Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread (Page 55)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller |
Reply CLOSED
|
|
2011-02-21 9:39 AM in reply to: #3006331 |
Expert 1143 Wellington, Florida | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread Slayers got this in the bag!!! |
|
2011-02-21 12:14 PM in reply to: #3362339 |
Master 3546 Millersville, MD | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread dfrash_1 - 2011-02-18 5:31 PM Josh- you mentioned run volume at 50 miles /wk. Is that what you guys are doing now or next month? I currently have two a days every day except for the day I do my long ride. Plus 4 days also have gym/strength workouts. If I add more running now something would have to give. My guess is you'll say trade a gym workout for another run or leave as is for now? Agreed with the others who have already cautioned about 50mpw. I was not prescribing that as a general number for everyone (there's no such thing)... I was responding to a specific question about achiving a sub 4 hour marathon and having the fitness to not walk the whole thing. I also suggested slowly building to that, something that could take many months (and we don't have many months until the race at this point). All that to say, the advice I was giving was not prescriptive to where anyone should be right now, and probably is not where most people are right now. It was, however, where I was at this point in the past during IM prep for a 3:32 marathon. But I was also at that point 7 monhts before the race, instead of the less-than-4 we are at now. In other words, I had built up a big running base before my IM prep started, so that I could go into run maintenance mode at 150-170 mile months, while focusing on the bike (and eventually the swim) in the months leading up to the IM. That's one approach, but certainly not the only approach, and not necessarily the best approach depending on your goals, background, schedule, recovery ability, genetics, etc.. |
2011-02-21 1:06 PM in reply to: #3365292 |
Member 319 Seattle, WA | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread I am living proof of why you should definitely NOT start running 50 mpw without slowly building to that mileage. After my HIM in August, I had 9 weeks until the Portland Marathon in October. I aggressively built from probably only 20 mpw to 50ish (one week I even got to 60), and while I finished the marathon, I was sidelined for 6 weeks completely with a stress fracture. I'm building back up to decent mileage again (currently around 25), but the point is: with the race this close, risking injury by jumping in run mileage without building to it could possibly mean a DNS at CdA. |
2011-02-21 2:02 PM in reply to: #3365379 |
Veteran 140 Longmont, Colorado | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread mango6383 - 2011-02-21 12:06 PM OK, I'll bite...what's DFL?I am living proof of why you should definitely NOT start running 50 mpw without slowly building to that mileage. After my HIM in August, I had 9 weeks until the Portland Marathon in October. I aggressively built from probably only 20 mpw to 50ish (one week I even got to 60), and while I finished the marathon, I was sidelined for 6 weeks completely with a stress fracture. I'm building back up to decent mileage again (currently around 25), but the point is: with the race this close, risking injury by jumping in run mileage without building to it could possibly mean a DNS at CdA. |
2011-02-21 3:30 PM in reply to: #3365481 |
Expert 1207 Liberty Lake, WA | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread cam111 - 2011-02-21 1:02 PM mango6383 - 2011-02-21 12:06 PM OK, I'll bite...what's DFL?I am living proof of why you should definitely NOT start running 50 mpw without slowly building to that mileage. After my HIM in August, I had 9 weeks until the Portland Marathon in October. I aggressively built from probably only 20 mpw to 50ish (one week I even got to 60), and while I finished the marathon, I was sidelined for 6 weeks completely with a stress fracture. I'm building back up to decent mileage again (currently around 25), but the point is: with the race this close, risking injury by jumping in run mileage without building to it could possibly mean a DNS at CdA. Dead F-ing Last |
2011-02-21 4:09 PM in reply to: #3364430 |
Master 3546 Millersville, MD | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread kstater39 - 2011-02-20 9:02 PM cam111 - 2011-02-18 11:00 AM I'm sure this is a question of the ages...how do I run faster?.. My z2 pace is around 11:30/mile while a 10:00/mile puts me into z4, which is uncomfortable but I can maintain for about an hour i CAN assure you that I do not have the knowledge base or the speed of everyone else on this group. However, I do have the experience that you do with naturally being a 12 minute mile runner. I came from no athletic background. Rode bulls in college and lifted weights all through life. However, when I started tri'ing at 39 I had never ran more than 1.5 miles strait. I would agree with what has been said that it is simply miles, speed work thrown in, and add two big additions - patience and realistic expectations. Again, I have no great story. I looked like I was athletic when I started. I have lost 15-20 pounds and look "skinny" now but weight was not my issue. I do not have a heart issue, etc. I was just born slow. However, Saturday I ran a half marathon at a 1:47 or close to a 8 min/mile pace. I never thought this was possible. However, it took 2.5 years to do it and miles and miles. I do not do the volume that alot of folks on the board do. My body is still adjusting to more miles. Also I am still learning what works for me. I just wanted to let you know that people like us do get faster if we train smart like has been said. A coach has done that for me. However, you can do it on your own if you have the time to learn how to coach yourself. However, BE PATIENT. Take each accomplishment as it comes and enjoy it. Do not get pissed when you run a 9:30 pace at zn 4 for a 5 k because you wanted a 9 min pace if you had only a 9:30 in the tank. Be happy with what you accomplish and train smart. Train like you are training to win Kona but only compete against your yesterday or last year or whatever. But train against yourself. There is no shame in a 12 min pace if it was truly all you had in the tank. I can tell you this - if Chrissy Welington pushes harder than what I pushed Saturday for my PR then God Bless her she earns her victories. Because I had nothing left in me, near me, or anywhere around me. To many people what is important is the number 2:40 marathon etc. I think what matters is how you suck the all you have out through a smart well thought out plan that allows you to effeciently win your goal - which in our case is swimming/biking/running as close as possible to our maximum potential to each and still finish strong. Who really cares about the number unless you are one of the gifted ones who have the ability and the discipline to really strive for a kona spot. The rest of us are competing against ourself - the rest is a contest(Imho) Great post! |
|
2011-02-21 4:20 PM in reply to: #3006331 |
Champion 6503 NOVA - Ironic for an Endurance Athlete | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread Josh, You are dead on about running long runs too fast (too close to race pace), and other runs too slowly (just a little faster than race pace). This advice is sound, but as an easily injured triathlete, I find that a one hour speed, tempo and track workouts cause more issues (for me) than a 3 hour slow run. n=1 |
2011-02-21 5:18 PM in reply to: #3365668 |
Expert 694 WA | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread T in Liberty Lake - 2011-02-21 1:30 AM OK, I'll bite...what's DFL?Dead F-ing Last LOL!!!...I didn't know what it meant either, but makes total sense. |
2011-02-21 5:19 PM in reply to: #3360692 |
Expert 694 WA | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread JoshKaptur - 2011-02-17 3:14 AM RunRene - 2011-02-17 6:10 PM Since they are "Tri" shoes they have a hole at the bottom so water drains out if it rains or if you get out of the swim really wet. You forgot the third reason tri shoes have drain holes. LOL!! Of course!...I have tried but wasn't able to. I didn't know you could get penalized for it. |
2011-02-21 6:25 PM in reply to: #3006331 |
Extreme Veteran 492 Austin, TX | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread To run a sub-4 marathon, bike lots! It doesn't matter how well you can run if you get off the bike wasted. Don't get me wrong, you need to put in the run miles but all the run miles in the world won't mean anything unless you come off the bike fresh. |
2011-02-21 6:34 PM in reply to: #3364865 |
New user 35 Cave Creek, Az | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread Updated my logs from my Feb 7th forward spreadsheets (didn't bother logging last month). Thanks for commenting. I won't bump my running based on what everyone has said but will cut my gym work and add more bike since I need more hill speed work. Out sick and rain spoiled this weekend some but will be back hitting it tomorrow! Thanks for the helpful comments! |
|
2011-02-21 6:37 PM in reply to: #3365904 |
Elite 3495 SE | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread Come off the bike fresh? Ha thats a good one. Yes ride lots and yes ride hard, but don't expect that just because you did both of them in training you will come off the bike fresh after 112 miles. At least not me, and I like to ride alot and hard. Having said that, sub 4 hours is doable for quite a few with proper training and race pacing. Its 9:0x pace which for me is manageable if I follow the plan. |
2011-02-21 7:02 PM in reply to: #3365904 |
Pro 3883 Woodstock,GA | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread rbalazs - 2011-02-21 7:25 PM To run a sub-4 marathon, bike lots! It doesn't matter how well you can run if you get off the bike wasted. Don't get me wrong, you need to put in the run miles but all the run miles in the world won't mean anything unless you come off the bike fresh. Absolutely true! If you can get to a point where you ride at ~70-75% FTP (TSS=~300) for a 112 mile ride you are going to have a great chance to run well off the bike assuming you executed your nutrition plan correctly. |
2011-02-21 8:22 PM in reply to: #3365954 |
Elite 3495 SE | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread Rocketman I'd ask for your definitions of fresh and well. If yours and mine are the same, you will get no argument. Any normal AGer that feels fresh after 112 miles gets mad props from Slayer. After TSS of 300 and IF of 70-75%, if you are feeling fresh and running well, then Coggan's tables are not too far off as they seem to be in my case (I think my FTP is not the best predictor for 5 hour rides-5 hour rides are). I parlayed a tss 256.2 and If .705 to a 3:53 IM mary at IMFL this year (VI 1.05). And you know what, I never felt fresh and well. Not like complete and utter carp yes, fresh and well, no! Bottom line is you need to not neglect any of the sports, but go heavy on bike and run if possible, learn your nutrition/hydration, and PACING!!!! Did I mention PACING? http://tpks.ws/MkrO http://home.trainingpeaks.com/articles/cycling/normalized-power,-intensity-factor,-training-stress-score.aspx |
2011-02-21 9:01 PM in reply to: #3006331 |
Veteran 262 Clarksvile | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread Ladies and Gentlemen please let me introduce “BLACK MOMBA” (Speed Concept 7.0). I took her out Friday and let me tell you I was flying. My eyes watered up because of the speed. Now granted I was going down a huge hill without my glasses, that’s beside the point. I think I’m going to push my Bike pace prediction to 23 or even 25 mph with periods of supersonic. (Black Momba.jpg) Attachments ---------------- Black Momba.jpg (58KB - 12 downloads) |
2011-02-21 9:15 PM in reply to: #3366121 |
Regular 183 Parker, Colorado | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread tribean - 2011-02-21 8:01 PM Ladies and Gentlemen please let me introduce “BLACK MOMBA” (Speed Concept 7.0). Whoa, that's an imposing looking machine, congratulations! I'll be sure to move right as you go flying past. Those rims do look awfully small against that huge frame, though, I think you're going to need some 808s to balance out the look. |
|
2011-02-21 9:35 PM in reply to: #3006331 |
Veteran 140 Longmont, Colorado | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread With all of the great posts and advice there seems to be a common element of guidance (almost caution) for "nutrition" but not a lot of specifics. Are there good references/resources that a 1st timer would benefit from? Thanks! |
2011-02-21 10:47 PM in reply to: #3366172 |
Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread After TSS of 300 and IF of 70-75%, if you are feeling fresh and running well, then Coggan's tables are not too far off as they seem to be in my case (I think my FTP is not the best predictor for 5 hour rides-5 hour rides are). I parlayed a tss 256.2 and If .705 to a 3:53 IM mary at IMFL this year (VI 1.05). And you know what, I never felt fresh and well. Not like complete and utter carp yes, fresh and well, no! Sounds like me. On my last HIM I had a TSS of 200, IF of 85%. My run was ok but faded in the last 2 miles. For me, hitting 300 TSS on a full IM would result in a terrible run. I think I'll be targeting the 250 ballpark like you mentioned. Keep in mind that Coggan's book is very cycling-centric as he has dealt with pro cyclists more than triathletes. So I'd definitely treat "fresh" as a very subjective term. |
2011-02-22 5:48 AM in reply to: #3366172 |
Expert 1207 Liberty Lake, WA | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread cam111 - 2011-02-21 8:35 PM With all of the great posts and advice there seems to be a common element of guidance (almost caution) for "nutrition" but not a lot of specifics. Are there good references/resources that a 1st timer would benefit from? Thanks! The easy answer is... Have a plan, and practice your plan. Everyone is different, what works for some may not work for you. The following is my bike nutrition plan from 2010. If you want to see my full race day plan you can find it in my training log on 5/10/2010. (FYI - I'm just over 6-foot and race around 200 pounds. Smaller people my not need as much salt in their plan.) Nutrition On The Bike |
2011-02-22 5:50 AM in reply to: #3006331 |
Elite 3495 SE | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread tribean! so hot! enjoy it. as to nutrition, there is loads on the net you can read up on. PBNnutrition on (Brian?) on twitter/slowtwitch is a firm that gives nutrition breakdowns for the pros and consults with age groupers. for me the days and nights before I eat low fiber, plenty of carbs (good kinds) and lean proteins and higher sodium the night before I bang 1000 cals at around 1-2 am and try and go back to sleep as much as my nerves allow. prerace-a light breakfast (bagel/muffin, bananas/muscle milk shake <same as above for night snack> My nutrition during the bike is pretty simple. two 3 hours bottles of a carbo pro/powerbar peform mixture with some hammer endurolytes mixed in (looking into salt tabs this year as a substitute for endurolytes). I take in about 325 cals per hour. You can mix as you like. Sometimes I may take a gel or gu bloks if i want something to chew on. Run is a gel every 3 miles and water or perform until mile 15-18 then i go to coke only. Never go back to the water or perform. I did this in a rush but wanted to get it out there to get you a start. You def need to tweak things for your size, sweating, etc. Edited by phatknot 2011-02-22 5:52 AM |
2011-02-22 7:00 AM in reply to: #3366137 |
Veteran 262 Clarksvile | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread coxma22 - 2011-02-21 8:15 PM tribean - 2011-02-21 8:01 PM Ladies and Gentlemen please let me introduce “BLACK MOMBA” (Speed Concept 7.0). Whoa, that's an imposing looking machine, congratulations! I'll be sure to move right as you go flying past. Those rims do look awfully small against that huge frame, though, I think you're going to need some 808s to balance out the look.I Concur Matt. It’s almost as if she's naked without some 808s, or maybe a 404 in the Front and 808 in the back. I think I'm going to rent some wheels for 70.3 CA and IMCDA. I’m trying to find someone here locally to rent from but can’t find anyone. This is Colorado I know someone does. |
|
2011-02-22 9:02 AM in reply to: #3365741 |
Master 3546 Millersville, MD | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread pga_mike - 2011-02-21 5:20 PM Josh, You are dead on about running long runs too fast (too close to race pace), and other runs too slowly (just a little faster than race pace). This advice is sound, but as an easily injured triathlete, I find that a one hour speed, tempo and track workouts cause more issues (for me) than a 3 hour slow run. n=1 Yep - this is fundamentally why the BarryP approach has you building volume through frequent but slow runs... the best of both worlds (allows you to get your mileage way up without any seriously taxing (from an injury risk standpoint) runs). |
2011-02-22 9:05 AM in reply to: #3365904 |
Master 3546 Millersville, MD | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread rbalazs - 2011-02-21 7:25 PM To run a sub-4 marathon, bike lots! It doesn't matter how well you can run if you get off the bike wasted. Don't get me wrong, you need to put in the run miles but all the run miles in the world won't mean anything unless you come off the bike fresh. Agreed with this... an oft' quoted slowtwitchism is "it's all about the run because the run is last, which is why it's all about the bike". Basically to really nail and IM you need to be in superb bike and run shape. Though as I've said previously... I think you can get the same (or better) fitness by biking HARD (and lots, if possible)... whereas if you run hard much at all in IM training, you're injury potential skyrockets. |
2011-02-22 9:07 AM in reply to: #3366681 |
Expert 1164 Roswell, GA | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread JoshKaptur - 2011-02-22 10:02 AM pga_mike - 2011-02-21 5:20 PM Josh, You are dead on about running long runs too fast (too close to race pace), and other runs too slowly (just a little faster than race pace). This advice is sound, but as an easily injured triathlete, I find that a one hour speed, tempo and track workouts cause more issues (for me) than a 3 hour slow run. n=1 Yep - this is fundamentally why the BarryP approach has you building volume through frequent but slow runs... the best of both worlds (allows you to get your mileage way up without any seriously taxing (from an injury risk standpoint) runs). I guess I need to at least read this BarryP approach. I notice that always go out way to hard on long runs, and pay for it later. Im talking 7:00-7:30 for the first few miles, then slow down to 8:30 or so. I end up exhausted and sore, which I know is a big no-no. I suppose there is no real solution to the issue, besides being very aware of my pace and going slower than I feel I should. |
2011-02-22 9:17 AM in reply to: #3366693 |
Elite 3495 SE | Subject: RE: Ironman Coeur d'Alene : Official Thread The solution is to tell Coach Dan what you are after and have him train you to do it on race day. Shanks taught me how to pace. It took a year of doing (read: fighting) it but it paid off. Now I just love running slower on long course because the mantras are "slow and steady wins the race" and "Patience is a virtue." I love plodding by all the folks like I used to be who blow up inevitably at some point. |
|