Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?) Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
OptionResults
Mitt Romney105 Votes - [59.32%]
Barack Obama56 Votes - [31.64%]
Gary Johnson16 Votes - [9.04%]
Whoever the Communists are putting up0 Votes - [0%]

2012-08-17 4:19 PM
in reply to: #4368508

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
scoobysdad - 2012-08-17 2:21 PM
ADollar79 - 2012-08-17 3:13 PM

scoobysdad - 2012-08-17 2:47 PM I gotta say I'm honestly shocked by the results to date. I know the BT CoJ crowd is hardly a representative sample, and that a lot of things can change between now and November, but I'm really surprised at the margin here.

Why?  Looking at triathlon demographics, wouldn't you think the sport leans to the right? 

Yes, but my impression was that those who looked in on CoJ did not lean right.

 

There are 120+ responses and I don't think there are anywhere near 120 people who comment on these threads.



2012-08-17 4:39 PM
in reply to: #4368631

User image

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
JoshR - 2012-08-17 4:19 PM

scoobysdad - 2012-08-17 2:21 PM
ADollar79 - 2012-08-17 3:13 PM

scoobysdad - 2012-08-17 2:47 PM I gotta say I'm honestly shocked by the results to date. I know the BT CoJ crowd is hardly a representative sample, and that a lot of things can change between now and November, but I'm really surprised at the margin here.

Why?  Looking at triathlon demographics, wouldn't you think the sport leans to the right? 

Yes, but my impression was that those who looked in on CoJ did not lean right.

 

There are 120+ responses and I don't think there are anywhere near 120 people who comment on these threads.



That's interesting by itself.



2012-08-17 10:24 PM
in reply to: #4364280

User image

Master
2447
200010010010010025
White Oak, Texas
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
I am shocked by the results.  The area I live in is a solid Republican area now and 4 years ago I had only 2 people I kew were supporting Obama of those I know one has changed to Romney and he is a life long Dem. The other I will have to ask.  But I thought COJ was more liberal.
2012-08-17 11:16 PM
in reply to: #4368946

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)

CBarnes - 2012-08-17 11:24 PM I am shocked by the results.  The area I live in is a solid Republican area now and 4 years ago I had only 2 people I kew were supporting Obama of those I know one has changed to Romney and he is a life long Dem. The other I will have to ask.  But I thought COJ was more liberal.

That's pretty funny itself. I see COJ as very right-leaning and conservative. I am not at all surprised by the results.

2012-08-17 11:30 PM
in reply to: #4364407

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
scoobysdad - 2012-08-15 12:07 PM
powerman - 2012-08-15 10:41 AM

scoobysdad - 2012-08-15 9:15 AM
powerman - 2012-08-15 10:08 AM Where is none of the above?
Just as in a real election, voting "none of the above" doesn't in any way impact who wins so it's not a choice that's included. I know some people think voting that "none of the above" makes some grand statement, but in reality it only makes the same statement as those who are too lazy to vote at all. And you simply hand your voting power over in greater measure to those who DO vote.

Riiiight... because voting for two puppets put up by two parties that are running this country into the ground makes a much better "statement".

Thanks for the gasoline... just put it with the rest of it.

If you want to work for and vote for the rise of a legitimate third party, fine, more power to you. Eventually I may even support you. But really? You think abstaining from voting makes any difference? And before you argue that voting for any presidential candidate makes no difference in the present system, I'll simply ask you to consider all the ways the specific person America chooses to put in the Oval Office wields considerable influence, from foreign relations to our military actions/inactions in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Somalia, Syria, Central Africa and various other places, the Cabinet heads he/she chooses to head up the various departments of government, the justices he/she chooses to interpret law on the Supreme Court and Federal courts, EPA policy and much, much more. All of these individual choices by that one person we call "The President" can have a very real, meaningful impact on our lives even if you believe, in the end, we're all just pawns in a system that provides "The Illusion of Choice".

You are making two presuppositions that for the most part do not hold true.

The first is that an individual's vote matters. In national elections, an individual's vote is practically meaningless. Unless you live in one of the 12 or so counties in the country that are truly close in presidential elections. Local elections, that's another matter. Maybe state elections your vote will have some sway. But given the rate of incumbency re-elections, probably not.

The second is that the president has the power to make a big difference in a lot of things. This Freakonomics episode, talking to a number of economists, suggests otherwise. Yes, the president can pack the supreme court. But over time, most of the courts have ended up shifting mostly to the middle politically. He (and one day, she) can engage other countries - but any deals have to be agreed upon by congress. He can go to war - again, in most circumstances, the call would be the same no matter who is president (think entering WWII after Pearl Harbor, or war in Afghanistan after 9/11). 

I respect the office, and I think it is great that we have a system where our international representative gets switched up often. But I harbor few illusions that my personal vote matters to effect outcomes.

2012-08-18 12:16 AM
in reply to: #4368976

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
gearboy - 2012-08-17 11:30 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-08-15 12:07 PM
powerman - 2012-08-15 10:41 AM

scoobysdad - 2012-08-15 9:15 AM
powerman - 2012-08-15 10:08 AM Where is none of the above?
Just as in a real election, voting "none of the above" doesn't in any way impact who wins so it's not a choice that's included. I know some people think voting that "none of the above" makes some grand statement, but in reality it only makes the same statement as those who are too lazy to vote at all. And you simply hand your voting power over in greater measure to those who DO vote.

Riiiight... because voting for two puppets put up by two parties that are running this country into the ground makes a much better "statement".

Thanks for the gasoline... just put it with the rest of it.

If you want to work for and vote for the rise of a legitimate third party, fine, more power to you. Eventually I may even support you. But really? You think abstaining from voting makes any difference? And before you argue that voting for any presidential candidate makes no difference in the present system, I'll simply ask you to consider all the ways the specific person America chooses to put in the Oval Office wields considerable influence, from foreign relations to our military actions/inactions in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Somalia, Syria, Central Africa and various other places, the Cabinet heads he/she chooses to head up the various departments of government, the justices he/she chooses to interpret law on the Supreme Court and Federal courts, EPA policy and much, much more. All of these individual choices by that one person we call "The President" can have a very real, meaningful impact on our lives even if you believe, in the end, we're all just pawns in a system that provides "The Illusion of Choice".

You are making two presuppositions that for the most part do not hold true.

The first is that an individual's vote matters. In national elections, an individual's vote is practically meaningless. Unless you live in one of the 12 or so counties in the country that are truly close in presidential elections. Local elections, that's another matter. Maybe state elections your vote will have some sway. But given the rate of incumbency re-elections, probably not.

The second is that the president has the power to make a big difference in a lot of things. This Freakonomics episode, talking to a number of economists, suggests otherwise. Yes, the president can pack the supreme court. But over time, most of the courts have ended up shifting mostly to the middle politically. He (and one day, she) can engage other countries - but any deals have to be agreed upon by congress. He can go to war - again, in most circumstances, the call would be the same no matter who is president (think entering WWII after Pearl Harbor, or war in Afghanistan after 9/11). 

I respect the office, and I think it is great that we have a system where our international representative gets switched up often. But I harbor few illusions that my personal vote matters to effect outcomes.

So what if no one voted?  I'm asking.....I don't have any preconceived idea.  You say a personal vote doesn't matter, and I feel that way sometimes, although I always vote.  What if none of us did?



2012-08-18 9:09 AM
in reply to: #4368988

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)

Left Brain - 2012-08-18 1:16 AM

...

So what if no one voted?  I'm asking.....I don't have any preconceived idea.  You say a personal vote doesn't matter, and I feel that way sometimes, although I always vote.  What if none of us did?

But that isn't what actually happens. Even with the fairly low voter turnouts, an individual's vote in national elections rarely makes much difference (again, there are a few counties in the country where this is not going to be true). You might as well as what would happen if everyone who went to a restaurant ordered the same meal - wouldn't they run out of it. It doesn't happen.

One of the Freakonomics books discusses this greater detail. 

2012-08-18 10:04 AM
in reply to: #4368972

User image

Pro
4824
20002000500100100100
Houston
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
gearboy - 2012-08-17 11:16 PM

CBarnes - 2012-08-17 11:24 PM I am shocked by the results.  The area I live in is a solid Republican area now and 4 years ago I had only 2 people I kew were supporting Obama of those I know one has changed to Romney and he is a life long Dem. The other I will have to ask.  But I thought COJ was more liberal.

That's pretty funny itself. I see COJ as very right-leaning and conservative. I am not at all surprised by the results.

Me too.
2012-08-18 5:22 PM
in reply to: #4364280

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
I'd vote for Obama but I didn't vote in the poll I'm trying to lull all the conservatives into a false sense of security.

But seriously, COJ has always been pretty right-leaning and has only gotten more so since the last election. Not because people have changed sides, but because new right-leaning BT-ers have found a community of people who share the same views that they do. The results don't surprise me a bit.
2012-08-18 6:20 PM
in reply to: #4364280


258
1001002525
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)

Wheres the Kang and Kodos poll?

2012-08-18 6:47 PM
in reply to: #4369489

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
slaterson19 - 2012-08-18 7:20 PM

Wheres the Kang and Kodos poll?

It's true. They are aliens. But what are we going to do about it? It's a two party system. We have to vote for one of them.



2012-10-18 1:58 PM
in reply to: #4368288

User image

Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

2012-10-18 2:02 PM
in reply to: #4459417

User image

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?



Now, now. Let's all play nice.

It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

2012-10-18 2:07 PM
in reply to: #4459424

User image

Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

2012-10-18 4:09 PM
in reply to: #4459436

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 2:07 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

Frankly, I'm getting tired of this garbage.  Your continued belittling of the Democrat party is getting old.

Jenna Jameson endorsed Romney.  Does that make him a porn star?

White Surpremist group endoreses Ron Paul.  Does that make him a member of the KKK?

2012-10-18 4:13 PM
in reply to: #4459436

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 2:07 PM

scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/



Oh come on. You can do better than that. The communist endorsement of Obama? Old and tired and boring. You're better than this, Cruse!


2012-10-18 4:15 PM
in reply to: #4369432

User image

Master
1730
100050010010025
Straight outta Compton
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)

jmk-brooklyn - 2012-08-18 4:22 PM I'd vote for Obama but I didn't vote in the poll I'm trying to lull all the conservatives into a false sense of security. But seriously, COJ has always been pretty right-leaning and has only gotten more so since the last election. Not because people have changed sides, but because new right-leaning BT-ers have found a community of people who share the same views that they do. The results don't surprise me a bit.

Perhaps you should start a poll in the nutritional cafe... I'm guessing most of the tree-huggers hang out over there, since there are so many threads about being vegetarian.  I bet you'll find Barry wins by 10 to 1.

2012-10-18 4:16 PM
in reply to: #4459701

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
mcgilmartin - 2012-10-18 4:15 PM

jmk-brooklyn - 2012-08-18 4:22 PM I'd vote for Obama but I didn't vote in the poll I'm trying to lull all the conservatives into a false sense of security. But seriously, COJ has always been pretty right-leaning and has only gotten more so since the last election. Not because people have changed sides, but because new right-leaning BT-ers have found a community of people who share the same views that they do. The results don't surprise me a bit.

Perhaps you should start a poll in the nutritional cafe... I'm guessing most of the tree-huggers hang out over there, since there are so many threads about being vegetarian.  I bet you'll find Barry wins by 10 to 1.



You mean Berry, right?

Get it? Berry? Get it?
2012-10-18 4:23 PM
in reply to: #4459688

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
crowny2 - 2012-10-18 3:09 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 2:07 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

Frankly, I'm getting tired of this garbage.  Your continued belittling of the Democrat party is getting old.

Jenna Jameson endorsed Romney.  Does that make him a porn star?

White Surpremist group endoreses Ron Paul.  Does that make him a member of the KKK?

Yes and yes. What do I win?

2012-10-18 4:29 PM
in reply to: #4459436

User image

Master
1730
100050010010025
Straight outta Compton
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:07 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

Why wouldn't they endorse their own candidate?

2012-10-18 5:02 PM
in reply to: #4364280

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
You guys are killing me.  lol


2012-10-18 9:40 PM
in reply to: #4459688

User image

Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
crowny2 - 2012-10-18 2:09 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 2:07 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

Frankly, I'm getting tired of this garbage.  Your continued belittling of the Democrat party is getting old.

Jenna Jameson endorsed Romney.  Does that make him a porn star?

White Surpremist group endoreses Ron Paul.  Does that make him a member of the KKK?

I'm not really sure what you mean?

How am I belittling the Democrat Party?

Have you looked at the cpusa.org web site to compare what the CPUSA stand for and what their goals and objectives are?

2012-10-18 9:52 PM
in reply to: #4459697

User image

Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
mr2tony - 2012-10-18 2:13 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 2:07 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

Oh come on. You can do better than that. The communist endorsement of Obama? Old and tired and boring. You're better than this, Cruse!

Tony, first I want to thank you for spelling my name correctly. 

Well yes it is old but never the less the CPUSA has been a registered party since I think 1916. You make it sound like they are some foreign and radical fringe group, when in fact the majority of their goals and objectives are pretty much the same as President Obama's.

One of the main principals of Communism is a strong central govt. and weak, little or no local government. Quite the opposite of what our founding fathers set up in the 1700s and warned us against. Which one does our current country look more like today? What has been the trend for the last 50 years, growing/bigger or shrinking Federal Govt.?

2012-10-18 9:53 PM
in reply to: #4459721

User image

Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
mcgilmartin - 2012-10-18 2:29 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:07 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

Why wouldn't they endorse their own candidate?

From what I read President Obama is their candidate. 

2012-10-19 9:08 AM
in reply to: #4460073

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?)
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 9:40 PM
crowny2 - 2012-10-18 2:09 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 2:07 PM
scoobysdad - 2012-10-18 12:02 PM
crusevegas - 2012-10-18 1:58 PM

Wondering if anyone has changed there mind who they would vote for since the debates started?

Why did you make two entries for Obama in the poll scoobs?

Now, now. Let's all play nice. It's about time we run this poll again, so I'll start a new one.

It's a legitimate questions isn't it?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/communist-party-usa-endorses-obama-democrats-for-2012/

Frankly, I'm getting tired of this garbage.  Your continued belittling of the Democrat party is getting old.

Jenna Jameson endorsed Romney.  Does that make him a porn star?

White Surpremist group endoreses Ron Paul.  Does that make him a member of the KKK?

I'm not really sure what you mean?

How am I belittling the Democrat Party?

Have you looked at the cpusa.org web site to compare what the CPUSA stand for and what their goals and objectives are?

It isn't just this thread.  You continue to belittle liberals/progressives with demeaning comments instead of commenting directly on the subject of the thread.  It is a tired tactic and really does nothing for your argument about the topic.  For me, it degrades when you might actually have thoughtful comments to make, which you do sometimes.  You make me think.  I don't always agree, but you make me think, and that is a good thing.  But when you continue to make statements like that, it makes me less likely to take what you say seriously.

So to take your question to its ridiculous extreme, you didn't answer my questions.  What about those endorsements? 

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Presidential Election Poll (Who would you vote for NOW?) Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3