General Discussion Triathlon Talk » aerobic base questions Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2007-12-10 3:58 PM

User image

Champion
6046
5000100025
New York, NY
Subject: aerobic base questions

ok, so this weekend was truly the 2 most boring runs I have done. to keep my heart rate down I had to do 11-12 minute miles - did  5 saturday and 7 sunday.  I can almost walk that pace.  My RPE is only about 3 - please explain to me how this builds my aerobic base and makes me faster????

How many of you have actually experienced this???

 

thanks 



2007-12-10 4:13 PM
in reply to: #1093243

User image

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
What was your goal HR and how did you pick the number?  I generally keep my HR in zone 2 which is less than 150bpm.  I did a LT test and then modified it slightly.
2007-12-10 4:17 PM
in reply to: #1093243

User image

Pro
6582
50001000500252525
Melbourne FL
Gold member
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
drchaya - 2007-12-10 4:58 PM

ok, so this weekend was truly the 2 most boring runs I have done. to keep my heart rate down I had to do 11-12 minute miles - did 5 saturday and 7 sunday. I can almost walk that pace. My RPE is only about 3 - please explain to me how this builds my aerobic base and makes me faster????

How many of you have actually experienced this???

 

thanks

Welcome to the dark and boring side!

I have felt your pain, 2 years ago I start HRM training and had to do 10 minute miles to keep my HR in Z2. Before that I thought I had to do 8 min miles for any run I did.  Yet within 5 months my fitness improved so much I PR'd a 5k without doing any hards runs except mixing in intervals on my longer runs. 

Based on a RW article I read awhile back, even world class track athletes spend ~90% of their training in Z2 region.  As you get fitter your pace will naturally increase.

2007-12-10 4:19 PM
in reply to: #1093243

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
I would ask your coach, he/she should know why the specific sessions were prescribed at such intensity and how it will fit in the big picture based on your specific needs.
2007-12-10 4:23 PM
in reply to: #1093243

User image

Expert
941
50010010010010025
WA
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
drchaya - 2007-12-10 4:58 PM

ok, so this weekend was truly the 2 most boring runs I have done. to keep my heart rate down I had to do 11-12 minute miles - did 5 saturday and 7 sunday. I can almost walk that pace. My RPE is only about 3 - please explain to me how this builds my aerobic base and makes me faster????

How many of you have actually experienced this???

 

thanks

ooh ooh! i am a very recent convert to the "slow" thing. v. quick synopsis:

-I've done 4 sprints and 2 half marys, never really trained according to the BT philosophy of z1/z2 go slow to get fast

-Decided I wanted to get fast

-Ran a 5K on 9/30 at 29:50...~the same time as my last four 5Ks stretching back to 2004 (ALL around 30 minutes).

-Did Z1/Z2 training in October/November. Felt doubt because I felt so slow. Ran all 11-12 minute miles. Could not imagine how this could possibly help. My RPE was also very low, and I could walk just about as fast as run that pace, just like you. Convinced myself I should give it a shot, be patient, and at least what happened when I ran another 5K in December.

-That 5K was yesterday. I wanted hit 28 minutes. You can check my logs for the week before the race, I was wondering how I could possibly be faster when I didn't even know what a 9 minute mile felt like. But then, I did it, coming in just under 28 minutes.

-I really don't understand how it happened, but it did and I'm a convert. I'm going to continue with the z1/z2 training at 11-12 min/mile until I have about 200 miles under my belt, then incorporate some tempo/speed to get even faster.

I advocate patience and trying it out, try a race in a while and see how you improve. You might be converted then too . I don't think I will doubt anymore.



Edited by lisazapato 2007-12-10 4:25 PM
2007-12-10 4:30 PM
in reply to: #1093243

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

People look for that instant gratification that you receive from the "ache" of harder workouts and something like Z1/2 work takes literally years to build and have a great affect.  Each workout has a specific goal and place, and if you follow them correctly it will all balance out and you will be stronger/faster/better for it.

Patience Grasshopper ........



2007-12-10 4:42 PM
in reply to: #1093243

User image

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

How timely--just put out a long post on this in my mentor group. I'm a believer and I still need to remind myself when I'm feeling like, hey, I'm not getting a workout here ...

I love this article from Mark Allen:

http://www.duathlon.com/articles/1460

The answer's maddeningly simple: you build base, you eventually go much faster at the same heart rate, and dizzyingly faster if you push the heart rate, say in races. I don't spend a lot of time digging through review articles anymore for the fancy schmancy commentary on the primary research, but it's out there.

2007-12-10 4:57 PM
in reply to: #1093243

User image

Champion
6046
5000100025
New York, NY
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

to answer Jorge and kproudfoot -

I did LT on the bike - so for now was a bit liberal with the zone 2 - was more in zone 3 by biking numbers....

To do what Mike Ricci suggests and do a whole month of zone 1/2 I think you all would have to heavily medicate me - and since I want numbers for running (praying they are substantially higher) I am doing LT/VO2 max this saturday on dreadmill.

 

And yes Rick, I have NO patience.....

my dog was really happy with the pace - she could trot along having a grand old time - and thankfully her interactions with others helped to entertain me..... 

it is going to be a long december..... but if it helps me get to 8 minute or less mile pace in 5K fine.....just really hard to see how.....

2007-12-10 4:58 PM
in reply to: #1093410

User image

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
drchaya - 2007-12-10 4:57 PM

to answer Jorge and kproudfoot -

I did LT on the bike - so for now was a bit liberal with the zone 2 - was more in zone 3 by biking numbers....

To do what Mike Ricci suggests and do a whole month of zone 1/2 I think you all would have to heavily medicate me - and since I want numbers for running (praying they are substantially higher) I am doing LT/VO2 max this saturday on dreadmill.

 

And yes Rick, I have NO patience.....

my dog was really happy with the pace - she could trot along having a grand old time - and thankfully her interactions with others helped to entertain me..... 

it is going to be a long december..... but if it helps me get to 8 minute or less mile pace in 5K fine.....just really hard to see how.....

Do a run LT test, the numbers should be different and thus allow you to run faster.
2007-12-10 4:58 PM
in reply to: #1093367

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2007-12-10 5:22 PM
in reply to: #1093418

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
PennState - 2007-12-10 4:58 PM
TriAya - 2007-12-10 5:42 PM

How timely--just put out a long post on this in my mentor group. I'm a believer and I still need to remind myself when I'm feeling like, hey, I'm not getting a workout here ...

I love this article from Mark Allen:

http://www.duathlon.com/articles/1460

The answer's maddeningly simple: you build base, you eventually go much faster at the same heart rate, and dizzyingly faster if you push the heart rate, say in races. I don't spend a lot of time digging through review articles anymore for the fancy schmancy commentary on the primary research, but it's out there.

Careful MAF threads don't always go over well....

Yup as Rick said, be patient. As a well-known (read infamous) MAF runner I think it's an OK approach, but it really is too  simple to do exactly what 'the grip' says. My coach is a Z2 fan but even in off-season base build we do some Z3 stuff. Jorge has shown me some light on this one

Mark Allen's article is really just from Dr. Maffetone and he is apparently a bit crazy... so just don't use MAF training as a 'cure all'   (can't believe I'm saying this )

Yeah, you're right--and no approach or method or plan is a cure-all, esp. if there are individuals with individual needs involved!

I do like the way the article explains it, though. Simple (if too simple).

And there's a lot of different info/experience re. doing ALL, EVERYTHING in Z1/Z2, what type of re-building base is necessary for experienced athletes in a new training season (or off-season, as you pointed out), etc. etc.

Cat's post sounded like she'd never actually spent a significant amount of time building a strong aerobic base, though.



2007-12-10 5:53 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Coach
9167
5000200020001002525
Stairway to Seven
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
We can't tell you what HR you should be training in,b ut since your a science kind of gal, training primarly in Friel's Zone 2 (note how I specified where I got my zone definition from), WILL result in the following biochemical and physiologic changes in your body:

1) increase in the size of slow twitch muscle fibers, increasing total contractile force
2) increase in the number of mitochondria that metabolize fat and oxygen into ATP
3) increase in the nubmer of enzymes that catalyze the conversion of fat into energy
4) increase in the number of capillaries feeding each muscle fiber

These changes take place slowly, and even over years as you continue to work in this area. All of the above results in increased ability for your body to take up oxygen and use it for energy, resulting in less work that your cardiovascular system has to do in terms of central delivery of oxygen.

ultimately you will be able to run faster at the same HR as well as run at your current speed at a lower heart rate, both of which indicate improved aerobic fitness.

There are other ways to improve your central delivery of oxygen, but these are high intensity, short term methods whose adaptations go away as soon as you stop...they are the "icing on the cake"

By building your peripheral muscle adaptation to your specific activity (running in this example), you build a broad base for your fitness, thus enabling your PEAK of fitness to be even higher than if all you worked on was your icing.

That is HOW workign at lower heart rates builds your fitness.
2007-12-10 6:38 PM
in reply to: #1093529

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
AdventureBear - 2007-12-10 5:53 PM We can't tell you what HR you should be training in,b ut since your a science kind of gal, training primarly in Friel's Zone 2 (note how I specified where I got my zone definition from), WILL result in the following biochemical and physiologic changes in your body: 1) increase in the size of slow twitch muscle fibers, increasing total contractile force 2) increase in the number of mitochondria that metabolize fat and oxygen into ATP 3) increase in the nubmer of enzymes that catalyze the conversion of fat into energy 4) increase in the number of capillaries feeding each muscle fiber These changes take place slowly, and even over years as you continue to work in this area. All of the above results in increased ability for your body to take up oxygen and use it for energy, resulting in less work that your cardiovascular system has to do in terms of central delivery of oxygen. ultimately you will be able to run faster at the same HR as well as run at your current speed at a lower heart rate, both of which indicate improved aerobic fitness. There are other ways to improve your central delivery of oxygen, but these are high intensity, short term methods whose adaptations go away as soon as you stop...they are the "icing on the cake" By building your peripheral muscle adaptation to your specific activity (running in this example), you build a broad base for your fitness, thus enabling your PEAK of fitness to be even higher than if all you worked on was your icing. That is HOW workign at lower heart rates builds your fitness.
you produce similar or greater adaptations at higher intensities (zone 3 or 4). IMO the main reason to train at lower intenisties besides the 4 points you stated is to be able to handle more training volume while at the same time allowing your body to get used to the stress produced by training.
2007-12-10 6:49 PM
in reply to: #1093410

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
drchaya - 2007-12-10 4:57 PM

to answer Jorge and kproudfoot -

I did LT on the bike - so for now was a bit liberal with the zone 2 - was more in zone 3 by biking numbers....

To do what Mike Ricci suggests and do a whole month of zone 1/2 I think you all would have to heavily medicate me - and since I want numbers for running (praying they are substantially higher) I am doing LT/VO2 max this saturday on dreadmill.

 

And yes Rick, I have NO patience.....

my dog was really happy with the pace - she could trot along having a grand old time - and thankfully her interactions with others helped to entertain me..... 

it is going to be a long december..... but if it helps me get to 8 minute or less mile pace in 5K fine.....just really hard to see how.....

once you do your lab or field test you will get your running trainng zones adjusted and the pace might be faster. Still be ready to do the majority of your training at lower intensities while yur coach gets to know your limits and while you get use to the stress of training. You don't want to run fast in the winter; you want to be able to do the work so you can run fast the day of your big race...
2007-12-10 7:58 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Master
1472
10001001001001002525
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

This year I have gone from race pace being 10 minute miles. LSD (z1/ z2) pace coming in around 11:30 miles.

Now, my last 5k I went sub 24 minute.

My long run saturday in middle zone 1 pretty much the entire time was right around 10 minute miles. 10 miles. No aches, no pains, no injuries.

I plan on going sub 40 in New Years Day 5 miler if weather conditions are conducive. ALL because of HR training.

A year ago a 5 miler would have EASILY been a 52+ minute affair.

My run LT is 167, bike is 153. Obviously you can see if I used  my bike LT I would have to crawl to stay in zone 1 and 2. Do yourself a favor and do a run LT test.

2007-12-10 8:03 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Champion
6046
5000100025
New York, NY
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

Thank you Suzanne - that is what I was looking for in the how....

and Jorge I think my coach is like you - does not feel that all the work needs to be zone 2 - has me right now doing one bike and one run per week but does have me doing some pace work this week (yay).

 

Suzanne (and anyone else who knows) - did a bunch of athletes really let people muscle biopsy them to get this data??? It seems counterintuitive that slow running would cause faster gains than interval work..... 



2007-12-10 8:04 PM
in reply to: #1093790

Champion
6046
5000100025
New York, NY
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
idahodan - 2007-12-10 7:58 PM

This year I have gone from race pace being 10 minute miles. LSD (z1/ z2) pace coming in around 11:30 miles.

Now, my last 5k I went sub 24 minute.

My long run saturday in middle zone 1 pretty much the entire time was right around 10 minute miles. 10 miles. No aches, no pains, no injuries.

I plan on going sub 40 in New Years Day 5 miler if weather conditions are conducive. ALL because of HR training.

A year ago a 5 miler would have EASILY been a 52+ minute affair.

My run LT is 167, bike is 153. Obviously you can see if I used my bike LT I would have to crawl to stay in zone 1 and 2. Do yourself a favor and do a run LT test.

 

Saturday at 7am..... 

2007-12-10 8:21 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Veteran
225
10010025
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
Check out this table to see what happens to your body at different training intensities. It is from a cycling book, but still applies to running, or any endurance event for that matter. You can see that higher intensities look like a better deal, but like amiine said, you can handle more volume at a zone 2 effort thus making more gains.
2007-12-10 8:35 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Champion
6046
5000100025
New York, NY
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

If I go by the Borg scale at the bottom of that link, then I was a 2 MAYBE a 3....and except for muscle glycogen storage increase it looks like there is more gain at Borg 4....which would more like zone 3.....which would be much more appealing to me.....

 

2007-12-10 8:43 PM
in reply to: #1093801

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

Suzanne (and anyone else who knows) - did a bunch of athletes really let people muscle biopsy them to get this data??? It seems counterintuitive that slow running would cause faster gains than interval work..... 

Actually, no .... it's pretty logical ..... do you think you will have better results by stimulating your muscles for longer periods and more often or for shorter periods that require more rest?  The muscle doesn't care whether you are Z1 or Z5 ...... it is simply responding to the loads put on it.  So a constant lighter load for a long time will (in my non-medical opinion) stimulate and enhance those fibers better and make them more adapted to workloads than high intensity loads applied over a very short time.

Back to the whole icing/cake thing (speedwork/base).  This is something that HAS been proven over time that you cannot train and sustain high intensity workouts constantly.  The body can't handle it and it will start to rebel and break when the loads are constantly too high .....

Newbie mistake #1 in every coaching book out there for endurance sports is "too hard, too fast = burnout and injury."

2007-12-10 8:52 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions

I did zero speed work this whole year as I struggled with run injuries and had to take weeks off at a time, did all my run training in my aerobic zones from testing and zones set up by my coach. Guess what my long runs I was 1:30-2:00 faster than the previous year. It really does work.

I look forward to meeting you on the 23rd and watching your training this year. You have a lot of questions and like to fully understand stuff...I'm much the same way...but I do most of my asking to my coach as I trust him. 



2007-12-10 9:12 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2007-12-10 9:25 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Extreme Veteran
552
5002525
Minnetonka, MN
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
I never really ran at all until I went into the Marine Corps. In the Corps, the PFT test earned you points for promotion in the following manner:

-If you maxed out the pull-ups and did 20, you got 100 points.

-If you maxed out the sit-ups and did 80 in 2 minutes (if I remember correctly) you got 100 points.

-If you ran 3 miles in less than 18 minutes, you got 100 points.


The pull-ups were easy to do. The sit-ups were easy to do. I didn't know any better, so I ran the 3 miles in about 17:30 most times, only going over 18 minutes once, because I assumed that it must be relatively as easy as the other two....

The ONLY time I ever ran other than the actual PFT was in formation runs with my unit. Over half the time we were almost shuffling in boots and utilities. I would guess it was at 10-12 minutes per mile on average. We ran at least 5 times a week, and often for 5-7 miles while I was in the infantry, and never very fast.

Looking back, I realize a lot of it was just being too young and stupid to slow down or quit, and, yeah, I puked most every time immediately after finishing, but running slow was the only training I did for those PFTs, and I did consistently run 3 miles in less than 18 minutes.


2007-12-10 9:28 PM
in reply to: #1093243

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2007-12-10 9:37 PM
in reply to: #1094020

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: aerobic base questions
bikeboyaug - 2007-12-10 9:28 PM

Can someone explain where running mechanics comes into play here?  I'm having difficulty seeing how one can maintain a high/optimum cadence (90 footstrikes per min.) at such low intensity running.

you keep similar cadence at every intensity; Z1 to Z5 although not many around here should worry much about Z5. optimal cadence will vary 80-95 so it is ok if your cadence is a bit low when running easy/steady and a bit higher when running tempo or LT. what changes is the frequency and stride lenght
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » aerobic base questions Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2