Bill Clinton is pathological liar!!!! (Page 4)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rocket Man - 2005-11-04 2:46 PM Besides Opus you aren't even a US citizen......what qualifies you to comment at all? Well, you didn't really answer my question... which is okay. I never suggested that you weren't entitled to comment. Please understand that you may not have liked my question, but I must be clear, it was never, ever meant to suggest that you couldn't comment on whatever you choose and it was most definitely not intended to in any way diminish your service to your country (hence my giving you all your due respect). As to what qualifies me to comment, I'll let you decide that for yourself as I suspect my answer is not going to be of much help. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Brett, I think you did a good job of explaining yourself and I don't think that Opus meant to question your qualifications only to seek understanding of where you were coming from. So was your comment just said out of anger or do you really think that Canadians should't comment on American policy? Jen |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think in another thread I talked about how lying through statisitcs, and how a correlation doesn't mean there's a cause-and-effect relationship. But if you want to go there, didn't W name his SCOTUS appointee the next business day after Scooter Libby was indicted? I know it wasn't to defelct attention... drewb8 - 2005-11-04 1:57 PMOk. Suppose, hypothetically speaking, that there never was a Monica Lewinsky scandal and Clinton still decided to intervene in Somalia and Kosovo. Would you still view them as mistakes or would the the intervention have been legitimatized once its intention changed from being a distraction from a scandal? |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() drewb8 - 2005-11-04 10:57 AM Ok. Suppose, hypothetically speaking, that there never was a Monica Lewinsky scandal and Clinton still decided to intervene in Somalia and Kosovo. Would you still view them as mistakes or would the the intervention have been legitimatized once its intention changed from being a distraction from a scandal? Lets not leave out North Korea... They were all mistakes. Just like Iraq and Afghanistan are big mistakes. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChuckyFinster - 2005-11-04 11:58 AM jeng - 2005-11-04 10:54 AM And Canadians don't have a vested interest in the outcomes of the USA's political process? Oh, now you did it. You went and dropped the "Canada" bomb. You know you will always be like another state to us. Right after Puerto Rico and Mexico! I'm kidding ![]() Thanks for the explanation Chucky. We try hard to fit in. ![]() Jen |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Yeah, but launching miltary action and putting people in harms way is much more serious if you really believe the only reason for it is to distract from a scandal |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ASA22 - 2005-11-04 1:39 PMJust a quick question for everyone: Is it the war in Iraq objectionable or is it the reasons for going to war? I opposed the beginning of the Iraq war based on Augustine's Just War Theory. According to the theory, a just war requires:
So while I concluded that starting the war was not just, I could not say that the POTUS' act of starting it was immoral, since there was some compelling evidence that the war might be just. Edited by dontracy 2005-11-04 2:07 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Anyone could miss Canadia, all tucked away down there... |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Does that mean that we get warm weather? |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-11-04 2:04 PM ASA22 - 2005-11-04 1:39 PMJust a quick question for everyone: Is it the war in Iraq objectionable or is it the reasons for going to war? I opposed the beginning of the Iraq war based on Augustine's Just War Theory. According to the theory, a just war requires:
So while I concluded that starting the war was not just, I could not say that the POTUS' act of starting it was immoral, since there was some compelling evidence that the war might be just. Well articulated. But, where do you feel that the war in Iraq fell short of meeting the just War Theory? (Not an indictment, simply asking you to expound on your point with a little more particularity.) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() BellinghamSpence - 2005-11-04 10:38 AMI can't remember much about my 9th year of life. Mostly is it recess yet (play time at school). You can remember your 9th year if something memorable or impressionable happened. My best friend's mom died of cancer that year. It was my first experience with death of someone close to me. I have a million memories that left an impression much like Rosa Parks may have had on Clinton. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jeng - 2005-11-04 12:08 PM Does that mean that we get warm weather? No no. That would melt your igloos, eh? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ASA22 - But, where do you feel that the war in Iraq fell short of meeting the just War Theory? I based it on two points. 1. I was not convinced that we were about to get attacked. I believed that there were WMDs, and I think the entire world intelligence community seems to have believed the same. At the same time, it did not seem like an attack was immanent. So, for me, it did not meet the standard for Just Cause. 2. I did not think that we had exhausted a peaceful solution. I agreed that the UN did not meet its responsibilites at the time, nor did some of our allies, but I wasn't convinced that all possible peaceful solutions had been tried. So it did not meet the standard for Last Resort. Putting the two together, it seemed like there was still time to try a peaceful solution rather than attacking. At the same time, I recognized the POTUS' rightful authority to prosecute the war. He was well within a reasonable area. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() We often ascribe the most horrific motives to policians that we would never even suspect of our worst enemies. So, when somebody suggests that a politician makes a major announcement of a new policy to distract the media from some bad or embarassing news, I have no trouble believing it. When somebody suggests, on the other hand, that a politician has some of his own citizens sent into a war zone where some will most certainly be killed in order to distract from a domestic political issue, then I must stop and question this. For a human being to do this, I think we all will agree that this person must be evil. Assuming that this is a team decision, you have a group of people together who are all evil. Let's take a step back now, and ask ourselves how likely it is that a whole group of people can be so basically bad that they would conspire to commit what amounts to a crime against humanity, and not one of them, not one of their secretaries, no one, has since suffered a crisis of conscience and revealed what went on at that time. This is why I believe you have to be predisposed against somebody to allow yourself the indulgence of believing this. |
![]() ![]() |
Wife, Mother, Friend.![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChipmunkHeart - 2005-11-04 11:21 AM White people used to ride the bus? I rode the bus everywhere! To school, to the mall, to friends houses..... yeah, a white girl in MISSISSIPPI. My school bus was 2/3rds black folks though and the white kids always sat in the back (probably b/c we got on first). |
|
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'm really shocked that a political debate is raging at BT. And after I have my 4th glass of wine, I'm going to weigh in on this weighty topic. Working on my 2nd glass so it shouldn't be much longer... |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Sorry I had to drive home from work and catch up......first off let me say that I truely did not mean to offend anyone from the Great Frozen North....that being said I felt as if Opus was questioning my qualifications on commenting on the Clinton administration...and I was saying if I am not justified how can you be since you aren't a citizen and don't participate in our polictical process. That being said, I saw with my own eyes how the Department of Defense gutted the military during the Clinton years, expected the American fighting men and women to do more with less, and oh yea soldiers and dogs keep off the grass. Given the limited time that we had to rebuild the military during the first Bush term I am amazed at how well our forces have performed, it is a true testament to the spirit and professionalism of our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines. As for a response to the war being immoral and non military courses of action, my response is this: When I and my friends went out in Kuwait City we had numerous people come up to us and thank us for protecting them, I made close friends with some of our Kuwaiti counterparts who were POW's during the Gulf War and they begged us to get rid of him before he was able to aquire nuclear arms. These men told us of how the country was looted, women raped and killed, men killed for no reason, Saddam is a despot and I hope the Iraqi courts sentence him to die so he can take his place in Hell with Satan. WMD's-1993 Northern Iraq- 50,000 Kurds gassed...what more proof do you need? As for non military courses of action 13 years of sanctions obviously didn't work....Oil for Food anyone? It seems interesting to me that the countries opposing the war (Russia, France) were the ones making millions illegally in this scam. I don't have to tell you where I stand I think that is obvious, everyone is entitled to their opinion and if you are against the war or POTUS then that is you right as a citizen (or non-citizen) to dissent. However never forget that those brave men and women who are in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other countries that you probably have never heard of are fighting and dying to give you that right. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-11-04 1:27 PM ASA22 - But, where do you feel that the war in Iraq fell short of meeting the just War Theory? I based it on two points. 1. I was not convinced that we were about to get attacked. I believed that there were WMDs, and I think the entire world intelligence community seems to have believed the same. At the same time, it did not seem like an attack was immanent. So, for me, it did not meet the standard for Just Cause. 2. I did not think that we had exhausted a peaceful solution. I agreed that the UN did not meet its responsibilites at the time, nor did some of our allies, but I wasn't convinced that all possible peaceful solutions had been tried. So it did not meet the standard for Last Resort. Putting the two together, it seemed like there was still time to try a peaceful solution rather than attacking. At the same time, I recognized the POTUS' rightful authority to prosecute the war. He was well within a reasonable area. Actually, look at the whole Plame thing. The CIA and the Bush Administration disagreed on much of the "intelligence" surrounding Iraq's WMD situation. And before anyone questions my "right" to speak on this topic, my brother is currently on his second tour in Iraq with the 101st. The reasons given to us ( the public ) for going to war when we did have shown to have been knowingly inflated and misrepresented. We're now floundering in Iraq because W is an idiot and had/has no idea how to handle the post-war situation. My brother is now needlessly in harm's way because of those screwups. -C |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() As much as I would love to continue debating politics with you all , I am going to make dinner for my wife and daughter so keep it civil....we may disagree with each other but we alll still like to ride our bikes. Coredump hope your brother is well....sorry that you feel the way that you do. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Just wanted to say, I'm incredibly proud of my brother. I believe in what he's doing there, as does he. Heck, he just re-upped last week. ![]() My disagreement over the war is with the justification we were handed for going when we did. I believe it was premature and based on known false information. Yet Bush did it anyway, and in doing so, has caused many casualties on both sides that could/should have been avoided. -C |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() coredump - 2005-11-04 12:11 PM Actually, look at the whole Plame thing. The CIA and the Bush Administration disagreed on much of the "intelligence" surrounding Iraq's WMD situation. And before anyone questions my "right" to speak on this topic, my brother is currently on his second tour in Iraq with the 101st. The reasons given to us ( the public ) for going to war when we did have shown to have been knowingly inflated and misrepresented. We're now floundering in Iraq because W is an idiot and had/has no idea how to handle the post-war situation. My brother is now needlessly in harm's way because of those screwups. -C First let me say I wish your brother a safe return home. I find it very interesting that I keep meeting folks who have served in Iraq recently who are very much against this war. My neighbor has just returned from nearly 2 years there, where he held his best friend's head in his lap as he died, where he shrunk 2 inches from the weight of his armor, where he was exposed to countless chemicals and other dangerous substances. It's heartbreaking to listen to him talk about how we were misled into this war and how so many lives, American, British, Iraqi, etc. have been sacrificed. Perhaps it's just a sign of where I live, but you see many cars with "Support Our Troops" stickers next to "Impeach W" stickers. Also, I don't believe Clinton gutted our military as badly as many neo-cons would have us believe. He continued what both Reagan and Bush 1 started before him. I'd like to see supportable facts regarding his military-destruction before I'll agree to that one. And further, it helps no one's argument to resort to pejoratives and nicknames like "Slick Willy" or whatever is the favored term for George W. in certain circles. |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() The great thing about democracy is that all have a right to say what we believe and each of our opinions are valid - whether they come from someone in the military, non-military or even some far away country like Canadia. I think as well that to believe that one of our leaders would purposly put our soldiers in harms way you really have to believe in the worst in that person, whether its believing that Clinton only did it as a distraction frmo scandal or that Bush purposly lied just to go to war. I don't thikn anyone on the right or left would argue that removing Saddam was anything but a good thing. But wasn't also liberating the people of Kosovo? If the true justification fro going to war was to remove Saddam W should have been up front about it being the reason. The American population may have gone along with it or it may not have. Edited by drewb8 2005-11-04 3:30 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rocket Man - 2005-11-04 4:08 PM that being said I felt as if Opus was questioning my qualifications on commenting on the Clinton administration... Please, please, Rocket Man, I beg you, read the question I posed, not the one you think I posed. You will see that I didn't say you couldn't or didn't have a right to comment on something. C'mon, this is crazy! |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'm getting confused as to where this is going. I thought we were flaming Clinton, how did the Iraq war come up? While the "exit plan" hasn't exactly been working out, there can be little doubt that the world is a better place with Saddam rotting in prison. The mass graves speak for themselves. It's no secret that 10's of thousands of people were slaughtered at his whim. I won't go as far as to say the ends justify the means... okay I will. The ends justify the means. We are waging an unconventional war that can't be fought by both sides lining up their respective militaries and shooting at each other. Our enemy chooses to fight a global guerilla war. The only way to combat that is to fight proxy battles with people we know to support our enemy. Here's my allegory for how the military works in this situation, say an your way to work everyday someone keeps drilling you in the back of the head with a rock. This goes on day after day. The culprit always takes off down a dark alley even though you know who they are you don't know where they live and you can't catch them. So what do you do? Well the friend of my enemy is my enemy, so you go to the guy giving him the rocks, and you drill him. Then you go to the guy who let him crash on his couch, and you whoop his arse. And hopefully, eventually, this will either lead you back to the guy who's been hitting you with debris or cause his friends to make him knock it off because they're tired of catching beatings for his stupidity. Not necessarily pleasant, but it's better than fanatics crashing airliners into skyscrapers. Oh, and I love Canada and Canadiens, and I feel our fates are intrinsically linked. I am quite ashamed of some of the snubbings that our politicians/representatives have hit you with considering the support that you have given us. The taxes seem a bit steep, but I certainly like what you've done with the place. bts Edited by Brett 2005-11-04 3:53 PM |
|