Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Tookie Williams Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 8
 
 
2005-12-13 1:57 PM
in reply to: #304725

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 2:52 PM

Your right I don't know you. I am basing and standing by my statement solely on what I have seen you share on this topic.

I have seen many of your posts in the past, and yes some are worth paying for. On this subject however, you come across as completely unsympathetic to the victims and or their families. You actually think, don't you, that Tookie being allowed to become a celebrity author is a good thing with no consideration for the families of his victims? If you don't you should go back and re-read some of your own posts.. Tell me why should he or any other convicted criminal be allowed to benefit from publishing a book in prison?

I'm not in favor of criminals profiting from their crimes. I don't know if Tookie made money from his books or not. If so, that's wrong and the money should go to the victims' families, or their favorite charities if they don't want it.

It may sound cold, but the argument against the death penalty has nothing to do with the victims or their families. It's about what we believe to be morally right. And that's it.

I'll say it again: when we kill the killers, we're no better then they. 



2005-12-13 2:00 PM
in reply to: #304710

User image

Pro
3906
20001000500100100100100
St Charles, IL
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 12:42 PM

coredump - 2005-12-13 11:30 AM I didn't realize we were declaring war on our own citizens Chucky, or that there were "acceptable casualties" in that war.

To clarify your statement, you are okay with the idea that our current system can allow us to kill an innocent person? You have no qualms about doing so?

I think you scare me more than Tookie.

-C

Now, everyone is more of a threat than Tookie.



Nope, just those that can brush off the potential execution of innocent people ( and I'm not referring to Tookie here ) as "acceptable casualties".

-C
2005-12-13 2:00 PM
in reply to: #304725

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 2:52 PM
I have seen many of your posts in the past, and yes some are worth paying for. On this subject however, you come across as completely unsympathetic to the victims and or their families. You actually think, don't you, that Tookie being allowed to become a celebrity author is a good thing with no consideration for the families of his victims? If you don't you should go back and re-read some of your own posts.. Tell me why should he or any other convicted criminal be allowed to benefit from publishing a book in prison?



Yikes! I think maybe *you* should go back and reread Jim's posts. You're attacking his character based on his philosophical and moral objection to the death penalty, and that's just not cool.

I would say you owe him an apology, but I'm sure he'd accept you not attacking his character in an intellectual debate.
2005-12-13 2:02 PM
in reply to: #304729

User image

Pro
3906
20001000500100100100100
St Charles, IL
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 12:55 PM
coredump - 2005-12-13 10:30 AMI didn't realize we were declaring war on our own citizens Chucky, or that there were "acceptable casualties" in that war.

To clarify your statement, you are okay with the idea that our current system can allow us to kill an innocent person? You have no qualms about doing so?

I think you scare me more than Tookie.

-C
I'm perfectly fine with our imperfect system because 99.999999% of the time we get it right. You want perfection in an imperfect world. Why stop at the death penalty, after all we can't be sure that ALL the people behind bars are truly guilty so why not let everyone go free for the fear that we may imprison an innocent man? Take it a step further, we should not arrest anyone for fear that we falsely accuse an innocent man. We wouldn't want to hurt his feelings would we.


A falsely imprisoned person can be released.  A falsely executed person cannot be resurrected.

I don't ask for perfection, I ask for an acknowledgement of imperfection.

-C
2005-12-13 2:03 PM
in reply to: #304732

Elite
2458
20001001001001002525
Livingston, MT
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 10:57 AM

It may sound cold, but the argument against the death penalty has nothing to do with the victims or their families. It's about what we believe to be morally right. And that's it. I'll say it again: when we kill the killers, we're no better then they.


That's your opinion. So in effect, the fact that the government takes money from us at the point of a gun (taxes), they are the same as an armed robber? I know you don't believe that.

2005-12-13 2:04 PM
in reply to: #304722

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Rennick -

I believe that society in general has a disregard for the value of human life.]



Jean, I agree with you.


What I suggest is the work on the table is this:

I bet everyone who has contributed to this thread believes that society has a disregard for human life.

If you oppose the DP, you may think that society disregards human life because they are putting someone to death.

If you support the DP, you may think that society disregards human life because it coddles criminals which leads to more crime.

So, it seems that we essentially want the same thing, a society that values life. Problem is, how to get there.

What are some common denominators that we can agree on?


2005-12-13 2:05 PM
in reply to: #304734

User image

Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Opus - 2005-12-13 12:00 PM
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 2:52 PM I have seen many of your posts in the past, and yes some are worth paying for. On this subject however, you come across as completely unsympathetic to the victims and or their families. You actually think, don't you, that Tookie being allowed to become a celebrity author is a good thing with no consideration for the families of his victims? If you don't you should go back and re-read some of your own posts.. Tell me why should he or any other convicted criminal be allowed to benefit from publishing a book in prison?

Yikes! I think maybe *you* should go back and reread Jim's posts. You're attacking his character based on his philosophical and moral objection to the death penalty, and that's just not cool. I would say you owe him an apology, but I'm sure he'd accept you not attacking his character in an intellectual debate.

Well maybe I missed it, but which post does he talk aobut the victims famalies. I distinctly remember the one praising Tookies acomplishments. I am sure that is a great comfort to the famalies of the people he is convicted of murdering.

Let me as you or anyone else here: If you had a close family member violently murdered by someone, how would you feel about all of Hollywood's celebrities singing his praises on national tv, becasue of all the good he has done....

2005-12-13 2:08 PM
in reply to: #304076

User image

Master
4101
20002000100
Denver
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Maybe ASA can clarify, but I thought it was the founding fathers intentions was that it is better to have a guilty man go free than for an innocent man to be locked up and this is why there is so many "hurdles" (some say too much) for due process, appeals, etc. in our system and why you are innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. end hijack of death penalty morality discussion. Oh right....

Edited by drewb8 2005-12-13 2:10 PM
2005-12-13 2:08 PM
in reply to: #304736

Elite
2458
20001001001001002525
Livingston, MT
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

A falsely imprisoned person can be released. A falsely executed person cannot be resurrected.


Not if he is doing a life sentence and nothing comes about to change that. You also assume that I'd rather have, as an innocent man, a life imprisonment than a death sentence. You are also assuming that I don't die in prison at the hands of other inmates because you falsely put me there.


I don't ask for perfection, I ask for an acknowledgement of imperfection.


I already gave you that. I acknowledged that the system is not perfect and I'm okay with it. You want perfection but only in death penalty cases. Be consistent in that you want perfection throughout the entire system. Instead you are willing to throw the baby out with the bath water.

2005-12-13 2:09 PM
in reply to: #304732

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2005-12-13 2:09 PM
in reply to: #304741

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

Not running away, but I gotta go get my daughtyer from school.

I'll talk more about this later. 



2005-12-13 2:12 PM
in reply to: #304746

Pro
3906
20001000500100100100100
St Charles, IL
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:08 PM
A falsely imprisoned person can be released. A falsely executed person cannot be resurrected.
Not if he is doing a life sentence and nothing comes about to change that. You also assume that I'd rather have, as an innocent man, a life imprisonment than a death sentence. You are also assuming that I don't die in prison at the hands of other inmates because you falsely put me there.
I don't ask for perfection, I ask for an acknowledgement of imperfection.
I already gave you that. I acknowledged that the system is not perfect and I'm okay with it. You want perfection but only in death penalty cases. Be consistent in that you want perfection throughout the entire system. Instead you are willing to throw the baby out with the bath water.


I'm not advocating anarchy, I believe you were the one who suggested that. 

I oppose the death penalty, not any other applications of our legal system.

-C
2005-12-13 2:13 PM
in reply to: #304076

Elite
2458
20001001001001002525
Livingston, MT
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Sorta off topic. Did you guys see that HBO special they ran about a year ago where they followed around a prison cook that made the last meals for prisoners about to be executed? It was interesting to say the least.

2005-12-13 2:16 PM
in reply to: #304741

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 3:05 PM
Well maybe I missed it, but which post does he talk aobut the victims famalies. I distinctly remember the one praising Tookies acomplishments. I am sure that is a great comfort to the famalies of the people he is convicted of murdering.

Let me as you or anyone else here: If you had a close family member violently murdered by someone, how would you feel about all of Hollywood's celebrities singing his praises on national tv, becasue of all the good he has done....



Well I must have missed the list rules that state what must or must not be said in this debate in order for people not to launch ad hominems at you. Just because Jim doesn't *say* he sympathizes with the family, it doesn't mean he doesn't sympathize with the families. I would naturally assume that he and everybody else does. Regardless, I've never heard you say that you value human life, so can I assume you do not value human life? Of course not! So, why do you have to hear Jim state that he sympathizes with the families for you to not think the opposite?
2005-12-13 2:38 PM
in reply to: #304757

Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Opus - 2005-12-13 12:16 PM
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 3:05 PM Well maybe I missed it, but which post does he talk aobut the victims famalies. I distinctly remember the one praising Tookies acomplishments. I am sure that is a great comfort to the famalies of the people he is convicted of murdering.

Let me as you or anyone else here: If you had a close family member violently murdered by someone, how would you feel about all of Hollywood's celebrities singing his praises on national tv, becasue of all the good he has done....

Well I must have missed the list rules that state what must or must not be said in this debate in order for people not to launch ad hominems at you. Just because Jim doesn't *say* he sympathizes with the family, it doesn't mean he doesn't sympathize with the families. I would naturally assume that he and everybody else does. Regardless, I've never heard you say that you value human life, so can I assume you do not value human life? Of course not! So, why do you have to hear Jim state that he sympathizes with the families for you to not think the opposite?

It wasn't so much that he didn't say anyting prior to my statement regarding the families of his victims. It was due to the fact that he thoguht Tookies celebrity status was a good thing. Again I don't think the famalies need to hear about his books he wrote and "all of the good he has done". He was in prison for violently murdering 4 people, I don't understand why he was able to do that and why someone woud sing his praises, effectively spitting in the faces of his victims famalies.

Here are the statments that were made that condoned his public status.

<formulas />Posted 2005-12-12 6:04 PM (#304176 - in reply to #304102)
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams



Expert

Posts: 3268

Location: Augusta, GA
Online

Bronze member

Well, some of us believe that the death penalty is morally wrong. And it has nothing to do with what a guy does or does not do in prison.

 

Beyond my personal beliefs regarding capital punishment, I believe he deserves clemency because he is doing good for society while incarcerated. All that will be wasted when he is put to death.

 

Because he is...was working hard to undue what he started. In his time in prison, he was an anti-gang advocate, and now his voice in the matter is lost. Who do you think these kids would listen to when faced with a dilemma involving joining a gang? Arnold or Tookie?

I think because he's been executed, some kids are going to make the wrong choice where before they my not have. 

a particular case, please try to remember who is giving you those facts. I have seen the anti-death penalty side really bend the facts of the case. I urge you all, if you are truely interested in a case, to seek out the actual trial transcript. Attempt to get the full picture of what went on at the trial court level.

So that's always good advice, but I'd be curious to hear what facts you think we're bending? The fact that life in prison isn't an easy one? The fact that it costs a bunch more money to execute a prisoner? The fact that we're morally convicted in our belief? The fact that Tookie did some good behind bars, more good than he's doing now that he's dead

 



Expert

Posts: 3268

Location: Augusta, GA
Online

Bronze member

I'm sure they could give a rat's @ss about what he did behind bars. That's not my point, though.

 

amiine - 2005-12-13 2:02 PM

The fact that Tookie did some good behind bars, more good than he's doing now that he's dead?

 

I am sure the families of the victims were VERY happy to hear that Tookie reconsidered his ways and learned to differentiate between what’s right and what’s wrong after murdering their beloved ones…

 

 If I have violated the rules here, please share which ones with me and I will issue the appropriate apology. I am learing every day.

2005-12-13 2:46 PM
in reply to: #304774

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Crusevegas,

If nothing I've said up to now has had any effect on you, then nothing else I can say will either.

I don't think you've violated any rules, I just think you have been extremely unfair to Jim.


2005-12-13 3:28 PM
in reply to: #304726

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
I want to address coredump's post regarding physical evidence. There is a new issue that prosecutors deal with, it's so prevelant now that it has a name it's called the "CSI" syndrome. It is where people have come to unrealistically expect certain physical evidence. Again I don't know the specific facts of this case. And as I argued before I make a decision I would want to make an informed decision. that is I would want to read the trial transcript. That said lets talk about finger prints. Was the suspect a secretor or not? What conditions was the weapon exposed to prior to it being found? These conditions can effect whether or not prints can be recovered. When you say no prints were found, is it that no prints of anyones were found, or no prints of value were found, or prints were found and the defendant was elliminated as the contributor of those prints, or prints were found but there were only 1,2,3,4,5,6, areas of similarity not the required number of similarities to give a definitive positive match.

Let's talk about fiber evidence. Why would you expect fiber evidence? Is there something in the facts of the case to suggest that there should be fiber evidence here? (I"m asking I don't know) was there a struggle? Where was the crime committed, outside, inside. If inside what was the ventalation situation. All can effect the finding of fiber evidence.

Look all I'm saying is that people have unrealistic expectations of what they think should be found at a crime scene, largely based upon a cop show (CSI) which is total and complete BS. Some of the stuff they do doesn't even exist!!!!
2005-12-13 3:31 PM
in reply to: #304786

Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

Opus - 2005-12-13 12:46 PM Crusevegas, If nothing I've said up to now has had any effect on you, then nothing else I can say will either. I don't think you've violated any rules, I just think you have been extremely unfair to Jim.

I understand how you feel, I too think that if what I have said so far, regarding convicted killers having access to the media and amenities that they have makes it harder for the death penalty to be abolished, nothing else will either.

It does amaze me that the anti-death penalty people (in my opinon based on what I have read) seem to also be so concerned about the rights and privilages of the crimal, without thinking of the victims and their famalies.

2005-12-13 3:33 PM
in reply to: #304747

Expert
941
50010010010010025
WA
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
courtney_leone - 2005-12-13 12:09 PM
run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 1:57 PM
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 2:52 PM

Your right I don't know you. I am basing and standing by my statement solely on what I have seen you share on this topic.

I have seen many of your posts in the past, and yes some are worth paying for. On this subject however, you come across as completely unsympathetic to the victims and or their families. You actually think, don't you, that Tookie being allowed to become a celebrity author is a good thing with no consideration for the families of his victims? If you don't you should go back and re-read some of your own posts.. Tell me why should he or any other convicted criminal be allowed to benefit from publishing a book in prison?

I'm not in favor of criminals profiting from their crimes. I don't know if Tookie made money from his books or not. If so, that's wrong and the money should go to the victims' families, or their favorite charities if they don't want it.

It may sound cold, but the argument against the death penalty has nothing to do with the victims or their families. It's about what we believe to be morally right. And that's it.

I'll say it again: when we kill the killers, we're no better then they.

When we kill the killers, they are getting what they deserve. Ooopps, there I go again. We need to stop the Tookie talk. Don, I completely agree with you. Now let's stop the insanity



how can anyone as a fellow human being who wasn't present know what anyone really deserves?  only God knows that. 

one of my favorite bumper stickers:

why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?

coredump - i'm with you.  i can't imagine how families of innocent people might feel if their loved one is executed and the government comes back with an "oops - we messed up, he didn't do anything.  sorry."  humans are so fallible and don't deserve to play God.
2005-12-13 3:41 PM
in reply to: #304706

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 1:38 PM

ASA22 - 2005-12-13 2:31 PM
1) No physical evidence? I doubt it. I'd love to see the trial evidence list. So there were no autopsie photos, no crime scene photos. nothing? I seriously doubt it. Those are physical evidence! Of course there's physical evidence. If there's a body, there's physical evidence. What is implied is physical evidence linking the person to the crime. 2) Attention people of the U.S. there is no legal requirment that there be physical evidence to convict!!!!! All evidence is judged by the same standard, the standard for weighing the credibility of evidence is the same for physical and testimonial. Not true. All evidence is not judged by the same standard. It's the jury's call, but I'd venture to say that DNA evidence carries more weight in their minds than circumstantial, he-said she-said evidence. 3) There is no legal difference between testimonial evidence and physical evidence. True, but juries decide how to view the evidence. And if you've got a guy on the stand ratting his buddy out to avoid prosecution himself, well, I think that evidence wouldn't carry as much weight as say, GSR on the accused's hands. 4) What physical evidence are you expecting given the specifics of the case? Here's an example, if I shoot the victim from long range, I dispose of the gun, but an eye witness sees me committ the shooting. Let's assume I am aprehended 10 days after the crime. What physical evidence would there be? Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable. 5) CSI is a TV show people. Most of what you see is total crap!!!!!! The only thing that is crap is the timeline and neatness in which cases are wrapped up. The forensics and police work are, I think, pretty accurate. 6) I don't have an answer for the recantation. What about, in this case, the guy that CONFESSED? It happens often. Some recantations are valid, some are BS. Believe it or not, some criminals that are incarcerated for a long period of time make up stories of police and prosecutorial misconduct in an attempt to get their own convictions over turned or to try to strike a deal for a reduction in their sentence. All Gasp in shock. believe it or not the guy doing life for a rape has nothing to loose by lying. ( I don't know the specifics of this case, I'm just speaking from actual first hand personal experience) I've even seen people confess to murders they didn't committ. I've seen this occurr, that the person that confessed to the crime was serving a life sentence and confessed with the specific agreement that the Government would not seek the death penalty. I know it happens, we had a guy confess to a murder and we were able to conclusively show that he wasn't even in the State at the time of the murder he confessed to. 7) What is meant by "coerced by prosecutors and police"? Did the guy have pending felony charges and they offered him a plea for his testimony? Did they threaten him somehow? Again, I've been accused of threatening a witness and a defendant, when all I did was offer them a deal in exchange for their testimony. So without knowing the specifics of what the coercion was I'm not willing to conceed anything. And the term "coercion" is nebulus without knowing the specific facts. 8) It is typical for murder cases, to take 2-3 years before they reach the initial trial. Most of the delays is artibutable to the DEFENDANT!!!! It is very seldom the Government that is asking for the continuances in a Capital Case. It is the Defense delaying the initial trial. However, anti-death penalty advocates never relay this little bit of reality when they give dates. The implication is "look how long it took, and how long this poor man/woman suffered" 9) Looks like the system ultimately worked. The conviction was overturned. (Of course from this synopsis the clear implication is that the conviction was overturned due to some form of misconduct, but that is only an implication. The case may have been over turned for another reason. Without the benefit of the actual opinion it is impossible for me to say.)


Re garding your statement that it is not true that physical evidence and testimonial evidence are not judged by the same standard, you're totally wrong on this issue. There is a legal standard for how juries are to weigh the evidence, in Florida it is contained in standard jury instruction number 3.7 and 3.9. Contrary to your assertion there is no legal difference in how a jury is to weigh the credibility of evidence. The jury is instructed that failing to follow the law as set out in the jury instructions is a miscarriage of justice.
There is no distinction made between testimonial and physical. On this I'll take my 10 years of actual criminal trial experience and my involvment in the actual trial of well over 2000 cases over your experience. You may think there is a legal difference, or you may want there to be a legal difference but there isn't any.

And again this idea that the "forensics and police work are" pretty accurate is such BS! having been involved in the investiagtion of hundreds and hundreds of cases, I'm telling you from my actuall experience, not just my experience watching TV, that the efficacy of the forensic specialists on that show are at the very least, highly exagerated. The show gives the impression that some form of forensic evidence is found or could be found at every crime scene. It's bunk!!!!

I'll take almost anything on this board and not strike back in a personal way. But I wont' take someone telling me I'm wrong about a criminal procedure matter. Such as, that I am wrong about the legal standard for weighing the credibility of evidence. There is no seperate standard for physical and testimonial evidence.

Let me say this: by examples I'm trying not to illustrate the specifics in a particular case. I am trying to illustrate some of the unrealistic expectations regarding physical evidence that the general public has. I'm also trying to show that there are two sides to each case. I've yet to see a jury convict someone on no evidence.

And as an aside, if the police and prosecutors fabricated evidence to gain a conviction, if they took affirmative steps to lie about a defendant, any defendant, I don't care if that defendant is charged with stealing a pcak of gum, those individuals should go to jail for the maximum sentence allowed by law.

As a prosecutor my job is as follows 1) Uphold the laws of the State of Florida, 2) Seek Justice, 3) Do what is right and fair; 4) candor toward the Court and the System.

Edited by ASA22 2005-12-13 3:52 PM
2005-12-13 3:46 PM
in reply to: #304853

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
crusevegas - 2005-12-13 3:31 PM

It does amaze me that the anti-death penalty people (in my opinon based on what I have read) seem to also be so concerned about the rights and privilages of the crimal, without thinking of the victims and their famalies.

Fallacious generalizations are unhelpful to an debate honest exchange of ideas or understanding.

I don't believe in killing people. Period. That's not about the criminal, the crime, or the lust for vengeance on the part of society or the victim's family. I do not believe in killing people. Surely, that is not difficult to understand?

The families of victims suffer. They will forever suffer the loss of their loved one. Their suffering provokes compassion in me and sometimes rage. It does not provoke a raging lust for vengeance. It does not change my belief that killing people is wrong. The Great Creator forbid I should ever know the rage that some families might feel in their deepest sorrow. I hope and pray that my spirituality would not fail me and lead me to a darkness that says vengeance is the answer. I hope to never be that dark when confronted with that kind of agony. I hope my spiritual being will be stronger than that. But I am human and I would likely falter or fail my spiritual beliefs during such a dark period. However, just because I fail doesn't mean a detached yet just society should fail with me.

Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord. While I'm not Christian, I do believe in a spirituality that discourages humans from playing God, a spirituality that says I cannot overcome evil with evil, that I can overcome evil only with good.



Edited by Renee 2005-12-13 3:56 PM


2005-12-13 3:50 PM
in reply to: #304076

Pro
3883
20001000500100100100252525
Woodstock,GA
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

I have been following this discussion all day and have held off adding my opinion but I just can't stay quiet anymore.

1) The argument of "not sentencing an innocent man/women to die"- It seems to me that anyone even suspected of capital murder has some criminal history or incredibly bad luck. Last time I checked they didn't go and jerk random people out of their homes and convict them of capital murder. These suspects must have had SOMETHING to tie them to the victims or they would have never been involved in the case from the get go. Secondly, a jury must find someone guilty beyond a resonable doubt.If there is not enough evidence or testimony to create resonable doubt then these people are somehow involved or know who is involved. I really think that the error rate here is very low. You can't fake physical evidence (i.e fingerprints, DNA, etc.).

2) The "we are no better than the killers" argument-what a bunch of crap! If you make the conscious decision to end another person's life then you forfeit your life PERIOD! Tookie got what he deserved, just like Ted Bundy, and Timothy McVeigh. You take life you better be prepared to pay with your own.

Not to open up another can of worms, but this sounds alot like the whole argument on the Patriot Act. In my opinion you shouldn't care if you don't have anything to hide. Same for capital punishment, if you aren't planning to kill someone then it shouldn't matter.

2005-12-13 4:02 PM
in reply to: #304863

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
ASA22 - 2005-12-13 4:41 PM
There is no seperate standard for physical and testimonial evidence.


While there is no separate standard for physical and testimonial evidence, when the jury is presented with two opposing versions of what transpired by two witnesses to the same event, are they allowed to make a judgement on credibility? I would say that the answer is probably yes (otherwise few people would ever be convicted).

If this is the case, and the jury is allowed to determine who is credible and who is not, then it would seem to me that even if testimonial evidence carries the same legal weight as physical evidence, the fact that inanimate physical evidence does not lie or contradict itself and others not only automatically lends it more weight than testimonial evidence, but also makes it of a completely different character.

So, legally they are the same, but it would seem to me that the jury would believe evidence of the bloody fingerprint before the cries of "I'm innocent" by its owner.
2005-12-13 4:10 PM
in reply to: #304875

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Rocket Man - 2005-12-13 4:50 PM

I have been following this discussion all day and have held off adding my opinion but I just can't stay quiet anymore.

1) The argument of "not sentencing an innocent man/women to die"- It seems to me that anyone even suspected of capital murder has some criminal history or incredibly bad luck. Last time I checked they didn't go and jerk random people out of their homes and convict them of capital murder. These suspects must have had SOMETHING to tie them to the victims or they would have never been involved in the case from the get go. Secondly, a jury must find someone guilty beyond a resonable doubt.If there is not enough evidence or testimony to create resonable doubt then these people are somehow involved or know who is involved. I really think that the error rate here is very low. You can't fake physical evidence (i.e fingerprints, DNA, etc.).

2) The "we are no better than the killers" argument-what a bunch of crap! If you make the conscious decision to end another person's life then you forfeit your life PERIOD! Tookie got what he deserved, just like Ted Bundy, and Timothy McVeigh. You take life you better be prepared to pay with your own.

Not to open up another can of worms, but this sounds alot like the whole argument on the Patriot Act. In my opinion you shouldn't care if you don't have anything to hide. Same for capital punishment, if you aren't planning to kill someone then it shouldn't matter.



"In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up."

- Martin Niemöller
2005-12-13 4:12 PM
in reply to: #304076

Champion
5183
5000100252525
Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
I think it's telling that we, as a group, treat each other so disrespectfully on this topic. Yes this is a serious issue about which we obviously care a great deal, but so far I am totally unimpressed with the general opposition's level or respect for THIS process, our discussion process on BT.

It's a simple issue, actually. You believe it morally permissable to put another human being to death as a punishment, or you don't.

The idea that the anti-death penalty crowd's position indicates more sympathy for the criminal than for the victims is ludicrous. Choosing to not kill is no more out of sympathy than choosing to pray/soothe/support for victims is out of sympathy. It's about what we deem to be The Right Thing, and in my book, there are precious few Right Things inspired by sympathy.

But yeah, when it gets personal, I'm out.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Tookie Williams Rss Feed  
 
 
of 8