Other Resources My Cup of Joe » And the Boston overreaction at events begins... Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2013-04-23 12:01 PM
in reply to: #4711149

User image

Extreme Veteran
1648
100050010025
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
Do clear tri shorts violate the rules?

Edited by Moonrocket 2013-04-23 12:01 PM


2013-04-23 12:12 PM
in reply to: #4711242

User image

Veteran
376
100100100252525
Medford Lakes, NJ
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
velocomp - 2013-04-23 9:30 AM

DanielG - 2013-04-23 7:03 AM It is extremely sad how much people are willing to give up "to be safe" which doesn't work. What depresses me even more is there are people who want to destroy everything that made this country THE place people wanted to fight to become citizens of and are pushing to undo the constitution in as their means to "make it safe."

I guess I don't feel like I'm giving up anything.  It would be different if people were randomly checking my house, stopping me on my way to work, etc.  But if the worst I have to put up with is getting to the airport a little early.  Being searched when going to a sports event, or having to be checked into my daughters school, I don't consider that to be giving up stuff.

I do on the other hand completely oppose taking away items from people (you know what I'm talking about).  But let's be honest, that is not about making things safer, that is a groups personal agenda.

The two scenarios listed above should not really be considered as the same.

 

Where do you draw the line?  Is it when DHS puts body scan machines at any and all public venues, or is it when they install them in the mall? Or is it the day the police come knocking to perform a random search of you home under the guise if you have nothing to hide let us in?

“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?” said Napolitano

 

How much are you willing to sacrifice to feel safe?

For me this is a slippery slope that nets very little in terms of freedoms lost versus really being safe.

 

2013-04-23 12:45 PM
in reply to: #4711514

User image

Elite
5145
500010025
Cleveland
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...

BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 11:29 AM So I guess bringing your own water bottles is right out, too? Because, you, know, it could be anything.

 

I hope that they make everybody take off their shoes before entering/exiting transition... someone could have a shoe bomb.

 

OMG, someone could fill their seat tube with explosives, run wires disguised as Di2 cables to a bento box that has a cell phone.  They need to stop allowing bikes at triathlons.

 

2013-04-23 12:56 PM
in reply to: #4711802

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
cgregg - 2013-04-23 1:45 PM

BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 11:29 AM So I guess bringing your own water bottles is right out, too? Because, you, know, it could be anything.

 

I hope that they make everybody take off their shoes before entering/exiting transition... someone could have a shoe bomb.

 

OMG, someone could fill their seat tube with explosives, run wires disguised as Di2 cables to a bento box that has a cell phone.  They need to stop allowing bikes at triathlons.

 

If someone blows up a P5 it's truly a tragedy

2013-04-23 12:57 PM
in reply to: #4711516

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
coredump - 2013-04-23 11:29 AM

BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 10:29 AM So I guess bringing your own water bottles is right out, too? Because, you, know, it could be anything.

3 oz or less, per container.

Does a wetsuit count as a container? Because I'm sure I've put more than 3oz of fluid in there before a race.

2013-04-23 12:58 PM
in reply to: #4711830

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 1:56 PM
cgregg - 2013-04-23 1:45 PM

BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 11:29 AM So I guess bringing your own water bottles is right out, too? Because, you, know, it could be anything.

 

I hope that they make everybody take off their shoes before entering/exiting transition... someone could have a shoe bomb.

 

OMG, someone could fill their seat tube with explosives, run wires disguised as Di2 cables to a bento box that has a cell phone.  They need to stop allowing bikes at triathlons.

 

Brings new meaning to the phrase 'blowing up on the bike.'



2013-04-23 12:59 PM
in reply to: #4711838

User image

Elite
5145
500010025
Cleveland
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 1:58 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 1:56 PM
cgregg - 2013-04-23 1:45 PM

BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 11:29 AM So I guess bringing your own water bottles is right out, too? Because, you, know, it could be anything.

 

I hope that they make everybody take off their shoes before entering/exiting transition... someone could have a shoe bomb.

 

OMG, someone could fill their seat tube with explosives, run wires disguised as Di2 cables to a bento box that has a cell phone.  They need to stop allowing bikes at triathlons.

 

Brings new meaning to the phrase 'blowing up on the bike.'

 

That's definitely going to impact their run, fo' sho'!

2013-04-23 1:00 PM
in reply to: #4711838

User image

Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 1:56 PM
cgregg - 2013-04-23 1:45 PM

BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-04-23 11:29 AM So I guess bringing your own water bottles is right out, too? Because, you, know, it could be anything.

 

I hope that they make everybody take off their shoes before entering/exiting transition... someone could have a shoe bomb.

 

OMG, someone could fill their seat tube with explosives, run wires disguised as Di2 cables to a bento box that has a cell phone.  They need to stop allowing bikes at triathlons.

 

Brings new meaning to the phrase 'blowing up on the bike.'



Another meaning to 'what kind of fuel do you use on the bike?' as well

Edited by DanielG 2013-04-23 1:01 PM
2013-04-23 1:07 PM
in reply to: #4711593

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...

chirunner134 - 2013-04-23 11:13 AM no clothes or anything in the clear bucket because things could be wrapped inside clothes or a towel.

I'm ok with the bolded.  No clothes in transition period.  ;-)

2013-04-23 1:16 PM
in reply to: #4711149

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...

In reality life itself comes with an acceptable level of risk. I see the need to balance public safety with liberty, but the reality is there is always risk. Someone absolutely determined to harm another without regard for their own life will find a way.

I'm not sure how we prevent another act of terror like in Boston. Screen every person along a 26.2 mile route? Impossible. Profiling? Ineffective and of questionable legality. CISPA/SOPA/PIPA? Truly Big Brother is watching.

By and large, law enforcement has done a pretty remarkable job keeping us safe. Sadly these types of attacks have always happened, but remain rare. I don't see how giving up our freedoms makes us any safer.

2013-04-23 1:24 PM
in reply to: #4711722

User image

Veteran
1019
1000
St. Louis
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
otisbrown - 2013-04-23 12:12 PM
velocomp - 2013-04-23 9:30 AM

DanielG - 2013-04-23 7:03 AM It is extremely sad how much people are willing to give up "to be safe" which doesn't work. What depresses me even more is there are people who want to destroy everything that made this country THE place people wanted to fight to become citizens of and are pushing to undo the constitution in as their means to "make it safe."

I guess I don't feel like I'm giving up anything.  It would be different if people were randomly checking my house, stopping me on my way to work, etc.  But if the worst I have to put up with is getting to the airport a little early.  Being searched when going to a sports event, or having to be checked into my daughters school, I don't consider that to be giving up stuff.

I do on the other hand completely oppose taking away items from people (you know what I'm talking about).  But let's be honest, that is not about making things safer, that is a groups personal agenda.

The two scenarios listed above should not really be considered as the same.

 

Where do you draw the line?  Is it when DHS puts body scan machines at any and all public venues, or is it when they install them in the mall? Or is it the day the police come knocking to perform a random search of you home under the guise if you have nothing to hide let us in?

“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?” said Napolitano

 

How much are you willing to sacrifice to feel safe?

For me this is a slippery slope that nets very little in terms of freedoms lost versus really being safe.

 

You do not have a constitutional right to fly, participate in a triathlon, shop at a mall, or attend a sporting event.  If you do not like the policies of the TSA, RD, mall owner, or sports venue regarding their requirements for entry in to their facility, then you may choose to drive, enter a different race, shop at Walmart, or watch the game on your tv.  You do have a constitutional right to not have you home randomly searched.  You do have a constitutional right to walk to work without being randomly stopped and searched.  There is your line.

That's not to say that I agree with or think the overreactions are in any way effective.  More often than not I believe they are nothing more than an attempt to cover your azz legally.  Arriving two hours early for a flight and taking your shoes off is a headache and an inconvenience, but it is not a loss of freedom.



2013-04-23 1:30 PM
in reply to: #4711684

User image

Veteran
312
100100100
St. Paul
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...

Moonrocket - 2013-04-23 12:01 PM Do clear tri shorts violate the rules?

No, because they don't hide anything.

2013-04-23 1:55 PM
in reply to: #4711327

User image

Master
2167
20001002525
Livonia, MI
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
Dan-L - 2013-04-23 10:03 AM

If this is how organisations are going to react, the terrorits have won.

When terrorist plot, I highly doubt they're plotting about "how to make things just a little less convenient for those stupid Americans.........."

2013-04-23 1:56 PM
in reply to: #4711916

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
kevin_trapp - 2013-04-23 12:24 PM
otisbrown - 2013-04-23 12:12 PM
velocomp - 2013-04-23 9:30 AM

DanielG - 2013-04-23 7:03 AM It is extremely sad how much people are willing to give up "to be safe" which doesn't work. What depresses me even more is there are people who want to destroy everything that made this country THE place people wanted to fight to become citizens of and are pushing to undo the constitution in as their means to "make it safe."

I guess I don't feel like I'm giving up anything.  It would be different if people were randomly checking my house, stopping me on my way to work, etc.  But if the worst I have to put up with is getting to the airport a little early.  Being searched when going to a sports event, or having to be checked into my daughters school, I don't consider that to be giving up stuff.

I do on the other hand completely oppose taking away items from people (you know what I'm talking about).  But let's be honest, that is not about making things safer, that is a groups personal agenda.

The two scenarios listed above should not really be considered as the same.

 

Where do you draw the line?  Is it when DHS puts body scan machines at any and all public venues, or is it when they install them in the mall? Or is it the day the police come knocking to perform a random search of you home under the guise if you have nothing to hide let us in?

“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?” said Napolitano

 

How much are you willing to sacrifice to feel safe?

For me this is a slippery slope that nets very little in terms of freedoms lost versus really being safe.

 

You do not have a constitutional right to fly, participate in a triathlon, shop at a mall, or attend a sporting event.  If you do not like the policies of the TSA, RD, mall owner, or sports venue regarding their requirements for entry in to their facility, then you may choose to drive, enter a different race, shop at Walmart, or watch the game on your tv.  You do have a constitutional right to not have you home randomly searched.  You do have a constitutional right to walk to work without being randomly stopped and searched.  There is your line.

That's not to say that I agree with or think the overreactions are in any way effective.  More often than not I believe they are nothing more than an attempt to cover your azz legally.  Arriving two hours early for a flight and taking your shoes off is a headache and an inconvenience, but it is not a loss of freedom.

What if they go ahead and declare you an Enemy Combatant (as some were advocating for the suspects in this bombing)? Then they can indefinitely detain you and never have to prove that you were involved in anything. Surely that allows them to search you/your property for whatever reason as well. 

2013-04-23 2:01 PM
in reply to: #4711991

User image

Champion
6999
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
JoshR - 2013-04-23 1:56 PM
kevin_trapp - 2013-04-23 12:24 PM
otisbrown - 2013-04-23 12:12 PM
velocomp - 2013-04-23 9:30 AM

DanielG - 2013-04-23 7:03 AM It is extremely sad how much people are willing to give up "to be safe" which doesn't work. What depresses me even more is there are people who want to destroy everything that made this country THE place people wanted to fight to become citizens of and are pushing to undo the constitution in as their means to "make it safe."

I guess I don't feel like I'm giving up anything.  It would be different if people were randomly checking my house, stopping me on my way to work, etc.  But if the worst I have to put up with is getting to the airport a little early.  Being searched when going to a sports event, or having to be checked into my daughters school, I don't consider that to be giving up stuff.

I do on the other hand completely oppose taking away items from people (you know what I'm talking about).  But let's be honest, that is not about making things safer, that is a groups personal agenda.

The two scenarios listed above should not really be considered as the same.

 

Where do you draw the line?  Is it when DHS puts body scan machines at any and all public venues, or is it when they install them in the mall? Or is it the day the police come knocking to perform a random search of you home under the guise if you have nothing to hide let us in?

“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?” said Napolitano

 

How much are you willing to sacrifice to feel safe?

For me this is a slippery slope that nets very little in terms of freedoms lost versus really being safe.

 

You do not have a constitutional right to fly, participate in a triathlon, shop at a mall, or attend a sporting event.  If you do not like the policies of the TSA, RD, mall owner, or sports venue regarding their requirements for entry in to their facility, then you may choose to drive, enter a different race, shop at Walmart, or watch the game on your tv.  You do have a constitutional right to not have you home randomly searched.  You do have a constitutional right to walk to work without being randomly stopped and searched.  There is your line.

That's not to say that I agree with or think the overreactions are in any way effective.  More often than not I believe they are nothing more than an attempt to cover your azz legally.  Arriving two hours early for a flight and taking your shoes off is a headache and an inconvenience, but it is not a loss of freedom.

What if they go ahead and declare you an Enemy Combatant (as some were advocating for the suspects in this bombing)? Then they can indefinitely detain you and never have to prove that you were involved in anything. Surely that allows them to search you/your property for whatever reason as well. 

Probably does not mater what war its for either.  War on terror, War on Drugs, War on Crime, War on Christmas, or battle of the network stars .

2013-04-23 2:04 PM
in reply to: #4711916

User image

Veteran
376
100100100252525
Medford Lakes, NJ
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
kevin_trapp - 2013-04-23 2:24 PM
otisbrown - 2013-04-23 12:12 PM
velocomp - 2013-04-23 9:30 AM

 

Where do you draw the line?  Is it when DHS puts body scan machines at any and all public venues, or is it when they install them in the mall? Or is it the day the police come knocking to perform a random search of you home under the guise if you have nothing to hide let us in?

“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?” said Napolitano

 How much are you willing to sacrifice to feel safe?

For me this is a slippery slope that nets very little in terms of freedoms lost versus really being safe.

 

You do not have a constitutional right to fly, participate in a triathlon, shop at a mall, or attend a sporting event.  If you do not like the policies of the TSA, RD, mall owner, or sports venue regarding their requirements for entry in to their facility, then you may choose to drive, enter a different race, shop at Walmart, or watch the game on your tv.  You do have a constitutional right to not have you home randomly searched.  You do have a constitutional right to walk to work without being randomly stopped and searched.  There is your line.

That's not to say that I agree with or think the overreactions are in any way effective.  More often than not I believe they are nothing more than an attempt to cover your azz legally.  Arriving two hours early for a flight and taking your shoes off is a headache and an inconvenience, but it is not a loss of freedom.

 

I removed some of the quotes to make the post more readable. 

So in your eyes the constitution defines the meaning of freedom?  Does that mean your right to bear arms means any type of arms?  In the extreme sense, do you have the right to own a missile? After all it is a type of arms. 

I never viewed my freedom being defined by the constitution. Rather I viewed the constitution as the rules our government must follow to ensure they dont over step their bounds. 

For me I draw the line when the government directs how a venue such as a game should be secured.  If a stadium owner determines they want to add metal detectors and force patrons to pass through them, so be it.  After all it is their stadium.   

I know in this case it is the race director that is reacting and making the change.  Obviously, there are much more effective tactics to reduce the risk at this type of event. 



Edited by otisbrown 2013-04-23 2:06 PM


2013-04-23 2:14 PM
in reply to: #4711990

User image

Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 2:55 PM

Dan-L - 2013-04-23 10:03 AM

If this is how organisations are going to react, the terrorits have won.

When terrorist plot, I highly doubt they're plotting about "how to make things just a little less convenient for those stupid Americans.........."



Then you missed the whole point of 9/11. We have too much freedom. We have too much money and we're not living up to a set of laws that really restricts freedom. To wake us up and get us onto that path was the point of 9/11.

2013-04-23 2:16 PM
in reply to: #4711991

User image

Veteran
1019
1000
St. Louis
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
JoshR - 2013-04-23 1:56 PM
kevin_trapp - 2013-04-23 12:24 PM
otisbrown - 2013-04-23 12:12 PM
velocomp - 2013-04-23 9:30 AM

DanielG - 2013-04-23 7:03 AM It is extremely sad how much people are willing to give up "to be safe" which doesn't work. What depresses me even more is there are people who want to destroy everything that made this country THE place people wanted to fight to become citizens of and are pushing to undo the constitution in as their means to "make it safe."

I guess I don't feel like I'm giving up anything.  It would be different if people were randomly checking my house, stopping me on my way to work, etc.  But if the worst I have to put up with is getting to the airport a little early.  Being searched when going to a sports event, or having to be checked into my daughters school, I don't consider that to be giving up stuff.

I do on the other hand completely oppose taking away items from people (you know what I'm talking about).  But let's be honest, that is not about making things safer, that is a groups personal agenda.

The two scenarios listed above should not really be considered as the same.

 

Where do you draw the line?  Is it when DHS puts body scan machines at any and all public venues, or is it when they install them in the mall? Or is it the day the police come knocking to perform a random search of you home under the guise if you have nothing to hide let us in?

“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?” said Napolitano

 

How much are you willing to sacrifice to feel safe?

For me this is a slippery slope that nets very little in terms of freedoms lost versus really being safe.

 

You do not have a constitutional right to fly, participate in a triathlon, shop at a mall, or attend a sporting event.  If you do not like the policies of the TSA, RD, mall owner, or sports venue regarding their requirements for entry in to their facility, then you may choose to drive, enter a different race, shop at Walmart, or watch the game on your tv.  You do have a constitutional right to not have you home randomly searched.  You do have a constitutional right to walk to work without being randomly stopped and searched.  There is your line.

That's not to say that I agree with or think the overreactions are in any way effective.  More often than not I believe they are nothing more than an attempt to cover your azz legally.  Arriving two hours early for a flight and taking your shoes off is a headache and an inconvenience, but it is not a loss of freedom.

What if they go ahead and declare you an Enemy Combatant (as some were advocating for the suspects in this bombing)? Then they can indefinitely detain you and never have to prove that you were involved in anything. Surely that allows them to search you/your property for whatever reason as well. 

IMHO, that would be a violation of his sixth amendment rights.  As despicable a man as the living bomber appears to be, he deserves his day in court.  The Patriot Act and I disagree on many things.

2013-04-23 2:29 PM
in reply to: #4711991

User image

Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
JoshR - 2013-04-23 2:56 PM
What if they go ahead and declare you an Enemy Combatant (as some were advocating for the suspects in this bombing)? Then they can indefinitely detain you and never have to prove that you were involved in anything. Surely that allows them to search you/your property for whatever reason as well. 



Yeah, I really disagree with that one too. It's a shame that wasn't dismantled like it was supposed to be. People who were loudest about how wrong that was are now on board with using it. Weird.

I thought that was a campaign point, to overturn that dreadful law and to close Gitmo. Guess that was just words.

2013-04-23 2:32 PM
in reply to: #4712042

User image

Master
2167
20001002525
Livonia, MI
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
DanielG - 2013-04-23 3:14 PM
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 2:55 PM
Dan-L - 2013-04-23 10:03 AM

If this is how organisations are going to react, the terrorits have won.

When terrorist plot, I highly doubt they're plotting about "how to make things just a little less convenient for those stupid Americans.........."

Then you missed the whole point of 9/11. We have too much freedom. We have too much money and we're not living up to a set of laws that really restricts freedom. To wake us up and get us onto that path was the point of 9/11.

Silly me, I thought they just hated us and wanted us to die.  

I didn't realize that what they really wanted was just to make us wait in line an extra 20 minutes at TSA and make triathlon less convenient with no bag in transition rules.

2013-04-23 2:41 PM
in reply to: #4712085

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 1:32 PM
DanielG - 2013-04-23 3:14 PM
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 2:55 PM
Dan-L - 2013-04-23 10:03 AM

If this is how organisations are going to react, the terrorits have won.

When terrorist plot, I highly doubt they're plotting about "how to make things just a little less convenient for those stupid Americans.........."

Then you missed the whole point of 9/11. We have too much freedom. We have too much money and we're not living up to a set of laws that really restricts freedom. To wake us up and get us onto that path was the point of 9/11.

Silly me, I thought they just hated us and wanted us to die.  

I didn't realize that what they really wanted was just to make us wait in line an extra 20 minutes at TSA and make triathlon less convenient with no bag in transition rules.

 

Which again, those measures do nothing. Anyone that wants to, is still going to be able to inflict harm upon others. Look at last week. There was an incredible amount of security there. Reports have said there were bomb sniffing dogs, metal detectors and the obvious police presence (seen within 100 feet of the bombing itself) and what did this do? Absolutely nothing. They didn't stop it, they didn't apprehend the individuals, or anything.

So we are being increasingly scrutinized in our daily lives for what? 



2013-04-23 4:20 PM
in reply to: #4712085

User image


489
100100100100252525
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 8:32 PM
DanielG - 2013-04-23 3:14 PM
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 2:55 PM
Dan-L - 2013-04-23 10:03 AM

If this is how organisations are going to react, the terrorits have won.

When terrorist plot, I highly doubt they're plotting about "how to make things just a little less convenient for those stupid Americans.........."

Then you missed the whole point of 9/11. We have too much freedom. We have too much money and we're not living up to a set of laws that really restricts freedom. To wake us up and get us onto that path was the point of 9/11.

Silly me, I thought they just hated us and wanted us to die.  

I didn't realize that what they really wanted was just to make us wait in line an extra 20 minutes at TSA and make triathlon less convenient with no bag in transition rules.

If they hated you and wanted you to die there are a lot more efficient ways of killing more people than the Boston example.  The want to undermine your way of life, get in your head, make you worry, cause stress and generally terrorise.

When terrorists plot they calculate the attention it will receive, the reaction it will cause, the terror it will put in the hearts of those affected and the spoke it puts in the wheels of society.

I've lived in the direct line of terrorists all my life.  Whether it be the IRA or this bunch of idiots - they've made me angry and they've made me upset but they'll never terrorise me.  I love the way we celebrate the heroic stories and highlight the good that comes from these incidents - we need to make more of that.  What we don't need to do is change our way of life in ways that aren't sensible.

Clear bags in a triathlon transition doesn't even address the risk they're responding too. Stupid, thoughtless, reaction that shows weakness.

Bad news about the airport situation too - do you know those additional queues caused by the security checks where people are all packed in close proximity while they wait to get their bags checked?  Think about that for a second - they've actually made the risk worse with their response.  Dimwitted.

2013-04-23 6:44 PM
in reply to: #4712085

User image

Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 3:32 PM

DanielG - 2013-04-23 3:14 PM
noelle1230 - 2013-04-23 2:55 PM
Dan-L - 2013-04-23 10:03 AM

If this is how organisations are going to react, the terrorits have won.

When terrorist plot, I highly doubt they're plotting about "how to make things just a little less convenient for those stupid Americans.........."

Then you missed the whole point of 9/11. We have too much freedom. We have too much money and we're not living up to a set of laws that really restricts freedom. To wake us up and get us onto that path was the point of 9/11.

Silly me, I thought they just hated us and wanted us to die.  

I didn't realize that what they really wanted was just to make us wait in line an extra 20 minutes at TSA and make triathlon less convenient with no bag in transition rules.



No, they want us to convert to Islam. No, that statement does not belong in red. Convert to Islam or die, those are our choices.

2013-04-23 6:46 PM
in reply to: #4711149

User image

Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...

Boston Marathon bombing: Williams-Sonoma pulls pressure cookers
http://www.upi.com/blog/2013/04/23/Boston-Marathon-bombing-Williams...



High-end cookware and home goods retailer Williams-Sonoma has pulled pressure cookers from their shelves following the Boston Marathon bombing.
2013-04-23 6:54 PM
in reply to: #4712507

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: And the Boston overreaction at events begins...

That's absurd.  I was thinking about getting new pressure cooker.  Good thing I don't s hops at W-S anyway.  Overpriced.

People should stop selling backpacks too, you know, out of respect.

Hey, I guess if you want to hurt your own business for some kind of statement - it's America, go right ahead.  Bed Bath and Beyond, here I come to spend my money.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » And the Boston overreaction at events begins... Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3