Sexual abuse charges Rock Penn State University (Page 4)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() maxmattmick - 2011-11-08 2:49 PM Cuetoy - 2011-11-08 2:41 PM I don’t care if anyone here has idolized Penn State their entire life, or JoePa who stood for everything that was good about college athletics all these years, BUT I cannot even start to comprehend how anyone here can try to reason that JoePa or the Grad Assistant did the right thing by just reporting to the higher ups. They may have their behind covered on a legal basis and even the charges of perjury against the administrators will be hard to prove, but all of those involved had an obligation as human beings to do more than what they did. The sad part is, that the number of kids that suffered because of their inaction, may never be known. again, we don't know to what extent Joe Paterno followed up or anything... we're assuming he reported to the higher ups and then left it go... we don't know that. maybe he did, maybe he didn't I'm just saying to make assumptions is wrong. To say they had an "obligation to do more than they did" is wrong... we don't know yet what they did or didn't do... If these "allegations" came out about Dean Smith or Roy Williams I doubt you'd say "string em up" without due process. You'd like to think so, but more than likely you'd say wait for the facts. Well, read the grand jury report and you will have a much better idea of what he was made aware off and what he decided to do. If you want to hold to the idea that he followed up the serious accusation after that but that no one listened to him for 8 years then my friend you are in denial. My opinion is not based in assumptions, is based on the facts that have been revealed so far and the grand jury report. We certainly know that they didn’t do enough, or is it more plausible that the authorities didn’t do anything for 8 years while the rampant abused continued? If those allegations came out against anyone, even someone I personally knew my opinion would be the same. Nowhere in my statements in this thread have I stated that they are legally guilty, for that they deserve their day in court. But morally, no one can acquit them of their inaction to act. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2011-11-08 3:14 PM Scout7 - 2011-11-08 3:13 PM I find this assumption difficult to accept, especially when we are operating on minimal facts. Do you think the state police commissioner is operating on minimal facts? He felt he knew enough to make a moral judgment about Paterno's course of action.
she shouldn't have verbalized her personal moral judgement... very unprofessional |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Scout7 - 2011-11-08 3:13 PM marmadaddy - 2011-11-08 1:39 PM In your mind, that's the next question. In my mind, I would have thought the police would be talking to the actual witness, not me, and probably not done much else besides check in with my superiors to see what happened with it. Did Paterno do enough? I don't know. The fact is, we don't really know all of the details about what actions he undertook. However, he was not indicted by the grand jury. That has to say something. I am disturbed by, what appears to me at least, the overwhelming sentiment that Paterno should be punished, or that he is morally guilty, if not legally so. I do not think the situation is so simple as to say "He didn't contact police, he acted immorally". This thought is an assumption that there was only one obviously correct course of action, and he consciously chose not to pursue it. I find this assumption difficult to accept, especially when we are operating on minimal facts.Maybe he did ask if it was reported to the authorities and was told it was. I doubt this as the next question would be "why didn't they talk to me?". what he said |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Cuetoy - 2011-11-08 3:18 PM maxmattmick - 2011-11-08 2:49 PM Cuetoy - 2011-11-08 2:41 PM I don’t care if anyone here has idolized Penn State their entire life, or JoePa who stood for everything that was good about college athletics all these years, BUT I cannot even start to comprehend how anyone here can try to reason that JoePa or the Grad Assistant did the right thing by just reporting to the higher ups. They may have their behind covered on a legal basis and even the charges of perjury against the administrators will be hard to prove, but all of those involved had an obligation as human beings to do more than what they did. The sad part is, that the number of kids that suffered because of their inaction, may never be known. again, we don't know to what extent Joe Paterno followed up or anything... we're assuming he reported to the higher ups and then left it go... we don't know that. maybe he did, maybe he didn't I'm just saying to make assumptions is wrong. To say they had an "obligation to do more than they did" is wrong... we don't know yet what they did or didn't do... If these "allegations" came out about Dean Smith or Roy Williams I doubt you'd say "string em up" without due process. You'd like to think so, but more than likely you'd say wait for the facts. Well, read the grand jury report and you will have a much better idea of what he was made aware off and what he decided to do. If you want to hold to the idea that he followed up the serious accusation after that but that no one listened to him for 8 years then my friend you are in denial. My opinion is not based in assumptions, is based on the facts that have been revealed so far and the grand jury report. We certainly know that they didn’t do enough, or is it more plausible that the authorities didn’t do anything for 8 years while the rampant abused continued? If those allegations came out against anyone, even someone I personally knew my opinion would be the same. Nowhere in my statements in this thread have I stated that they are legally guilty, for that they deserve their day in court. But morally, no one can acquit them of their inaction to act. the grand jury report has to do with one thing... sandusky's actions and so it only mentions Paterno's and others actions as they relate to Sandusky's you can't assume that what is in the GJR is the extent of their collective actions I'll wait for that Grand Jury to convene and then make my judgement on paterno and the others |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() maxmattmick - 2011-11-08 3:21 PM I'll wait for that Grand Jury to convene and then make my judgement on paterno and the others Understood. However, if you don't mind, do you think Penn State should do the same?
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Scout7 - 2011-11-08 3:13 PM marmadaddy - 2011-11-08 1:39 PM ....I am disturbed by, what appears to me at least, the overwhelming sentiment that Paterno should be punished, or that he is morally guilty, if not legally so. I do not think the situation is so simple as to say "He didn't contact police, he acted immorally". This thought is an assumption that there was only one obviously correct course of action, and he consciously chose not to pursue it. I find this assumption difficult to accept, especially when we are operating on minimal facts.Maybe he did ask if it was reported to the authorities and was told it was. I doubt this as the next question would be "why didn't they talk to me?". I understand your discomfort with that assumption...I, though, have no trouble with that assumption, for two reasons. 1) the facts are not thin...they're supported by a 3 years of investigation, a gran jury report, countless corroborating witnesses, and continued emerging, credible witnesses (today, two janitors who saw something AND a 9th alleged victim came forward), claims against the man that were never prosecuted in 1998. That's enough for me. 2) It would have to be an exceptional argument to convince me that any reaction to the situation other than breaking up the activity when they saw it (McCreary did not) OR reporting it to the police immediatley (none of the chain from McCreary on up did) is the appropriate response. The kid was at risk, immediate, physical risk. Bottom line: 4 adults trusted with the development of young men and women at a prestigious, top-notch university did not display any accountability for ensuring that hideous things weren't happening in their locker room, on their campus. All four are morally guilty. ETA: I have no idea how any of them actually could sleep after knowing about it, and knowing that nothing ever came of it. Most people I know wouldn't rest until there was some finite action.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2011-11-08 3:23 PM maxmattmick - 2011-11-08 3:21 PM I'll wait for that Grand Jury to convene and then make my judgement on paterno and the others Understood. However, if you don't mind, do you think Penn State should do the same?
again, you're talking about a coach with legendary stature... there's only a few of them and I think he's earned the benefit of the doubt if you're talking about a guy that's been there 10, 12 15 years I'd be a bit more hasty |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Scout7 - 2011-11-08 3:13 PM marmadaddy - 2011-11-08 1:39 PM In your mind, that's the next question. In my mind, I would have thought the police would be talking to the actual witness, not me, and probably not done much else besides check in with my superiors to see what happened with it. Did Paterno do enough? I don't know. The fact is, we don't really know all of the details about what actions he undertook. However, he was not indicted by the grand jury. That has to say something. I am disturbed by, what appears to me at least, the overwhelming sentiment that Paterno should be punished, or that he is morally guilty, if not legally so. I do not think the situation is so simple as to say "He didn't contact police, he acted immorally". This thought is an assumption that there was only one obviously correct course of action, and he consciously chose not to pursue it. I find this assumption difficult to accept, especially when we are operating on minimal facts.Maybe he did ask if it was reported to the authorities and was told it was. I doubt this as the next question would be "why didn't they talk to me?". If the facts are as reported: that is, that a person within the Penn State Football program caught Sandosky in the shower performing a sex act on a child, I'm sorry but there is only one obvious course of action, and that course of action is to personally contact police. Every person, and I mean every person, that had knolwedge of this event and didn't contact police, is morally culpable. Just my personal opinion. But seeing the act and not going to the police is horrific. Being told of the act by the witness and not going to the police is horrific, being told by the witnesses supervisor that they were told of the act and not going to police is horrific. The reality, the way it is being reported now, the Penn State's inaction in not contacting police, delayed the investigation into this monster, and may have lead to him having additional time and opportunity to perp on additional kids. On a side note at some point it appears that at some level Penn State people knew, or suspected the allegations were true (The banned Sandosky from coming on campus with kids) and they covered it up. And yet nothing is going to happen to the program. But some kid sells his jersey to a booster and the program gets whacked by the NCAA. Shouldn't institutional control also cover the coaches and staff, not just the athletes? |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() maxmattmick - 2011-11-08 3:28 PM Goosedog - 2011-11-08 3:23 PM maxmattmick - 2011-11-08 3:21 PM I'll wait for that Grand Jury to convene and then make my judgement on paterno and the others Understood. However, if you don't mind, do you think Penn State should do the same?
again, you're talking about a coach with legendary stature... there's only a few of them and I think he's earned the benefit of the doubt if you're talking about a guy that's been there 10, 12 15 years I'd be a bit more hasty This isn't taling about having a 5-7 season, this isn't talking about not making a bowl game for 3 years in a row, this isn't talking about recruiting violations, all of which you could argue that a "legendary coach" should get the benefit of the doubt. This is talking about a Football Program and a University turning a blind eye to one of their staff members committing horrific felonies of child sexual abuse on their property, under their watch. When, according to reports one staffer caught Sandosky actually engaged in a sex act. No benefit of the doubt should be given. Especially, because it now seems that after the witnessed event Sandosky perped on other children. How those that knew of what was going on can be "given" anything but the boot is beyond me. There are more important things than football, even in Penn. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Scout7 - 2011-11-08 3:13 PM marmadaddy - 2011-11-08 1:39 PM In your mind, that's the next question. In my mind, I would have thought the police would be talking to the actual witness, not me, and probably not done much else besides check in with my superiors to see what happened with it. Did Paterno do enough? I don't know. The fact is, we don't really know all of the details about what actions he undertook. However, he was not indicted by the grand jury. That has to say something. I am disturbed by, what appears to me at least, the overwhelming sentiment that Paterno should be punished, or that he is morally guilty, if not legally so. I do not think the situation is so simple as to say "He didn't contact police, he acted immorally". This thought is an assumption that there was only one obviously correct course of action, and he consciously chose not to pursue it. I find this assumption difficult to accept, especially when we are operating on minimal facts.Maybe he did ask if it was reported to the authorities and was told it was. I doubt this as the next question would be "why didn't they talk to me?". Yes, as someone who has found evidence of probable child abuse that absolutely would be my next question. This is not based on a moral construct of myself that I've built up in my own mind, it's based on my experience. I have insight into the mind of an adult in this situation. I experienced something similar to Paterno in that I became aware of the possible sexual abuse of a child. The drive to see that the situation was dealt with and the child(ren) were safe was intense. As I wrote earlier it was a moral imperative. It never entered my mind to do anything but notify the authorities. Legal authorities. An assurance from a non-legal authority that it had been "taken care of" would never have sufficed. I don't believe my reaction in the situation would be considered at all unusual. Quite the opposite. Anyone who would so easily abdicate their responsibility to act, and act decisively, in a situation like that is IMO a moral degenerate. Perhaps they would be acting within the bounds of the law, but that would hardly make it right. Perhaps he did do more, or attempted to. The facts as reported so far and the report from the grand jury indicate otherwise, however we are still in the "media storm" period of these revelations. As I wrote before, if he did do more or sincerely tried to, I hope that is as widely reported as anything else about this. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() turtlegirl - 2011-11-08 12:35 PM NYTimes is reporting that Penn State is planning an exit strategy for Joe Paterno.
I didn't realize he still coached there. The only time you see him is watching the game from the press box. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() read a bit of the grand jury report, like to page 3. Read a couple articles. I don't watch football (well the CFL) so I have no connection to this team or this university. That old coach guy that everyone is trying to protect or judge or whatever. He is a bum. No two ways. That is so friggin messed up. This reminds me in some ways to the Sheldon Kennedy/Theron Fluery and Graham James assaults. You wonder how many pros are out there who were messed around by this guy. There has got to be some. It is amazing the power that these guys hold over their victims. I mean this happened nine years ago, is that right. What crushes my soul is that this is happening somewhere else right now. And someone knows and is doing nothing. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. Edited by Fred D 2011-11-08 7:05 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Penn State Proud. Hurt. Ashamed. Effing Disgusted with my Alma Mater. As a PSU alum, I've been so upset about this over this that I've been at a loss for words. Above all else, as a Penn State alum I've always been Penn State Proud. Folks that didn't go there can't possibly understand what that means. Penn State Proud means being upheld to an academic standard considered to be "public university Ivy league". It means living in a town for seven years (for me) among the safest and least stressful in the nation. It means that if your team doesn't win, you can at least say, "yeah, but we KNOW we did it without cheating, it's freakin' Penn State." WE ARE...PENN STATE. Penn State is a little bubble of safety as you traverse the minefield of passage from youth to adulthood. It might very well be the most insulated environment anywhere. To me, that illusion is gone. Joe Paterno has been the embodiment of all that is Penn State. He has devoted his life to the maturation and development of athletes and, for the most part, students. He has donated an incredible amount of money and time into the development and advancement of the University. I have been among the dwindling minority that have supported Joe recently, basically saying, "Dude can coach 'till he's a hundred for all I care...he deserves it." I really feel that's gone, too. For me, this has nothing, and everything to do with the football program. The nothing part is that the freakin' President of the University knew about this, and did nothing. The head of the Keystone Cops University Police knew about this, and did nothing. The football part is only about fear and cowardice. Fear and cowardice that calling out this predator would jeopardize your job as an assistant football coach. Cowardice that you put the supposed pristine reputation of your employer above the welfare of a defenseless minor. I know more details will come out over the coming days and weeks. I know it's theoretically possible that it's not as bad as it seems. I honestly don't see how. I just never thought I'd see the day where I'd be embarrassed to say I'm a Penn Stater. So sad.
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2011-11-08 8:04 PM Number of victims reportedly nearing 20. (was 8 yesterday am) They posted a telephone number after the presser yesterday and calls are rolling in. YES, I get it, these are allegations, but this is going to get so much worse. Worst scandal in US college history.... unless you can think of a bigger one?? Those poor young adults. I pray they can get some reconciliation and peace. How dare anybody perpetrate children. |
![]() ![]() |
Regular![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'm also ashamed and disgusted at what has gone on at PSU. Like others have said, PSU was always considered top notch and honest. I was proud to tell all that I graduated from Penn State. Now, and I haven't read the entire GJR, its alarming that this went on there. I still want to give Joe the benefit but it looks bleak. McQueary should be ashamed, I can't see how he can live with himself. Sandusky should rot in hell. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Here are my abreviated thoughts and reasons why Paterno and EVERYONE currently in place at Penn State's athletic department need to be replaced. I graduated from a prestigious Catholic High School in the mid 70's. During my time there, ALL of the students were aware of two Catholic Brothers from the Society of Mary who were actively engaged in trying to lure kids/students/us into compromising positions. We ALL knew to stay away from them and NEVER to be alone with them. It was, literally, common knowledge. Times were different in the '70's and these things were generally not spoken about. Still, it was no surprise to see the criminal indictments come down on the two offenders in the '90's. Like I said.....duh....no kidding!!! There was some surprise at who the victims were, but you get over that pretty quick...it's kids vs. authority, some kids aren't strong. We knew, our parents knew, teachers knew. I KNOW they did because I was there when it was brought up. Again, you just didn't DO ANYTHING about it. Maybe it was lack of "proof", or the unwillingness to be the person who calls someone out on such a henious crime. I don't know. What I do know is that HUNDREDS and maybe THOUSANDS of people knew these two guys were predators. Now flash forward to the situation at Penn State. I've read the grand jury indictments. There was an investigation in 1998. He was caught with 10-13 year old boys in the shower, ON CAMPUS, in sexual positions, on 2 occasions. He had access to HUNDREDS of kids through his foundation. He made trips to bowl games and stayed the night in the hotel rooms of the children he brought, along with his wife, who was in another room. Parents were complaining to the school and to Paterno. Do you think there was ANYONE who didn't have a conversation/opinion/experience to relate with Sandusky? There wasn't....they all knew. Look, I experienced it, so I understand how it simmers.....as I tried to explain above. But that obviously doesn't make it right. And the only way to rid an institution of the guilt, the shame, and the culpability, is to rid it of everyone who was there and did not stand up. Unfortunately, it includes almost everyone in authority. It just does. They all knew, they all talked about it, these things are NOT secrets. I owe a very successful and productive life to the Brothers of the Society of Mary. I couldn't begin to tell you the great work I saw them do with regards to building men. The two criminals I described in this post are an abboration. I'm sure there are hundreds and hundreds of men who will speak to the good work of Joe Paterno and his staff in the forging of their character. I get it. I also understand that they screwed up. I doesn't necessarily make them bad men.....these things are hard for the experts, much less the rest of us, but they still have to go. They, at the VERY LEAST, suspected there was something terribly wrong and did nothing...and the most vunerable of children were victimized because of it. Wait until you see how many people come forward now as victims. He got caught twice in the shower, do you think he got caught both times he was there? My gosh, he was there hundreds of times with multiple victims/kids....you'll see. It is what it is.....but Paterno and the rest of the Athletic department of Penn have to leave. That's how you end it.
Edited by Left Brain 2011-11-08 10:46 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Ugh. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20111108_Timeline_of_events.html Sad. I Feel sorry for these individuals that are on the Honorary board of directors for the the Second Mile. http://www.thesecondmile.org/ourTeam/bod/bodHono.php Most of all feel bad for all these foster kids and young ones that are put in these sitiuations of false hope.....to get used and abused. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() One shoe dropped: http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/09/report-joe-paterno-to-retire-at-seasons-end/?hpt=hp_c1 It'll be interesting to see whether the trustees will let him finish the season, or remove him immediately. My guess is that they'll let him coach the game this weekend - his last home game - then remove him for the remaining road games / bowl games. |
![]() ![]() |
Runner | ![]() I honestly don't know why I continue. People's minds are made up. But, I will say, it is not so much that people blame Paterno for not going to police sooner that bothers me so much. Rather, it's the fact that there seems to be minimal mention of the other parties involved. For instance, Sandusky was reported to police in the 90's for showering with a minor, by the minor's parents. The state AG dropped the case. Sandusky's own charity had possible news of his abuses, but they did nothing. The university administration did nothing but apparently tell Sandusky to stay off the university property after the allegation in 2002. Which is after he left the university's employ. Instead, the focus is primarily aimed at the man who did what he thought was right at the time. Reading the indictment gives an impression of differing stories. How much did McQuery (who was not a full-time employee of the football program at the time) actually tell Paterno? Why didn't he do something, as he was the eyewitness to the event? Why didn't he step in and stop it right then and there? Why didn't he go to the police immediately? Instead, he tells Paterno the day after the event that he witnessed something. How much detail he actually gave, we will most likely never know. At that point, Paterno called in his boss, who called in his boss. What was said in that meeting, we'll probably never really know that, either. And we'll most likely never really know what exactly transpired behind office doors either. Yes, I admit, Paterno should have been more diligent in following up, and could have been more involved. But there are other parties that need to be discussed far more than Paterno in my mind. People who had known about potential issues earlier on, people who had more involvement in things over more years. I understand the need to be angry at everyone involved. But I do believe that too much focus is being directed in the wrong place. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Scout7 - 2011-11-09 3:19 PM Reading the indictment gives an impression of differing stories. How much did McQuery (who was not a full-time employee of the football program at the time) actually tell Paterno? Why didn't he do something, as he was the eyewitness to the event? Why didn't he step in and stop it right then and there? Why didn't he go to the police immediately? Instead, he tells Paterno the day after the event that he witnessed something. How much detail he actually gave, we will most likely never know. At that point, Paterno called in his boss, who called in his boss. What was said in that meeting, we'll probably never really know that, either. And we'll most likely never really know what exactly transpired behind office doors either. You just gave yourself every reason for ALL of them to go, as I said needed to happen. I'm not mad at anyone. All were complicit....it really doesn't matter to what degree. |
|