Increasing power threshold over the winter (Page 6)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I just started using a trainer that will give me wattage figures. Can I trust them enough to use for power training? Edited by ImTriing 2008-01-11 10:30 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I am training for IM CDA and my power tests have sucked. Seeing you are my coach Jorge, maybe you can explain to the group what you have me doing to give those doing IM a better idea of what this looks like in a practical way. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() So I totally screwed up on my first ever 20min TT on my new Computrainer. I'm not sure if I've to retest, please say no.... The test hurts a lot more than I had imagined! 20min TT - Avg Watts = 134. Weight = 113. FTP = 95% x 134 = 127. Power to weight = 2.5. Avg cadence = 88. Avg HR = 153. Problem is that I went out way too fast. Overall avg is 134W but it's really all over the place. Power first 5min = 146W, next 5min = 132W, next 5min = 124W and last 5min = 134W. Question is what would be the avg power if I had kept a relatively even pace for the whole 20min? Can I take the avg of first and last 5min, like 140, resulting in FTP 133 and power to weight ratio of 2.6? I'd love to get to 3.0 in 16 wks, i.e. FTP of 154. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() So have a computrainer for a year. Just coming off about 4-5 months of no training from injuries. Did my test, 2.09 power/weight. I feel so weak right now ![]() Edited by bradword 2008-01-12 10:40 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Patricia, One the great uses of a power meter is to learn proper pacing. Many folks don't do it well. By watching your power numbers you can learn to do it better. I've worked the past year on this and can do even pacing or slightly increasing power on intervals and time trials, but in tris I tend to go to hard early so my first half and second half power numbers are different. Keep practicing and it will get easier. When you do intervals you can play around with this and improve this important skill. After riding on my trainer for a couple months I can normally zoom in my power and have a VI of 1.0-1.02 which means my variability in my power is not much. Ideally you want it to be 1.0 in racing and time trialing which means your power output was consistant. Edited by KathyG 2008-01-13 5:46 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Jorge, Very interesting info in your last post, and somewhat reconforting for me, since it's close to how I want to structure my winter/early spring en route to an International DU on June 14th. To answer your question, I am self-coached but a self-proclaimed "training research/science geek". I just love to research and read everything I can on training. My plan is also to go for the most bang for my buck on the CT. From Monday to Friday, I have a daily total of 50 minutes to train on the CT (5:10AM to 6:00AM) before the routine kicks in, plus about a 2 hour slot on Saturday mornings. I usually run at lunch time (when I can) My weekly plan for Jan/Feb is various FT intervals, and some steady-state rides at "sweet spot" level (220-235). I use Tempo rides (190-225) for longer steady-state efforts (never more than 90 minutes). This will be adapted starting Jan. 28 since I won't be able to do "doubles" anymore (run at lunch time) since my daily work routine will pick up again. Overall, for the WKO+ fans, my current target is to increase weekly TSS (b/r) by 20-30 pts a week. Once again, thanks for all the great info. Edited by bryank14 2008-01-14 8:29 AM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() patricia7 - 2008-01-12 8:22 PM go with FT of 130 and start doing FT intervals for 4-6 weeks and adjust. if doing let's say 2-4x10 min @ FT with 2 min spin as recover feels somehow easy then you'll know your FT is higher hence you indeed pushed too hard. (we all do the 1st few attempts). If that is the case do minor adjustemnts playing with 5 watts at a time. work your legs a bit and after a cycle of solid FT sessioins you can retest.So I totally screwed up on my first ever 20min TT on my new Computrainer. I'm not sure if I've to retest, please say no.... The test hurts a lot more than I had imagined! 20min TT - Avg Watts = 134. Weight = 113. FTP = 95% x 134 = 127. Power to weight = 2.5. Avg cadence = 88. Avg HR = 153. Problem is that I went out way too fast. Overall avg is 134W but it's really all over the place. Power first 5min = 146W, next 5min = 132W, next 5min = 124W and last 5min = 134W. Question is what would be the avg power if I had kept a relatively even pace for the whole 20min? Can I take the avg of first and last 5min, like 140, resulting in FTP 133 and power to weight ratio of 2.6? I'd love to get to 3.0 in 16 wks, i.e. FTP of 154. |
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Some things I figured should be important to for you to know so we are on the same page when taking about power training. Notice – you don’t need to know 100% all the formulas or details behind this, as long as you understand the lingo and why training in certain way can benefit your training that’s enough! If you have cycling peaks WKO+ here is a nice write up explaining graphs and definitions: http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=4455 FTP = Functional Threshold Power = max sustainable power for 60 min Training zones per A. Coggan: Tests: All tests have around 20 min warm up as 15 min build up endurance + some pick ups (5x30 seconds at FT plus 30 seconds Z1-Z2 spin as recovery) |
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Shermbelle - 2008-01-12 12:09 AM I am training for IM CDA and my power tests have sucked. Seeing you are my coach Jorge, maybe you can explain to the group what you have me doing to give those doing IM a better idea of what this looks like in a practical way. In your case we have been very meticulous in getting the best out of every session due to your IMCdA goals and work schedule/life priorities. We broke down your training priorities in two: run cycle and bike cycle We are 10 week into your 12 week run focus cycle in which we pretty much build you up to 6x run a week. During the same period we started adding 2 bike session (1xFT and 1xTempo) a week to increase your power but most important to get you ready for the hard work for the bike cycle coming up. We went from short FT sessions (6x5 min, 5x7 min, 4x8min, etc) and now you are almost at 2x20 min @ FT every week plus 1-1.5 hrs @ Tempo, swimming enough AND running often; IOW we have established the foundation of your training. We haven’t been working your body super hard (yet![]() In two weeks we’ll switch gears to more biking and we will work you hard at FT (2x a week) 1 tempo 1.5-2 hrs and a 4th endurance ride (4+ hrs) weather dependant or a shorter version if on trainer. Since the heavy volume is coming up and with your crazy work schedule, we have to find the best balance between training and life |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I will ask my question in a different way as I got no responses. As I am currently back in school, I can not afford a computrainera or power tap. I do have access to a trainer that will give me power readings (Nashbar trainer). Can I trust those readings enough to use in a power focused training plan? If so, where should I start? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Mike |
![]() ![]() |
Not a Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ImTriing - 2008-01-14 12:36 PM I will ask my question in a different way as I got no responses. As I am currently back in school, I can not afford a computrainera or power tap. I do have access to a trainer that will give me power readings (Nashbar trainer). Can I trust those readings enough to use in a power focused training plan? If so, where should I start? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Mike I'm not familiar with the trainer in question so it might be good or it might not. Generally, I'd be cautious about relying on the data it provides without being able to test it for reliability and repeatability somehow. Sorry I can't be more helpful. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ImTriing - 2008-01-14 12:36 PM I will ask my question in a different way as I got no responses. As I am currently back in school, I can not afford a computrainera or power tap. I do have access to a trainer that will give me power readings (Nashbar trainer). Can I trust those readings enough to use in a power focused training plan? If so, where should I start? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Mike I missed your previous Q... To be honest I am not familiar with that trainer hence I am not sure the quality or accuracy. That been said if the trainer works in a way that provides you a baseline and consistent power readings the it should work cuz you’ll guide your training based on the same power numbers very session. i.e. the polar power meter is a cheapER alternative to training with power but usually the readings are higher than a more reliable system like the power tap or SRM. It also can give you funky readings from time to time due to gearing, chain wearing and installation. But in general it should provide similar #s most of the time making it consistent enough to help you train a lot better than with HRM alone. The only problem is that you won't be able to train (outside) and race with power which is a huge benefit. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() KathyG - 2008-01-10 11:17 PM No increase in power of 10% does not give you 10% increase in speed in general. Kathy, You're absolutely correct. I found this table - http://www.computrainer.com/html/manuals/workout/Table2.html 10% increase in power results in only 3% increase in speed in my case, all other things being equal. It's hard to believe, but Computrainer guarantees speed would go up 2mph in 5mos or your money back - http://www.computrainer.com/rm_inc/PIGuarantee.htm, that would take a 37% increase in power in my case!! KathyG - 2008-01-13 6:44 AM One the great uses of a power meter is to learn proper pacing. Many folks don't do it well. By watching your power numbers you can learn to do it better. I've worked the past year on this and can do even pacing or slightly increasing power on intervals and time trials, but in tris I tend to go to hard early so my first half and second half power numbers are different. This makes a lot of sense. amiine - 2008-01-14 9:39 AM go with FT of 130 and start doing FT intervals for 4-6 weeks and adjust. I'll use that # for FT. I'm still building base (Z1-Z3) and working on pedaling efficiency. I'll be ready for FT intervals next month. I'm mostly following Friel's Computrainer workout manual (for short distance triathletes) and applying Coggan's power training levels. I'm experimenting on my optimal cadence. Using CT's ergo mode, set a constant power level, and then figure out what gear-cadence combination feels the best. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Ugh, did my FTP test today and only picked up 4 stinking points from Dec 4th. Can I blame it on chocolate cake last night? Not sure what kind of gains are decent, but I can say I havent been as focused on applying structured workouts based on power. I know, I know....thats not really training with power then right? I have been doing more ints and tempo than last year, so good to see some gains, but going to try and take some recommended workouts on this thread into this next month. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() "Ugh, did my FTP test today and only picked up 4 stinking points from Dec 4th." 4 points is 4 points in 38 days....not bad. I did a series of TT this past summer and everyone I'd hit 183...over a 6 week period..it was quite annoying until one week I hit 193. I set a modest goal of improving 20 watts from high of last season. The more toward your potential the harder it is to make gains. |
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I did my 1st official FT session as part of my 6 week cycle Anyway, since I’ll be doing 2x FT sessions per week, my 1st session of the week was on the easy side. I did 45 min on the trainer and spent the majority of time between endurance and tempo (Z2-Z3) and added in the middle of my session 2x5 min @ 255-260 watts (98-100% of FT) with 3 min Z1 spin as recovery. I could have definitely done longer or more intervals but since I still need to run 45 miles total for the week and I’ll do a 2nd FT session in a few days there is no need to rush things. The next 2 days will give me a better idea of how taxing this session really was (plus the s/r) and tell me how much more I should push the next session. Still I will keep it on the conservative side for a few weeks. #s for session - 45 min, 200 avg watts, NP 224, cad 95, 55 TSS.Anyone else doing FT intervals yet? anyone seeing improvements already? or not? |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() amiine - 2008-01-16 7:29 PM Anyone else doing FT intervals yet? anyone seeing improvements already? or not? First post in this thread....not doing FT intervals yet, just completed my first FTP test on the bike (CT at the DTC)....same time as Jszat above. It was either do the FTP test with him or watch him do it...he's such a task master! Anywho...haven't crunched the numbers in too much detail, but average wattage for the 20 min TT was 252. Not the greatest and my power-to-weight ratio is pretty weak too (I'm slowly working on improving the denominator in that calc, so I expect better things in the future). Another worthy result of the testing is that I have a better appreciation for my biking LTHR...helpful to me in that heretofore I have been training with HR and a "guesstimate" of my biking LTHR. At the very worst, I will continue to use the HR data to train as I work my way into a power-based program. Now back to reading more of this thread to help figure out that last part.... |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I recently did 2 x 20 minute efforts as hard as I could, pretty much the way it's spelled out in the Carmichael Training Systems (and maybe Allen and Coggan?) book. Every plan seems to have their own way of doing the FT test. I did these 5 minutes apart, doing 234 watts in the first one and 236 watts in the second test. So I assume that I average these and take 97% of it for my FT? Or is it 95%? Anyway, I'm guessing my FT power is somewhere in the vicinity of 220-225 watts, close enough for me. This is an improvement over my previous test about 8 weeks ago that calculated at around 210 watts or so. I guess I'm looking at around a 10 watt increase so far. I'm hoping to get this up around 250 watts by this summer and for November's IMAZ.
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() amiine - 2008-01-16 8:29 PM Anyone else doing FT intervals yet? anyone seeing improvements already? or not? YES!!!! (sorry you already knew that) but I will say for me things are coming along well. Granted my early tests were horrible so there was no where to go but up. I think the plan is to retest in a couple of weeks and can't wait to see if I can shatter my old FT. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() amiine - 2008-01-16 8:29 PM Anyone else doing FT intervals yet? anyone seeing improvements already? or not? I've been doing 2x20m sweet spot intervals 2-3x a week for the last 8 weeks plus a longish social ride on the weekends. I have been using the 20m TT test protocol from The Book, but I did an FTP test using the 2x20 method for the first time this morning because, at the very least, it seemed like a more challenging test and better training. I was afraid of overcooking it so I held back and ended up doing just the opposite. I had too much left in the tank at the end:
The results ended up being: 1st interval 245W, 2nd int 248W. Gridline is at the avg, 246.5. 246.5*0.97 = 239 and change. If I round up (and I will since I feel I went too easy) to 240, that represents a whopping 2W increase in 4 weeks. I'm a bit underwhelmed, but perhaps I was simply expecting too much. I may try to change one of my workouts to threshold intervals and see how it goes. Edited by tzmitch 2008-01-17 6:06 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tzmitch - 2008-01-17 6:04 AM do you have the actual data from the test? (NP, TSS, etc)
I've been doing 2x20m sweet spot intervals 2-3x a week for the last 8 weeks plus a longish social ride on the weekends. I have been using the 20m TT test protocol from The Book, but I did an FTP test using the 2x20 method for the first time this morning because, at the very least, it seemed like a more challenging test and better training. I was afraid of overcooking it so I held back and ended up doing just the opposite. I had too much left in the tank at the end: The results ended up being: 1st interval 245W, 2nd int 248W. Gridline is at the avg, 246.5. 246.5*0.97 = 239 and change. If I round up (and I will since I feel I went too easy) to 240, that represents a whopping 2W increase in 4 weeks. I'm a bit underwhelmed, but perhaps I was simply expecting too much. I may try to change one of my workouts to threshold intervals and see how it goes. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() max - 2008-01-16 8:54 PM Max, you increased 10 watts in 8 week; how many FT sessions and avg duration per week you've been doing so far?I recently did 2 x 20 minute efforts as hard as I could, pretty much the way it's spelled out in the Carmichael Training Systems (and maybe Allen and Coggan?) book. Every plan seems to have their own way of doing the FT test. I did these 5 minutes apart, doing 234 watts in the first one and 236 watts in the second test. So I assume that I average these and take 97% of it for my FT? Or is it 95%? Anyway, I'm guessing my FT power is somewhere in the vicinity of 220-225 watts, close enough for me. This is an improvement over my previous test about 8 weeks ago that calculated at around 210 watts or so. I guess I'm looking at around a 10 watt increase so far. I'm hoping to get this up around 250 watts by this summer and for November's IMAZ.
|
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() amiine - 2008-01-17 8:27 AM do you have the actual data from the test? (NP, TSS, etc) All that and more: Power-Tap #1: Power-Tap #3: Entire workout (209 watts): |
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tzmitch - something doesn't add up. you said: I've been doing 2x20m sweet spot intervals 2-3x a week for the last 8 weeks plus a longish social ride on the weekends AND If I round up (and I will since I feel I went too easy) to 240, that represents a whopping 2W increase in 4 weeks What was your FT 8 week ago? If you only gained 2 w in 4 weeks doing 2-3x 2x20 min per week, what was the% of FT for those intervals? How long and what % of FT is your longish ride? I am just trying to understand what’s going on cuz I would expect a bigger FTP gain with so 2-3x20 min session a week. A possible explanation could be that on your previous FT test you did the 20 min version and while you might be able to post an excellent 20 min watts avg when you extend the effort over a longer time your power decreases a bit on the power curve |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() amiine - 2008-01-17 8:29 AM Max, you increased 10 watts in 8 week; how many FT sessions and avg duration per week you've been doing so far? Jorge, so far it's been roughly one per week, though sometimes I get in two of them. A lot of my other stuff has been at what is more of a Tempo pace, averaging about 8-10 beats below my FT heart rate, along with the occasional hill interval (shorter) which puts my HR up around 5-10 beats past my FT. Those intervals are about 5 minutes long each, spaced a bit farther apart, like 5-10 minutes or so.
|
|