ND vs Bama Who you got? (Page 5)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
New user ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() And, if the game wasn't enough - did anyone hear that McCarron has a hot girlfriend? |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() volfireman07 - 2013-01-08 7:07 AM And, if the game wasn't enough - did anyone hear that McCarron has a hot girlfriend? After hearing what Musburger said, I wouldn't be surprised if she filed a restraining order. Here's her in the Miss Alabama competition as well as the "He said what?" comment http://www.ksdk.com/sports/article/355903/6/ESPNs-awkward-moment-wi... |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() DanielG - 2013-01-08 7:24 AM volfireman07 - 2013-01-08 7:07 AM And, if the game wasn't enough - did anyone hear that McCarron has a hot girlfriend? After hearing what Musburger said, I wouldn't be surprised if she filed a restraining order. Here's her in the Miss Alabama competition as well as the "He said what?" comment http://www.ksdk.com/sports/article/355903/6/ESPNs-awkward-moment-wi... She did at halftime as it became necessary. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dsand97 - 2013-01-08 9:20 AM Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. Sorry, that spot belongs to my Commodores. The leprechauns can have fifth. That was embarrassing last night. My favorite comment I've read today is "We heard that ND had an SEC caliber defense. Who knew they were talking about Tennessee?" |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() dsand97 - 2013-01-08 8:20 AM Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. So if the playoffs started today, 4 teams, who would it be? Bama, Georgia (again), Oregon, A&M? That makes sense to me, but look at that... 3 SEC teams. Would Clemson argue to be in there? South Carolina has a good argument to get into that mix as they beat Clemson and Georgia... |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:30 AM dsand97 - 2013-01-08 8:20 AM Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. So if the playoffs started today, 4 teams, who would it be? Bama, Georgia (again), Oregon, A&M? That makes sense to me, but look at that... 3 SEC teams. Would Clemson argue to be in there? South Carolina has a good argument to get into that mix as they beat Clemson and Georgia... Go with all BCS winners 'Bama Vs Louisville Oregon Vs either Stanford or FSU Which would probably (note probably, "oops" games happen) end up with Oregon Vs 'Bama. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() DanielG - 2013-01-08 8:37 AM GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:30 AM Go with all BCS winners 'Bama Vs Louisville Oregon Vs either Stanford or FSU Which would probably (note probably, "oops" games happen) end up with Oregon Vs 'Bama. dsand97 - 2013-01-08 8:20 AM Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. So if the playoffs started today, 4 teams, who would it be? Bama, Georgia (again), Oregon, A&M? That makes sense to me, but look at that... 3 SEC teams. Would Clemson argue to be in there? South Carolina has a good argument to get into that mix as they beat Clemson and Georgia... Interesting. So there's still one sitting out that is just as deserving ("Hey, we won a BCS game!"). Before someone chimes-in here with "Well the 4 teams in the 'playoff' will meet in the bowl games." We know that. We're just saying what 4 teams would you put in a playoff right now. Hypotheticals is all we got. |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'm kind of starting to get on the conference champion bandwagon. If you can't even win your conference, then you shouldn't be in the race for the championship. That's the playoff there.... Win your conference, then you can see about a national championship. Top 4 rated conference champions, and ND has to pick a conference or don't play for NC. This "9 win season gets a BCS bowl bid" business is crap. So that would make Stanford, Alabama, K-State, FSU. Alabama crushes everyone there, but I don't see how you have Stanford win the conference but Oregon play in the playoffs?????(same with the other conferences). I also don't see how you have them ranked ahead of Stanford (just as an example) going into the playoffs. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:44 AM DanielG - 2013-01-08 8:37 AM GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:30 AM Go with all BCS winners 'Bama Vs Louisville Oregon Vs either Stanford or FSU Which would probably (note probably, "oops" games happen) end up with Oregon Vs 'Bama. dsand97 - 2013-01-08 8:20 AM Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. So if the playoffs started today, 4 teams, who would it be? Bama, Georgia (again), Oregon, A&M? That makes sense to me, but look at that... 3 SEC teams. Would Clemson argue to be in there? South Carolina has a good argument to get into that mix as they beat Clemson and Georgia... Interesting. So there's still one sitting out that is just as deserving ("Hey, we won a BCS game!"). Before someone chimes-in here with "Well the 4 teams in the 'playoff' will meet in the bowl games." We know that. We're just saying what 4 teams would you put in a playoff right now. Hypotheticals is all we got. Sub-genre with records: Alabama 7-1 13-1 Florida State 12-2 Stanford 8-1 12-2 Oregon 8-1 12-1 Louisville 11-2 I guess that would kick Louisville out. So AL FSU Stanford OR That would work ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() DanielG - 2013-01-08 8:59 AM GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:44 AM Sub-genre with records: Alabama 7-1 13-1 Florida State 12-2 Stanford 8-1 12-2 Oregon 8-1 12-1 Louisville 11-2 I guess that would kick Louisville out. So AL FSU Stanford OR That would work DanielG - 2013-01-08 8:37 AM GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:30 AM Go with all BCS winners 'Bama Vs Louisville Oregon Vs either Stanford or FSU Which would probably (note probably, "oops" games happen) end up with Oregon Vs 'Bama. dsand97 - 2013-01-08 8:20 AM Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. So if the playoffs started today, 4 teams, who would it be? Bama, Georgia (again), Oregon, A&M? That makes sense to me, but look at that... 3 SEC teams. Would Clemson argue to be in there? South Carolina has a good argument to get into that mix as they beat Clemson and Georgia... Interesting. So there's still one sitting out that is just as deserving ("Hey, we won a BCS game!"). Before someone chimes-in here with "Well the 4 teams in the 'playoff' will meet in the bowl games." We know that. We're just saying what 4 teams would you put in a playoff right now. Hypotheticals is all we got. ![]() I wouldn't want to see two teams from the same conference in a 4 team playoff. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() DanielG - 2013-01-08 8:59 AM GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:44 AM Sub-genre with records: Alabama 7-1 13-1 Florida State 12-2 Stanford 8-1 12-2 Oregon 8-1 12-1 Louisville 11-2 I guess that would kick Louisville out. So AL FSU Stanford OR That would work DanielG - 2013-01-08 8:37 AM GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 9:30 AM Go with all BCS winners 'Bama Vs Louisville Oregon Vs either Stanford or FSU Which would probably (note probably, "oops" games happen) end up with Oregon Vs 'Bama. dsand97 - 2013-01-08 8:20 AM Well its all said and done and by all accounts the best ND can hope to be is the 4th best team........ ...............in the S.E.C........................ ...............East Division. So if the playoffs started today, 4 teams, who would it be? Bama, Georgia (again), Oregon, A&M? That makes sense to me, but look at that... 3 SEC teams. Would Clemson argue to be in there? South Carolina has a good argument to get into that mix as they beat Clemson and Georgia... Interesting. So there's still one sitting out that is just as deserving ("Hey, we won a BCS game!"). Before someone chimes-in here with "Well the 4 teams in the 'playoff' will meet in the bowl games." We know that. We're just saying what 4 teams would you put in a playoff right now. Hypotheticals is all we got. ![]() So you're saying the PAC12 is better than the SEC? Why would FSU or Stanford (both 2 loss teams) have more ability to stay in than Louisville? |
![]() ![]() |
Resident Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Left Brain - 2013-01-08 9:08 AMI wouldn't want to see two teams from the same conference in a 4 team playoff. even if they were, say, the only two one-loss teams in the country and hadn't yet played each other? |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() But aren't we doing this wrong? You don't pick the top 4 from now. You pick the top 4 BEFORE the bowl games. The point is the big bowl games ARE the playoffs. If that's the case then it's ND, AL, FL & OR (granted FL choked BIG time against Louisville but I honestly think they would have put up a better fight against AL than ND) Edited by TriRSquared 2013-01-08 9:26 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() the bear - 2013-01-08 9:21 AM Left Brain - 2013-01-08 9:08 AMI wouldn't want to see two teams from the same conference in a 4 team playoff. even if they were, say, the only two one-loss teams in the country and hadn't yet played each other? Conference champions.....period. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Left Brain - 2013-01-08 10:28 AM the bear - 2013-01-08 9:21 AM Left Brain - 2013-01-08 9:08 AMI wouldn't want to see two teams from the same conference in a 4 team playoff. even if they were, say, the only two one-loss teams in the country and hadn't yet played each other? Conference champions.....period. I'd prefer the conference champions (either by a championship game or regular season at their choosing) be the play in games as well. And limit conference size to 12 teams. That way, a 20 team conference can't b!tch they have more teams hence need a second slot. Edited by pitt83 2013-01-08 9:32 AM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Left Brain - 2013-01-08 10:28 AM the bear - 2013-01-08 9:21 AM Left Brain - 2013-01-08 9:08 AMI wouldn't want to see two teams from the same conference in a 4 team playoff. even if they were, say, the only two one-loss teams in the country and hadn't yet played each other? Conference champions.....period. So ND never makes it in. I'm OK with that. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() TriRSquared - 2013-01-08 9:25 AM But aren't we doing this wrong? You don't pick the top 4 from now. You pick the top 4 BEFORE the bowl games. The point is the big bowl games ARE the playoffs. If that's the case then it's ND, AL, FL & OR (granted FL choked BIG time against Louisville but I honestly think they would have put up a better fight against AL than ND) And there it is. The person talking about how it would've ended up... TRS, we were just saying if they held it after the bowls what would it look like. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() TriRSquared - 2013-01-08 10:42 AM Left Brain - 2013-01-08 10:28 AM the bear - 2013-01-08 9:21 AM Left Brain - 2013-01-08 9:08 AMI wouldn't want to see two teams from the same conference in a 4 team playoff. even if they were, say, the only two one-loss teams in the country and hadn't yet played each other? Conference champions.....period. So ND never makes it in. I'm OK with that. Ohh, there's a path for ND. Just that they fail to choose it... |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() pitt83 - 2013-01-08 9:56 AM TriRSquared - 2013-01-08 10:42 AM Ohh, there's a path for ND. Just that they fail to choose it...Left Brain - 2013-01-08 10:28 AM the bear - 2013-01-08 9:21 AM Left Brain - 2013-01-08 9:08 AMI wouldn't want to see two teams from the same conference in a 4 team playoff. even if they were, say, the only two one-loss teams in the country and hadn't yet played each other? Conference champions.....period. So ND never makes it in. I'm OK with that. That is exactly right. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() If I were king there would be four 24 team conferences .....each with four 6 team divisions. The playoffs would start at the division level (minor bowl games), move to the conference level (mid bowl games), and then to the championship series. (major bowls).....have a third place game to make it 4 majow bowl games. Yeah, it looks alot like the pro format only with more teams and games, but you need that to keep the bowl game people happy. If you want to keep the same number of schools in Div. one than make the conferences/divisons larger. I know it's not goiung to happen, but it'd be pretty simple. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2013-01-08 10:47 AM TriRSquared - 2013-01-08 9:25 AM But aren't we doing this wrong? You don't pick the top 4 from now. You pick the top 4 BEFORE the bowl games. The point is the big bowl games ARE the playoffs. If that's the case then it's ND, AL, FL & OR (granted FL choked BIG time against Louisville but I honestly think they would have put up a better fight against AL than ND) And there it is. The person talking about how it would've ended up... TRS, we were just saying if they held it after the bowls what would it look like. Right, but they wouldn't hold it after the bowls. So I'm not sure what the point was. And for the record even Louisville would have given a better game than ND. I'm not trying to argue FL into the NC game this year. They did not deserve it. But neither did ND. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Left Brain - 2013-01-08 10:04 AM If I were king there would be four 24 team conferences .....each with four 6 team divisions. The playoffs would start at the division level (minor bowl games), move to the conference level (mid bowl games), and then to the championship series. (major bowls).....have a third place game to make it 4 majow bowl games. Yeah, it looks alot like the pro format only with more teams and games, but you need that to keep the bowl game people happy. If you want to keep the same number of schools in Div. one than make the conferences/divisons larger. I know it's not goiung to happen, but it'd be pretty simple. Texas High School Football Players end-up playing 16 games to get to the championship. There are at-least as many schools in each TX high school division as there are in CFB and yet every year, they crown a champion. FBS college football is all about programs getting to win their last game and calling themselves "champion" of something at the end of the year "GoDaddy.Com Bowl Champion!!!" |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Left Brain - 2013-01-08 11:04 AM If I were king there would be four 24 team conferences .....each with four 6 team divisions. The playoffs would start at the division level (minor bowl games), move to the conference level (mid bowl games), and then to the championship series. (major bowls).....have a third place game to make it 4 majow bowl games. Yeah, it looks alot like the pro format only with more teams and games, but you need that to keep the bowl game people happy. If you want to keep the same number of schools in Div. one than make the conferences/divisons larger. I know it's not goiung to happen, but it'd be pretty simple. So, I'm just one tier ahead of you with 12 teams per conference and more conferences. We're agreeing today. Perhaps the Mayans were right? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() We were at an Aggie's house with an Auburn grad this weekend and we came-up with a great idea. SEC should kick one team out per year and allow one team in each year. "Sorry Kentucky, you gotta go play in the Sun Belt conference. Welcome in Louisville!" European Soccer style. |
|