Other Resources The Political Joe » Trump Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 40
 
 
2015-11-04 4:06 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Expert
852
5001001001002525
Evergreen, Colorado
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Trump

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.



2015-11-04 4:24 PM
in reply to: Stacers

User image

Master
2802
2000500100100100
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Trump
Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.




Thanks for jumping in and being a voice of reason. Phew!

I remember hearing a lot of this back-slapping and over confidence from a lot of these same voices back in 2008 and 2012.
2015-11-04 5:07 PM
in reply to: Stacers

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.

I'm a registered republican, but it's only because I live in a republican state (primary voting).  I'm really a Libertarian at heart with a strong emphasis on fiscal conservatism and libertarian socially.  My social views are mostly conservative, but I'm libertarian about them when it comes to government policy (if that makes sense).

I've posted in several other places why the economy is in distress so I won't derail things too much with that, but a general summary is that the stock market is sky high only because we've injected it with steroids through Fed manipulation.  If it weren't for the crazy low interest rates and quantitative easing the market would be only slightly higher than the 2008 crash IMHO.  You'll notice that the market starts to crash any time there's even a whisper of raising the rates which is a real problem.  We can't leave the rates this low forever.
The other problem is underemployment and overall workforce participation.  Sure the "unemployment rate" has recovered, but it's not a real measure of the reality of the American worker experience as a whole.
There's no question many people have benefited from Obama's policies, but there's also a ton of people who have been hurt.  My insurance guy just left my office a few minutes ago and my current health plan I offer my employees is going up even more than he thought.  It's going up more than the cost of a full time employee for the exact same coverage.  I most certainly am not benefitting from the ACA and none of my employees are either.  They're not going to be happy come January.

I think many people including yourself are very disconnected with the people that support Trump.  He is touching on the economy and Illegal immigration which has had a huge impact on blue-collar workers in America.  Even several large unions are seriously looking at endorsing Trump because illegal immigration and exporting jobs is killing them.
People can bash on him all they want on a personal level (and honestly it's just in many areas), but it doesn't change the level of support he has and how broad it is.  He's way in front across almost every demographic in the Republican party, he's polling very well with independents and minority communities.  Depending on which poll you look at, he's out polling Hillary when everyone in the Democratic party still thinks of him as a joke.

I started this race as a Cruz/Paul supporter, but the more I see what Trumps doing the more I'm coming on board.  Rand has removed himself from the race, so I'm about 50/50 with Trump/Cruz with Trump starting to edge out front.

 

2015-11-04 5:08 PM
in reply to: ejshowers

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by ejshowers
Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.

Thanks for jumping in and being a voice of reason. Phew! I remember hearing a lot of this back-slapping and over confidence from a lot of these same voices back in 2008 and 2012.

For the record, I wasn't here in 2008.  lol

btw, if I'm over confident about Trump, then doesn't that make you equally over confident about Hillary?  

2015-11-04 5:53 PM
in reply to: Stacers

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.

This is what happens when the only thing people read is fox news, other murdoch "news" sources, and crazy conservative blogs. They live in the bubble.

2015-11-04 6:06 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Trump
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

[Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn Far less than McCain/Romney or far less than Trump? Or both?

I was referring to far less than McCain/Romney, but I don't think it's much of a stretch to argue that Obama (in 2008) was less qualified than Trump is now either.
The point being that qualifications for the job aren't as important as many would like to think.  it's a popularity contest and that means whoever has the most enthusiasm is typically the winner.

I mostly agree with you about it being a popularity contest, up to a point. I think popularity gets you a ticket to the dance, but I don't think it wins elections by itself. I think it's funny, though, that the "Qualifications aren't that important" argument switches sides every election, depending on which party has the "less 'qualified'" candidate. You can bet that when the GOP was running veteran Senator McCain, war hero and political lifer, against Junior Senator Obama they weren't singing the "qualifications aren't that important" song. On the contrary-- it was, "This guy's only been a senator for five minutes! Now he wants to be PRESIDENT?!" Now that their two top candidates have a combined total of zero days in public office of any kind, suddenly, it's "Qualifications? We don't need no stinking qualifications!!"

We need a business leader who understands how to balance a budget and do international deals that actually benefit our country.

I guess in many ways I'm becoming a single issue voter myself, but the issue is the economy.  lol




And what's your evidence that Trump has done either of those things? He's gone bankrupt a number of times, which doesn't suggest, on it's face, that he's that skilled at balancing a budget, and how do you know he's even been personally in charge of the P&L anyway? And as for international deals, you think that opening condos in Seoul and golf courses in Dubai translates to multinational trade agreements and treaties?

His real estate business (which he inherited, btw) has had it's ups and downs, for sure, and the success that it's had as well as all of the success that he's had personally outside of real estate has been largely (in the case of his r-e business) or entirely (in the case of his reality-show business) the result of leveraging his celebrity. That's going to mean nothing in the world of international diplomacy. It might even be a hinderance. Imagine what you'd think of them if Great Britain or France elected a bombastic, billionaire tabloid- and reality-tv star with no political experience as president. You'd think they were idiots.

Whether you think Obama is qualified or not, it sounds an awful lot like you've talked yourself into believing that whatever it is that Trump brings to the table is somehow transferrable to the Oval Office. I hope he doesnt' win, and I don't think he will, but if he does, I hope you're right, because I don't see it.



2015-11-04 6:06 PM
in reply to: dmiller5

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Trump

I covered my bubble with tin foil and I stockpile rifles and freeze dried apricots.  I'm good.

2015-11-04 6:41 PM
in reply to: ejshowers

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Trump
Originally posted by ejshowers

Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.




Thanks for jumping in and being a voice of reason. Phew!

I remember hearing a lot of this back-slapping and over confidence from a lot of these same voices back in 2008 and 2012.

Did I miss something. Seems the overwhelming tone of the thread is disdain for the Gang O' Pu**ies and Trump. That sound you are mistaking for back slapping is face palming!
2015-11-04 6:44 PM
in reply to: dmiller5

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Trump
Originally posted by dmiller5

Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.

This is what happens when the only thing people read is fox news, other murdoch "news" sources, and crazy conservative blogs. They live in the bubble.



You realize that salon.com is the left leaning equivalent of watching Hannity, right?
2015-11-04 7:00 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Trump
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by ejshowers
Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.

Thanks for jumping in and being a voice of reason. Phew! I remember hearing a lot of this back-slapping and over confidence from a lot of these same voices back in 2008 and 2012.

For the record, I wasn't here in 2008.  lol

btw, if I'm over confident about Trump, then doesn't that make you equally over confident about Hillary?  



For me, it's less about being confident in Hillary than about being confident that no one among the GOP candidates makes me too worried. The GOP is still spouting the same tired rhetoric that lost them the last two elections (blah blah gay marriage, blah blah abortion, blah blah Obama is bad and might be a Muslim). Yawn. The same rhetoric that their OWN PARTY told them had to change if they were going to win the White House in '16. Trump might package it a little differently, but it's still the same old story. To the extent that he even has a story at all.
2015-11-04 7:32 PM
in reply to: jmk-brooklyn

User image

Expert
2180
2000100252525
Boise, Idaho
Subject: RE: Trump

I concur.  I just don't get how presumably educated, informed voters can listen to Trump spew his gibberish and think he has even a remote chance of getting the Republican nod, much less a room at 1600 Penn Blvd.  The Democrats haven't even BEGUN to attack the Repub front runners.  They don't have to-they'll implode all on there own.   What will Trumps speeches sound like now that he's NOT leading in the polls.  How is Rubio gonna explain his misuse of Florida Party charge/credit cards.  And Cruz.....we'll he's just Ted.  He's disliked so completely that the establishment Repubs will vote for Hillary before they back Cruz. 

Meanwhile the 'Select" Committee only strengthened Hillary in the eyes of moderate Democrats.  We're talking about the wife of Teflon Bill, here. 

 



2015-11-04 7:40 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by jeffnboise

I concur.  I just don't get how presumably educated, informed voters can listen to Trump spew his gibberish and think he has even a remote chance of getting the Republican nod, much less a room at 1600 Penn Blvd.  The Democrats haven't even BEGUN to attack the Repub front runners.  They don't have to-they'll implode all on there own.   What will Trumps speeches sound like now that he's NOT leading in the polls.  How is Rubio gonna explain his misuse of Florida Party charge/credit cards.  And Cruz.....we'll he's just Ted.  He's disliked so completely that the establishment Repubs will vote for Hillary before they back Cruz. 

Meanwhile the 'Select" Committee only strengthened Hillary in the eyes of moderate Democrats.  We're talking about the wife of Teflon Bill, here. 

 

I will vote for Trump just so I don't have to vote for Clinton.......I am legion.  You are crazy if you think I'm not.



Edited by Left Brain 2015-11-04 7:40 PM
2015-11-04 8:30 PM
in reply to: dmiller5

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by dmiller5

Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.

This is what happens when the only thing people read is fox news, other murdoch "news" sources, and crazy conservative blogs. They live in the bubble.

ok, coming from you this really makes me laugh.  People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.  :-P

2015-11-04 8:41 PM
in reply to: jmk-brooklyn

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

[Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn Far less than McCain/Romney or far less than Trump? Or both?

I was referring to far less than McCain/Romney, but I don't think it's much of a stretch to argue that Obama (in 2008) was less qualified than Trump is now either.
The point being that qualifications for the job aren't as important as many would like to think.  it's a popularity contest and that means whoever has the most enthusiasm is typically the winner.

I mostly agree with you about it being a popularity contest, up to a point. I think popularity gets you a ticket to the dance, but I don't think it wins elections by itself. I think it's funny, though, that the "Qualifications aren't that important" argument switches sides every election, depending on which party has the "less 'qualified'" candidate. You can bet that when the GOP was running veteran Senator McCain, war hero and political lifer, against Junior Senator Obama they weren't singing the "qualifications aren't that important" song. On the contrary-- it was, "This guy's only been a senator for five minutes! Now he wants to be PRESIDENT?!" Now that their two top candidates have a combined total of zero days in public office of any kind, suddenly, it's "Qualifications? We don't need no stinking qualifications!!"

We need a business leader who understands how to balance a budget and do international deals that actually benefit our country.

I guess in many ways I'm becoming a single issue voter myself, but the issue is the economy.  lol

And what's your evidence that Trump has done either of those things? He's gone bankrupt a number of times, which doesn't suggest, on it's face, that he's that skilled at balancing a budget, and how do you know he's even been personally in charge of the P&L anyway? And as for international deals, you think that opening condos in Seoul and golf courses in Dubai translates to multinational trade agreements and treaties? His real estate business (which he inherited, btw) has had it's ups and downs, for sure, and the success that it's had as well as all of the success that he's had personally outside of real estate has been largely (in the case of his r-e business) or entirely (in the case of his reality-show business) the result of leveraging his celebrity. That's going to mean nothing in the world of international diplomacy. It might even be a hinderance. Imagine what you'd think of them if Great Britain or France elected a bombastic, billionaire tabloid- and reality-tv star with no political experience as president. You'd think they were idiots. Whether you think Obama is qualified or not, it sounds an awful lot like you've talked yourself into believing that whatever it is that Trump brings to the table is somehow transferrable to the Oval Office. I hope he doesnt' win, and I don't think he will, but if he does, I hope you're right, because I don't see it.

If you're going to bag on him at least be truthful about it.  He's never gone bankrupt, he had businesses in Atlantic City that went BK as did all casinos there.  From what I read he was the first to realize they were failing and punch out while many others stuck around and really took a bath.  In comparison to committing a felony offense of sending classified information through a private email server (that will likely never be prosecuted) I'd say this is nothing.

He inherited $200m and turned it into a $7-10B realestate empire.  So, it's ridiculous to say he inherited his business in an effort to discredit his business acumen.

I agree being a celebrity means nothing internationally, but in comparison to Obama (who is horrible internationally) I'll take Trump all day long.

btw, none of truly know what any of the candidates are going to bring to the office.  Based on experience we kind of know what Hillary will bring and we kind of know what the GOPe folks will bring, and that's exactly what the country does not need.

2015-11-04 8:44 PM
in reply to: jmk-brooklyn

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by ejshowers
Originally posted by Stacers

I'm reading this thread in a state of complete fascination. It's like we live in a different country. Am I missing something? 

Disclaimer: I'm an independent. I've voted about 50/50 repub/dem in presidential elections, so I'm admittedly out of touch with the way people on either side think - I'm pretty moderate - fiscal conservative, liberal on social issues. 

That said, you're constantly referring to how the Democrats are fighting a losing battle because Obama is such a failure, and the economy is so terrible, and Trump is going to take it all so easily. I feel like we must be talking about completely different people.

My husband and I both own small businesses. He owns a home-building company and has a number of employees. Life for us was REALLY rough when Obama took office in 2008. His business tanked, my business tanked, we almost lost our health insurance because we're self-employed and had no corporate policy. Our friends who had corporate gigs were getting laid off from jobs and losing their homes to foreclosure left and right. I can't even count the number of folks I know who had to take unemployment for an extended period, or file for bankruptcy. We've managed to hang on and have both grown our businesses. We have decent health insurance. We have a home. Things are good right now - NOT gangbusters like 2006 (and I wouldn't want to go back to that, because that kind of bubble isn't healthy), but good enough. All of the aforementioned friends who lost jobs and struggled, after seven years of Obama in office, have steady jobs and have been able to find homes or rentals and get their feet back under them. None of these people consider themselves to be worse off post-Obama than they were in 2008. 

Also, you keep stating that everyone is underestimating Trump and that you "feel sorry" for the Democrats. What I think people underestimate is the distaste moderate voters have for the current state of the Republican party. It's a joke. These guys are all a joke. Did you see them embarrass themselves with the Benghazi hearing last week? What a waste of resources! They're all caricatures, and Trump is the worst. I would be embarrassed to be an American if he were our president. I don't like Clinton, and I don't agree with a lot of Sanders' platform, but at least these guys can have an intelligent conversation on a public stage. I don't know yet who will get my vote, but it certainly won't be Trump, if he gets the nod from the Republicans.

Thanks for jumping in and being a voice of reason. Phew! I remember hearing a lot of this back-slapping and over confidence from a lot of these same voices back in 2008 and 2012.

For the record, I wasn't here in 2008.  lol

btw, if I'm over confident about Trump, then doesn't that make you equally over confident about Hillary?  

For me, it's less about being confident in Hillary than about being confident that no one among the GOP candidates makes me too worried. The GOP is still spouting the same tired rhetoric that lost them the last two elections (blah blah gay marriage, blah blah abortion, blah blah Obama is bad and might be a Muslim). Yawn. The same rhetoric that their OWN PARTY told them had to change if they were going to win the White House in '16. Trump might package it a little differently, but it's still the same old story. To the extent that he even has a story at all.

I haven't seen anyone talking about gay marriage other than interviewers trying to paint them into a corner.  Nobodies running on gay marriage or abortion that I'm aware of.  We're even in the primary season where people are typically way over into the far right land, but most are fairly libertarian on most social issues that I've seen.  I know with Trump he's probably the most socially Liberal candidate that's ever run for the Republican nomination which is exactly what everyone has been telling the Republicans they need to do.

2015-11-04 8:58 PM
in reply to: jeffnboise

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by jeffnboise

I concur.  I just don't get how presumably educated, informed voters can listen to Trump spew his gibberish and think he has even a remote chance of getting the Republican nod, much less a room at 1600 Penn Blvd.  The Democrats haven't even BEGUN to attack the Repub front runners.  They don't have to-they'll implode all on there own.   What will Trumps speeches sound like now that he's NOT leading in the polls.  How is Rubio gonna explain his misuse of Florida Party charge/credit cards.  And Cruz.....we'll he's just Ted.  He's disliked so completely that the establishment Repubs will vote for Hillary before they back Cruz. 

Meanwhile the 'Select" Committee only strengthened Hillary in the eyes of moderate Democrats.  We're talking about the wife of Teflon Bill, here. 

 

Did you just call me dumb?   (kidding)

For the record, I think the same thing about Hillary supporters so no offense taken.

I agree that Cruz is probably not going to happen and Rubio is a joke so he's going nowhere.  I'd say the Democrats (er, I mean media) has been attacking Trump with everything they got for months and it hasn't touched him.  On the contrary I can also say that nobody has even BEGUN to attack Hillary and she's likely not looking forward to it.  With the email stuff, even if she isn't prosecuted she has to defend her serious error in judgement by transmitting classified information that potentially put many American lives at risk.

Bill is a huge asset to Hillary for sure, but I don't think even he can polish her up enough to drag her over the finish line.



2015-11-04 9:06 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

btw, latest polls shows Carson dropping like a rock after the last debate.

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TR130/type/smallest/filters/PARTY_ID_:2/dates/20150808-20151103/collapsed/false/spotlight/1

I read an interesting article about Carson's whole campaign.  I've always felt it seemed weird but I'm not sure if this is a hit piece article or actually has some truth to it.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/11/ben-carson-running-for-president.html

I do know that many candidates run knowing they have no chance to win, but they want to build their brand to make more money on the speaking circuit.  "former presidential candidate XXX" for the rest of their life.

2015-11-04 11:15 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Trump
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jeffnboise

I concur.  I just don't get how presumably educated, informed voters can listen to Trump spew his gibberish and think he has even a remote chance of getting the Republican nod, much less a room at 1600 Penn Blvd.  The Democrats haven't even BEGUN to attack the Repub front runners.  They don't have to-they'll implode all on there own.   What will Trumps speeches sound like now that he's NOT leading in the polls.  How is Rubio gonna explain his misuse of Florida Party charge/credit cards.  And Cruz.....we'll he's just Ted.  He's disliked so completely that the establishment Repubs will vote for Hillary before they back Cruz. 

Meanwhile the 'Select" Committee only strengthened Hillary in the eyes of moderate Democrats.  We're talking about the wife of Teflon Bill, here. 

 

Did you just call me dumb?   (kidding)

On the contrary I can also say that nobody has even BEGUN to attack Hillary and she's likely not looking forward to it.



You can't possibly be serious.
2015-11-04 11:35 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Trump
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

[Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn Far less than McCain/Romney or far less than Trump? Or both?

I was referring to far less than McCain/Romney, but I don't think it's much of a stretch to argue that Obama (in 2008) was less qualified than Trump is now either.
The point being that qualifications for the job aren't as important as many would like to think.  it's a popularity contest and that means whoever has the most enthusiasm is typically the winner.

I mostly agree with you about it being a popularity contest, up to a point. I think popularity gets you a ticket to the dance, but I don't think it wins elections by itself. I think it's funny, though, that the "Qualifications aren't that important" argument switches sides every election, depending on which party has the "less 'qualified'" candidate. You can bet that when the GOP was running veteran Senator McCain, war hero and political lifer, against Junior Senator Obama they weren't singing the "qualifications aren't that important" song. On the contrary-- it was, "This guy's only been a senator for five minutes! Now he wants to be PRESIDENT?!" Now that their two top candidates have a combined total of zero days in public office of any kind, suddenly, it's "Qualifications? We don't need no stinking qualifications!!"

We need a business leader who understands how to balance a budget and do international deals that actually benefit our country.

I guess in many ways I'm becoming a single issue voter myself, but the issue is the economy.  lol

And what's your evidence that Trump has done either of those things? He's gone bankrupt a number of times, which doesn't suggest, on it's face, that he's that skilled at balancing a budget, and how do you know he's even been personally in charge of the P&L anyway? And as for international deals, you think that opening condos in Seoul and golf courses in Dubai translates to multinational trade agreements and treaties? His real estate business (which he inherited, btw) has had it's ups and downs, for sure, and the success that it's had as well as all of the success that he's had personally outside of real estate has been largely (in the case of his r-e business) or entirely (in the case of his reality-show business) the result of leveraging his celebrity. That's going to mean nothing in the world of international diplomacy. It might even be a hinderance. Imagine what you'd think of them if Great Britain or France elected a bombastic, billionaire tabloid- and reality-tv star with no political experience as president. You'd think they were idiots. Whether you think Obama is qualified or not, it sounds an awful lot like you've talked yourself into believing that whatever it is that Trump brings to the table is somehow transferrable to the Oval Office. I hope he doesnt' win, and I don't think he will, but if he does, I hope you're right, because I don't see it.

If you're going to bag on him at least be truthful about it.  He's never gone bankrupt, he had businesses in Atlantic City that went BK as did all casinos there.  From what I read he was the first to realize they were failing and punch out while many others stuck around and really took a bath.  In comparison to committing a felony offense of sending classified information through a private email server (that will likely never be prosecuted) I'd say this is nothing.

He inherited $200m and turned it into a $7-10B realestate empire.  So, it's ridiculous to say he inherited his business in an effort to discredit his business acumen.

I agree being a celebrity means nothing internationally, but in comparison to Obama (who is horrible internationally) I'll take Trump all day long.

btw, none of truly know what any of the candidates are going to bring to the office.  Based on experience we kind of know what Hillary will bring and we kind of know what the GOPe folks will bring, and that's exactly what the country does not need.


I never said he had no business acumen, but he's not a finance guy or a self-made guy. He took a huge stake and turned it into an even bigger stake. Good for him. You assume, basically, that because he's rich that he knows how to manage the economy of an entire nation, and I think that's a UUUUUUUUUUUUGE stretch. (See what I did there?) I'd much rather have an economist or someone who understands the workings of a global economy. That's not what Trump is. He builds golf courses and hotels with gold toilets.
2015-11-05 8:44 AM
in reply to: jmk-brooklyn

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn
Originally posted by tuwood

[Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn Far less than McCain/Romney or far less than Trump? Or both?

I was referring to far less than McCain/Romney, but I don't think it's much of a stretch to argue that Obama (in 2008) was less qualified than Trump is now either.
The point being that qualifications for the job aren't as important as many would like to think.  it's a popularity contest and that means whoever has the most enthusiasm is typically the winner.

I mostly agree with you about it being a popularity contest, up to a point. I think popularity gets you a ticket to the dance, but I don't think it wins elections by itself. I think it's funny, though, that the "Qualifications aren't that important" argument switches sides every election, depending on which party has the "less 'qualified'" candidate. You can bet that when the GOP was running veteran Senator McCain, war hero and political lifer, against Junior Senator Obama they weren't singing the "qualifications aren't that important" song. On the contrary-- it was, "This guy's only been a senator for five minutes! Now he wants to be PRESIDENT?!" Now that their two top candidates have a combined total of zero days in public office of any kind, suddenly, it's "Qualifications? We don't need no stinking qualifications!!"

We need a business leader who understands how to balance a budget and do international deals that actually benefit our country.

I guess in many ways I'm becoming a single issue voter myself, but the issue is the economy.  lol

And what's your evidence that Trump has done either of those things? He's gone bankrupt a number of times, which doesn't suggest, on it's face, that he's that skilled at balancing a budget, and how do you know he's even been personally in charge of the P&L anyway? And as for international deals, you think that opening condos in Seoul and golf courses in Dubai translates to multinational trade agreements and treaties? His real estate business (which he inherited, btw) has had it's ups and downs, for sure, and the success that it's had as well as all of the success that he's had personally outside of real estate has been largely (in the case of his r-e business) or entirely (in the case of his reality-show business) the result of leveraging his celebrity. That's going to mean nothing in the world of international diplomacy. It might even be a hinderance. Imagine what you'd think of them if Great Britain or France elected a bombastic, billionaire tabloid- and reality-tv star with no political experience as president. You'd think they were idiots. Whether you think Obama is qualified or not, it sounds an awful lot like you've talked yourself into believing that whatever it is that Trump brings to the table is somehow transferrable to the Oval Office. I hope he doesnt' win, and I don't think he will, but if he does, I hope you're right, because I don't see it.

If you're going to bag on him at least be truthful about it.  He's never gone bankrupt, he had businesses in Atlantic City that went BK as did all casinos there.  From what I read he was the first to realize they were failing and punch out while many others stuck around and really took a bath.  In comparison to committing a felony offense of sending classified information through a private email server (that will likely never be prosecuted) I'd say this is nothing.

He inherited $200m and turned it into a $7-10B realestate empire.  So, it's ridiculous to say he inherited his business in an effort to discredit his business acumen.

I agree being a celebrity means nothing internationally, but in comparison to Obama (who is horrible internationally) I'll take Trump all day long.

btw, none of truly know what any of the candidates are going to bring to the office.  Based on experience we kind of know what Hillary will bring and we kind of know what the GOPe folks will bring, and that's exactly what the country does not need.

I never said he had no business acumen, but he's not a finance guy or a self-made guy. He took a huge stake and turned it into an even bigger stake. Good for him. You assume, basically, that because he's rich that he knows how to manage the economy of an entire nation, and I think that's a UUUUUUUUUUUUGE stretch. (See what I did there?) I'd much rather have an economist or someone who understands the workings of a global economy. That's not what Trump is. He builds golf courses and hotels with gold toilets.

So multiple choice.  Who do you think would be better suited to run the largest economy in the world?

1. A college professor/state senator/US senator who did little more than balance his personal checkbook all that time.

2. A multi-billionaire executive who owns and manages hundreds of properties and has tens of thousands of employees.

3. A lifelong political spouse (governor/president)/Senator/Secretary of State.

Of those three, we can certainly argue various qualifications but there's no rational person on earth who can say that Donald isn't the most qualified person in this race to fix the economy and jobs issues.  Obama doesn't have a clue about the economy and it's been showing for 8 years of doing nothing more than prolonging the stupid Bush QE plans to buy our way into prosperity through destroying the dollar.  
Clinton doesn't even think there is an economy or jobs problem, so she's most certainly not going to fix anything.

I haven't seen any national polls yet, but inside the Republican party Trump is polling better than all the other candidates combined on the economy.  I know Democrats love to paint trump as an idiot who doesn't know anything, but I thought you'd find this quote interesting:

2015-11-05 9:16 AM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Trump

1 or 3

running a for profit business, and running the government, are extraordinarily different.  The government is legally not allowed to really make money.



2015-11-05 9:25 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by dmiller5

1 or 3

running a for profit business, and running the government, are extraordinarily different.  The government is legally not allowed to really make money.

Correct....but the Govt. is allowed to save money, and it is allowed to balance it's budget....something that would REALLY benefit all of us.  I tend to agree that we need someone in that office with come business acumen, particularly when it comes to foreign policy in this "global economy".  I don't see many candidates (actually none) besides Trump that fit that bill. 

If my choices are either Clinton or Sanders........and Trump.  I'll vote for Trump.



Edited by Left Brain 2015-11-05 9:26 AM
2015-11-05 9:29 AM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by dmiller5

1 or 3

running a for profit business, and running the government, are extraordinarily different.  The government is legally not allowed to really make money.

Correct....but the Govt. is allowed to save money, and it is allowed to balance it's budget....something that would REALLY benefit all of us.  I tend to agree that we need someone in that office with come business acumen, particularly when it comes to foreign policy in this "global economy".  I don't see many candidates (actually none) besides Trump that fit that bill. 

If my choices are either Clinton or Sanders........and Trump.  I'll vote for Trump.

hes a joke

2015-11-05 9:40 AM
in reply to: dmiller5

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by dmiller5

Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by dmiller5

1 or 3

running a for profit business, and running the government, are extraordinarily different.  The government is legally not allowed to really make money.

Correct....but the Govt. is allowed to save money, and it is allowed to balance it's budget....something that would REALLY benefit all of us.  I tend to agree that we need someone in that office with come business acumen, particularly when it comes to foreign policy in this "global economy".  I don't see many candidates (actually none) besides Trump that fit that bill. 

If my choices are either Clinton or Sanders........and Trump.  I'll vote for Trump.

hes a joke

Ok.....but Clinton is a liar who just constantly plays political games (one of the worst of the lot as far as I'm concerned.....I'm done with career politicians), and Sanders is a dreamer (with NO chance of being the Dem candidate)......so I'll take the joke with good business sense every time.  Besides, it'll be fun.

2015-11-05 9:46 AM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Trump

Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by dmiller5

Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by dmiller5

1 or 3

running a for profit business, and running the government, are extraordinarily different.  The government is legally not allowed to really make money.

Correct....but the Govt. is allowed to save money, and it is allowed to balance it's budget....something that would REALLY benefit all of us.  I tend to agree that we need someone in that office with come business acumen, particularly when it comes to foreign policy in this "global economy".  I don't see many candidates (actually none) besides Trump that fit that bill. 

If my choices are either Clinton or Sanders........and Trump.  I'll vote for Trump.

hes a joke

Ok.....but Clinton is a liar who just constantly plays political games (one of the worst of the lot as far as I'm concerned.....I'm done with career politicians), and Sanders is a dreamer (with NO chance of being the Dem candidate)......so I'll take the joke with good business sense every time.  Besides, it'll be fun.

no I meant you LB :P

New Thread
Other Resources The Political Joe » Trump Rss Feed  
 
 
of 40