BT Development Mentor Program Archives » SBR Utopia - OPEN Rss Feed  
Moderators: alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 190
 
 
2013-01-25 8:40 AM
in reply to: #4594132

User image

Regular
186
100252525
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN

I'm so slow that my long runs are events in and of themselves. _______

_____________ HAHAHA....and do u get tired of holding your arms up, Kate?



2013-01-25 8:51 AM
in reply to: #4594162

User image

Elite
3779
20001000500100100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Good thoughts and comments on form and function of hard/fast swimming. 
2013-01-25 10:37 AM
in reply to: #4543084

User image

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN

Howdy, Utopics! All sorts of you topics brought up that I can brilliantly, with detail and links, answer when I'm training ... and it all disappears at the end is that like having better recall of drunk thoughts when drunk?

My friend the monitor lizard was not at the pool today, although a giant bubble came up in the middle of the pool that made me think so.

As for my titanium taint trainer time ... there's a lot of debate about long sessions / big days (there just was a thread in TT ... ) I say unequivocally this 7-hour ride was tougher than the 10-hour one leading up to IMWA (likely owing to a higher level of effort overall, plus 2 hours split up in 30min chunks throughout in Z4--big ring, little cog).

However, unlike the 10-hour one (and the IMWA cycle), I was *not* thinking GET ME THE HELL OFF THIS BIKE yes! a marathon sounds great, I'm ready to rock it, does that mean I get to get off the bike?! I attribute this to better bike fitness.

2013-01-25 12:25 PM
in reply to: #4594111

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 8:25 AM
Asalzwed - 2013-01-24 2:09 PM

So I've taken some of the feedback you guys gave to heart and done a shorter warmup for my speed days.

I simply broke it out into another double day and do an AM recovery run and the PM track workout.

I think it has really helped. I feel a lot more fresh and have been running with a faster group than usual.

Nice! Would suggest calling the AM run a "shakeout". Not much difference, but that's what the fast people say. Wink

Considering my PM session is hill repeats the night before, recovery may be a more appropriate term. But I will call it a "shakeout" from now on so that people think I am fast Smile



Edited by Asalzwed 2013-01-25 12:55 PM
2013-01-25 12:28 PM
in reply to: #4593915

User image

Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
axteraa - 2013-01-25 1:01 AM
tri808 - 2013-01-24 8:31 PM
axteraa - 2013-01-24 6:27 AM

To add to my previous post.  

If your goal is to swim fast 100s at a 1:20 pace (for simplified math), try to swim the 10x25 so that you complete each 25 in 20 seconds but do it by maintaining and focusing on form rather than just busting a gut.  Once you can do that reliably, go to 5x50 with a goal of 40 second 50s, then 60 second 75s.  This would have to happen over time but it may help you get over the problem of technique going out the window in the strong => fast area.

Arend...I was told by one of my masters coaches that swimming is a combination of form and function.  Form is self explanitory, but function meaning more about your strength, endurance, turnover, and cardio.

So when doing some sets, we would do drills where the whole purpose was to focus on form.  But we would also do sets where we would focus on function.  Meaning going hard..."somewhat" ignoring form, and just trying to increase our swimming strength and cardio. 

So when you're actually trying to swim "fast"...you need to combine both form and function and the result is something in between.  But in training, that doesn't mean you should shy away from the extremes.  Where you focus more on form, or more on function...even though you know each extreme is not the most efficient way to swim.  It should be obvious that you don't want to spend a significant time focusing on function if that means doing a lot of swimming with bad form...but some isn't so bad.

Thoughts?

Oh yeah, absolutely.  I'm all for the occasional set that just makes you want puke in the gutter and the only thing you can think about is not drowning.  

"So when you're actually trying to swim "fast"...you need to combine both form and function and the result is something in between"

Yes and no?  Your best form combined with your best function should produce the highest speed - it just may not be sustainable for very long.  The trick is finding that level of effort you apply that is sustainable.  Maybe that's what you meant by what you wrote.  

It's very similar to power on the bike really.  There is a bit of a fine line of how much power you can put out - you can maintain a certain amount for a period of time but increase that by just a bit and you quickly fail.  Except in the pool when you go just over that level, your crankarms start bending, the chain starts jumping gears and the brakes rub on the rims of the wheels.  

To add on, we had a set last night that was pretty hard, and the bolded section was very true.  I can flail around, destroy my arms and hit 1:XX, or I can actually concentrate (i mean, really concentrate) on form when going as fast as I can and actually go 1:XX - :01.  But you have to have decent form first I think in order to both swim as hard as you absolutely can and still maintain some semblance of form.  yes, it starts breaking down after 50 or 75 yards

There is a lot of talk, here on BT and elsewhere, of drills, and form, and technique.  That is all appropriate.  But you won't learn how to swim fast unless you actually swim fast in training at times. 

At our masters we also do sets that are ba**s to the wall, but also do sets where we try to recover our stroke and work on form.  As to the former, a good friend and fast swimmer describes that you are doing it right when your body starts tingling



Edited by ChrisM 2013-01-25 12:29 PM
2013-01-25 12:34 PM
in reply to: #4594158

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 8:39 AM
rymac - 2013-01-25 8:31 AM

Adrienne:  Since you are reading Daniels I had a question (since my sister stole my book and I can not reference it).  What does Daniel say the ideal recovery for 'I' pace intervals is?  I am thinking it is equal time on/off but can not remember.   I thought the 'R' pace was the unlimited time, whenever you are ready, type recovery period.

If anybody else knows and can chime in that would be great.

We are continuing to get clobbered with snow.  Already have a foot on the ground in the last 2 days and supposed to get 4-6 inches more today.  At least it is warming up into the 20s Smile.

Not sure if I am going to risk the long drive to the pool in this weather or just jump on the trainer for a recovery type bike.

It looks like Daniels Interval work is up at VO2 level, so for that, about equal work equal rest/recover. For longer VO2 work intervals, the recover can be a little shorter if you like. After a few minutes of rest you should be ready. R-Pace looks to be harder than I-pace, like for 200-400m intervals.

 

My book is at home so I need to double check this BUT I seem to recall him giving a variety of options for the recovery. The interesting thing about VO2 work is that it takes 2 minutes to get up to max consumption of oxygen. So, if your rest is on the shorter side, you won't be starting from zero to get back up to max. But of course this is a fine line because you need to be able to complete all of your intervals.

R pace is more about speed and economy, not training the VO2 "system" so it's generally a quicker pace (but not necessarily) and not what you would call "harder."  The purpose is really to work on your mechanics so you aren't confined to running over those 2 minutes to get into V02. 



2013-01-25 1:31 PM
in reply to: #4543084

User image

Payson, AZ
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Somehow you guys made run talk sound like power talk
2013-01-25 1:39 PM
in reply to: #4594787

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN

bzgl40 - 2013-01-25 1:31 PM Somehow you guys made run talk sound like power talk

Ugh. I hate to be that guy. Errr girl. 

Especially because I think the majority of people can get a hell of a long way simply getting out the door as often as possible and running ... mostly easy and sometimes hard.

2013-01-25 1:43 PM
in reply to: #4594162

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
dustytrails - 2013-01-25 9:40 AM

I'm so slow that my long runs are events in and of themselves. _______

_____________ HAHAHA....and do u get tired of holding your arms up, Kate?

Arms are not the problem. 

2013-01-25 1:55 PM
in reply to: #4594683

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 12:34 PM
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 8:39 AM
rymac - 2013-01-25 8:31 AM

Adrienne:  Since you are reading Daniels I had a question (since my sister stole my book and I can not reference it).  What does Daniel say the ideal recovery for 'I' pace intervals is?  I am thinking it is equal time on/off but can not remember.   I thought the 'R' pace was the unlimited time, whenever you are ready, type recovery period.

If anybody else knows and can chime in that would be great.

We are continuing to get clobbered with snow.  Already have a foot on the ground in the last 2 days and supposed to get 4-6 inches more today.  At least it is warming up into the 20s Smile.

Not sure if I am going to risk the long drive to the pool in this weather or just jump on the trainer for a recovery type bike.

It looks like Daniels Interval work is up at VO2 level, so for that, about equal work equal rest/recover. For longer VO2 work intervals, the recover can be a little shorter if you like. After a few minutes of rest you should be ready. R-Pace looks to be harder than I-pace, like for 200-400m intervals.

 

My book is at home so I need to double check this BUT I seem to recall him giving a variety of options for the recovery. The interesting thing about VO2 work is that it takes 2 minutes to get up to max consumption of oxygen. So, if your rest is on the shorter side, you won't be starting from zero to get back up to max. But of course this is a fine line because you need to be able to complete all of your intervals.

R pace is more about speed and economy, not training the VO2 "system" so it's generally a quicker pace (but not necessarily) and not what you would call "harder."  The purpose is really to work on your mechanics so you aren't confined to running over those 2 minutes to get into V02. 

I don't actually have the book, but this seems to be the section we're looking for. Excellent read. Recovery is not quite fixed, but he gives some guidelines in there on how to make it work for various durations of work.

2013-01-25 2:02 PM
in reply to: #4594803

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 1:39 PM

bzgl40 - 2013-01-25 1:31 PM Somehow you guys made run talk sound like power talk

Ugh. I hate to be that guy. Errr girl. 

Especially because I think the majority of people can get a hell of a long way simply getting out the door as often as possible and running ... mostly easy and sometimes hard.

Well, they are rather similar. If we had started with running and then moved on to power, one could say the same thing. I think it's a good connection to make because then one can more easily see the bigger picture of how to do workouts. For those of us that understood the power part, we just need to learn how to equate those ideas to pacing. The bigger picture becomes much easier to see when things are more alike or more simple.



2013-01-25 2:08 PM
in reply to: #4594844

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 1:55 PM
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 12:34 PM
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 8:39 AM
rymac - 2013-01-25 8:31 AM

Adrienne:  Since you are reading Daniels I had a question (since my sister stole my book and I can not reference it).  What does Daniel say the ideal recovery for 'I' pace intervals is?  I am thinking it is equal time on/off but can not remember.   I thought the 'R' pace was the unlimited time, whenever you are ready, type recovery period.

If anybody else knows and can chime in that would be great.

We are continuing to get clobbered with snow.  Already have a foot on the ground in the last 2 days and supposed to get 4-6 inches more today.  At least it is warming up into the 20s Smile.

Not sure if I am going to risk the long drive to the pool in this weather or just jump on the trainer for a recovery type bike.

It looks like Daniels Interval work is up at VO2 level, so for that, about equal work equal rest/recover. For longer VO2 work intervals, the recover can be a little shorter if you like. After a few minutes of rest you should be ready. R-Pace looks to be harder than I-pace, like for 200-400m intervals.

 

My book is at home so I need to double check this BUT I seem to recall him giving a variety of options for the recovery. The interesting thing about VO2 work is that it takes 2 minutes to get up to max consumption of oxygen. So, if your rest is on the shorter side, you won't be starting from zero to get back up to max. But of course this is a fine line because you need to be able to complete all of your intervals.

R pace is more about speed and economy, not training the VO2 "system" so it's generally a quicker pace (but not necessarily) and not what you would call "harder."  The purpose is really to work on your mechanics so you aren't confined to running over those 2 minutes to get into V02. 

I don't actually have the book, but this seems to be the section we're looking for. Excellent read. Recovery is not quite fixed, but he gives some guidelines in there on how to make it work for various durations of work.

Yes, that's  it. Those graphs are exactly what I was thinking of when talking about VO2.

2013-01-25 2:31 PM
in reply to: #4594862

User image

Expert
1260
10001001002525
Norton Shores, MI
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 3:08 PM
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 1:55 PM
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 12:34 PM
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 8:39 AM
rymac - 2013-01-25 8:31 AM

Adrienne:  Since you are reading Daniels I had a question (since my sister stole my book and I can not reference it).  What does Daniel say the ideal recovery for 'I' pace intervals is?  I am thinking it is equal time on/off but can not remember.   I thought the 'R' pace was the unlimited time, whenever you are ready, type recovery period.

If anybody else knows and can chime in that would be great.

We are continuing to get clobbered with snow.  Already have a foot on the ground in the last 2 days and supposed to get 4-6 inches more today.  At least it is warming up into the 20s Smile.

Not sure if I am going to risk the long drive to the pool in this weather or just jump on the trainer for a recovery type bike.

It looks like Daniels Interval work is up at VO2 level, so for that, about equal work equal rest/recover. For longer VO2 work intervals, the recover can be a little shorter if you like. After a few minutes of rest you should be ready. R-Pace looks to be harder than I-pace, like for 200-400m intervals.

 

My book is at home so I need to double check this BUT I seem to recall him giving a variety of options for the recovery. The interesting thing about VO2 work is that it takes 2 minutes to get up to max consumption of oxygen. So, if your rest is on the shorter side, you won't be starting from zero to get back up to max. But of course this is a fine line because you need to be able to complete all of your intervals.

R pace is more about speed and economy, not training the VO2 "system" so it's generally a quicker pace (but not necessarily) and not what you would call "harder."  The purpose is really to work on your mechanics so you aren't confined to running over those 2 minutes to get into V02. 

I don't actually have the book, but this seems to be the section we're looking for. Excellent read. Recovery is not quite fixed, but he gives some guidelines in there on how to make it work for various durations of work.

Yes, that's  it. Those graphs are exactly what I was thinking of when talking about VO2.

Perfect.  Thanks Ben.

I have been doing 0.5mi-1.0mi 'I' pace intervals over the last couple weeks.  That would fall into the 3-5 minute category that he mentions and keeping the rest periods about equal to that but really cool to hear the reasoning behind it.

2013-01-25 2:35 PM
in reply to: #4594662

User image

Master
1736
100050010010025
Midcoast Maine
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
ChrisM - 2013-01-24 1:28 PM

There is a lot of talk, here on BT and elsewhere, of drills, and form, and technique.  That is all appropriate.  But you won't learn how to swim fast unless you actually swim fast in training at times. 

At our masters we also do sets that are ba**s to the wall, but also do sets where we try to recover our stroke and work on form.  As to the former, a good friend and fast swimmer describes that you are doing it right when your body starts tingling

Truer words haven't been spoken about swimming. I think a lot of folks are (initially) so pleased to be able to complete the distance (myself included) that they stay at the speed that got them there. For true improvement - you need to swim fast during training times. I kind of liken it to running fartleks. Kind of.

2013-01-25 7:20 PM
in reply to: #4594862

User image

Champion
7595
50002000500252525
Columbia, South Carolina
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 3:08 PM
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 1:55 PM
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 12:34 PM
brigby1 - 2013-01-25 8:39 AM
rymac - 2013-01-25 8:31 AM

Adrienne:  Since you are reading Daniels I had a question (since my sister stole my book and I can not reference it).  What does Daniel say the ideal recovery for 'I' pace intervals is?  I am thinking it is equal time on/off but can not remember.   I thought the 'R' pace was the unlimited time, whenever you are ready, type recovery period.

If anybody else knows and can chime in that would be great.

We are continuing to get clobbered with snow.  Already have a foot on the ground in the last 2 days and supposed to get 4-6 inches more today.  At least it is warming up into the 20s Smile.

Not sure if I am going to risk the long drive to the pool in this weather or just jump on the trainer for a recovery type bike.

It looks like Daniels Interval work is up at VO2 level, so for that, about equal work equal rest/recover. For longer VO2 work intervals, the recover can be a little shorter if you like. After a few minutes of rest you should be ready. R-Pace looks to be harder than I-pace, like for 200-400m intervals.

 

My book is at home so I need to double check this BUT I seem to recall him giving a variety of options for the recovery. The interesting thing about VO2 work is that it takes 2 minutes to get up to max consumption of oxygen. So, if your rest is on the shorter side, you won't be starting from zero to get back up to max. But of course this is a fine line because you need to be able to complete all of your intervals.

R pace is more about speed and economy, not training the VO2 "system" so it's generally a quicker pace (but not necessarily) and not what you would call "harder."  The purpose is really to work on your mechanics so you aren't confined to running over those 2 minutes to get into V02. 

I don't actually have the book, but this seems to be the section we're looking for. Excellent read. Recovery is not quite fixed, but he gives some guidelines in there on how to make it work for various durations of work.

Yes, that's  it. Those graphs are exactly what I was thinking of when talking about VO2.

Yes, that's it.  Bear in mind that not everything is in the book.  JD used to post quite a bit on letsrun (though not so much any more).  I recall one very interesting post (I think it was him -- but maybe Canova?) about rest intervals and he pointed out essentially what you already said, namely, that the nature of the impact of the workout can depend a lot on the rest interval.  A shorter rest interval is going to stress different systems than a longer rest interval.  Neither is wrong -- they're just different workouts.  Obviously you can do more reps on a longer rest intervals, but sometimes more reps isn't the point.

2013-01-26 7:50 AM
in reply to: #4594912

User image

Master
2411
2000100100100100
Goodyear, AZ
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
itsallrelative_Maine - 2013-01-25 12:35 PM
ChrisM - 2013-01-24 1:28 PM

There is a lot of talk, here on BT and elsewhere, of drills, and form, and technique.  That is all appropriate.  But you won't learn how to swim fast unless you actually swim fast in training at times. 

At our masters we also do sets that are ba**s to the wall, but also do sets where we try to recover our stroke and work on form.  As to the former, a good friend and fast swimmer describes that you are doing it right when your body starts tingling

Truer words haven't been spoken about swimming. I think a lot of folks are (initially) so pleased to be able to complete the distance (myself included) that they stay at the speed that got them there. For true improvement - you need to swim fast during training times. I kind of liken it to running fartleks. Kind of.

x2

I am by no means fast in the water but I was stuck at a 1:45 pace for the longest time until I learned to get uncomfortable and swim "fast" in training.



2013-01-26 8:00 AM
in reply to: #4594803

User image

Master
2411
2000100100100100
Goodyear, AZ
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 11:39 AM

bzgl40 - 2013-01-25 1:31 PM Somehow you guys made run talk sound like power talk

Ugh. I hate to be that guy. Errr girl. 

Especially because I think the majority of people can get a hell of a long way simply getting out the door as often as possible and running ... mostly easy and sometimes hard.

Love this! There's a temptation in Triathlon to over complicate things...I think the "mostly easy and sometimes hard" philosophy is spot on. I use this for both my run and cycling training, and in other areas of my life such as nutrition: mostly good, sometimes bad (mostly wine, sometimes beer/mostly dark chocolate, sometimes milk/mostly coffee, sometimes decaf) ... you get the picture ;-)

I don't use a HR monitor, PM etc, just gold old RPE....I get decent results, without the stress :-)



Edited by riorio 2013-01-26 8:02 AM
2013-01-26 10:47 AM
in reply to: #4543084

User image

Payson, AZ
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
It's a rainy rainy day here in Payson, AZ.  Good day to get on the trainer so got that done early this morning
2013-01-26 10:52 AM
in reply to: #4595596

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
Nice sunny day here and for once the wind isn't blowing hard.  I'll be on the trainer for 90 mins later on but first, a nap!
2013-01-26 11:03 AM
in reply to: #4543084

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN

Sunny day here. Hoping to go to the pool in a bit. 

Feeling a bit banged up today. So dumb.

Last night I decided to go for a bit of a bike ride in the late afternoon. I was so happy to sneak it in and not have to ride on the trainer. So I'm riding my new bike and feeling great. I got to one of the busiest intersections in our city, unclipped my left foot, started to move foward and somehow leaned to the right and down I went.

Scraped my knee and bruised a few places. Bike is fine though but it scratched the edge of the seat a bit. grrr. 

Wishing everyone a great workout weekend. :=)

2013-01-26 11:13 AM
in reply to: #4595618

User image

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
KateTri1 - 2013-01-27 1:03 AM

Sunny day here. Hoping to go to the pool in a bit. 

Feeling a bit banged up today. So dumb.

Last night I decided to go for a bit of a bike ride in the late afternoon. I was so happy to sneak it in and not have to ride on the trainer. So I'm riding my new bike and feeling great. I got to one of the busiest intersections in our city, unclipped my left foot, started to move foward and somehow leaned to the right and down I went.

Scraped my knee and bruised a few places. Bike is fine though but it scratched the edge of the seat a bit. grrr. 

Wishing everyone a great workout weekend. :=)

Well, rats ... but welcome to the club. Glad the bike is okay! And you too Heal up fast.



2013-01-26 11:20 AM
in reply to: #4595456

User image

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
riorio - 2013-01-26 10:00 PM
Asalzwed - 2013-01-25 11:39 AM

bzgl40 - 2013-01-25 1:31 PM Somehow you guys made run talk sound like power talk

Ugh. I hate to be that guy. Errr girl. 

Especially because I think the majority of people can get a hell of a long way simply getting out the door as often as possible and running ... mostly easy and sometimes hard.

Love this! There's a temptation in Triathlon to over complicate things...I think the "mostly easy and sometimes hard" philosophy is spot on. I use this for both my run and cycling training, and in other areas of my life such as nutrition: mostly good, sometimes bad (mostly wine, sometimes beer/mostly dark chocolate, sometimes milk/mostly coffee, sometimes decaf) ... you get the picture ;-)

I don't use a HR monitor, PM etc, just gold old RPE....I get decent results, without the stress :-)

This is the understatement of the year.

Salty uses no electronics (watchless crazy lady!!!) and she gets pretty decent results, too.

I'm still on RPE as well.

2013-01-26 11:25 AM
in reply to: #4595618

User image

Regular
186
100252525
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN

Is there a right way to fall over clipped in?

Swam fast 25's today interspersed between 100's. Asked coach to inform me when my form fell apart. it didn't. pace was 24 sec for the 25 meters.  For some reason I would like to know how fast I can go to lose form. that's for Monday I guess.

Coach suggested I do kicking drills without a board and work on my extension. I do not like those drills, they are hard for me. I guess that means I should do them more....

Doing a bike ride in the morning ...no matter the weather. Might be windy/ drizzly...maybe 20 mph not too terrible but its on the lake so maybe  stronger wind. Races in Texas are notorious for being windy at times.

Running coming along ok. don't care for the tenderness on hip pointer tho. hmmmm....

Great Weekend to All !!!

2013-01-26 11:36 AM
in reply to: #4595618

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-01-26 1:30 PM
in reply to: #4595646

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: SBR Utopia - OPEN
dustytrails - 2013-01-26 1:25 PM

Is there a right way to fall over clipped in?

Swam fast 25's today interspersed between 100's. Asked coach to inform me when my form fell apart. it didn't. pace was 24 sec for the 25 meters.  For some reason I would like to know how fast I can go to lose form. that's for Monday I guess.

Coach suggested I do kicking drills without a board and work on my extension. I do not like those drills, they are hard for me. I guess that means I should do them more....

Doing a bike ride in the morning ...no matter the weather. Might be windy/ drizzly...maybe 20 mph not too terrible but its on the lake so maybe  stronger wind. Races in Texas are notorious for being windy at times.

Running coming along ok. don't care for the tenderness on hip pointer tho. hmmmm....

Great Weekend to All !!!

There is no guarantee your form will fall apart in a 25 by going fast (not saying it won't).  You may simply just reach a point where you don't go any faster.  Now start extending that out to 50s and longer where the time spent swimming is long enough for you to fatigue more and it becomes way more likely.

As to the suggestion of kicking without a board, your coach is probably right.  I'm not a big fan either though and rarely kick that way.  A strong flutter kick on your back with a good streamline including flip turns and a few underwater dolphin kicks off the wall can be a tough set.

New Thread
BT Development Mentor Program Archives » SBR Utopia - OPEN Rss Feed  
 
 
of 190