General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2017-03-03 12:00 AM

User image

Master
2760
20005001001002525
Los Angeles, CA
Subject: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question
Hello everyone,

This is a question about CP calculations. Last Tuesday I did an FTP test that included a 3 minute all out effort and a 20 minute all out effort. I plugged in these 2 average power values (using KK Fluid Trainer VP) and calculated a CP value.

Today I did Jorge's 5 minute max effort test and plugged in this average power value (which was slightly higher than the 3 minute one from Tuesday's test) along with last Tuesday's 20 minute average power and calculated a lower CP value. I thought my CP value would go up but instead it went down.

How can a lower average power for a shorter interval test of 3 minutes yield a CP value and a higher average power for a 5 minute interval yield a lower CP value?

Thanks,
Roland


2017-03-03 4:46 AM
in reply to: kloofyroland

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question

The CP method looks at a short duration (3 to 5min in your case) and a long duration (20min) and looks at the decline between the two and predicts a power that you can hold for a "long time" based on that decline

You increase your short duration power and left your long duration (20min) power the same. So it now sees a bigger decline and predicts a lower CP

That's a simplistic view of it

The more "complete" way is to plot Energy on the Y axis, and duration on the X axis and the slope between the two points is your CP

5min@300watts = 300sec*300w = 90000Joules
20min@250watts = 1200sec*250w = 300000Joules

Slope = deltaY/deltaX = delta energy/ delta time = (300000-90000)/(1200-300) = 233 this is your CP

Now boost that short duration to 320watts
5min@320watts = 300sec*320w = 96000Joules
20min@250watts = 1200sec*250w = 300000Joules

Slope = deltaY/deltaX = energy/time = (300000-96000)/(1200-300) = 226 this is your CP

So 5min power went up, but CP came down


2017-03-03 7:33 AM
in reply to: kloofyroland

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question

Without plotting to show the picture, it's kind of like a see-saw, albeit a wobbly one. Short time on the left, longer time to the right. 3 & 5 minutes are short, 20 is in the middle, 60 or longer is more right. The 20' stayed the same, so acts like a pivot point, anchored in place. The left side went up, so the right side will come down. If the 20' comes up, so will CP.

The CP estimate may have come down, but could also be more accurate. Since it's only been a week, you likely did get better at the execution. That's something in itself.

2017-03-03 8:45 AM
in reply to: kloofyroland

User image

Veteran
1677
1000500100252525
Houston, Texas
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question

Marc and Ben gave good information, but here's another way to think about it if you don't like all the numbers.  The short/long tests that are used to calculate your CP are kind of trying to "factor out" your anaerobic contribution.  In other words, if you can really crush short intervals, but aren't able to sustain for longer durations, your predicted CP will be lower.  A 20 minute test can be skewed because it's not really "a long time", which is what CP is predicting.  If you have two points to look at (i.e. a short interval and a long interval), it can use them to figure out how much your anaerobic capacity is contributing to your longer interval, and figure out a rate of decay to predict your CP. 

On the other hand, if you're strong for longer intervals, but struggle with short ones, then your CP may be artificially inflated. 

I'm not sure if this helped clear things up or not.  But you can play with different 5' and 20' (theoretical) power outputs and put it in the CP calculator to see how it's affected. 

2017-03-06 11:59 AM
in reply to: ligersandtions

User image

Master
2760
20005001001002525
Los Angeles, CA
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question
Thanks guys! I love this training plan!
2017-03-16 8:46 PM
in reply to: kloofyroland

User image

Master
2760
20005001001002525
Los Angeles, CA
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question
Hello again everyone,

I've been monitoring my progress since I started this plan in January and I am certainly making good bike fitness gains. My next question is about CP in his calculator. I'm thinking CP in his calculator is also FTP?

Anyway, my last 20' all out test yielded a watt value that's 3 watts higher than the CP calculated. During the test I ran a about a month before, my 20' all out test yielded a value that's 4 watts higher. Pretty close on both tests.

I calculated 95% of the average power output of a 20' all out test and that looked like a power output I could sustain for an hour (FTP) but the CP value Jorge's plan yielded seems too high to be sustainable. In my case, Jorge's CP value is 7-8 watts higher than 95% of 20' all out test value (FTP). I guess I can do a 60 minute test for both values and see which one is fits better to calculate my zones.

I'm confused because many tests I've found online say to use 95% of 20' all out test average or normalized power to get FTP which I thought would be really close to Jorge's plan's CP but it's not. Can anyone help me understand the differences between the 2?

Thanks,
Roland


2017-03-17 3:09 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question
In theory, FTP and CP are not the same

FTP is the higher power a rider can sustain in a quasi steady state for an hour.
CP is the power a rider can sustain for a "long time". and is the result of a calculation

FTP is measured by going out and doing something like a 1hr TT. There are ways to estimate FTP, but they are estimates. You can get an idea of how good these estimates are here : http://alex-cycle.blogspot.ca/2008/05/the-seven-deadly-sins.html

The CP model allows you to calculate a theoretical power for any duration of time. From the CP model you could theoretcally calculate the power you could sustain for 45min, 1 hr..... Your CP is usually less than your FTP. I believe CP and lactate threshold correlate well.(I mean MLSS but that is overcomplicating it)

So training peaks sets zones based on FTP, Jorge (and others) set them based on CP. Jorge also sets them for HR based on lactate threshold HR

The 95% of 20' is a way to approximate your FTP. When that method came out it actually specified you had to do a 5' blowout before the 20' but some decided to (IMO wrongfully) drop that component. This leads to over estimated FTPs for some people

The 5/20 CP test can work well IF the tests are really done to maximal effort and this requires some experience in pacing and target setting.

If your CP is higher than 95% of your CP, I suspect your CP is wrong and I suspect you under performed in your short test.

But it probably doesn't really matter. For training purposes, being a few watts off is not a big deal. Your coach (in this case Jorge) should be giving you workouts you can do. If you can't, then probably your CP is too high and you need to adjust. If you made it through that 6x4@105% with 45s rest, I suspect your CP is not far off.

The big big big mistake you can make is take what may be an innaccurate CP and try to do a HIM at 80% of it.

Stick to CP, learn to test through experience and you will zero in on the right zones. Specific workouts like that 6x4 will give you an indication of whether your CP is too high/too low..

Edited by marcag 2017-03-17 3:17 AM
2017-03-17 11:30 AM
in reply to: marcag

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question

CP & FTP will be close, but aren't quite the same. Someone has a link showing power decay over time with this and the aerobic & anaerobic contributions. I might at home. CP is where the aerobic contribution essentially flattens out. The anaerobic is stretched really thin over longer periods of time. FTP essentially leaves it in, hence the difference in concept, but small difference in value.

2017-03-20 12:24 PM
in reply to: brigby1

User image

Master
2760
20005001001002525
Los Angeles, CA
Subject: RE: Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question
Ahh okay. Makes sense. Thanks guys. I'll stick with the current CP since I can hold the 6x4's.

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Jorge's Plan Cycling Zone Calculator question Rss Feed  
RELATED POSTS

Jorge's Cycling Plan day #99

Started by odpaul7
Views: 1107 Posts: 8

2013-03-07 2:54 PM JZig

Where is Jorge's Winter Cycling Plan? Pages: 1 2

Started by Afletcher
Views: 11581 Posts: 45

2011-10-29 2:33 PM neweyes

Shoulda, coulda, woulda...another lesson to be had...Jorge's cycling plan

Started by Donto
Views: 1768 Posts: 7

2010-10-04 10:15 AM sevrdhed

Jorge's winter plan few questions

Started by big joe
Views: 1110 Posts: 3

2010-10-02 3:50 PM big joe

jorge's winter cycling program Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8

Started by wannabefaster
Views: 28111 Posts: 177

2010-10-15 12:25 PM JorgeM
RELATED ARTICLES
date : September 30, 2016
author : Team BT
comments : 0
Subscribe to your favorite forums and threads!
 
date : September 6, 2011
author : mikericci
comments : 4
Triathlon Coach explains Zone 1 and Zone 2 training and the benefits of each training zone
date : April 14, 2011
author : Troy Jacobson
comments : 0
What is the difference between a recovery ride and junk miles?
 
date : June 4, 2006
author : mikericci
comments : 1
Information compiled on various plans from the most common user questions.
date : December 14, 2004
author : Don Magie
comments : 0
Known for its brutal cadences, nasty sprints and 12-minute hills, the spin class seems to be the perfect substitute for a raunchy ride outside. But is it?