Lance swim 49 for 2.4 miles.. (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Here's my two cents. Lance always trained for the Tour De France Period. He trained to win the greatest bike race of all time. (Probably with a little motivation from the French and the governing bodies of cycling) He never trained to win a classic race, the Giro, none of em. If Lance is coming back to Triathlon with the intent on winning, he will test the waters, then train only for what he thinks is the biggest Triathlon race in the world (Kona I presume).. Can he do it? Only time will tell. Will he raise a ton of Livestrong money YES.... |
|
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() menglo - 2011-04-06 8:45 PM He will push the bike leg, the other pros know that. Maybe this is what Ironman needed to push their times faster (reference to the "why aren't ironman times getting faster" thread in the iron distance forum)? Here Here |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Don't you know riding a bike 112 miles is completely different than a 3 week tour. He's only ridden in the tt position for maybe 1h15 at most not the 4:20ish he'll need for Hawaii. Plus what does he know about nutrition he won't have a team car behind him to tell him when to eat. All this is meant as sarcasm. I would use pink font but I'm too computer stupid to figure out how. Personally I find it crazy that people would doubt his ability to compete at an elite level in an Iron distance tri. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tcovert - 2011-04-06 2:34 PM ChrisM - 2011-04-06 12:14 PM THis isn't (IMHO) like a cyclist coming over to tris to try to dominate (like... who was that?) Lance has a solid tri background. I don't think it would diminish anyone's accomplishments. If anyone thinks it's easy to run 6's off the bike in an IM because "Lance can do it" they're welcome to try ...And utterly freakish genetic gifts underlying all his training. I think that gets overlooked in these discussions sometimes, in some sort of misplaced attempt to downgrade Lance's potential in a return to tri. We talk about "genetics" frequently here and LA is a good example of someone who has been shown over the years in testing to be ridiculously well adapted to endurance racing (as, f'rinstance, here and here)...that absolutely translates beyond the bike. It really is amazing to step back and think about this. He has been a bike racer for a long while now. He jumps back in the pool after (how long?) off and lays down a sub 50 2.4 mile OWS. Simply mind boggling. As much as I like the guy it is pretty maddening to think about how easily he jumps right back into something and is already at the tippity top of the scale. :shakeshead: |
![]() ![]() |
![]() Fred Doucette - 2011-04-06 8:57 AM bryancd WTC. In regards to how much faster can he ride, I would think he wants to go 4:10 or so but I just don't see him or anyone running a sub 3 off that kind of effort. Yes, that is the issue. By riding so far out in front he will have his nose in the wind the whole race, which is a MAJOR disadvantage when comparing to someone enjoying the legal draft benefits in a group. I think what would be interesting is what effect would taking the top running pro's out of their bike comfort zones. ie they could blow up too trying to stay within range of LA. The drama. Couldn't agree more. The pros all know what each other is capable of. Craig Alexander knows he can chase down Lieto even if he's down 12-15 minutes to him off the bike. But does Alexander know for sure that he can chase down Lance if he is 25 minutes ahead of him off the bike? Will Craig automatically assume Lance will run a 3:10+ marathon...or does he need to gamble and pick up his bike pace in the event that Lance somehow can run a 3:00 marathon. I'm not saying Lance could run a 3:00 marathon after a 4:15ish bike, but it will certainly play mind games on the pros. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() linfieldpt - 2011-04-06 2:37 PM glenndenning06 - 2011-04-06 11:41 AM I know from a source close to Lance that he plans on racing at Kona this year (and winning it). I am very hesitant to reveal who my source, is so of course everyone is going to be skeptical. not to burst your bubble but that was exactly what Carmichael said about a year ago I think it would be more advantageous for lance to race at a place like CDL or St George where the bike course is tougher with milder climate. Anybody agree? Yep. That would also negate the need to spend an eternity in the TT position too. The man made his money on climbing big hills. He would KILL St. George. Has anyone taken the time to check the participants list for all the majors IM's? Of course, it would be completely reasonable of him to request that his name remain off the participant list People don't even really leave him alone now, could you imagine how much ridiculousness he'd have to deal with if his participation was announced in advance? If I were him I would really just want to show up and not deal with the pre-race drama. Though, that's not very fair to the other participants. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Alot of people seem to think he's not gonna do too great at IM.
I personally think he's gonna totally KILL it! The dude is an ANIMAL! ;-)
49 swim is pretty frickin quick. Wonder what he's like on a bike?! |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dangremond - 2011-04-06 2:33 PM Regarding his ability to run off the bike can some of you power guru's help me understand the relationship of % of FTP on the IM bike to ability to run effectively afterwards. Is there a rule of thumb as far as the pro's go? Following that point does anyone have a guess about LA's FTP compared to top triathlete's? The generally accepted range for IMs is 70-76% of FTP. Pros are likely racing at the top end of this, if not just beyond. This point is the one that I think people miss consistently when downplaying LA's chances. Typically, the argument is "Oh, he'll crush the bike but that he'll blow up on the run because he went too hard." Except for him to dominate the bike won't require him to go hard. I think the highest FTP ever claimed for LA was 483 watts. Even with significant losses over the last several years, I'd wager his FTP is still north of 400. Take 75% of that and you end up with 300+ watts. While that number looks huge to those of us that train with power, for a pro cyclist, doing 4+ hours at 75% would NOT be a hard effort. Torbjorn Sindballe set the course record in 2005 on 286 watts. I'm not sure what Stadler's power was when he broke the record in 2006. The point is, Lance will ride away from the rest of the field while not pushing himself any harder than they are. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Oh, and Lance finished behind James Bonney and James Cotter Cotter is a pro that specializes in 70.3. He won Steelhead 70.3 last year and had a swim split of 24:28. He came in 2nd at Eagleman 70.3 with a swim split of 27:16. Bonney is another pro with a pretty impressive background (including 4th at Kona in 1998). Here are their tweets afterwards: Cotter: "Fast 2.4 mile swim with @jamesbonney and @juanpelota today. They both put me in the hurt. Juan will be FOP in any 70.3/IM swim." Bonney: "@juanpelota great swim. It was a solid ice breaker for the IM distance. Next time opt for the light weight waffles post-race." |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think it would be more advantageous for lance to race at a place like CDL or St George where the bike course is tougher with milder climate He lives in Texas. Plus have you seen the temperature on some of those Tour stages? He's proven himself capable of handling the heat. And I agree that pretty much any Tour rider outclasses the field of riders in the triathlon world. It doesn't matter if they're a little out of their element. Look at what Lance and Levi did to the guys in the Leadville 100 the past couple years. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Hence my next sentence. ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred Doucette - 2011-04-06 5:00 PM The generally accepted range for IMs is 70-76% of FTP. Pros are likely racing at the top end of this, if not just beyond. This point is the one that I think people miss consistently when downplaying LA's chances. Typically, the argument is "Oh, he'll crush the bike but that he'll blow up on the run because he went too hard." Chris Lieto is pretty secretive about his numbers but I understood he rode at 80-81% of FTP. He is riding way shorter than any of us and he has had some run meltdowns, so I'm not advocating it. Just pointing out that the pro's go over 76% I believe.
last year at nautica lieto and mecc were racing, mecca won by 1-2 seconds, anyways for 20 miles mecca mentioned he was pushing 450 watts. they were ave 27-28 mph. and lieto was pulling away.... |
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() spudone - 2011-04-06 2:35 PM I think it would be more advantageous for lance to race at a place like CDL or St George where the bike course is tougher with milder climate He lives in Texas. Plus have you seen the temperature on some of those Tour stages? He's proven himself capable of handling the heat. What i meant about mild climate was not humid and have terrible crosswinds like kona is known for. Pure heat is different, you get that in many places in the world. But kona's humidity and wind gusts are well known. I should have been more clear |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Again, ideally he races as an AG'er but get's to start with the pro's. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2011-04-06 5:56 PM Again, ideally he races as an AG'er but get's to start with the pro's. if that happens that would be cool from a standpoint of people finally realizing what triathlon is all about... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() trix - 2011-04-06 4:11 PM bryancd - 2011-04-06 5:56 PM Again, ideally he races as an AG'er but get's to start with the pro's. if that happens that would be cool from a standpoint of people finally realizing what triathlon is all about... So, when I go to work Monday and say I did a tri, they won't say "that one in Hawaii?" Instead, they'll say, "the one Lance did?" |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trix - 2011-04-06 4:23 PM Fred Doucette - 2011-04-06 5:00 PM The generally accepted range for IMs is 70-76% of FTP. Pros are likely racing at the top end of this, if not just beyond. This point is the one that I think people miss consistently when downplaying LA's chances. Typically, the argument is "Oh, he'll crush the bike but that he'll blow up on the run because he went too hard." Chris Lieto is pretty secretive about his numbers but I understood he rode at 80-81% of FTP. He is riding way shorter than any of us and he has had some run meltdowns, so I'm not advocating it. Just pointing out that the pro's go over 76% I believe.
last year at nautica lieto and mecc were racing, mecca won by 1-2 seconds, anyways for 20 miles mecca mentioned he was pushing 450 watts. they were ave 27-28 mph. and lieto was pulling away.... He may have hit 450 watts for short periods but certainly not for 20 miles. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2011-04-06 5:56 PM Again, ideally he races as an AG'er but get's to start with the pro's. just quoting you to stay on the same theme. how will he get into race.
I'm sure this has been brought up before. But isn't there a CEO challange type entrance that just basically costs more? I"m not sure of the structure of all of the different branches of Livestrong, but is he a CEO of any of them, if only in name?
Maybe he can get in as one of the feel good stories, you know, the young man overcomes cancer type angle |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Gaarryy - 2011-04-06 7:45 PM bryancd - 2011-04-06 5:56 PM Again, ideally he races as an AG'er but get's to start with the pro's. just quoting you to stay on the same theme. how will he get into race.
I'm sure this has been brought up before. But isn't there a CEO challange type entrance that just basically costs more? I"m not sure of the structure of all of the different branches of Livestrong, but is he a CEO of any of them, if only in name?
Maybe he can get in as one of the feel good stories, you know, the young man overcomes cancer type angle It's the Executive Challenge. You don't necessarily need to be a CEO. Basically you pay a whole lot more money and you get a bunch of extra stuff (guaranteed entry, VIP tickets, accommodations, etc). There are also separate Kona qualifying slots. Basically, it's a separate set of AGs for rich people, not necessarily corresponding to the normal AGs. They only promise that there will be at least two XC age groups and that each AG will have 1 slot. If there are more than 6 people in an AG, that AG will get 2 slots. Can't see any reason for LA to do this. It's not a way of buying a direct slot to Kona, just a way of ensuring you're only competing against a small set of other rich folks for the slot. Since that's the case, there's no reason for him not to just qualify as an age grouper, unless he wants to do a race that's already sold out. Even in that case, I don't think he'd have a problem raising the funds for a CF slot, assuming WTC just doesn't let him in to any race he wants to do. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred Doucette - 2011-04-06 2:00 PM I would love to see Lance do an ironman. I suspect it would draw incredible ratings if LA raced Kona. I do see Kona as the race he's want as he is not a 'shrinking violet' and likes the biggest of stages to compete on. The drama and speculation is pretty fascinating. It could be the biggest ratings ever if he raced in KONA, and did reasonably welll....it could bring a lot of positive attention to the sport....i would be glued to the tv!!! |
![]() ![]() |
![]() glenndenning06 - 2011-04-06 11:41 AM I know from a source close to Lance that he plans on racing at Kona this year (and winning it). I am very hesitant to reveal who my source, is so of course everyone is going to be skeptical. I think he's on the Big Island now and he's there a LOT. Can Pro's qualify for Kona doing a 70.3? |
![]() ![]() |
Melon Presser![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Bah, triathlon. I think Lance should play dodgeball. Now there's an undervalued, underexposed sport that could really use the kind of big bucks and attention Lance would bring. |
|