Other Resources My Cup of Joe » TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ... Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
CLOSED
 
 
of 68
 
 
2013-01-18 3:04 PM
in reply to: #4585120

User image

Master
1780
1000500100100252525
Boynton Beach, FL
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

You mean not involving women at all? Whatever floats your boat...



2013-01-18 3:05 PM
in reply to: #4585119

User image

Champion
17756
50005000500020005001001002525
SoCal
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
Techdiver - 2013-01-18 1:02 PM
Big Appa - 2013-01-18 2:54 PM
Techdiver - 2013-01-18 12:51 PM

I was told it was considered wrong to do too. Scout breaks that is.

It is one of the many reasons that go into why we are both were we are at currently and more happy because of it.

Yes SIR

Much more happy now and my bank account thanks me even more. And I have my dog.

Life is pretty good. And I have even gone for 2 runs in the last week.

Bring on spring time out on my bike and I OWN THE WORLD... hahaha

Glad you are happy man

2013-01-18 3:06 PM
in reply to: #4585124

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
Samyg - 2013-01-18 3:04 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

You mean not involving women at all? Whatever floats your boat...



Not at all. There are a lot of non-offensive-to-women videos out there that include women. Someone who thinks all sex is degrading to women is doing it wrong!
2013-01-18 3:07 PM
in reply to: #4585120

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

Honestly I do not watch it, what I have seen does not impress me and I am under the impression that that is the vast majority of the genera.  If there are "movies" where there is more equitable treatment, for lack of a better term, then that is a slightly different story. 

2013-01-18 3:09 PM
in reply to: #4585130

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:06 PM
Samyg - 2013-01-18 3:04 PM
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

You mean not involving women at all? Whatever floats your boat...

Not at all. There are a lot of non-offensive-to-women videos out there that include women. Someone who thinks all sex is degrading to women is doing it wrong!

To be clear hear I in no way think all sex is degrading to women.  I simply do not see it as a spectator sport.

It is also not the sex itself but how women are treated in the vast majority of male oriented pronography.

2013-01-18 3:10 PM
in reply to: #4581010

User image

Master
1780
1000500100100252525
Boynton Beach, FL
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
LOOK SQUIRREL!


2013-01-18 3:10 PM
in reply to: #4585134

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...

Samyg - 2013-01-18 4:10 PM LOOK SQUIRREL!

BEWBS!!!

2013-01-18 3:11 PM
in reply to: #4581010

User image

Expert
1121
1000100
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
Wow . . . lots of ground covered since page 23.
2013-01-18 3:12 PM
in reply to: #4585131

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
trinnas - 2013-01-18 3:07 PM

mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

Honestly I do not watch it, what I have seen does not impress me and I am under the impression that that is the vast majority of the genera.  If there are "movies" where there is more equitable treatment, for lack of a better term, then that is a slightly different story. 



Sigh. OK well I thought the SAW movies were gratuitously violent so I don't watch them. That doesn't mean I don't watch horror movies at all. I just find the horror movies I do like. In other words, you shouldn't rule out an entire genre of movies simply because you've seen ones you don't like. If you don't like porn, that's fine, it's not for everybody, but to say that the ``vast majority'' is degrading to women is a pretty broad generalization. I've seen TONS that isn't degrading to women. In fact, a lot of the ones I've seen have ONLY women in them and are oftentimes single women doing ... stufffff.
2013-01-18 3:12 PM
in reply to: #4585134

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...

Samyg - 2013-01-18 3:10 PM LOOK SQUIRREL!

that's not a squirrel my friend!

2013-01-18 3:12 PM
in reply to: #4581010

User image

Chatham Ontario
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...

Peace out Tan

Happy Weekend. I am off for the weekend.. WOOHOO



2013-01-18 3:14 PM
in reply to: #4585138

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...

Ershk - 2013-01-18 3:11 PM Wow . . . lots of ground covered since page 23.

Don't act all surprised!! 

I am definitely in for a Jan31st TAN outing for those who are close :-

Goggs? Monica? Matt?

2013-01-18 3:15 PM
in reply to: #4585138

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
Ershk - 2013-01-18 4:11 PM

Wow . . . lots of ground covered since page 23.


I was off on a scout break. Recap please....
2013-01-18 3:15 PM
in reply to: #4585133

User image

Expert
790
500100100252525
Frisco
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
trinnas - 2013-01-18 3:09 PM
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:06 PM
Samyg - 2013-01-18 3:04 PM
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

You mean not involving women at all? Whatever floats your boat...

Not at all. There are a lot of non-offensive-to-women videos out there that include women. Someone who thinks all sex is degrading to women is doing it wrong!

To be clear hear I in no way think all sex is degrading to women.  I simply do not see it as a spectator sport.

It is also not the sex itself but how women are treated in the vast majority of male oriented pronography.

 

are you trying to say degrading the way usually all porn scenes end?

2013-01-18 3:15 PM
in reply to: #4585139

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 3:12 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 3:07 PM
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

Honestly I do not watch it, what I have seen does not impress me and I am under the impression that that is the vast majority of the genera.  If there are "movies" where there is more equitable treatment, for lack of a better term, then that is a slightly different story. 

Sigh. OK well I thought the SAW movies were gratuitously violent so I don't watch them. That doesn't mean I don't watch horror movies at all. I just find the horror movies I do like. In other words, you shouldn't rule out an entire genre of movies simply because you've seen ones you don't like. If you don't like porn, that's fine, it's not for everybody, but to say that the ``vast majority'' is degrading to women is a pretty broad generalization. I've seen TONS that isn't degrading to women. In fact, a lot of the ones I've seen have ONLY women in them and are oftentimes single women doing ... stufffff.

I kind of like porn...there I said it!

2013-01-18 3:16 PM
in reply to: #4585146

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
pitt83 - 2013-01-18 3:15 PM

Ershk - 2013-01-18 4:11 PM

Wow . . . lots of ground covered since page 23.


I was off on a scout break. Recap please....


Porn bad. Porn good. Scout breaks bad. Scout breaks good.

Something is going on Jan. 31. Not sure what.

Nothing.


2013-01-18 3:16 PM
in reply to: #4585138

User image

Master
3870
200010005001001001002525
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...

Ershk - 2013-01-18 1:11 PM Wow . . . lots of ground covered since page 23.

Yes! And I don't think I could've gotten a word in edgewise on that last topic. Fast and furious that was.

2013-01-18 3:16 PM
in reply to: #4585149

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:16 PM

pitt83 - 2013-01-18 3:15 PM

Ershk - 2013-01-18 4:11 PM

Wow . . . lots of ground covered since page 23.


I was off on a scout break. Recap please....


Porn bad. Porn good. Scout breaks bad. Scout breaks good.

Something is going on Jan. 31. Not sure what.

Nothing.

So yeah, usual..
2013-01-18 3:17 PM
in reply to: #4585139

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:12 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 3:07 PM
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

Honestly I do not watch it, what I have seen does not impress me and I am under the impression that that is the vast majority of the genera.  If there are "movies" where there is more equitable treatment, for lack of a better term, then that is a slightly different story. 

Sigh. OK well I thought the SAW movies were gratuitously violent so I don't watch them. That doesn't mean I don't watch horror movies at all. I just find the horror movies I do like. In other words, you shouldn't rule out an entire genre of movies simply because you've seen ones you don't like. If you don't like porn, that's fine, it's not for everybody, but to say that the ``vast majority'' is degrading to women is a pretty broad generalization. I've seen TONS that isn't degrading to women. In fact, a lot of the ones I've seen have ONLY women in them and are oftentimes single women doing ... stufffff.

Just because it is not BDSM does not mean it is not degrading.  If you are nothing more than a piece of meat then you are nothing more than a piece of meat regardless of the number and gender make up of the "actors".

2013-01-18 3:18 PM
in reply to: #4585148

User image

Champion
17756
50005000500020005001001002525
SoCal
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
NRG42 - 2013-01-18 1:15 PM

I kind of like porn...there I said it!

You don't have to feel bad about saying you like something.

2013-01-18 3:19 PM
in reply to: #4585143

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...

Interwebz problems and I almost missed two pages!  I'm not arguing either side of the this, but it's interesting conversations.  I searched the web for some other opinions and found several along the same lines as Dr. Phil.  not saying he's right or wrong:

Is Internet Pornography Cheating?

Internet pornography is a growing trend that has many people worried about their relationships. Is it cheating? And is it a "normal guy thing"? Here's what Dr. Phil believes:

  • It is not OK behavior. It is a perverse and ridiculous intrusion into your relationship. It is an insult, it is disloyal and it is cheating.
  • Consider how it makes your partner feel. If it makes your partner feel ugly, hurt, deceived, lied to or inadequate, then it needs to stop. If it is eroding your relationship, it's gone too far.
  • Pornography isn't real, it's a fantasy. It's makeup, beauty lenses, hair extensions, camera angles, lighting and silicone! It's also somebody's daughter who has taken a really, really wrong turn. She's demeaning herself, debasing herself, humiliating herself and she's being exploited by people who are funded by you. It is a sick, demented, twisted world. It's not healthy, it's not natural and it's not normal.
  • Viewing Internet pornography or engaging in cybersex is a short step to taking cheating to the next level.
  • You need to tell your partner that viewing pornography is absolutely, unequivocally unacceptable in your relationship. Draw a line: Your partner needs to choose between the pornography or the relationship.

    Ask yourself or your partner:
  • Would you do it with your partner standing right there?
  • Are you turning outside of your relationship to meet a need that should be met within the relationship? You can't change what you don't acknowledge, so find out if you or your partner have a problem.
  • Do you justify the behavior by saying, "It's harmless," "Everyone does it," or "It's just the Internet"?
  • Does it intrude on your relationship?
  • Which is more important: pornography or your relationship?

 



2013-01-18 3:19 PM
in reply to: #4585147

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
Boogie7247 - 2013-01-18 4:15 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 3:09 PM
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:06 PM
Samyg - 2013-01-18 3:04 PM
mr2tony - 2013-01-18 4:02 PM
trinnas - 2013-01-18 2:57 PM
mehaner - 2013-01-18 3:52 PM
Kido - 2013-01-18 3:49 PM

I'm just saying, that for some people, that kind of material does nothing for them.  And it's offensive and degrading.  And if their significant other happens to enjoy him/her self on occasion, it's also offensive because if they have a perfectly willing partner, why show interest/attraction to something else?

And how can you REALLY argue if that's how they feel?  If they are offended, they are offended.  Can't make them NOT take offense.

 

As a side note.  Gawds I love my smartphone.

but if the perfectly willing partner is GONE for a week at a time for work, why is the porn/etc offensive, that's where it doesn't add up.  if my husband were ignoring me or unable to perform for me because of porn,  THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM.  but if i'm in germany for a week and he takes care of his own business a few times, i just can't find anything offensive about that.  you know i'm taking care of me then too!

I am in the porn is offensive not the scout break activity.  That is simply for the fact that women in most of those "movies" are treated as meat.  If that is what you want in your women OK but  not the kind of person I would want or want to be.

*note not you specifically meh a general you tot eh guys.

Okaaaaay but you do realize there are other types of non-offensive-to-women porn out there, right?

You mean not involving women at all? Whatever floats your boat...

Not at all. There are a lot of non-offensive-to-women videos out there that include women. Someone who thinks all sex is degrading to women is doing it wrong!

To be clear hear I in no way think all sex is degrading to women.  I simply do not see it as a spectator sport.

It is also not the sex itself but how women are treated in the vast majority of male oriented pronography.

 

are you trying to say degrading the way usually all porn scenes end?

I am not sure what you mean by how they end.  If you mean the money shot per se no that is not what I am saying.

2013-01-18 3:19 PM
in reply to: #4585157

User image

Pro
4838
2000200050010010010025
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
Big Appa - 2013-01-18 3:18 PM
NRG42 - 2013-01-18 1:15 PM

I kind of like porn...there I said it!

You don't have to feel bad about saying you like something.

If you were making it then you should feel a little bad.

2013-01-18 3:19 PM
in reply to: #4585150

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
4agoodlife - 2013-01-18 3:16 PM

Ershk - 2013-01-18 1:11 PM Wow . . . lots of ground covered since page 23.

Yes! And I don't think I could've gotten a word in edgewise on that last topic. Fast and furious that was.



Just like the movie.
2013-01-18 3:20 PM
in reply to: #4585157

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ...
Big Appa - 2013-01-18 3:18 PM
NRG42 - 2013-01-18 1:15 PM

I kind of like porn...there I said it!

You don't have to feel bad about saying you like something.

How do you know saying it didn't totally turn me on?  Don't assume Cord :-)

New Thread
CLOSED
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » TAN #193: Labyrinth where unatTANded children go ... Rss Feed  
 
 
of 68