Wife asked an interesting question...
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2013-01-16 9:34 PM |
Veteran 389 sacramento, Colorado | Subject: Wife asked an interesting question... For my IM what is the longest training day you think I should have and what will it look like in the sense of what activities I will do for what duration?
Assume I am going to try and break 13 hours. |
|
2013-01-16 9:38 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Depending on your plan but probably a 6-7 hr ride. Some will add an hour run in after. I don't think I ever had more than a 7 hr day or so. |
2013-01-16 9:38 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Extreme Veteran 890 Sterling | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. |
2013-01-16 9:39 PM in reply to: #4581993 |
Elite 3060 N Carolina | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Bevie - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. I don't understand the 90 minute breaks. |
2013-01-16 9:50 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Veteran 236 Inland Empire, CA | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... my longest day was a simulated a little more than 70.3. and i raced IMAZ, goal was 11 but got sick the week of and finished in 12 and change. 2km swim - 32ish |
2013-01-16 9:57 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... I think the longest one on my plan is 7 hours. 6 hour bike one hour run. But I'm avoiding looking too closely that far ahead |
|
2013-01-16 10:14 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Veteran 188 | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... I did a few 100+ rides followed by a 6-10 mile run. That was about as far as my plan called for. |
2013-01-16 10:49 PM in reply to: #4581993 |
Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Bevie - 2013-01-16 7:38 PMWell you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. What plan is that? That is an insanely long and unnecessary day. My opinion only of course. |
2013-01-17 12:48 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
New user 219 Bonney Lake | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Last year I hit the 13 mark. My long day was a few bricks here and there. Long bike close to 6 hours then about 10 on the run. I used my sons baseball games as my destination to run to. For me last year it was the mental part of being able to move constantly for those hours. As in run not walk. Other than that a few 4-6 hour days on a weekend here and there. |
2013-01-17 12:50 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Extreme Veteran 890 Sterling | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... I am at work so I don't have the book in front of me so I may be off in the swim/run times a tad. Joel Friel's book Your' Best Triathlon. Guy knows what he's talking about that's for sure. I've listened to Crowie and some other pros talk about taking breaks in between each discipline on their big days. He devoted a section in this book to "big" days. I'll get more info once I get home and get back with you. |
2013-01-17 6:32 AM in reply to: #4581993 |
Veteran 660 Northern Illinois | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Bevie - 2013-01-16 9:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me.
Interesting concept. That would be a 12-13 hour day, I personally wouldn't want to do that but if it works for you then that's all that matters. If I "rested" for 90 minutes after a 6 hr bike ride there is no way I'm getting back up for a 2 1/2 hour run.
To the OP my longest training day will be a 6 hour bike (Fitzgerald Level 6 plan). |
|
2013-01-17 6:32 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Expert 1360 | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... my longest day for both my IMs was a 3000 m swim, 130 km ride and 15 km run. |
2013-01-17 6:33 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Veteran 629 Grapevine, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Oh...this is about triathlons. |
2013-01-17 6:34 AM in reply to: #4581994 |
Expert 1360 | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... japarker24 - 2013-01-16 10:39 PM Bevie - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. I don't understand the 90 minute breaks. I don't understand the 1.5-2 hour swim? for me, that would be something like 7000 m? |
2013-01-17 6:46 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Extreme Veteran 1986 Cypress, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... My longest day is a 4:30 ride. |
2013-01-17 8:00 AM in reply to: #4582150 |
Regular 311 Aalborg, Denmark | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... FranzZemen - 2013-01-17 3:33 AM Oh...this is about triathlons. Hah! |
|
2013-01-17 8:11 AM in reply to: #4581993 |
Extreme Veteran 887 Lake Placid, NY | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Bevie - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. Yep, I did something like this two month out and then a month out from IMLP. Not sure it would have much use for someone looking to PR, but as a first-time Ironman, it REALLY helped my confidence on race day, especially since I did it all on the race courses. I considered it my "secret weapon" for getting to the finish line. |
2013-01-17 8:33 AM in reply to: #4582265 |
Champion 6962 Atlanta, Ga | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... PinkPrincess - 2013-01-17 9:11 AM Bevie - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. Yep, I did something like this two month out and then a month out from IMLP. Not sure it would have much use for someone looking to PR, but as a first-time Ironman, it REALLY helped my confidence on race day, especially since I did it all on the race courses. I considered it my "secret weapon" for getting to the finish line. As others have said, that is a very very BAD idea! The recovery alone from this is going to be equivalent to your IM race day (read: 3-4 weeks). There is absolutely no reason to do this workout above, especially if you are looking at a 15+ IM day. In my 5+ years of coaching I have never come across an athlete I have trained, consulted or spoken to that this workout would benefit. Not one. I believe you may want to review what that workouts really calls for. If you're going to do a race simulation, I would recommend a Saturday with a 4500m swim, then an 80 miler at IM effort. Follow that up with a Sunday workout of 50 miles at IM effort and then a 10-12 mile run. The above, IMHO, gives you the necessary confidence (fatigue-wise) and also forces you to address nutrition and the mental aspects of an IM race day while not causing you to have to recover for more than a couple of days. |
2013-01-17 8:46 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Extreme Veteran 3025 Maryland | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... 8.5 hour ride through the mountains. Was very good for me mentally even if it did take a couple days to fully recover. |
2013-01-17 9:08 AM in reply to: #4581992 |
Veteran 667 asheville, nc | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Kido - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Depending on your plan but probably a 6-7 hr ride. Some will add an hour run in after. I don't think I ever had more than a 7 hr day or so. My plan was the same thing as the above. |
2013-01-17 9:09 AM in reply to: #4582311 |
Veteran 629 Grapevine, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Marvarnett - 2013-01-17 8:33 AM PinkPrincess - 2013-01-17 9:11 AM Bevie - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. Yep, I did something like this two month out and then a month out from IMLP. Not sure it would have much use for someone looking to PR, but as a first-time Ironman, it REALLY helped my confidence on race day, especially since I did it all on the race courses. I considered it my "secret weapon" for getting to the finish line. As others have said, that is a very very BAD idea! The recovery alone from this is going to be equivalent to your IM race day (read: 3-4 weeks). There is absolutely no reason to do this workout above, especially if you are looking at a 15+ IM day. In my 5+ years of coaching I have never come across an athlete I have trained, consulted or spoken to that this workout would benefit. Not one. I believe you may want to review what that workouts really calls for. If you're going to do a race simulation, I would recommend a Saturday with a 4500m swim, then an 80 miler at IM effort. Follow that up with a Sunday workout of 50 miles at IM effort and then a 10-12 mile run. The above, IMHO, gives you the necessary confidence (fatigue-wise) and also forces you to address nutrition and the mental aspects of an IM race day while not causing you to have to recover for more than a couple of days. I tend to do race simulations for sprints and olympics. I imagine your advice might be different for those (even if you disagreed with doing race simulations). What would you recommend for the HIM distance? Currently my race simulation is every Sunday, with a 2000 meter swim, about 40 mile bike, and 7 mile run. It seems to not wear on me - but I am interested in the wisdom of doing this. For my Sprint/Olympic distances, it was no drain at all and seemed to be the reason I propelled from zero to age group podium last summer. |
|
2013-01-17 9:09 AM in reply to: #4582311 |
Veteran 389 sacramento, Colorado | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Marvarnett - 2013-01-17 6:33 AM I'm not looking for a race simulation as I have a HIM a couple months prior. But would you still recommend the Sat/Sun effort? How far out from race day? ThanksPinkPrincess - 2013-01-17 9:11 AM Bevie - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. Yep, I did something like this two month out and then a month out from IMLP. Not sure it would have much use for someone looking to PR, but as a first-time Ironman, it REALLY helped my confidence on race day, especially since I did it all on the race courses. I considered it my "secret weapon" for getting to the finish line. As others have said, that is a very very BAD idea! The recovery alone from this is going to be equivalent to your IM race day (read: 3-4 weeks). There is absolutely no reason to do this workout above, especially if you are looking at a 15+ IM day. In my 5+ years of coaching I have never come across an athlete I have trained, consulted or spoken to that this workout would benefit. Not one. I believe you may want to review what that workouts really calls for. If you're going to do a race simulation, I would recommend a Saturday with a 4500m swim, then an 80 miler at IM effort. Follow that up with a Sunday workout of 50 miles at IM effort and then a 10-12 mile run. The above, IMHO, gives you the necessary confidence (fatigue-wise) and also forces you to address nutrition and the mental aspects of an IM race day while not causing you to have to recover for more than a couple of days. |
2013-01-17 9:09 AM in reply to: #4582051 |
Veteran 667 asheville, nc | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... ChrisM - 2013-01-16 11:49 PM Bevie - 2013-01-16 7:38 PMWell you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. What plan is that? That is an insanely long and unnecessary day. My opinion only of course. Agreed, sounds like doing nearly an ironman in order to train for an ironman. |
2013-01-17 9:21 AM in reply to: #4582400 |
Champion 6962 Atlanta, Ga | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... A HIM is a great indicator of your fitness for IM if done 6-7 weeks out, but not a great race simulation. I like this window because it allows for you to still fix things if needed right before your ramp up. If you are not doing any race simulations in your training, then I suggest you review that. The weekend given is a great gauge of where you are for IM day (if done properly) and I would do this about a month out from the race. This gives you time to make any adjustments (mostly nutrition-wise) in the next two weeks of your peak/race specific build before you hit a 2 week taper. The biggest mistake, IMHO, that most IM athletes (novice and experienced) make is not practicing EXACTLY what they will do on race day nutrition-wise, pacing-wise and even clothing-wise. This should all be nailed down more than a month before the race and practiced practiced practiced. |
2013-01-17 9:26 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Pro 4824 Houston | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Doing IMAZ this year. My longest training day will be the Redman full aqua-bike in September. My thought was it would give me the confidence of the full swim and bike without all the run pounding. I felt it was more bang for my buck than a HIM. |
|