remora on a shark or flies on a horse). I could even see interplanetary commerce among the many private ships. The difficult part will be keeping all the politicians in here... |
2013-01-03 2:17 PM in reply to: #4560375 |
Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth Bigfuzzydoug - 2013-01-03 2:10 PM Fun question! I would definitely NOT get chosen since I had cancer and would probably be deemed "genetically undesirable". Issues I could think of many off the top of my head... mass of a single ship (or multiple smaller ships), water, air, etc., etc. But I'm going to focus on just ONE: Everyone would be LONG dead before they got there. In fact, their children and children's children would all be dead. It would take about 60 generations to make the distance... Take the BEST case scenario - the closest possible Earth-like planet is in fact Earth-like and habitable. That would be Gliese581c orbiting the star Gliese 581 in the constellation Libra. It's about 20.3 light-years away (How many years it would take to get there at the speed of light). That's about 119 TRILLION miles. You don't power a spacecraft continuously (not enough fuel, no matter what the type, even ion-drive). You get it up to speed and let it drift at that speed towards the target. It takes about 7 months for a small rover craft to travel approximate 142 million miles to Mars. No humans on that rocket, so they don't need to worry about g-forces affecting people and can just slam the throttle down. That's flying at around 30,000 miles per hour. Let's say we invented some super-space-drive (forget Warp-drive, faster-than-light, it's not possible). And that could move our Earth Evac Ship 225 times faster, at 6,750,000 miles per hour. That's FAST! Almost 7 MILLION miles per hour!!! Now we're at 1% the speed of light. We're really blasting our way through space towards our salvation and new planet... At that speed, it will take just over TWO THOUSAND YEARS to get there! You might say that in that time we could continually upgrade and invent ways to move the ship faster... But the ship would most likely have long-since been destroyed from the internal war(s) for power that took place. Science facts are a b!tch, ain't they?
If you could go light speed, you should be able to go 20.3 light years in 20.3 years... They discussed on the show the project orion propulsion where you drop small clusters of nukes out the back of the ship and as they fire, they push a plate that accelerates the ship to ludicrous speed. Or about 7% of light speed. At that rate, they figure it'll take between 80 and 100 years to get to a nearby habitable planet. There's definitely no steering though and figure you'd have to save nukes for the stop on the other end... So basically, you'd have about 4 generations who knew nothing but life aboard a ship. Very strange to think indeed. |
2013-01-03 2:17 PM in reply to: #4560375 |
Master 2277 Lake Norman, NC | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth Bigfuzzydoug - 2013-01-03 3:10 PM Fun question! I would definitely NOT get chosen since I had cancer and would probably be deemed "genetically undesirable". Issues I could think of many off the top of my head... mass of a single ship (or multiple smaller ships), water, air, etc., etc. But I'm going to focus on just ONE: Everyone would be LONG dead before they got there. In fact, their children and children's children would all be dead. It would take about 60 generations to make the distance... Take the BEST case scenario - the closest possible Earth-like planet is in fact Earth-like and habitable. That would be Gliese581c orbiting the star Gliese 581 in the constellation Libra. It's about 20.3 light-years away (How many years it would take to get there at the speed of light). That's about 119 TRILLION miles. You don't power a spacecraft continuously (not enough fuel, no matter what the type, even ion-drive). You get it up to speed and let it drift at that speed towards the target. It takes about 7 months for a small rover craft to travel approximate 142 million miles to Mars. No humans on that rocket, so they don't need to worry about g-forces affecting people and can just slam the throttle down. That's flying at around 30,000 miles per hour. Let's say we invented some super-space-drive (forget Warp-drive, faster-than-light, it's not possible). And that could move our Earth Evac Ship 225 times faster, at 6,750,000 miles per hour. That's FAST! Almost 7 MILLION miles per hour!!! Now we're at 1% the speed of light. We're really blasting our way through space towards our salvation and new planet... At that speed, it will take just over TWO THOUSAND YEARS to get there! You might say that in that time we could continually upgrade and invent ways to move the ship faster... But the ship would most likely have long-since been destroyed from the internal war(s) for power that took place. Science facts are a b!tch, ain't they?
And BTW... I do believe in extraterrestrial life out there in the Universe. I don't think it's statistcally possible for there NOT to be. But for the reasons I wrote above - That's why we haven't had contact and most likely won't for a long long time. The vastness of space and what it takes in terms of speed and time to get across it is ridiculously big. We've only been sending radio signals (speed of light) for 70 years now. So anything sent, received, acknowledged, and replied - at the earliest - would take 140 years. IF they were 140 light-years away or closer (which they're not). We wouldn't hear from anyone out there until at least 2082 at the earliest. Sorry.
|
2013-01-03 2:22 PM in reply to: #4560394 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Evacuate Earth Bigfuzzydoug - 2013-01-03 3:17 PM But for the reasons I wrote above - That's why we haven't had contact and most likely won't for a long long time. The vastness of space and what it takes in terms of speed and time to get across it is ridiculously big. We've only been sending radio signals (speed of light) for 70 years now. So anything sent, received, acknowledged, and replied - at the earliest - would take 140 years. IF they were 140 light-years away or closer (which they're not). We wouldn't hear from anyone out there until at least 2082 at the earliest. Sorry. Doesn't this all presume this alien life is constrained by our technology? Maybe they got all Romulan and actually have a large battleship sitting on the far side of the moon.
Edited by Goosedog 2013-01-03 2:22 PM |
|