Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 7
 
 
2005-12-08 1:35 PM
in reply to: #302009

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide

Wow. So, their god is a smiting god. Whatever floats their boat. They're certainly willing to risk being smote by an enraged, grieving family member, aren't they?

Here's what I don't get: why anyone would worship an angry, bitter, little god. Why not go for a big, expansive, glorious, shining light of a god? You know, if you're gonna go with a god, go with the god that looks alot less like a drunken redneck of a god.



2005-12-08 1:37 PM
in reply to: #302011

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
runnergirl29 - 2005-12-08 1:33 PM

 The part about women taking care of the husband is in Proverbs 31. It's one of the characteristics that make a Proverbs 31 woman and in my church, a lot of women strive to be a Proverbs 31 woman.



So where does Dr. Dobson stand on becoming a Leviticus 25 slave owner?


2005-12-08 1:38 PM
in reply to: #302011

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
runnergirl29 - 2005-12-08 1:33 PM

You have to understand though, his beliefs are coming straight from the Bible- literally.  So naturally if you take the Bible like a grain of salt then you aren't going to agree with Dr. Dobson.  If you do, then you'll think Dr. Dobson is the best thing eveer!  The part about women taking care of the husband is in Proverbs 31.  It's one of the characteristics that make a Proverbs 31 woman and in my church, a lot of women strive to be a Proverbs 31 woman.  Alot of men I know are looking for a wife with those charactertistics.  But then again, some women/guys don't want  that.

I have a friend who works in legal services for battered women. Most of these women meet their abusers in church. Abusers troll churches for submissive women. Pretty despicable but I doubt abusers really have a code of ethics about where they find their victims.

2005-12-08 1:38 PM
in reply to: #302010

Veteran
407
100100100100
Dallas, Texas
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
run4yrlif - 2005-12-08 1:31 PM

Let's see, we have:
  • A PAC disguised as a religious organization.
  • Selective interpretation of the Bible.
  • Chistians supporting the commercialization of Christmas
  • Gay people shouldn't be advertised to?


PAC disguised as a religious organization happens frequently by both the "liberals" and "conservatives." So long as both side are doing it, I don't get too excited.

Selective interpretation of the Bible. I'm not sure there are any other interpretations--everyone takes what they like, ignores what they dislike, and spins the remainder to fit their "brand" of christianity.

Christians supporting the commercialization of Christmas. I agree. My guess is that their goal is to get Christmas, and hence christianity, featured more prominently. I see this as a backlash against the school prayer/nativity/cross/pledge of allegiance type of cases.

Gay people shouldn't be advertised to. Be careful how you characterize the issue. It appears that the opposition is to a compnay (in this case Ford) supporting publications which promote the homosexual lifestyle. The issue appears to be whether that lifestyle should be supported, not whether homosexuals should be marketed to.

Bill

Edited by SMUJD 2005-12-08 1:44 PM
2005-12-08 1:39 PM
in reply to: #302011

User image

Pro
4228
2000200010010025
Broomfield, Colorado
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide

You have to understand though, his beliefs are coming straight from the Bible- literally.  So naturally if you take the Bible like a grain of salt then you aren't going to agree with Dr. Dobson.  If you do, then you'll think Dr. Dobson is the best thing eveer!  The part about women taking care of the husband is in Proverbs 31.  It's one of the characteristics that make a Proverbs 31 woman and in my church, a lot of women strive to be a Proverbs 31 woman.  Alot of men I know are looking for a wife with those charactertistics.  But then again, some women/guys don't want  that.

and there's nothing in the Bible about men taking care of their wives/mothers?  It is all interpretation.  I do not believe that one gender was put on this earth to take care of the other gender.  That is just ridiculous.....

I will never agree with Dobson.....he makes me seriously pissed off.  What I see is that he actually creates division among humans.  My opinion, and I'll leave it at that before I get too crazy.

2005-12-08 1:41 PM
in reply to: #301937

Veteran
282
100100252525
Chula Vista, Ca
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide

I am looking on the FOF site and I am not seeing this boycott. When I did a search on their website I did come up with this.

 

Retailer is hit just before the biggest shopping weekend of the year.

The American Family Association is launching a boycott of Target stores this Thanksgiving weekend in response to the retail giant’s ban of the Salvation Army at their stores and the phrase “Merry Christmas” from their advertising. Target spokesperson, Carolyn Brookter says it’s true, the Salvation Army is not allowed to solicit in front of their stores. The ban started last year.

Is AMF a part of Focus on the Family? Seems like its a little more than the commercialization of Christmas. I wonder if you would be in a uproar if they banned some other group from their storefronts? (Even though I would like everyone banned from soliciting in front of stores)



2005-12-08 1:42 PM
in reply to: #301993

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
run4yrlif - but how is coming down on the side of the commercialization of Chistmas, Christian? I just don't get that at all.


I think their point is not to make Christmas more commercial, rather it is to stop the slide of Christmas becoming merely a secular holiday.

Of course, that slide has been going on for a while now.

One of my son's school calendars lists his days off for the year. Included are several secular holidays like Columbus Day and Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

Also listed is Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Winter Break, and Spring Break.

I'm glad that Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur are celebrated and observed by the school. What I can't stand is saying "Winter Break" instead of "Christmas Break", and "Spring Break" instead of "Easter Break". Why can't we call them for what they were originally intended for?

I agree with you about not wanting to make Christmas even more commercial than it already is. In this case, I'm going to give the boycotters a little slack.
2005-12-08 1:44 PM
in reply to: #302019

User image

Elite
2915
2000500100100100100
New City, New York
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
How about they only advertise to people "that have supressed thier homsexual tendancies for more than three years" There is whole new traget market out there.

Edited by rollinbones 2005-12-08 1:46 PM
2005-12-08 1:47 PM
in reply to: #302011

User image

Expert
760
5001001002525
Mt. Morris, IL
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide

You have to understand though, his beliefs are coming straight from the Bible- literally.  So naturally if you take the Bible like a grain of salt then you aren't going to agree with Dr. Dobson.  If you do, then you'll think Dr. Dobson is the best thing eveer!  The part about women taking care of the husband is in Proverbs 31.  It's one of the characteristics that make a Proverbs 31 woman and in my church, a lot of women strive to be a Proverbs 31 woman.  Alot of men I know are looking for a wife with those charactertistics.  But then again, some women/guys don't want  that.

Well let us take some versus literally.  I do consider myself a God fearing Christian, but I have to believe that literal translations are absurd. 

A man who refuses to impregnate his widowed sister-in-law is "wicked in the LORD's sight" and so is put to death. GE 38:8-10

Do not call any man on earth "father."  MT 23:9

A child who curses his parent(s) is to be put to death. A stubborn and/or rebellious child is to be put to death. EX 21:17, LE 20:9, DT 21:18-21

2005-12-08 1:48 PM
in reply to: #302009

User image

The Original
7834
5000200050010010010025
Raleigh/Durham
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
nccgrap - 2005-12-08 2:30 PM It gets way worse than this thread has even touched.  Last week a former student of mine was killed in Iraq.  There is a church group coming to protest the funeral to promote anti-gay beliefs.  I don't understand how this relates to the death of an American Hero, but for more information see the attached link.

 

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Anti-gay_church_protests_U.S._at_military_funerals

Ok- that's really bad.  Here's my perspective, and I have actually heard a women on Focus on the Family with the same approach as me.  So Focus on the Fmaily isn't all that crude if you ask me.  We all know that the Bible states that woman was created for man, and that homosexuality is a sin.  I personally don't agree with it but I am still going to love that person just like I love anyone else.  I'm not going to condone someone for their actions.  Reason being, homosexuality is a sin- just like all the rest.  It doens't matter- lying, stealing, cheating, mudering, lust, adultry, jealousy, homosexaulity, etc- they'll all sins.  And we all sin- some ways are more visible to others.  Some poeople sin by thinking bad or mean thoughts- we'll never know, but it's still a sin, and we all sin, not matter how hard we try not to.  If we chose to not like people based on their sins, then we wouldn't like anyone- including ourselves   Hope I didn't offend anyone- that wasn't my intent.

2005-12-08 1:49 PM
in reply to: #302026

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
Don, maybe it's because for the Winter and Spring breaks, there are more days off than just Easter and Christmas, but for the Jewish holidays the only days off are the actual observed days?

dontracy - 2005-12-08 1:42 PM .

One of my son's school calendars lists his days off for the year. Included are several secular holidays like Columbus Day and Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

Also listed is Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Winter Break, and Spring Break.

I'm glad that Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur are celebrated and observed by the school. What I can't stand is saying "Winter Break" instead of "Christmas Break", and "Spring Break" instead of "Easter Break". Why can't we call them for what they were originally intended for?

I agree with you about not wanting to make Christmas even more commercial than it already is. In this case, I'm going to give the boycotters a little slack.


2005-12-08 1:49 PM
in reply to: #302021

User image

The Original
7834
5000200050010010010025
Raleigh/Durham
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
COgirl - 2005-12-08 2:39 PM

You have to understand though, his beliefs are coming straight from the Bible- literally.  So naturally if you take the Bible like a grain of salt then you aren't going to agree with Dr. Dobson.  If you do, then you'll think Dr. Dobson is the best thing eveer!  The part about women taking care of the husband is in Proverbs 31.  It's one of the characteristics that make a Proverbs 31 woman and in my church, a lot of women strive to be a Proverbs 31 woman.  Alot of men I know are looking for a wife with those charactertistics.  But then again, some women/guys don't want  that.

and there's nothing in the Bible about men taking care of their wives/mothers?  It is all interpretation.  I do not believe that one gender was put on this earth to take care of the other gender.  That is just ridiculous.....

I will never agree with Dobson.....he makes me seriously pissed off.  What I see is that he actually creates division among humans.  My opinion, and I'll leave it at that before I get too crazy.

The part about a man's repsonsiblities/role is also in Proverbs 31.

2005-12-08 1:50 PM
in reply to: #302026

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide

dontracy - 2005-12-08 1:42 PM

What I can't stand is saying "Winter Break" instead of "Christmas Break", and "Spring Break" instead of "Easter Break". Why can't we call them for what they were originally intended for?

My guess is that the cultural diversity of our country has changed drastically over the last 60 years and the change in nomenclature reflects that diversity.

Tangential to that issue: recently, here in Hillsborough County, a Muslim group asked the School Board to add Ramadan to the calendar of school holidays. Instead of granting their request, the School Board yanked Easter and Yom Kippur off the holiday calendar. How stupid was that?! The muslim group said that they would rather not have Ramadan as a holiday if it meant that having the Christian and Jewish holidays yanked. After much public outcry, Easter and Yom Kippur are back on the school holiday calendar but still no Ramadan for the Muslim children. Hillsborough County has approx. the same Muslim population as Jewish population.

2005-12-08 1:53 PM
in reply to: #302039

Veteran
407
100100100100
Dallas, Texas
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
Renee - 2005-12-08 1:50 PM

After much public outcry, Easter and Yom Kippur are back on the school holiday calendar but still no Ramadan for the Muslim children. Hillsborough County has approx. the same Muslim population as Jewish population.



Politically correct or not, the fact is that Muslims in American are not in much of a position to agitate for their religion.

Bill
2005-12-08 1:54 PM
in reply to: #302035

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
runnergirl29 - 2005-12-08 1:48 PM

We all know that the Bible states that woman was created for man, and that homosexuality is a sin. 

Some of us find the Bible to be full of ludicrous instruction, perspective and ideas. In fact, I find the Bible to be a sin against humanity for some of the barbarous instructions found in it.

Jesus Christ never spoke against homosexuals. He did speak against judging others and casting stones. Where's the Christ in Christianity?

2005-12-08 1:55 PM
in reply to: #302035

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
runnergirl29 - 2005-12-08 1:48 PM

We all know that the Bible states that woman was created for man, and that homosexuality is a sin. I personally don't agree with it but I am still going to love that person just like I love anyone else. I'm not going to condone someone for their actions. Reason being, homosexuality is a sin- just like all the rest. It doens't matter- lying, stealing, cheating, mudering, lust, adultry, jealousy, homosexaulity, etc- they'll all sins. And we all sin- some ways are more visible to others. Some poeople sin by thinking bad or mean thoughts- we'll never know, but it's still a sin, and we all sin, not matter how hard we try not to. If we chose to not like people based on their sins, then we wouldn't like anyone- including ourselves Hope I didn't offend anyone- that wasn't my intent.



So is slave ownership a sin?

My belief is that the Bible was written in a different time. When Jesus was alive, the birth of more Christians was essential to the advancement of Christianity...there just weren';t that many Christians on earth. So for the religion to spread, it's numbers had to increase both through birth and through evangelism. Hence, it made sense that the Bible would advance procreation, and decry homosexuality as a bad thing (since it's not a means of procreation).


Fast forward 2005 years. We have lots of people on earth. Christianity is not threatened by low birth rates. SO the focus should be on evangelism, adn not procreation. Therefore, homosexuality is no longer a threat to the spread of the Word.

I make the same argument for the passages about the cleanlieness of shellfish and pork (modern food management has negated this as a health risk).


2005-12-08 1:57 PM
in reply to: #302018

User image

The Original
7834
5000200050010010010025
Raleigh/Durham
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
Renee - 2005-12-08 2:38 PM
runnergirl29 - 2005-12-08 1:33 PM

You have to understand though, his beliefs are coming straight from the Bible- literally.  So naturally if you take the Bible like a grain of salt then you aren't going to agree with Dr. Dobson.  If you do, then you'll think Dr. Dobson is the best thing eveer!  The part about women taking care of the husband is in Proverbs 31.  It's one of the characteristics that make a Proverbs 31 woman and in my church, a lot of women strive to be a Proverbs 31 woman.  Alot of men I know are looking for a wife with those charactertistics.  But then again, some women/guys don't want  that.

I have a friend who works in legal services for battered women. Most of these women meet their abusers in church. Abusers troll churches for submissive women. Pretty despicable but I doubt abusers really have a code of ethics about where they find their victims.

That doesn't surprise me at all.  Submission is always a popular topic in my Bible Studies.  Women should be "willing to submit" to their husbands, not forced.  But unfortunately that's not the case.  Some men/women defintiely take it beyond that point.  In any relationship (whether it's with someone inside/outside) the church, it's important that women are careful with any type of signs of control issues.  If a man has control issues and is using submission as an excuse for his actions that's just wrong.

2005-12-08 1:57 PM
in reply to: #302041

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
SMUJD - 2005-12-08 1:53 PM
Renee - 2005-12-08 1:50 PM After much public outcry, Easter and Yom Kippur are back on the school holiday calendar but still no Ramadan for the Muslim children. Hillsborough County has approx. the same Muslim population as Jewish population.

Politically correct or not, the fact is that Muslims in American are not in much of a position to agitate for their religion. Bill

My sense of Americanism tells me this is flat out un-American. Muslims are not second class citizens.

Interesting that you chose to refer to their request as agitation.

2005-12-08 1:57 PM
in reply to: #301937

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
Call Christmas what you want. It will only mean something to the people it means something to. Call it winter break, it will still be Christmas break for whomever thinks of it that way. What people seem to be bothered by is the fact that their way of thinking seems to be less popular than it was years ago.

Like I said a couple of weeks ago: Christmas has turned into a vulgar display of consumption where parents will trample other parents to get the last cabbage patch doll or beanie baby for their little precious spoiled sweetheart.

Don't decry the disappearance of the word "Christmas", denounce the disappearance of any semblance of dignity, weep at the loss of serenity and mourn the absence of any understanding of the true meaning of love.

I'm nailing the histrionics today!
2005-12-08 1:59 PM
in reply to: #302041

User image

Expert
760
5001001002525
Mt. Morris, IL
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
SMUJD - 2005-12-08 12:53 PM
Renee - 2005-12-08 1:50 PM After much public outcry, Easter and Yom Kippur are back on the school holiday calendar but still no Ramadan for the Muslim children. Hillsborough County has approx. the same Muslim population as Jewish population.

 

Politically correct or not, the fact is that Muslims in American are not in much of a position to agitate for their religion. Bill

I am sorry to do this but I thought we needed some humor in this thread.  At a wrestling meet last week a Hispanic kid named Jesus wrestled an Arab kid named Muhammad.  I hope I am not the only one who thinks that is funny! (this is a true story)



Edited by nccgrap 2005-12-08 2:01 PM
2005-12-08 2:00 PM
in reply to: #302029

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
rollinbones - How about they only advertise to people "that have supressed thier homsexual tendancies for more than three years" There is whole new traget market out there.


LOL

As far as I know, Dobson is not Catholic.

If you'd like to talke about the Vatican document on Homosexuals and the Seminary, then let's do it. We'll have to look at the first document on homosexuals and the priesthood, dating back to the early 60's, what's happened within Catholic seminaries since Vatican II, the call for this new document in early 2000/2001, the sexual abuse scandal within the Church. It would also probably be good to do an overview of Church teaching on human sexuality. Pope John Paul II's Theology of the Body would be a good start.

To turn the new document into a joke is to entirely miss it's point.


2005-12-08 2:00 PM
in reply to: #302054

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
nccgrap - 2005-12-08 1:59 PM

I hope I am not the only one who thinks that is funny!



I guess it depends on who won...
2005-12-08 2:00 PM
in reply to: #302048

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
runnergirl29 - 2005-12-08 1:57 PM

That doesn't surprise me at all.  Submission is always a popular topic in my Bible Studies.  Women should be "willing to submit" to their husbands, not forced.  But unfortunately that's not the case.  Some men/women defintiely take it beyond that point.  In any relationship (whether it's with someone inside/outside) the church, it's important that women are careful with any type of signs of control issues.  If a man has control issues and is using submission as an excuse for his actions that's just wrong.

1) I don't think abusers need an excuse for their actions. They're just looking for easy targets (submissive women who are taught by their religion that they should not question their husbands).

2) Abuse is not just a control issue; it's an anger and violence issue.

2005-12-08 2:03 PM
in reply to: #302050

Veteran
407
100100100100
Dallas, Texas
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
Renee - 2005-12-08 1:57 PM

My sense of Americanism tells me this is flat out un-American. Muslims are not second class citizens.

Interesting that you chose to refer to their request as agitation.



I understand and agree that it is un-American. I also am inclined to believe that it is true. The prevailing popular and policial will is not pro-Muslim.

I don't think the word "agitate" is out of line. I tend to view "lobbying" by any religious organization as agitation. They ("they" being religious organizations) are unquestionably entitled to agitate/lobby/etc for their positions.

Bill
2005-12-08 2:03 PM
in reply to: #302057

User image

Expert
760
5001001002525
Mt. Morris, IL
Subject: RE: Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide
run4yrlif - 2005-12-08 1:00 PM
nccgrap - 2005-12-08 1:59 PM

I hope I am not the only one who thinks that is funny!



I guess it depends on who won...

Muhammad won, but we thought his next match should Belezebub

 

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Focus on the Family: Chaps my hide Rss Feed  
 
 
of 7