General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Zone 2 sucks Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 4
 
 
2013-04-27 8:18 PM
in reply to: #4717145

User image

Regular
230
10010025
Napoleon
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
odpaul7 - 2013-04-27 10:59 AM

I understand completely the zone 2 sucks feeling. You won't notice gains at first. They'll seem to come at meaningless and imperceptible numbers. Then after a few weeks you start noticing that your 10:15 min/mi in zone 2 very rapidly becomes 9:30 at the exact same effort level And then 9:15. Then 9:00, and 8:45, and so on... And that 45 seconds is very significant, even if you can still run a 6 minute mile. Then the gains just keep coming as long as you keep consistent.

 

I agree 100%...I wasn't real sold on the idea for the first 2 months, but now 4 months later I am runner fast than ever...I does work, but it takes a while to see results.



2013-04-27 8:59 PM
in reply to: #4716857

User image


145
10025
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
I find that I don't like it, simply because my running form and cadence are vastly different over 9 minute miles.  It's like running and braking at the same time.
2013-04-27 9:06 PM
in reply to: #4716857

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-27 9:47 PM
in reply to: #4716857

Regular
272
1001002525
Apple Valley, Minnesota
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

 I abhor Z2, It goes against everything I
stand for J, I am learning to deal with it, and have noticed a few
things.  I don’t feel the long runs the
next day, and my Z2 pace is my wife’s running pace, she gets her huff and puff
on, and I can stroll around in Z2.  I did
do some interval work the other day, and noticed my pace was ~:15 less than my previous
pace, and my HR didn’t climb that far into Z3.

2013-04-27 10:02 PM
in reply to: #4717544


1660
10005001002525
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
GotBackup - 2013-04-27 9:47 PM

 I abhor Z2, It goes against everything I
stand for J, I am learning to deal with it, and have noticed a few
things.  I don’t feel the long runs the
next day, and my Z2 pace is my wife’s running pace, she gets her huff and puff
on, and I can stroll around in Z2.  I did
do some interval work the other day, and noticed my pace was ~:15 less than my previous
pace, and my HR didn’t climb that far into Z3.

 

You need to crank up the weekly mileage. You'll starting living in Z2 once you're running a fair amount of miles.

2013-04-28 6:24 AM
in reply to: #4716857

Member
45
25
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Curious - at what weekly mileage did most of you start including z2 workouts? I am currently only putting on 15-17 mpw running...(I am cycling, lifting and starting to swim the other days.)


2013-04-28 6:37 AM
in reply to: #4716857

Veteran
345
10010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
This is all great stuff.  Thanks to all.  Here's a follow up question:  Are you still able to keep the recommended cadence of 80-90 while shuffling along in Z2?  I can't get higher than 75 without crossing the HR line into Z3.  Can't figure out how to run slower with a high cadence.
2013-04-28 7:41 AM
in reply to: #4716857

Master
8250
5000200010001001002525
Eugene, Oregon
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

RE cadence, yes. Just take shorter steps. Many runners tend to overstride. My cadence is nearly the same (88-90, or 176-180, depending on how you count) everywhere between 10 and 6 minute mile pace.

As for Zone 2, you will appreciate it when you start doing intense bike and run workouts. For me, it's a welcome break!  I think for people who naturally tend more toward the endurance end of things, it comes very naturally. I could (and have) held a Zone 2 effort for 4-6 hours, in each sport (not on the same day, though) and really enjoyed it. For speedsters, it's probably more of a matter of forcing yourself to slow down. And you do have to swallow your pride in this sport--I mean, we run around half naked in tight spandex, ride with crazy-looking bikes and helmets, etc. What's so bad about running slowly?

 

2013-04-28 7:51 AM
in reply to: #4717642

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-28 7:57 AM
in reply to: #4717639

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-28 1:27 PM
in reply to: #4717694

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

To the Zone 2 gurus, a couple of questions:

1) What pace were you running prior to Zone 2 training?

2) How long have you been running prior to starting Zone 2 training?

3) How many months have you been training at Zone 2 now, and what is your mpm improvement in Zone 2?

4) What is your mpm improvement in a race distance (stand alone 5K, 10K, HM, etc) since starting your Zone 2 training?

5) In the 80% Z2/ 20%Z4-5 regimen, do you always keep a whole run in a given Zone, or do you have the same success if you do 80% of a run at zone 2 and 20% of the same run at Zone 4-5? (either once in a while or all the time)

6)  Do you Zone 2 swim and bike too?  Similar success?

I apologize for all the questions :)  Very interesting topic!



2013-04-28 2:33 PM
in reply to: #4717869

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-29 10:24 AM
in reply to: #4717869

Member
17

Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
switch - 2013-04-28 1:27 PM

To the Zone 2 gurus, a couple of questions:

1) What pace were you running prior to Zone 2 training?

I really started working out consistently with Zone 2 training.  But before that and depending on how often I would run to workout, I would try to hit 9:00-9:30/mi pace in my runs.  I almost always was a 10:00/mi pace guy for several weeks and then I would plateau at 9:15/mi pace.  

When I started Zone 2 training exclusively my pace was 11:30-12:00/mi depending on heat temps.

2) How long have you been running prior to starting Zone 2 training?

Off and on (i.e., inconsistently) for years. 

3) How many months have you been training at Zone 2 now, and what is your mpm improvement in Zone 2?

5 months or so.  My Zone 2 pace on Saturday was 8:10/mi pace.  It varies though depending on environmental factors and my nutrition/rest.

4) What is your mpm improvement in a race distance (stand alone 5K, 10K, HM, etc) since starting your Zone 2 training?

My 5K PB was 29:00.  Started Z2 in October.  December 1 new PB of 28:00.  End of March 5K new PB of 22:17.

5) In the 80% Z2/ 20%Z4-5 regimen, do you always keep a whole run in a given Zone, or do you have the same success if you do 80% of a run at zone 2 and 20% of the same run at Zone 4-5? (either once in a while or all the time)

I just do what my coach tells me.  Almost all of my runs are Zone 2.  We include strides at the end of about 30-40% of my runs of 6-8x20".  Those usually get my HR elevated into Zone 3 by the 8th repeat.  This weekend was my first track work out with speed and we did 4x200m Zone 4 repeats for the last mile and first four miles were Zone 2.  Speed work is just beginning, but even then I don't think it will ever get as much as 20%. 

6)  Do you Zone 2 swim and bike too?  Similar success?

Zone 2 on the bike.  Not quite as dramatic results as my running, but still getting stronger muscular endurance.  Don't use my HR for swimming, but try to use threshold pacing.  I am not a swimmer and have a difficult time still learning to pace in the pool/water.  

I apologize for all the questions   Very interesting topic!

2013-04-29 1:18 PM
in reply to: #4717869

Pro
6582
50001000500252525
Melbourne FL
Gold member
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
switch - 2013-04-28 2:27 PM

To the Zone 2 gurus, a couple of questions:

1) What pace were you running prior to Zone 2 training?

To fast! I was always trying to run 8m/mi, or faster, before I discovered HR training.  Don't know why just didn't understand training.

2) How long have you been running prior to starting Zone 2 training?

Several years but had a lot of nagging injuries in my lower legs.

3) How many months have you been training at Zone 2 now, and what is your mpm improvement in Zone 2?

Since Dec 2005 after I did my 1st LT field test.  Several weeks after I started I PR'd my 5k time without any speed work.

4) What is your mpm improvement in a race distance (stand alone 5K, 10K, HM, etc) since starting your Zone 2 training?

Impossible for me to say as I didn't run anything but 5k's back then.  All run training since has been "per protocol"!

5) In the 80% Z2/ 20%Z4-5 regimen, do you always keep a whole run in a given Zone, or do you have the same success if you do 80% of a run at zone 2 and 20% of the same run at Zone 4-5? (either once in a while or all the time)

Keep it in the zones.  For Z4 efforts (I don't do Z5 efforts) there is always a solid warmup and cooldown.  For Z2 It'll be Z1 for about a mile (WU) then Z2 thereafter and may drift into Z3 due to cardiac drift from heat and humidity (FL) if I don't slow my pace down to compensate.

6)  Do you Zone 2 swim and bike too?  Similar success?

No.  On the bike less weight is being supported by the legs so you can go harder.  Take a look at the BT winter cycling program.  It's give you an idea on how much is spent cursing vs hammering out the various intervals.

FWIW, I bought a bike trainer (KK road) and at first tried the HR program and didn't like it at all because of the lag HR has for the intervals.  I wanted something more absolute and switched over to power after making up a spreadsheet to use the KK published speed vs watts chart.  Then it's been great.

I apologize for all the questions   Very interesting topic!

None needed, it's BT at its finest!


Edited by Donto 2013-04-29 1:18 PM
2013-04-29 1:21 PM
in reply to: #4716867

Champion
8540
50002000100050025
the colony texas
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
tri808 - 2013-04-26 7:25 PM

I found myself liking Zone 2 a lot more when I started running more frequently and more volume.

 

Bingo

 

My motto is run in a way that you can run everyday.  I do speedwork or steep hills I get injured. Keeping in Z2 lets me run everyday. I've been closer to PR's from 10+ years ago that I thought wouldn't happen again just because of age

2013-04-29 1:54 PM
in reply to: #4719321

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2013-04-29 2:06 PM
in reply to: #4719397

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

I really appreciate everyone who has responded to my litany of Zone 2 questions. This is giving me a more faith in the Z2 approach. 

It is interesting to me how many times I have read--and I believe it--that you can't become a fast swimmer without swimming fast sets, yet here we have many people reporting PR/PB running with doing very little zone 4 and little to no zone 5. What do you think accounts for the difference between swimming and running--maybe, just maybe, we have some fishes reading this thread, though I know the runners and fishes don't mingle much;)

When I run a 5K, I'm well into Zone 4 for the majority of it, and finishing at 5.  Those of you getting your PRs off of Zone 2 training, what zone are you in racing your 5Ks?

2013-04-29 2:17 PM
in reply to: #4719408

Member
17

Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
switch - 2013-04-29 2:06 PM

I really appreciate everyone who has responded to my litany of Zone 2 questions. This is giving me a more faith in the Z2 approach. 

It is interesting to me how many times I have read--and I believe it--that you can't become a fast swimmer without swimming fast sets, yet here we have many people reporting PR/PB running with doing very little zone 4 and little to no zone 5. What do you think accounts for the difference between swimming and running--maybe, just maybe, we have some fishes reading this thread, though I know the runners and fishes don't mingle much

When I run a 5K, I'm well into Zone 4 for the majority of it, and finishing at 5.  Those of you getting your PRs off of Zone 2 training, what zone are you in racing your 5Ks?

 

Racing all out at and above lactate threshold for a 5K.  So, Zone 4/5.

2013-04-29 2:19 PM
in reply to: #4717120

Veteran
165
1002525
Central Mass
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Hi my name is Paul and you are not alone, I too have a Zone 2 Problem.  I find it difficult to stay there and did my first HR Ride and living in New England there are no flat spots which makes it next to impossible to keep your heart rate down unless you get off your bike and walk.
2013-04-29 2:19 PM
in reply to: #4716857

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-29 2:21 PM
in reply to: #4716857

Regular
789
500100100252525
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

This last fall when I started my IM training my zone 2 for running was slow for what I felt to be good. 9:00-9:15 pace. Just yesterday after riding for 4:35 trying to stay in zone 2 I got off the bike and went for a 50 minute run in zone 2 at a pace of 8:23/mile. Last fall that wouldn't of ever happened.

Training in that zone to establish a good base will benefit you but you have to be patient with it. I only started seeing noticeable improvements in my speed once my plan started having me do speed work again. 

So zone 2 training combined with proper speed work will help to keep you injury free IMO and prolly in a lot of other people's opinions.



2013-04-29 2:33 PM
in reply to: #4719433

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
tkos - 2013-04-29 2:19 PM

Any race depends on how long it will take you to race it. Technically Z4 is the max you can do in 1 hour. So the best of the best runners can maybe squeeze in a half marathon in that time. The rest if us can maybe do high Z3. 

Z5 can be held for a lot less. I did my recent 5K in mostly Z5 with a steady build up through the Zones to get there. I finished in 18:26. Much longer and I could not have held that pace / heart rate. 

You really do need some Z4/5 work to maximize the benefits of zone training as you want to use them to push your anaerobic threshold further away. Other than sprinting, you need to run aerobic. And the longer you can run at a higher heart rate, the better.

The big issue is spending too often training in Z3. It offers the least benefit (other than maybe some race pace training) with the maximum potential for injury. But to most people it feel comfortably fast, so they train in it often.

OK, I probably need to retest my LT.  I can hang out in what I have been thinking is Zone 4 for well over an hour running (absolutely can't biking or swimming), but I have been running >20 years.  The real bummer here is that probably means I've been "hanging" out in zone 3. shoot.

2013-04-29 2:50 PM
in reply to: #4719466

Regular
123
100
Toronto, ON
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

Your LT - and your zones - will differ in each sport.  Typically, it's highest for running, a bit lower for cycling, and lower still for swimming.  In unusual circumstances, like being highly trained in swimming and untrained in running, this may not hold.



Edited by fishwallop 2013-04-29 2:51 PM
2013-04-29 2:54 PM
in reply to: #4716857

New user
1

Halifax
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

Here's a little tip to make it "suck" less... something to take you're mind off the obnoxiously slow pace. Use a foot pod to focus/improve your cadence. The most efficient runners maintain a 180 cadence (midfoot strikes per minute) even during a Zone 2 effort.

In the beginning this will impede your ability to stay within Zone 2, but it will significantly improve your running economy. Every 3rd or 5th kilometer run at proper cadence for 1 km. In between efforts return back to your Zone 2 target HR. A few weeks of this and you will notice drastic changes to both your form and HR.

Jeff

Director, Kinesio Sport Lab

Halifax, NS

Follow us on Twitter @KinesioSportLab

Find us on Facebook!

2013-04-29 7:23 PM
in reply to: #4719500

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Zone 2 sucks Rss Feed  
 
 
of 4