Tan #86 - I told you so... (Page 38)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller |
Reply CLOSED
|
|
2009-11-19 11:49 AM in reply to: #2521942 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... trixie - 2009-11-19 11:42 AM
Hmmm, not sure. If it's someone I really like and have a lot in common with I'm sure there will probably be some curiousity. But maybe that's just me cause I'm a perv Trixie. I can't wait to nom WITH you for Thanksgiving. Sorry. Freudian slip. Edited by mr2tony 2009-11-19 11:50 AM |
|
2009-11-19 11:49 AM in reply to: #2521956 |
Champion 14571 the alamo city, Texas | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:46 PM In some cases yes in some cases no. Just because I WANT to have sex with someone doesn't mean it's inevitable. Shoot I can think of about 10 BT girls I wanna bang but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and do it. I mean, I could now that I'm single, but some of them are married or have boyfriends so that's not an option. Therefore, just friends. My FBI friends here, for example, I'd never touch them even though they're attractive women. I've never really even thought about it. I mean, I guess Tab P would fit into Slot V but really, they're just friends. I think of them the same way I think of my guy friends here, probably because I knew them before I was divorced. Anyway I used to train with a young lady and her husband would get all huffy. And he was a very good friend of mine. My wife, on the other hand, didn't give a rat's butt. So it's all about the individual How many of the guys?? |
2009-11-19 11:50 AM in reply to: #2521966 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... meherczeg - 2009-11-19 11:49 AM mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:46 PM In some cases yes in some cases no. Just because I WANT to have sex with someone doesn't mean it's inevitable. Shoot I can think of about 10 BT girls I wanna bang but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and do it. I mean, I could now that I'm single, but some of them are married or have boyfriends so that's not an option. Therefore, just friends. My FBI friends here, for example, I'd never touch them even though they're attractive women. I've never really even thought about it. I mean, I guess Tab P would fit into Slot V but really, they're just friends. I think of them the same way I think of my guy friends here, probably because I knew them before I was divorced. Anyway I used to train with a young lady and her husband would get all huffy. And he was a very good friend of mine. My wife, on the other hand, didn't give a rat's butt. So it's all about the individual How many of the guys?? Most of the guys. And yes, you are one of them. Edited by mr2tony 2009-11-19 11:50 AM |
2009-11-19 11:51 AM in reply to: #2521961 |
Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:48 PM akustix - 2009-11-19 11:44 AM How old are you, if I may ask? Do they have age restrictions? Lisa's boyfriend is an officer in the reserves.SO... I'm thinking about Army Reserve Chaplaincy... anyone here been in the reserves? For liturgical chaplains they have thrown out most age restrictions... although I am still below those...
|
2009-11-19 11:51 AM in reply to: #2521971 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... akustix - 2009-11-19 11:51 AM mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:48 PM akustix - 2009-11-19 11:44 AM How old are you, if I may ask? Do they have age restrictions? Lisa's boyfriend is an officer in the reserves.SO... I'm thinking about Army Reserve Chaplaincy... anyone here been in the reserves? For liturgical chaplains they have thrown out most age restrictions... although I am still below those...
I say do it. If I could go back into the military as a reserve officer, I'd totally do it. |
2009-11-19 11:51 AM in reply to: #2521969 |
Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:50 PM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 11:49 AM Most of the guys. And yes, you are one of them.mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:46 PM In some cases yes in some cases no. Just because I WANT to have sex with someone doesn't mean it's inevitable. Shoot I can think of about 10 BT girls I wanna bang but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and do it. I mean, I could now that I'm single, but some of them are married or have boyfriends so that's not an option. Therefore, just friends. My FBI friends here, for example, I'd never touch them even though they're attractive women. I've never really even thought about it. I mean, I guess Tab P would fit into Slot V but really, they're just friends. I think of them the same way I think of my guy friends here, probably because I knew them before I was divorced. Anyway I used to train with a young lady and her husband would get all huffy. And he was a very good friend of mine. My wife, on the other hand, didn't give a rat's butt. So it's all about the individual How many of the guys?? Tony if we are ever stranded on a desert island... you know. wink wink |
|
2009-11-19 11:52 AM in reply to: #2521973 |
Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:51 PM akustix - 2009-11-19 11:51 AM I say do it. If I could go back into the military as a reserve officer, I'd totally do it.mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:48 PM akustix - 2009-11-19 11:44 AM How old are you, if I may ask? Do they have age restrictions? Lisa's boyfriend is an officer in the reserves.SO... I'm thinking about Army Reserve Chaplaincy... anyone here been in the reserves? For liturgical chaplains they have thrown out most age restrictions... although I am still below those...
Why? |
2009-11-19 11:52 AM in reply to: #2505240 |
Champion 12759 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... where has TJ been??? I miss her? |
2009-11-19 11:53 AM in reply to: #2521973 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 9:51 AM akustix - 2009-11-19 11:51 AM I say do it. If I could go back into the military as a reserve officer, I'd totally do it.mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:48 PM akustix - 2009-11-19 11:44 AM How old are you, if I may ask? Do they have age restrictions? Lisa's boyfriend is an officer in the reserves.SO... I'm thinking about Army Reserve Chaplaincy... anyone here been in the reserves? For liturgical chaplains they have thrown out most age restrictions... although I am still below those...
I would do it too. (for the first time). I heard that there is a waiting line to get into the air force right now. I'm not surprised. With the economy, military is probably the only option for young people right now. What else can they do with limited jobs? |
2009-11-19 11:54 AM in reply to: #2521974 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... akustix - 2009-11-19 9:51 AM mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:50 PM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 11:49 AM Most of the guys. And yes, you are one of them.mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:46 PM In some cases yes in some cases no. Just because I WANT to have sex with someone doesn't mean it's inevitable. Shoot I can think of about 10 BT girls I wanna bang but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and do it. I mean, I could now that I'm single, but some of them are married or have boyfriends so that's not an option. Therefore, just friends. My FBI friends here, for example, I'd never touch them even though they're attractive women. I've never really even thought about it. I mean, I guess Tab P would fit into Slot V but really, they're just friends. I think of them the same way I think of my guy friends here, probably because I knew them before I was divorced. Anyway I used to train with a young lady and her husband would get all huffy. And he was a very good friend of mine. My wife, on the other hand, didn't give a rat's butt. So it's all about the individual How many of the guys?? Tony if we are ever stranded on a desert island... you know. wink wink Not me. I need to be spooned, and Tony is too small. |
2009-11-19 11:54 AM in reply to: #2521962 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:48 AM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:45 AM i kind of agree. if she were to train in a group, still being the only female, i think it's a diff story, but all that time alone with someone is probably not right. then again, i'm totally influenced by how i make decisions and it may or may not fit anyone else's goals/values. Group training is a different beast. one on one is a bit different. I bet I could do it a couple times but then I might start getting questions... Yeah I don't think it was like "let's do every workout together on your 20-week plan" it was more like "if you need company on a long ride lemme know" kind of thing. I train a lot with one of Tom's (single) guy friends. Sometimes in groups, sometimes just the two of us if no one else shows up. A lot of times it is me, Tom and him. We traveled to IMKS together, just the two of us and back. We went to dinner with his parents the night before. Tom was out of town, and it just made sense for us to travel together. I saw it as someone to talk to for 6 hours, and to share the cost of gas with. Nothing more. I never once considered it disrespectful to Tom. I honestly can't see how training with someone of the opposite sex would be considered "disrespectful" (unless of course lines are crossed, duh) - in fact I think it's quite healthy to have friends of the opposite sex. Edited by lisac957 2009-11-19 11:56 AM |
|
2009-11-19 11:54 AM in reply to: #2521969 |
Champion 14571 the alamo city, Texas | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:50 PM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 11:49 AM Most of the guys. And yes, you are one of them.mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:46 PM In some cases yes in some cases no. Just because I WANT to have sex with someone doesn't mean it's inevitable. Shoot I can think of about 10 BT girls I wanna bang but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and do it. I mean, I could now that I'm single, but some of them are married or have boyfriends so that's not an option. Therefore, just friends. My FBI friends here, for example, I'd never touch them even though they're attractive women. I've never really even thought about it. I mean, I guess Tab P would fit into Slot V but really, they're just friends. I think of them the same way I think of my guy friends here, probably because I knew them before I was divorced. Anyway I used to train with a young lady and her husband would get all huffy. And he was a very good friend of mine. My wife, on the other hand, didn't give a rat's butt. So it's all about the individual How many of the guys?? i'd totally do you in the butt. i'm gonna get another TAN axed. |
2009-11-19 11:56 AM in reply to: #2505240 |
Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... doink |
2009-11-19 11:56 AM in reply to: #2521985 |
Champion 14571 the alamo city, Texas | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... lisac957 - 2009-11-19 12:54 PM Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:48 AM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:45 AM i kind of agree. if she were to train in a group, still being the only female, i think it's a diff story, but all that time alone with someone is probably not right. then again, i'm totally influenced by how i make decisions and it may or may not fit anyone else's goals/values. Group training is a different beast. one on one is a bit different. I bet I could do it a couple times but then I might start getting questions... Yeah I don't think it was like "let's do every workout together on your 20-week plan" it was more like "if you need company on a long ride lemme know" kind of thing. I train a lot with one of Tom's (single) guy friends. Sometimes in groups, sometimes just the two of us if no one else shows up. A lot of times it is me, Tom and him. We traveled to IMKS together, just the two of us and back. We went to dinner with his parents the night before. Tom was out of town, and it just made sense for us to travel together. I saw it as someone to talk to for 6 hours, and to share the cost of gas with. Nothing more. I honestly can't see how training with someone of the opposite sex would be considered "disrespectful" (unless of course lines are crossed, duh) - in fact I think it's quite healthy to have friends of the opposite sex. that is why i said the decision has to be completely based on your personal values. my yardstick for these blurry situations would be "if [insert SO's name here] did this would i be upset?" in your Kansas example, i agree, no biggie, and he obviously wasn't. but, like when i met OD to swim, i wouldn't have gone if it was JUST him - he was bringing a female friend. because if my boyfriend met a girl online and went to work out with her - i would NOT be happy with that. Edited by meherczeg 2009-11-19 11:58 AM |
2009-11-19 11:59 AM in reply to: #2521974 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... akustix - 2009-11-19 11:51 AM mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:50 PM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 11:49 AM Most of the guys. And yes, you are one of them.mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:46 PM In some cases yes in some cases no. Just because I WANT to have sex with someone doesn't mean it's inevitable. Shoot I can think of about 10 BT girls I wanna bang but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and do it. I mean, I could now that I'm single, but some of them are married or have boyfriends so that's not an option. Therefore, just friends. My FBI friends here, for example, I'd never touch them even though they're attractive women. I've never really even thought about it. I mean, I guess Tab P would fit into Slot V but really, they're just friends. I think of them the same way I think of my guy friends here, probably because I knew them before I was divorced. Anyway I used to train with a young lady and her husband would get all huffy. And he was a very good friend of mine. My wife, on the other hand, didn't give a rat's butt. So it's all about the individual How many of the guys?? Tony if we are ever stranded on a desert island... you know. wink wink Who needs a desert island??? So Preach about the military thing (how's that for a non-sequitir, or maybe just a sequitir) I'd go back because I enjoyed the structured lifestyle, it feels good to serve your country and, frankly, I like to kill people. |
2009-11-19 11:59 AM in reply to: #2521991 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:56 AM lisac957 - 2009-11-19 12:54 PM Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:48 AM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:45 AM i kind of agree. if she were to train in a group, still being the only female, i think it's a diff story, but all that time alone with someone is probably not right. then again, i'm totally influenced by how i make decisions and it may or may not fit anyone else's goals/values. Group training is a different beast. one on one is a bit different. I bet I could do it a couple times but then I might start getting questions... Yeah I don't think it was like "let's do every workout together on your 20-week plan" it was more like "if you need company on a long ride lemme know" kind of thing. I train a lot with one of Tom's (single) guy friends. Sometimes in groups, sometimes just the two of us if no one else shows up. A lot of times it is me, Tom and him. We traveled to IMKS together, just the two of us and back. We went to dinner with his parents the night before. Tom was out of town, and it just made sense for us to travel together. I saw it as someone to talk to for 6 hours, and to share the cost of gas with. Nothing more. I honestly can't see how training with someone of the opposite sex would be considered "disrespectful" (unless of course lines are crossed, duh) - in fact I think it's quite healthy to have friends of the opposite sex. that is why i said the decision has to be completely based on your personal values. my yardstick for these blurry situations would be "if [insert SO's name here] did this would i be upset?" in your Kansas example, i agree, no biggie, and he obviously wasn't. That's my approach... If I'm getting naked with a hawt chick and making out, I ask myself, "If my wife was doing this, would I be upset?". Most of the time, I would say nope, and grab the video camera... |
|
2009-11-19 12:00 PM in reply to: #2521986 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... meherczeg - 2009-11-19 11:54 AM mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:50 PM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 11:49 AM Most of the guys. And yes, you are one of them.mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:46 PM In some cases yes in some cases no. Just because I WANT to have sex with someone doesn't mean it's inevitable. Shoot I can think of about 10 BT girls I wanna bang but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and do it. I mean, I could now that I'm single, but some of them are married or have boyfriends so that's not an option. Therefore, just friends. My FBI friends here, for example, I'd never touch them even though they're attractive women. I've never really even thought about it. I mean, I guess Tab P would fit into Slot V but really, they're just friends. I think of them the same way I think of my guy friends here, probably because I knew them before I was divorced. Anyway I used to train with a young lady and her husband would get all huffy. And he was a very good friend of mine. My wife, on the other hand, didn't give a rat's butt. So it's all about the individual How many of the guys?? i'd totally do you in the butt. i'm gonna get another TAN axed. Stop. I'm getting drippy. |
2009-11-19 12:01 PM in reply to: #2521979 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2009-11-19 12:01 PM in reply to: #2521997 |
Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:59 PM So Preach about the military thing (how's that for a non-sequitir, or maybe just a sequitir) I'd go back because I enjoyed the structured lifestyle, it feels good to serve your country and, frankly, I like to kill people. yeah... but being a chaplain... I would be unarmed and not really killing people. |
2009-11-19 12:01 PM in reply to: #2522000 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:59 AM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:56 AM lisac957 - 2009-11-19 12:54 PM Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:48 AM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:45 AM i kind of agree. if she were to train in a group, still being the only female, i think it's a diff story, but all that time alone with someone is probably not right. then again, i'm totally influenced by how i make decisions and it may or may not fit anyone else's goals/values. Group training is a different beast. one on one is a bit different. I bet I could do it a couple times but then I might start getting questions... Yeah I don't think it was like "let's do every workout together on your 20-week plan" it was more like "if you need company on a long ride lemme know" kind of thing. I train a lot with one of Tom's (single) guy friends. Sometimes in groups, sometimes just the two of us if no one else shows up. A lot of times it is me, Tom and him. We traveled to IMKS together, just the two of us and back. We went to dinner with his parents the night before. Tom was out of town, and it just made sense for us to travel together. I saw it as someone to talk to for 6 hours, and to share the cost of gas with. Nothing more. I honestly can't see how training with someone of the opposite sex would be considered "disrespectful" (unless of course lines are crossed, duh) - in fact I think it's quite healthy to have friends of the opposite sex. that is why i said the decision has to be completely based on your personal values. my yardstick for these blurry situations would be "if [insert SO's name here] did this would i be upset?" in your Kansas example, i agree, no biggie, and he obviously wasn't. That's my approach... If I'm getting naked with a hawt chick and making out, I ask myself, "If my wife was doing this, would I be upset?". Most of the time, I would say nope, and grab the video camera... You Vegas people are freaks. |
2009-11-19 12:03 PM in reply to: #2522009 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... mr2tony - 2009-11-19 10:01 AM Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:59 AM You Vegas people are freaks.meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:56 AM lisac957 - 2009-11-19 12:54 PM Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:48 AM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:45 AM i kind of agree. if she were to train in a group, still being the only female, i think it's a diff story, but all that time alone with someone is probably not right. then again, i'm totally influenced by how i make decisions and it may or may not fit anyone else's goals/values. Group training is a different beast. one on one is a bit different. I bet I could do it a couple times but then I might start getting questions... Yeah I don't think it was like "let's do every workout together on your 20-week plan" it was more like "if you need company on a long ride lemme know" kind of thing. I train a lot with one of Tom's (single) guy friends. Sometimes in groups, sometimes just the two of us if no one else shows up. A lot of times it is me, Tom and him. We traveled to IMKS together, just the two of us and back. We went to dinner with his parents the night before. Tom was out of town, and it just made sense for us to travel together. I saw it as someone to talk to for 6 hours, and to share the cost of gas with. Nothing more. I honestly can't see how training with someone of the opposite sex would be considered "disrespectful" (unless of course lines are crossed, duh) - in fact I think it's quite healthy to have friends of the opposite sex. that is why i said the decision has to be completely based on your personal values. my yardstick for these blurry situations would be "if [insert SO's name here] did this would i be upset?" in your Kansas example, i agree, no biggie, and he obviously wasn't. That's my approach... If I'm getting naked with a hawt chick and making out, I ask myself, "If my wife was doing this, would I be upset?". Most of the time, I would say nope, and grab the video camera... I know, right? One of her hot friends asked for my permision to make out with my wife. And she meant it. I told her it's not up to me. |
|
2009-11-19 12:03 PM in reply to: #2522009 |
Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... |
2009-11-19 12:03 PM in reply to: #2522006 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... akustix - 2009-11-19 12:01 PM mr2tony - 2009-11-19 12:59 PM So Preach about the military thing (how's that for a non-sequitir, or maybe just a sequitir) I'd go back because I enjoyed the structured lifestyle, it feels good to serve your country and, frankly, I like to kill people. yeah... but being a chaplain... I would be unarmed and not really killing people. Well yeah but you like to preach, Preach. I'd mow 'em down and you can give them last rites. We'd make a good team. |
2009-11-19 12:03 PM in reply to: #2522016 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 12:03 PM mr2tony - 2009-11-19 10:01 AM Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:59 AM You Vegas people are freaks.meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:56 AM lisac957 - 2009-11-19 12:54 PM Aikidoman - 2009-11-19 11:48 AM meherczeg - 2009-11-19 9:45 AM i kind of agree. if she were to train in a group, still being the only female, i think it's a diff story, but all that time alone with someone is probably not right. then again, i'm totally influenced by how i make decisions and it may or may not fit anyone else's goals/values. Group training is a different beast. one on one is a bit different. I bet I could do it a couple times but then I might start getting questions... Yeah I don't think it was like "let's do every workout together on your 20-week plan" it was more like "if you need company on a long ride lemme know" kind of thing. I train a lot with one of Tom's (single) guy friends. Sometimes in groups, sometimes just the two of us if no one else shows up. A lot of times it is me, Tom and him. We traveled to IMKS together, just the two of us and back. We went to dinner with his parents the night before. Tom was out of town, and it just made sense for us to travel together. I saw it as someone to talk to for 6 hours, and to share the cost of gas with. Nothing more. I honestly can't see how training with someone of the opposite sex would be considered "disrespectful" (unless of course lines are crossed, duh) - in fact I think it's quite healthy to have friends of the opposite sex. that is why i said the decision has to be completely based on your personal values. my yardstick for these blurry situations would be "if [insert SO's name here] did this would i be upset?" in your Kansas example, i agree, no biggie, and he obviously wasn't. That's my approach... If I'm getting naked with a hawt chick and making out, I ask myself, "If my wife was doing this, would I be upset?". Most of the time, I would say nope, and grab the video camera... I know, right? One of her hot friends asked for my permision to make out with my wife. And she meant it. I told her it's not up to me. Dude. Scout break! |
2009-11-19 12:04 PM in reply to: #2522005 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Tan #86 - I told you so... Syaotblh - 2009-11-19 12:01 PM NRG42 - 2009-11-19 11:52 AM where has TJ been??? I miss her? X2 Zilla is dead to me. |
|