Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Joe Biden replaced? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2012-08-16 1:08 PM
in reply to: #4366081

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
Personally, I think the choice of Veep, for the vast majority of voters, comes falls under the heading of “can’t really help—can only hurt”.

No matter what people think of Ryan, he’s not going to be running the show—Romney and his closest advisors are. It’s no different than McCain’s pick of Palin or Bush’s Sr’s pick of Quayle (though Ryan is smarter and more competent than both). The older wealthy candidate chooses younger running mate to give the impression that the administration will be open to new ideas and to entice the younger generation into thinking that they’ll have a voice in the administration that right now, doesn’t seem to relate well to them.

Or, on the other side, the younger, less well-known candidate (Obama or Bush Jr.) chooses old, political war-horse, to reassure the older voters that there is still the voice of experience in the white house, and that the views of older Americans will be considered.

It’s BS either way. This will be Romney’s White House, through and through. Ryan, other than the occasional photo op, will be marginalized until it’s time for him to run on his own ticket.

I think Ryan has some interesting ideas, but he’s not going to have any say whatsoever in the policies of this administration, any more than Palin would have had in McCain’s White House. He’s basically political eye candy.

I think he is capable of making a contribution, although I disagree with most of his views, but I don’t think that’s what he’s there for.


Edited by jmk-brooklyn 2012-08-16 1:11 PM


2012-08-16 1:34 PM
in reply to: #4366515

User image

Slower Than You
9566
5000200020005002525
Cracklantaburbs
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
Obama will be signing his death sentence if he replaces Biden with Hillary.
2012-08-16 1:35 PM
in reply to: #4366506

User image

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
Jtiger - 2012-08-16 1:03 PM

scoobysdad - 2012-08-16 12:21 PM
marmadaddy - 2012-08-16 12:18 PM

ADMIN NOTE:

Says a lot about his presidency, and unfortunately, the intelligence of many American voters.

Let's make this really clear. Calling a person or group of people stupid due to their political beliefs or how they vote is NOT OK here.

It's an ad hominem and no less an insult than saying "If you vote for X you're an idiot".   Any future posts that try this tactic will be removed and forum timeouts will be handed out accordingly.

Again, this was not my point. My point was how, IMO, Americans are increasingly voting based on the charisma or "star-quality" of politicians, regardless of party affiliation, and that politicians seem to be realizing this.

 

This is nothing new. 



Not sure that was the case in '04 or '00. The last "star" before Obama was Bill Clinton.

Bush, Quayle, Kerry, Edwards, Gore, Liebermann and McCain were not what I would call "stars" on the par of Obama, Hillary or Paul Ryan (though some may disagree Ryan is already a star, he has been the real face of the Republican Party and architect of the Republican Plan-- I would say he's at least where Obama was prior to launching his '08 campaign.) Palin, well, maybe she became one.

2012-08-16 1:36 PM
in reply to: #4366515

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
jmk-brooklyn - 2012-08-16 1:08 PM

Personally, I think the choice of Veep, for the vast majority of voters, comes falls under the heading of “can’t really help—can only hurt”.

No matter what people think of Ryan, he’s not going to be running the show—Romney and his closest advisors are. It’s no different than McCain’s pick of Palin or Bush’s Sr’s pick of Quayle (though Ryan is smarter and more competent than both). The older wealthy candidate chooses younger running mate to give the impression that the administration will be open to new ideas and to entice the younger generation into thinking that they’ll have a voice in the administration that right now, doesn’t seem to relate well to them.

Or, on the other side, the younger, less well-known candidate (Obama or Bush Jr.) chooses old, political war-horse, to reassure the older voters that there is still the voice of experience in the white house, and that the views of older Americans will be considered.

It’s BS either way. This will be Romney’s White House, through and through. Ryan, other than the occasional photo op, will be marginalized until it’s time for him to run on his own ticket.

I think Ryan has some interesting ideas, but he’s not going to have any say whatsoever in the policies of this administration, any more than Palin would have had in McCain’s White House. He’s basically political eye candy.

I think he is capable of making a contribution, although I disagree with most of his views, but I don’t think that’s what he’s there for.


As you said, he's there to appeal to the younger, less-wealthy crowd. And people who do P90X.
2012-08-16 2:39 PM
in reply to: #4366081

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
tuwood - 2012-08-16 11:11 AM

 

There's been a lot of chatter the last few days about replacing Biden with Hillary.  Do you guys think it will happen or if it would help?

 

No, and NO!

Personally I think adding Hillary to the ticket would provide a spark to the ticket

I agree, if by spark you mean the ticket would go down in flames

 Hillary is currently the lock nominee for 2016 no matter if Obama wins or loses.

No way

2012-08-16 3:19 PM
in reply to: #4366081

User image

Master
1795
1000500100100252525
Boynton Beach, FL
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
She wont do it.   Why risk associating yourself with Obama and his decisions for the next 4 years and decrease your good chances in 2016?   She has much to lose and little to gain IMHO.  


2012-08-16 9:44 PM
in reply to: #4366225

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?

scoobysdad - 2012-08-16 12:07 PM
mr2tony - 2012-08-16 10:40 AM
scoobysdad - 2012-08-16 10:36 AM I think Obama has to consider a couple of things: Would the distinct reek of desperation that replacing Joe Biden now (so soon after the announcement of Paul Ryan as a VP candidate) send out outweigh the handicap and risk of keeping Joe Biden as his running mate? Perceptions are important, and this move now would show: 1) Obama made a really bad choice in 2008, and 2) The Democrats really fear Paul Ryan, what he has to say and how he is capable of saying it-- that's going to put Obama squarely on the defensive.
It could have the opposite effect -- it could make people say `Biden is the problem, with Hillary we have the change we need!' Of course that's people who are going to vote for Obama anyway, but it may sway some fence-sitters. Biden is a pill for Obama. I'm sure the president doesn't like having to go around explaining what his Veep meant everytime he opens his mouth.
I agree, Tony. It's very interesting to me that the RockStar President, now faced with a RockStar opponent in Paul Ryan, is having to take a serious look at bringing in a RockStar running mate to try and off-set how much his own star has fallen. Says a lot about his presidency, and unfortunately, the intelligence of many American voters.

Let's be honest though.  At this point in '08, Sarah Palin was a "rock star."  Palin's debate performance was not good.  

I do expect Ryan to be a much more effective debater than Palin.  That said, I would not underestimate Joe Biden.  

All that said, Hillary will not be added to the ticket.  It would be a desperation move and it would not benefit the Democratic ticket.  (it aint happening)

 

2012-08-16 10:27 PM
in reply to: #4367333

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?

just saw this article.  Sounds believable and i found it on the internet so it has to be true.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/314270/klein-white-house-woos-hillary-robert-costa 

KLEIN: Larry, just before we went on the air tonight, I checked with my sources in the Clinton camp and I took notes because I want to be careful. And here is what they told me: Up until just a couple of weeks ago, the White House was putting out feelers to see if Hillary would accept the vice-presidential nod and replace Joe Biden. Bill Clinton was, I’m told, urging his wife to accept the number-two slot. He saw this as a great launching pad for her for running in 2016. But, then, Hillary had lunch in the White House a couple of weeks ago with Valerie Jarrett, Michelle’s best friend, senior adviser to both the first lady and the president. And she told Valerie Jarrett that she would not accept the vice-president spot. The lunch was ostensibly about other matters, but it came up. The vice-presidential thing came up. Hillary felt burned out after four years as secretary of state. But I’m told there were more important reasons for her not accepting.

 

KUDLOW: Such as?

KLEIN: Number one, she felt that if she were on the ticket with Obama and he lost, she would be tarred as a loser when she tried to run in 2016. On the other hand, if she was on the ticket and he won, and he continued his far, left-wing socialistic policies, she would have to defend those policies when she ran in 2016.

KUDLOW: It’s already tough enough for her to defend some of the foreign policies that he has been putting forward.

KLEIN: Exactly.

KUDLOW: So let me just get that. You’re saying, two weeks ago, that White House staff put out feelers to Hillary about going on the ticket as vice president.

KLEIN: That’s right.

KULDOW: And Hillary then didn’t make a decision immediately?  She-

KLEIN: She knew that she was having lunch with Valerie Jarrett.

KUDLOW: But not with President Obama?

KLEIN: The president has never spoken to Hillary about this. Because he is afraid that if he makes such a offer, and she turns it down, Bill will leak the story.

KUDLOW: Bill will leak the story.

KLEIN: He doesn’t trust Bill Clinton.

KUDLOW: Well, he shouldn’t. Bill Clinton disagrees about three quarters of the time.

 

2012-08-16 10:44 PM
in reply to: #4366081

User image

Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Columbus, Ohio
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
Personaly I could care less about politics. Does it really matter who is President? As long as the Buckeyes win on Saturday all is good!
2012-08-17 3:51 PM
in reply to: #4366228

User image

Expert
4269
200020001001002525
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?

ejshowers - 2012-08-16 11:08 AM Near zero chance of it happening.

X2 agreed...Plus I like Joe... He always finds a way to make me laugh

2012-08-17 3:52 PM
in reply to: #4367389

User image

Expert
4269
200020001001002525
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?

jacasa - 2012-08-16 10:44 PM Personaly I could care less about politics. Does it really matter who is President? As long as the Buckeyes win on Saturday all is good!

X2  Go Bucks 



2012-08-20 8:18 AM
in reply to: #4366594

Master
1946
100050010010010010025
Memphis, TN
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
scoobysdad - 2012-08-16 1:35 PM
Jtiger - 2012-08-16 1:03 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-08-16 12:21 PM
marmadaddy - 2012-08-16 12:18 PM

ADMIN NOTE:

Says a lot about his presidency, and unfortunately, the intelligence of many American voters.

Let's make this really clear. Calling a person or group of people stupid due to their political beliefs or how they vote is NOT OK here.

It's an ad hominem and no less an insult than saying "If you vote for X you're an idiot".   Any future posts that try this tactic will be removed and forum timeouts will be handed out accordingly.

Again, this was not my point. My point was how, IMO, Americans are increasingly voting based on the charisma or "star-quality" of politicians, regardless of party affiliation, and that politicians seem to be realizing this.

 

This is nothing new. 

Not sure that was the case in '04 or '00. The last "star" before Obama was Bill Clinton. Bush, Quayle, Kerry, Edwards, Gore, Liebermann and McCain were not what I would call "stars" on the par of Obama, Hillary or Paul Ryan (though some may disagree Ryan is already a star, he has been the real face of the Republican Party and architect of the Republican Plan-- I would say he's at least where Obama was prior to launching his '08 campaign.) Palin, well, maybe she became one.

 

Bush came across as the "guy I could drink a beer with" Gore and Kerry didn't have that kind of appeal, nor did McCain which is why he lost among other things. 

2012-08-22 6:20 PM
in reply to: #4366081

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
2012-08-22 7:03 PM
in reply to: #4366345

User image

Master
2447
200010010010010025
White Oak, Texas
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?
Who could he pick that is not 1. a bigger screwup than Biden or 2. more qualified than himself?  Nope Biden is the man.
2012-08-22 7:27 PM
in reply to: #4370806

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Joe Biden replaced?

Jtiger - 2012-08-20 9:18 AM

...

Bush came across as the "guy I could drink a beer with" Gore and Kerry didn't have that kind of appeal, nor did McCain which is why he lost among other things. 

 

i don't think that is the case. I liked McCain. He came across often fairly well (except when he got his ire up). He used to come on The Daily Show fairly often, able to poke a little fun at himself, and to make his points. He came across as a "guy to have a beer with"; much more so than Obama (who I ultimately supported), who is more cerebral and distant, IMHO.

I think it was his choice of Palin that sank him more than his personality.

Now the headliners I would like to see face off in 2016 are Hillary and Condi Rice. Two very smart women, both having served as Secretary of State. Each with some "baggage" in their political past (Bill and the affairs, W. and, well, I'll just leave it at that), that they would need to distance themselves from just enough. 

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Joe Biden replaced? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2