Dear Daughter... (Page 4)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2013-08-19 9:34 AM in reply to: KateTri1 |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain The Catholics forbid sex before marriage........ I'm just saying. What are you "saying"? I'm saying that forbidding a natural human function is a failed experiment. Where did anyone in this thread say sex is "forbidden"? And if you are referring to rules about the engagement of underaged sexual acts.. when did that become an "experiment"? Around age 12 and spin the bottle... Humans are curious creatures. |
|
2013-08-19 9:37 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Elite 6387 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by powerman I'm lucky if I can get a date! Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly And teens are forbidden to drink alcohol, but how's that working out? Education is a million times more effective than arbitrary rules. I've never forbidden my kids a taste of whatever I'm drinking. I'd rather them have a sip in front of me than sneaking around with his friends and all that peer pressure to try something forbidden. Sex is one of the most powerful drives we as humans (or any animal, actually) experience. Putting that into context is a pretty big part of being a parent. Sadly most parent's are afraid to have blunt conversations around this topic, but of all things you should talk to your kids about, this is probably the most important. Cloak it in mystery and make it forbidden to talk about, and all you're doing is increasing their curiosity.
... So... you let them watch? |
2013-08-19 9:44 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Expert 1951 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by KateTri1 Around age 12 and spin the bottle... Humans are curious creatures. Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain The Catholics forbid sex before marriage........ I'm just saying. What are you "saying"? I'm saying that forbidding a natural human function is a failed experiment. Where did anyone in this thread say sex is "forbidden"? And if you are referring to rules about the engagement of underaged sexual acts.. when did that become an "experiment"? hm.. I think it's possible to learn about that stuff without having someone's daughter groped by a boy at some party.. |
2013-08-19 9:46 AM in reply to: KateTri1 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain The Catholics forbid sex before marriage........ I'm just saying. What are you "saying"? I'm saying that forbidding a natural human function is a failed experiment. Where did anyone in this thread say sex is "forbidden"? And if you are referring to rules about the engagement of underaged sexual acts.. when did that become an "experiment"? I also disagree with the fact that having rules causes kids to not confide.. In my opinion having a poor parent/child relationship causes that.. You did: "But I am not opposed to telling my son (while he's under 18) that he's not allowed to mess around with girls." |
2013-08-19 9:51 AM in reply to: KateTri1 |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by KateTri1 Around age 12 and spin the bottle... Humans are curious creatures. Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain The Catholics forbid sex before marriage........ I'm just saying. What are you "saying"? I'm saying that forbidding a natural human function is a failed experiment. Where did anyone in this thread say sex is "forbidden"? And if you are referring to rules about the engagement of underaged sexual acts.. when did that become an "experiment"? hm.. I think it's possible to learn about that stuff without having someone's daughter groped by a boy at some party.. Based on discussions with my sons, girls are the ones who are more aggressive at this age. They mature earlier. My oldest broke up with his first girlfriend because she wanted to take things a lot farther than he was ready to go. |
2013-08-19 9:58 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by tuwood Tony, what you have described is almost exactly the tack we will take. We won't ever suggest that they should wait for marriage, as we don't think that's the way to go, and we have had to have a few early talks because of the farm, but, yeah, we have very, very similar approaches :)Originally posted by switch Originally posted by KateTri1 Well, actually, LB gave a really good example. I was thinking it, but I've been bagging on the Catholic Church too much lately, so I tried to keep it more universal:) Originally posted by switch Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by KateTri1 How do you tell him that he's not allowed to mess around with girls? I'm assuming there's more or it than 'I forbid it.' Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly And teens are forbidden to drink alcohol, but how's that working out? Education is a million times more effective than arbitrary rules. I've never forbidden my kids a taste of whatever I'm drinking. I'd rather them have a sip in front of me than sneaking around with his friends and all that peer pressure to try something forbidden. Sex is one of the most powerful drives we as humans (or any animal, actually) experience. Putting that into context is a pretty big part of being a parent. Sadly most parent's are afraid to have blunt conversations around this topic, but of all things you should talk to your kids . I agree about the benefits of continued conversation and fostering positive healthy relationships with our kids.. most definitely. But I am not opposed to telling my son (while he's under 18) that he's not allowed to mess around with girls. I'm not an authoritative parent, but it's my responsibility to keep him safe and guide him toward values that in my opinion, are important. I don't think that's "arbitrary". I struggle with this part of this idea a lot. I've seen a lot of families think they have this nailed down, and it's not, though, admittedly, that certainly can go for any parenting philosophy or rule du jour--regardless of its conservative or liberal bend. Nailed down.. what? What is the "this"? You mean some parents think if they tell their kid not to do, or more important, what to do, it will automatically happen? I have seen lots of conservative families espouse certain values and, yes, "forbid" things only to have their kids go off the deep-end with sex, drugs, alcohol, etc. Just because a family teaches certain values to their kids, or models that behavior in their home, doesn't always mean that's what the child/young adult/adult will choose. Liberal families also can have things go awry--no doubt--but I personally feel that demystifying things can take away some of the appeal. My family's approach sounds very similar to Don's and Brian's, but my kids are younger. We'll see...:) I'll agree with you here, IMHO straight up forbidding things is the worst approach and pretty much guarantees they'll do exactly what you don't want them to do when they get the first chance. There's a balance between being protective and allowing your kids freedom. With our kids, we have never forbidden them from doing anything per se but we did try to raise them as kind compassionate kids who were aware of the negatives of things like drinking, drugs, and sex. We then encourage them to not have sex outside of marriage, but are under no illusions that they likely will. We were even very clear that my wife and I both had sex as teenagers and even explained many of the issues we've had to deal with as a result. My wife told our daughter straight up, if she was going to even think about messing around that she'd get her on the pill. So, who knows. Even with my "very conservative" beliefs I may not be all that far from you on this whole thing Switch. lol My oldest is leaving for college tomorrow. He has a big heart and really longs for a committed relationship so I don't anticipate him "sleeping around" a bunch, but I am sure he'll find a girlfriend and get physical. My middle son who is a junior is in high school is similar, so I would say about the same. |
|
2013-08-19 10:00 AM in reply to: KateTri1 |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by tuwood I'll agree with you here, IMHO straight up forbidding things is the worst approach and pretty much guarantees they'll do exactly what you don't want them to do when they get the first chance. I can think of worse.. but ok.. whatever. You are entitled to your opinion. ok, now that I look at my statement again it doesn't quite reflect my opinion. I'm not saying to be permissive and not forbid anything, I was more referring to "only" forbidding things as a bad idea. Think of the smoking parent who tells their kids not to smoke. It's not going to work, they're likely to smoke. We set expectations with our kids and we tell them why they shouldn't do things. We do "forbid" them from doing things like having opposite sex friends in their bedrooms. I'm not sure if I'm making any sense, but I wanted to clarify a little bit. I think we're pretty close in our philosophies on this topic. |
2013-08-19 10:01 AM in reply to: powerman |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by powerman Originally posted by switch Originally posted by powerman Powerman, that's pretty much what I just said. Dude, you don't have to like me, but try to read the words I've written with a little less spin. Originally posted by switch Originally posted by KateTri1 Well, actually, LB gave a really good example. I was thinking it, but I've been bagging on the Catholic Church too much lately, so I tried to keep it more universal:) Originally posted by switch Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by KateTri1 How do you tell him that he's not allowed to mess around with girls? I'm assuming there's more or it than 'I forbid it.' Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly And teens are forbidden to drink alcohol, but how's that working out? Education is a million times more effective than arbitrary rules. I've never forbidden my kids a taste of whatever I'm drinking. I'd rather them have a sip in front of me than sneaking around with his friends and all that peer pressure to try something forbidden. Sex is one of the most powerful drives we as humans (or any animal, actually) experience. Putting that into context is a pretty big part of being a parent. Sadly most parent's are afraid to have blunt conversations around this topic, but of all things you should talk to your kids . I agree about the benefits of continued conversation and fostering positive healthy relationships with our kids.. most definitely. But I am not opposed to telling my son (while he's under 18) that he's not allowed to mess around with girls. I'm not an authoritative parent, but it's my responsibility to keep him safe and guide him toward values that in my opinion, are important. I don't think that's "arbitrary". I struggle with this part of this idea a lot. I've seen a lot of families think they have this nailed down, and it's not, though, admittedly, that certainly can go for any parenting philosophy or rule du jour--regardless of its conservative or liberal bend. Nailed down.. what? What is the "this"? You mean some parents think if they tell their kid not to do, or more important, what to do, it will automatically happen? I have seen lots of conservative families espouse certain values and, yes, "forbid" things only to have their kids go off the deep-end with sex, drugs, alcohol, etc. Just because a family teaches certain values to their kids, or models that behavior in their home, doesn't always mean that's what the child/young adult/adult will choose. Liberal families also can have things go awry--no doubt--but I personally feel that demystifying things can take away some of the appeal. My family's approach sounds very similar to Don's and Brian's, but my kids are younger. We'll see...:) Variables are so wide, that there is no you can make this a "conservative/liberal" thing. No way you can point to "demistyfying" as a "better" way of doing things. Everyone has train wrecks when everything was done "right", and everyone has good grow out of horrible conditions. On this one... yes, it IS copmplicated. Have you had your coffee this morning? "Conservatives espouse certain values only to have things not work out". Which I read as not so much "better", no? "Yes things can go bad, but I feel demistifying things can take away some of the appeal" Which I read as "better" no? And this was added to the Conservative paragraph... "Just because a family teaches certain values to their kids, or models that behavior in their home, doesn't always mean that's what the child/young adult/adult will choose."... yet can obviously apply to those that "espouce" demystification... no? I thought I read what you wrote. When you put quotes around something to reference what someone said you need to directly quote them, not paraphrase and omit. Looks to me like you read what you wrote, not what I wrote. |
2013-08-19 10:01 AM in reply to: jford2309 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Thinking back on my own life in this context and I can only make one comparison. My parents gave us pretty much zero rules. As we got old we moved into the basement of our house which had a door so we could come and go freely. I often would just leave for the weekend and return on sunday, or just stay at friends' houses for a few days. My brother did the same. Between the two of us, neither of us have kids (so my opinion doesnt matter) and I didn't start knockin boots until I was 17, though a lot of that was the fact that I couldn't get laid to save my life! My uber-Catholic neighbors, however, had three daughters and a son who were FORBIDDEN to leave the house most nights of the week even after they got older, they were told pre-marital sex was bad and they couldn't have boys or girls in the house after 9pm. Two of the three girls and the boy ended up having kids before even graduating from high school, and of course they'd often sneak boys (or in the boy's case, girls) into their house all the time. My best friend was one of those people who often snuck in (ironically, to see the one girl who had no kids before marriage). I know this is all anecdotal and it differs for everybody but I can say my judgment about whether to teach kids about sex, forbid them from having sex or try to hide them from the world was shaped early on by the family next door. To this day I'm still good friends with all of them, including their parents whom I consider like family, but if I had kids (thankfully I dont and never will) I would never expressly forbid them to do anything. I would give them as much education as I could, let them know the benefits (it's good exercise and, if done right, feels awesome!) and the drawbacks (pregnancy, STDs, etc etc etc) and let them make a choice. I am in the camp with Switch that if you demystify it, you make it less appealing. |
2013-08-19 10:12 AM in reply to: 0 |
Expert 1186 North Cackalacky | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... This thread now has me thinking about the scene in Chasing Amy where they talk about open communication about sex (specifically during) reducing the risk of permanent injury... I'm curious about different folk's reasons for linking sex and marriage so directly and intensely. jford was pretty clear about it; why do the rest of the group on that side of the fence feel that way? Edited by ScudRunner 2013-08-19 10:19 AM |
2013-08-19 10:13 AM in reply to: mr2tony |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by mr2tony Thinking back on my own life in this context and I can only make one comparison. My parents gave us pretty much zero rules. As we got old we moved into the basement of our house which had a door so we could come and go freely. I often would just leave for the weekend and return on sunday, or just stay at friends' houses for a few days. My brother did the same. Between the two of us, neither of us have kids (so my opinion doesnt matter) and I didn't start knockin boots until I was 17, though a lot of that was the fact that I couldn't get laid to save my life! My uber-Catholic neighbors, however, had three daughters and a son who were FORBIDDEN to leave the house most nights of the week even after they got older, they were told pre-marital sex was bad and they couldn't have boys or girls in the house after 9pm. Two of the three girls and the boy ended up having kids before even graduating from high school, and of course they'd often sneak boys (or in the boy's case, girls) into their house all the time. My best friend was one of those people who often snuck in (ironically, to see the one girl who had no kids before marriage). I know this is all anecdotal and it differs for everybody but I can say my judgment about whether to teach kids about sex, forbid them from having sex or try to hide them from the world was shaped early on by the family next door. To this day I'm still good friends with all of them, including their parents whom I consider like family, but if I had kids (thankfully I dont and never will) I would never expressly forbid them to do anything. I would give them as much education as I could, let them know the benefits (it's good exercise and, if done right, feels awesome!) and the drawbacks (pregnancy, STDs, etc etc etc) and let them make a choice. I am in the camp with Switch that if you demystify it, you make it less appealing. Stop all this articulate, thoughtful response stuff, or you'll make me start liking you ;) |
|
2013-08-19 10:15 AM in reply to: mr2tony |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by mr2tony Thinking back on my own life in this context and I can only make one comparison. My parents gave us pretty much zero rules. As we got old we moved into the basement of our house which had a door so we could come and go freely. I often would just leave for the weekend and return on sunday, or just stay at friends' houses for a few days. My brother did the same. Between the two of us, neither of us have kids (so my opinion doesnt matter) and I didn't start knockin boots until I was 17, though a lot of that was the fact that I couldn't get laid to save my life! My uber-Catholic neighbors, however, had three daughters and a son who were FORBIDDEN to leave the house most nights of the week even after they got older, they were told pre-marital sex was bad and they couldn't have boys or girls in the house after 9pm. Two of the three girls and the boy ended up having kids before even graduating from high school, and of course they'd often sneak boys (or in the boy's case, girls) into their house all the time. My best friend was one of those people who often snuck in (ironically, to see the one girl who had no kids before marriage). I know this is all anecdotal and it differs for everybody but I can say my judgment about whether to teach kids about sex, forbid them from having sex or try to hide them from the world was shaped early on by the family next door. To this day I'm still good friends with all of them, including their parents whom I consider like family, but if I had kids (thankfully I dont and never will) I would never expressly forbid them to do anything. I would give them as much education as I could, let them know the benefits (it's good exercise and, if done right, feels awesome!) and the drawbacks (pregnancy, STDs, etc etc etc) and let them make a choice. I am in the camp with Switch that if you demystify it, you make it less appealing. You sure we're not related? That was pretty much my childhood as well, except I was king of the trailer park in chasing girls... lol Maybe it's an Iowa thing |
2013-08-19 10:16 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by Left Brain Like X100. I know in that other thread I was jokingly referring to the fact that as my boys grow they occasionally appear almost human, but the truth it that the greatest part of parenting is when you see them mature as individuals. What you say here is exactly the truth. Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain The Catholics forbid sex before marriage........ I'm just saying. What are you "saying"? I'm saying that forbidding a natural human function is a failed experiment. Here's what I deal with. I'm not sure I can use another word to accurately portray where my 15 year old son is with this issue so I will just say that he is hounded on his phone, his facebook account, and in person by girls. As the biggest and arguably most athletic boy in his class it's amazing what I have seen girls text and facebook to him. It's become a matter of great entertainment for us....but it's really not that funny. I know it's only a matter of time before some girl, or guy (I don't control that either although I'll use girls because that seems to be his orientation), becomes an object of affection for him. Once that happens, probably sooner then later, all he will have to fall back on is his good relationship with me, and the guidance I can hopefully provide. Maybe he'll wait until he gets married, or maybe he won't because he can't......it's natural, and powerful. What he doesn't have to be is disrespectful, what he doesn't have to be is irresponsible, and most certainly it doesn't have to be something that he hides or is ashamed of. It's my job and my responsibility to walk him down that road, and I will. I like the prospects for my son's future.....he's a great kid with many talents. I consider a pothole filled with bad choices when it comes to sex to be one of the greatest obstacles in that future...but I also like his chances as long as he and I keep our relationship strong and he feels like he can confide in me. I figure once I "forbid" him from doing something....especially something that is good and natural, his confidence in me as someone he can talk to erodes......I'm not interested in that. I'm interested in him maturing as a person and an athlete with goals and dreams who's future remains bright. This, exactly, this in every way. Great post LB. |
2013-08-19 10:28 AM in reply to: switch |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by switch Originally posted by mr2tony Thinking back on my own life in this context and I can only make one comparison. My parents gave us pretty much zero rules. As we got old we moved into the basement of our house which had a door so we could come and go freely. I often would just leave for the weekend and return on sunday, or just stay at friends' houses for a few days. My brother did the same. Between the two of us, neither of us have kids (so my opinion doesnt matter) and I didn't start knockin boots until I was 17, though a lot of that was the fact that I couldn't get laid to save my life! My uber-Catholic neighbors, however, had three daughters and a son who were FORBIDDEN to leave the house most nights of the week even after they got older, they were told pre-marital sex was bad and they couldn't have boys or girls in the house after 9pm. Two of the three girls and the boy ended up having kids before even graduating from high school, and of course they'd often sneak boys (or in the boy's case, girls) into their house all the time. My best friend was one of those people who often snuck in (ironically, to see the one girl who had no kids before marriage). I know this is all anecdotal and it differs for everybody but I can say my judgment about whether to teach kids about sex, forbid them from having sex or try to hide them from the world was shaped early on by the family next door. To this day I'm still good friends with all of them, including their parents whom I consider like family, but if I had kids (thankfully I dont and never will) I would never expressly forbid them to do anything. I would give them as much education as I could, let them know the benefits (it's good exercise and, if done right, feels awesome!) and the drawbacks (pregnancy, STDs, etc etc etc) and let them make a choice. I am in the camp with Switch that if you demystify it, you make it less appealing. Stop all this articulate, thoughtful response stuff, or you'll make me start liking you Well we can't have that. Every Superman needs a Lex Luthor. |
2013-08-19 10:30 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by mr2tony Thinking back on my own life in this context and I can only make one comparison. My parents gave us pretty much zero rules. As we got old we moved into the basement of our house which had a door so we could come and go freely. I often would just leave for the weekend and return on sunday, or just stay at friends' houses for a few days. My brother did the same. Between the two of us, neither of us have kids (so my opinion doesnt matter) and I didn't start knockin boots until I was 17, though a lot of that was the fact that I couldn't get laid to save my life! My uber-Catholic neighbors, however, had three daughters and a son who were FORBIDDEN to leave the house most nights of the week even after they got older, they were told pre-marital sex was bad and they couldn't have boys or girls in the house after 9pm. Two of the three girls and the boy ended up having kids before even graduating from high school, and of course they'd often sneak boys (or in the boy's case, girls) into their house all the time. My best friend was one of those people who often snuck in (ironically, to see the one girl who had no kids before marriage). I know this is all anecdotal and it differs for everybody but I can say my judgment about whether to teach kids about sex, forbid them from having sex or try to hide them from the world was shaped early on by the family next door. To this day I'm still good friends with all of them, including their parents whom I consider like family, but if I had kids (thankfully I dont and never will) I would never expressly forbid them to do anything. I would give them as much education as I could, let them know the benefits (it's good exercise and, if done right, feels awesome!) and the drawbacks (pregnancy, STDs, etc etc etc) and let them make a choice. I am in the camp with Switch that if you demystify it, you make it less appealing. You sure we're not related? That was pretty much my childhood as well, except I was king of the trailer park in chasing girls... lol Maybe it's an Iowa thing I was the king of chasing girls, but unfortunately that's all it was: Chasing girls. They ran, and, dagnabbit, they ran FAST! |
2013-08-19 10:31 AM in reply to: switch |
Elite 6387 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by switch When you put quotes around something to reference what someone said you need to directly quote them, not paraphrase and omit. Looks to me like you read what you wrote, not what I wrote. When you use the terms conservatives and liberals, and make a judgment of what values or approaches you deem as better... don't be so suprised when someone takes it as such. My parents were quite conservative, not politically, socially... yet they "demistified" everything for me. Quite blunt, to the point, even informative.... and I wanted to try it all out as soon as I could. I'm very curious. I guess at this time, if we were the last two people on Earth... sex is out of the question? |
|
2013-08-19 10:31 AM in reply to: mr2tony |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by mr2tony Originally posted by switch Well we can't have that. Every Superman needs a Lex Luthor. Originally posted by mr2tony Thinking back on my own life in this context and I can only make one comparison. My parents gave us pretty much zero rules. As we got old we moved into the basement of our house which had a door so we could come and go freely. I often would just leave for the weekend and return on sunday, or just stay at friends' houses for a few days. My brother did the same. Between the two of us, neither of us have kids (so my opinion doesnt matter) and I didn't start knockin boots until I was 17, though a lot of that was the fact that I couldn't get laid to save my life! My uber-Catholic neighbors, however, had three daughters and a son who were FORBIDDEN to leave the house most nights of the week even after they got older, they were told pre-marital sex was bad and they couldn't have boys or girls in the house after 9pm. Two of the three girls and the boy ended up having kids before even graduating from high school, and of course they'd often sneak boys (or in the boy's case, girls) into their house all the time. My best friend was one of those people who often snuck in (ironically, to see the one girl who had no kids before marriage). I know this is all anecdotal and it differs for everybody but I can say my judgment about whether to teach kids about sex, forbid them from having sex or try to hide them from the world was shaped early on by the family next door. To this day I'm still good friends with all of them, including their parents whom I consider like family, but if I had kids (thankfully I dont and never will) I would never expressly forbid them to do anything. I would give them as much education as I could, let them know the benefits (it's good exercise and, if done right, feels awesome!) and the drawbacks (pregnancy, STDs, etc etc etc) and let them make a choice. I am in the camp with Switch that if you demystify it, you make it less appealing. Stop all this articulate, thoughtful response stuff, or you'll make me start liking you ;) Clever, very clever. lol. |
2013-08-19 10:33 AM in reply to: powerman |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by powerman Well, I'd have to be in the mood first, and you're kinda suckin at that today;)Originally posted by switch When you put quotes around something to reference what someone said you need to directly quote them, not paraphrase and omit. Looks to me like you read what you wrote, not what I wrote. When you use the terms conservatives and liberals, and make a judgment of what values or approaches you deem as better... don't be so suprised when someone takes it as such. My parents were quite conservative, not politically, socially... yet they "demistified" everything for me. Quite blunt, to the point, even informative.... and I wanted to try it all out as soon as I could. I'm very curious. I guess at this time, if we were the last two people on Earth... sex is out of the question? |
2013-08-19 10:38 AM in reply to: mr2tony |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by mr2tony Thinking back on my own life in this context and I can only make one comparison. My parents gave us pretty much zero rules. As we got old we moved into the basement of our house which had a door so we could come and go freely. I often would just leave for the weekend and return on sunday, or just stay at friends' houses for a few days. My brother did the same. Between the two of us, neither of us have kids (so my opinion doesnt matter) and I didn't start knockin boots until I was 17, though a lot of that was the fact that I couldn't get laid to save my life! My uber-Catholic neighbors, however, had three daughters and a son who were FORBIDDEN to leave the house most nights of the week even after they got older, they were told pre-marital sex was bad and they couldn't have boys or girls in the house after 9pm. Two of the three girls and the boy ended up having kids before even graduating from high school, and of course they'd often sneak boys (or in the boy's case, girls) into their house all the time. My best friend was one of those people who often snuck in (ironically, to see the one girl who had no kids before marriage). I know this is all anecdotal and it differs for everybody but I can say my judgment about whether to teach kids about sex, forbid them from having sex or try to hide them from the world was shaped early on by the family next door. To this day I'm still good friends with all of them, including their parents whom I consider like family, but if I had kids (thankfully I dont and never will) I would never expressly forbid them to do anything. I would give them as much education as I could, let them know the benefits (it's good exercise and, if done right, feels awesome!) and the drawbacks (pregnancy, STDs, etc etc etc) and let them make a choice. I am in the camp with Switch that if you demystify it, you make it less appealing. Oh, it's never less appealing, you just understand there are consequences for your actions. Who doesn't love pizza? |
2013-08-19 10:56 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Expert 1186 North Cackalacky | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... |
2013-08-19 10:59 AM in reply to: switch |
Pro 6011 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by switch Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by Left Brain Like X100. I know in that other thread I was jokingly referring to the fact that as my boys grow they occasionally appear almost human, but the truth it that the greatest part of parenting is when you see them mature as individuals. What you say here is exactly the truth. Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain The Catholics forbid sex before marriage........ I'm just saying. What are you "saying"? I'm saying that forbidding a natural human function is a failed experiment. Here's what I deal with. I'm not sure I can use another word to accurately portray where my 15 year old son is with this issue so I will just say that he is hounded on his phone, his facebook account, and in person by girls. As the biggest and arguably most athletic boy in his class it's amazing what I have seen girls text and facebook to him. It's become a matter of great entertainment for us....but it's really not that funny. I know it's only a matter of time before some girl, or guy (I don't control that either although I'll use girls because that seems to be his orientation), becomes an object of affection for him. Once that happens, probably sooner then later, all he will have to fall back on is his good relationship with me, and the guidance I can hopefully provide. Maybe he'll wait until he gets married, or maybe he won't because he can't......it's natural, and powerful. What he doesn't have to be is disrespectful, what he doesn't have to be is irresponsible, and most certainly it doesn't have to be something that he hides or is ashamed of. It's my job and my responsibility to walk him down that road, and I will. I like the prospects for my son's future.....he's a great kid with many talents. I consider a pothole filled with bad choices when it comes to sex to be one of the greatest obstacles in that future...but I also like his chances as long as he and I keep our relationship strong and he feels like he can confide in me. I figure once I "forbid" him from doing something....especially something that is good and natural, his confidence in me as someone he can talk to erodes......I'm not interested in that. I'm interested in him maturing as a person and an athlete with goals and dreams who's future remains bright. This, exactly, this in every way. Great post LB. x3. Excellent post! Just to pile on with some more thoughts... One approach is never going to be best for every kid. Take three different kids and raise them exactly the same, and you can get three completely different outcomes, but I do think there are certain approaches that tend to work more consistently than others if the end goal is raising an educated, well-adjusted, happy, responsible member of society. IMO, emphasizing core values including honesty, respect for others, self confidence, independence, open communication, and a good work ethic will tip the odds in favor of a good outcome and away from a kid becoming a train wreck regardless of where any of us falls regarding a lot of the details discussed in this thread. I also believe that blindly following a particular approach to raising your children and ignoring how they are developing as people is playing with fire. Sometimes as parents we need to change tactics as our children develop, because what worked when they were 12 or 13 probably isn't going to work when they're 15 or 16. |
|
2013-08-19 11:20 AM in reply to: ScudRunner |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by ScudRunner This thread now has me thinking about the scene in Chasing Amy where they talk about open communication about sex (specifically during) reducing the risk of permanent injury... I'm curious about different folk's reasons for linking sex and marriage so directly and intensely. jford was pretty clear about it, why do the rest of the group on that side of the fence feel that way? Great question, and I'll try to articulate my thoughts on the subject. I'm a Christian and I do believe that the bible is a guide to how we should live our lives. The bible does forbid sex outside of marriage (fornication) as well as adultery and many other things. It's easy for me to say it's as simple as that for me, but it's not. My wife and I have both experienced and had friends who have had a lot of negative things happen as a result of sex outside of marriage. I'm not going to say there aren't any good things out of it, because there are, but personally I feel it does more harm than good. Even before my wife and I were Christians we were strong opponents of sex outside of marriage based on our life experiences. I could probably come up with 100 anecdotes on direct negatives that I've either experienced or people I know have, but I'll just give this one about a guy I met through a prison ministry I work with. He was going to the University of Nebraska as a Sophomore. He had a 4.0 GPA and was a model student. No criminal history of any kind and was a "perfect kid" as far as society was concerned. My oldest heading off to college has been made very well aware of this case. |
2013-08-19 11:22 AM in reply to: 0 |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... I think there is one thing no one has brought up yet. I'm going to tell my son he can't have sex with any girl (yes girl, that's what the law says) under 16. In Idaho he could be labeled a sex offender for that. That screws him up for the rest of his life. Other than that, I'll just offer him my opinion and leave it up to him. Edited by JoshR 2013-08-19 11:23 AM |
2013-08-19 11:27 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Expert 1951 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by KateTri1 Originally posted by Left Brain The Catholics forbid sex before marriage........ I'm just saying. What are you "saying"? I'm saying that forbidding a natural human function is a failed experiment. Where did anyone in this thread say sex is "forbidden"? And if you are referring to rules about the engagement of underaged sexual acts.. when did that become an "experiment"? I also disagree with the fact that having rules causes kids to not confide.. In my opinion having a poor parent/child relationship causes that.. You did: "But I am not opposed to telling my son (while he's under 18) that he's not allowed to mess around with girls." key words |
2013-08-19 11:30 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Expert 1951 | Subject: RE: Dear Daughter... Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by ScudRunner This thread now has me thinking about the scene in Chasing Amy where they talk about open communication about sex (specifically during) reducing the risk of permanent injury... I'm curious about different folk's reasons for linking sex and marriage so directly and intensely. jford was pretty clear about it, why do the rest of the group on that side of the fence feel that way? Great question, and I'll try to articulate my thoughts on the subject. I'm a Christian and I do believe that the bible is a guide to how we should live our lives. The bible does forbid sex outside of marriage (fornication) as well as adultery and many other things. It's easy for me to say it's as simple as that for me, but it's not.
it should be that simple... One claims to be a Christian than turn words around, that are in the Bible that clearly forbid sex outside of marriage.. and wishy washy it? |
|