Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 (Page 25)
-
No new posts
Moderators: the bear, kaqphin, tinkerbeth, D001, k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2012-01-10 9:27 PM in reply to: #3982675 |
Coach 10487 Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 jgerbodegrant - 2012-01-10 5:39 PM I did my third test today. Put it this way....hardest I've gone on a bicycle ever. I'm not even sure if I have gained any fitness from last time. I just put a hurtin' on myself. Drooling. Not kidding. Took me about 10 minutes of riding in zone 2 to get my heart rate back down. First 20m test: 272 watts (3.2 w/kg) Second 20m test: 294 watts (3.5 w/kg) Third 20m test: 308 watts (3.7 w/kg) Great Job! keep up the consistency, let's get that 3 to 3.9 w/kg |
|
2012-01-10 9:28 PM in reply to: #3981466 |
Coach 10487 Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 rsmoylan - 2012-01-10 7:54 AM Jorge, thanks for all the great info. I am learning so much. I don't know if I love you or hate you sometimes. As long as you improve in your training and learn about smart training, I am ok with either |
2012-01-11 5:04 AM in reply to: #3744433 |
Member 32 Belfast | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Jorge I've read in the past that once you know your FT in watts you can just dial that number in for a race and keeping as close as possible will deliver the best performance you can manage. Does the same apply for heart rate? Now I know my FTHR can I keep that number in mind and aim to maintain my heart rate at or near for the duration of the race (Olympic, so the numbers from the cycle programme are roughly correct) and achieve the same result?
Thanks |
2012-01-11 10:36 AM in reply to: #3744433 |
Expert 1394 Wilmington, NC | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 2nd 5min test in the bag. Not dissapointing, but a little suprised. My legs have been really tired the last 2 days and last night I had a bad run after I did my 20min test on Monday. I figured I would not really see huge gains in my 5min test 1) because of tired legs/body and 2) I have only really been doing 2 of the 3 workouts a week and I always try to go with the slightly longer ones b/c I felt that my 20min power was not quite at the level of my 5min power from test 1. So my focus has been more towards 20min/CP power than 5min power. Well I thought I rode a pretty good 5min test and the way it felt I thought I was actually going to see a decent jump. I downloaded and it actually dropped. Like I said above, not dissapointed given my reasons above, but suprised it dropped a touch. Test 1 (Dec 14 & 18) 5min 316w avg 20min 256w avg CP 236w (3.46w/kg) Test 2 (Jan 9 & 11) 5min 309w avg 20min 277w avg CP 266w (3.91w/kg)
|
2012-01-14 8:34 AM in reply to: #3744433 |
New user 40 Chicago | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Test 2 (Week 7) done! 20 min test was pretty good, 5 min test was pretty tough, my average power dropped a bit in the last minute, so will need to work on pacing. Also for some reason started coughing pretty hard after 5 min test (may have something to do with an open window and really cold temperatures outside) Here are the results! 5 min @ 319W (vs 4 min @ 313W test 1) 20 min @ 255 (vs 20 min @ 240W test 1) CP 234 - 2.98 W/kg (vs 222 - 2.83 w/kg test1) Feel there is some progress ... 2 tests to go to reach my goal of 3.45 w/kg Happy training! Edited by Anton84 2012-01-14 8:35 AM |
2012-01-14 8:31 PM in reply to: #3744433 |
Master 1793 Essex Jct, VT | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Holy buckets, as my mom used to say. Here are my results: 20 min power was 303/ now 305 watts. 5 min power was 334/ now 358 watts. (4.67 w/kg) I guess the ceiling has been raised. Jorge, My CP has dropped about 10 watts. I understand the why. But my question is if I can do the workouts at the higher CP value, should I do them? Or, would I get more benefit from lowering my CP and doing my workouts with the lower value?
|
|
2012-01-15 10:10 AM in reply to: #3744433 |
Extreme Veteran 368 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Would be awesome if the whole winter cycling program was setup on trainerroad, as opposed to just the 6 week..... |
2012-01-15 6:05 PM in reply to: #3744433 |
New user 40 Chicago | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 How much of the CP/FTP gains carry over throughout the season? I will finish the program in March and then will start specific training for Ironman Wisconsin. The program is working great and I see great improvements now. Should I expect my FTP to drop as the season progresses (since I will be doing mostly aerobic training), or does it stay pretty steady? Thanks! |
2012-01-16 10:37 AM in reply to: #3744433 |
Elite 6387 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 My question is what are we working on with the long rides? I'm learning this stuff about VO2 and CP. My running is on hold so now I am going to ride the 4x a week till I can get back to that. I did the long ride yesterday. I'm just week 2 but did 2 hours watching the game. The workout was 70-75-80%... that was pretty easy and I was not tired so I basically did about 85% for 1.5 hours. My question is what are we working on? What is the range I want to stay in for the long ride? And I am realizing this year it's about the weekly work load not blowing out a killer workout. |
2012-01-17 8:06 AM in reply to: #3744433 |
Extreme Veteran 821 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 1st 20' Test Done long way to go but I am def happy and encouraged by the results so far! |
2012-01-17 1:22 PM in reply to: #3994482 |
37 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 I just finished my 3rd 30min test - dropped a tad from test two. The same thing happened last year as well on test 3. Not sure why because I felt pretty good going into it. |
|
2012-01-17 2:12 PM in reply to: #3744433 |
Expert 668 Lancaster, PA | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Quick question- on Week 6 - getting ready to do day2 w.out.Should I be using the cp # from last test or should I use the power#I got last night from the last 1 x 4' @20MP ???Thomas |
2012-01-17 9:10 PM in reply to: #3995518 |
Master 1793 Essex Jct, VT | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 golfpro - 2012-01-17 3:12 PM Quick question- on Week 6 - getting ready to do day2 w.out.Should I be using the cp # from last test or should I use the power#I got last night from the last 1 x 4' @20MP ???Thomas I used CP for that workout. |
2012-01-18 8:10 PM in reply to: #3744433 |
Extreme Veteran 821 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 2x20 two days after FTP was painful :/ |
2012-01-19 11:31 AM in reply to: #3744433 |
Extreme Veteran 688 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Day 40 of HR plan doesn't make sense to me. Can someone clarify the main set? 20' at 2min 95-105%??? |
2012-01-19 11:45 AM in reply to: #3999588 |
Master 1793 Essex Jct, VT | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 MRDAVIDALEXANDER - 2012-01-19 12:31 PM Day 40 of HR plan doesn't make sense to me. Can someone clarify the main set? 20' at 2min 95-105%??? 20' as 2' @ 95-105% + 10' @ 70-75% I think that's a typo. I think it should read. Ride for 20min. as 2min @95-105% and 2 min @ 70-75%. So you are alternating. 2 min hard/2 min easy. |
|
2012-01-19 4:04 PM in reply to: #3744433 |
Veteran 820 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Jorge, This may have been asked before, but I haven't read all 20 some pages yet, but will be when I can. Anyhow, I' looking at starting the program Mon along with the free HIM plan. I have the HIM plan modified to fir my schedule along with your plan. Would it be ok for me to just drop it in place of what it calls for on the HIM plan, most weeks only have 3 days for bike, most weeks maybe 60,60, 90+ so that I think will work well with your plan, but does add a session which I don't think will be a problem, just extra bike traning.
My question was in regards to recovery weeks though, your plan while it does have a recovery week, they are still fairly high in effort, but reduced on the long ride. The problem I was wondering about though is it will not line up with the recovery weeks of the HIM plan. The HIM plan is weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 for recovery, and yours are 6,10, and 15. Even if I did wait to start your plan to make 8 from the HIM plan line up with 6 from yours, I t still would be thrown off with the extra week you have at the end, instaed of 14 in your being recovery, it is 15. So should I sweat it? Or just start at the same time and call it good, even though I'll still be going fairly hard on the bike during my recovery week for the HIM plan, if anything I guess I could just cut your long bike to an hour on those weeks, and extend the long bike on your recovery weeks. Hope it makes sense with me flip flopping talking about your plan vs the other. |
2012-01-19 8:36 PM in reply to: #3982675 |
NH | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 jgerbodegrant - 2012-01-10 6:39 PM I did my third test today. Put it this way....hardest I've gone on a bicycle ever. I'm not even sure if I have gained any fitness from last time. I just put a hurtin' on myself. Drooling. Not kidding. Took me about 10 minutes of riding in zone 2 to get my heart rate back down. First 20m test: 272 watts (3.2 w/kg) Second 20m test: 294 watts (3.5 w/kg) Third 20m test: 308 watts (3.7 w/kg) That's sick my friend. I'm gonna have to hit the running harder because you're eliminating any hope of me getting close to you on the bike! Very nice. |
2012-01-20 3:59 PM in reply to: #3744433 |
Extreme Veteran 759 Villanova | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Question for Jorge and others: Well, its finally caught up to me. I'm on week 8 of Don Fink's IronFit plan for IMCDA. I was replacing the weekday bikes with Jorge's plan (I'm on week 10) and the past two weeks, my power has been falling on the interval rides. I just don't know that I have the fitness. Should I, A) Continue the plan just knowing full well that my power numbers may not show progress due to the extra load I'm taking on during the IM plan. B) Scrap Jorge's plan knowing that I at least got 10 weeks worth of gains and fully focus on the IM plan. Thanks all! |
2012-01-20 10:16 PM in reply to: #4002262 |
New user 40 Chicago | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 japewang - 2012-01-20 3:59 PM Question for Jorge and others: Well, its finally caught up to me. I'm on week 8 of Don Fink's IronFit plan for IMCDA. I was replacing the weekday bikes with Jorge's plan (I'm on week 10) and the past two weeks, my power has been falling on the interval rides. I just don't know that I have the fitness. Should I, A) Continue the plan just knowing full well that my power numbers may not show progress due to the extra load I'm taking on during the IM plan. B) Scrap Jorge's plan knowing that I at least got 10 weeks worth of gains and fully focus on the IM plan. Thanks all! I'm on week 8 right now. Doing Jorge's plan and lifting twice a week. The plan is very tough, and I don't see how I could do this and swim and run at the same time. I would go with option B. Just my 2 cents. Edited by Anton84 2012-01-20 10:17 PM |
2012-01-21 10:49 AM in reply to: #4002262 |
Elite 6387 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 japewang - 2012-01-20 2:59 PM Question for Jorge and others: Well, its finally caught up to me. I'm on week 8 of Don Fink's IronFit plan for IMCDA. I was replacing the weekday bikes with Jorge's plan (I'm on week 10) and the past two weeks, my power has been falling on the interval rides. I just don't know that I have the fitness. Should I, A) Continue the plan just knowing full well that my power numbers may not show progress due to the extra load I'm taking on during the IM plan. B) Scrap Jorge's plan knowing that I at least got 10 weeks worth of gains and fully focus on the IM plan. Thanks all! Which days are you doing? A;ll 3 week days and no optional 4th? It was mentioned doing only 1 and 2 for less intensity. Do you take recovery weeks? Nothing wrong with taking one when needed. |
|
2012-01-21 5:33 PM in reply to: #3744433 |
Regular 98 Farmington Hills | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Finished my 2nd test today. I felt good for the 5 min test. The 20min test on Tuesday was another story! However, very happy with my progress to date... Test 1. 20min 274w w/kg 3.0 5min 302w w/kg 3.3 Test 2. 20min 292w w/kg 3.2 5min 339w w/kg 3.7 |
2012-01-21 10:39 PM in reply to: #4003595 |
Master 1793 Essex Jct, VT | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 dtrimmer - 2012-01-21 6:33 PM Finished my 2nd test today. I felt good for the 5 min test. The 20min test on Tuesday was another story! However, very happy with my progress to date... Test 1. 20min 274w w/kg 3.0 5min 302w w/kg 3.3 Test 2. 20min 292w w/kg 3.2 5min 339w w/kg 3.7 Then you're doing it wrong. |
2012-01-22 7:07 AM in reply to: #4003120 |
Extreme Veteran 759 Villanova | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 powerman - 2012-01-21 10:49 AM japewang - 2012-01-20 2:59 PM Question for Jorge and others: Well, its finally caught up to me. I'm on week 8 of Don Fink's IronFit plan for IMCDA. I was replacing the weekday bikes with Jorge's plan (I'm on week 10) and the past two weeks, my power has been falling on the interval rides. I just don't know that I have the fitness. Should I, A) Continue the plan just knowing full well that my power numbers may not show progress due to the extra load I'm taking on during the IM plan. B) Scrap Jorge's plan knowing that I at least got 10 weeks worth of gains and fully focus on the IM plan. Thanks all! Which days are you doing? A;ll 3 week days and no optional 4th? It was mentioned doing only 1 and 2 for less intensity. Do you take recovery weeks? Nothing wrong with taking one when needed. I'm doing the 1st and 2nd days with a long ride on the weekend. Tell me more about taking a recovery week. I certainly know what you mean, but I'm curious about recommendation about application. Both Jorge's plan and my IM plan (IronFit) are pretty well spelled out. Are you suggesting I just throw in a random week that's recovery off plan? Take a week off of Jorge's plan to do easy bikes and then come back in where I left off? thanks! |
2012-01-22 12:08 PM in reply to: #4004113 |
Elite 6387 | Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 japewang - 2012-01-22 6:07 AM powerman - 2012-01-21 10:49 AM japewang - 2012-01-20 2:59 PM Question for Jorge and others: Well, its finally caught up to me. I'm on week 8 of Don Fink's IronFit plan for IMCDA. I was replacing the weekday bikes with Jorge's plan (I'm on week 10) and the past two weeks, my power has been falling on the interval rides. I just don't know that I have the fitness. Should I, A) Continue the plan just knowing full well that my power numbers may not show progress due to the extra load I'm taking on during the IM plan. B) Scrap Jorge's plan knowing that I at least got 10 weeks worth of gains and fully focus on the IM plan. Thanks all! Which days are you doing? A;ll 3 week days and no optional 4th? It was mentioned doing only 1 and 2 for less intensity. Do you take recovery weeks? Nothing wrong with taking one when needed. I'm doing the 1st and 2nd days with a long ride on the weekend. Tell me more about taking a recovery week. I certainly know what you mean, but I'm curious about recommendation about application. Both Jorge's plan and my IM plan (IronFit) are pretty well spelled out. Are you suggesting I just throw in a random week that's recovery off plan? Take a week off of Jorge's plan to do easy bikes and then come back in where I left off? thanks! Ya, that was the "less" intense one. Or leave off the optional long ride. I am not the guy you want to be taking expert advice from.... Last year I tried to stay on programs and what ever... now people that have been doing this for a while don't seem to take "recovery" weeks, they just alter things a bit. So I do my running plan and now this plan and I will adjust depending how I feel and if I am feeling run down then I will take it easy for a week to recharge. I don't plan on "recovery weeks", but I will need to recharge from time to time. This plan is "cycling specific" but for triathletes... so if you need to cut back or rest up because of your running, do so... you could just substitute one of the beginning weeks as a recovery week since they were sort of short and easy. I don't know how much help that is, take it for what it's worth. |
|