EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread (Page 7)
-
No new posts
General Discussion | Iron Distance Race Groups » EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread | Rss Feed |
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2009-05-19 8:25 AM in reply to: #2160068 |
Master 1420 Reston, VA | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread PennState - 2009-05-19 8:36 AM docswim24 - 2009-05-18 3:43 PM For those of you that have done Eagleman and Columbia in the same year, what where your bike speeds? If you averaged x at Columbia, what did you do at Eagleman? Uh, my prediction for you Dan is dominance... pure dominance. As said if the wind picks up it can challenge, however the wind and rain and cold of Columbia cut down speeds IMHO. I would expect to see you in the 24-25mph range, maybe faster if the conditions allow. Thanks for the vote of confidence. I seem to be much better at shorter races than longer races though (notice my spectacular blow-up at both my 1/2 and full last year) so we will see. It looks like most people are 1-2 mph faster at Eagleman vs Columbia? |
|
2009-05-19 8:48 AM in reply to: #2160208 |
Cycling Guru 15134 Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread For stronger cyclists I would actually put the two paces close together. Weaker ones I'd give them + 2 mph or so at E-Man. Last year is my only gage of doing both. I averaged 23.4 at Columbia last year but only did 22.5-ish at E-Man (in brutal conditions with the heat and some wind). I did try to ride somewhat conservatively since I had no fitness and the weather conditions, but I was still slower at E-Man than Columbia. Lack-o-fitness still caught up as I was already cramping in T2 and bagged the run after a mile. Based on knocking off 2 minutes or so from your combined T1/bike time at Columbia to come up with your average pace of around 23, I would say that if you stayed within yourself that you should be able to put up around a 2:25 at E-Man and be able to put up a good run split. I'm sure you could go faster, but the trick at E-Man is to not throw it all on the table in the first half of the bike when you feel good and have more cross or tail winds. The second half kicks your azz if you are not ready for it and can suck a lot of oomph out of you. Edited by Daremo 2009-05-19 8:50 AM |
2009-05-19 9:08 AM in reply to: #2158763 |
Expert 1296 | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread docswim24 - 2009-05-18 3:43 PM For those of you that have done Eagleman and Columbia in the same year, what where your bike speeds? If you averaged x at Columbia, what did you do at Eagleman? I am not a big fan of comparing races like this. One is hilly and one is not. Each race brings a different conditions and factors to the table. At the 70.3 distance no matter what you do on the bike if you don't fuel properly your run is gonna be in the hopper. So the complexity of going fast on the bike at 70.3 in my opinion is exponentially different that at 40K. You can have kinda bad nutrition at the OLY distance and still run well over 10K. However the opposite is far from true. If you have been out doing race day simulations at or near the 70.3 distance you know where you should be. Try not to compare race to race. |
2009-05-19 9:09 AM in reply to: #2160274 |
Expert 1296 | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Daremo - 2009-05-19 9:48 AM For stronger cyclists I would actually put the two paces close together. Weaker ones I'd give them + 2 mph or so at E-Man. Last year is my only gage of doing both. I averaged 23.4 at Columbia last year but only did 22.5-ish at E-Man (in brutal conditions with the heat and some wind). I did try to ride somewhat conservatively since I had no fitness and the weather conditions, but I was still slower at E-Man than Columbia. Lack-o-fitness still caught up as I was already cramping in T2 and bagged the run after a mile. Based on knocking off 2 minutes or so from your combined T1/bike time at Columbia to come up with your average pace of around 23, I would say that if you stayed within yourself that you should be able to put up around a 2:25 at E-Man and be able to put up a good run split. I'm sure you could go faster, but the trick at E-Man is to not throw it all on the table in the first half of the bike when you feel good and have more cross or tail winds. The second half kicks your azz if you are not ready for it and can suck a lot of oomph out of you. Very good points Rick.... |
2009-05-19 9:36 AM in reply to: #2160337 |
Master 1420 Reston, VA | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread gadzinm - 2009-05-19 10:08 AM docswim24 - 2009-05-18 3:43 PM For those of you that have done Eagleman and Columbia in the same year, what where your bike speeds? If you averaged x at Columbia, what did you do at Eagleman? I am not a big fan of comparing races like this. One is hilly and one is not. Each race brings a different conditions and factors to the table. At the 70.3 distance no matter what you do on the bike if you don't fuel properly your run is gonna be in the hopper. So the complexity of going fast on the bike at 70.3 in my opinion is exponentially different that at 40K. You can have kinda bad nutrition at the OLY distance and still run well over 10K. However the opposite is far from true. If you have been out doing race day simulations at or near the 70.3 distance you know where you should be. Try not to compare race to race. I like to have an idea of about what speed I should be around as a sanity check that way I know if something is off (wheel rub, pushing way to hard early, etc). Based upon my training rides I know where I want to be as far as pwr, hr, feel, etc. Speed is one of my sanity checks. |
2009-05-19 9:42 AM in reply to: #2160445 |
Cycling Guru 15134 Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Considering you 2 will be going head to head, this should be fun to watch!! Both of you will come out of the water about the same time and I expect similar bike splits. We'll just have to see if Dan can put up the sort of run that Mike can. You guys should put a beer bet on your swim splits! |
|
2009-05-19 9:45 AM in reply to: #2160445 |
Expert 1296 | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread docswim24 - 2009-05-19 10:36 AM gadzinm - 2009-05-19 10:08 AM I like to have an idea of about what speed I should be around as a sanity check that way I know if something is off (wheel rub, pushing way to hard early, etc). Based upon my training rides I know where I want to be as far as pwr, hr, feel, etc. Speed is one of my sanity checks.docswim24 - 2009-05-18 3:43 PM For those of you that have done Eagleman and Columbia in the same year, what where your bike speeds? If you averaged x at Columbia, what did you do at Eagleman? I am not a big fan of comparing races like this. One is hilly and one is not. Each race brings a different conditions and factors to the table. At the 70.3 distance no matter what you do on the bike if you don't fuel properly your run is gonna be in the hopper. So the complexity of going fast on the bike at 70.3 in my opinion is exponentially different that at 40K. You can have kinda bad nutrition at the OLY distance and still run well over 10K. However the opposite is far from true. If you have been out doing race day simulations at or near the 70.3 distance you know where you should be. Try not to compare race to race. I don't train with power just speed. But it looks like you have enough metrics to know where you should be. Would you not want to ride at your goal Watts for the distance? Speed should take care of itself if you stay in those ranges, no? Lets just say for simplicity sake that your race simulation rides...you should be faster than those.... |
2009-05-19 9:48 AM in reply to: #2160464 |
Master 1420 Reston, VA | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Daremo - 2009-05-19 10:42 AM Considering you 2 will be going head to head, this should be fun to watch!! Both of you will come out of the water about the same time and I expect similar bike splits. We'll just have to see if Dan can put up the sort of run that Mike can. You guys should put a beer bet on your swim splits! Ha - swim we should be close but Mike is a better biker than me and has run much better at this distance than I have. |
2009-05-19 9:51 AM in reply to: #2160476 |
Master 1420 Reston, VA | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread gadzinm - 2009-05-19 10:45 AM docswim24 - 2009-05-19 10:36 AM gadzinm - 2009-05-19 10:08 AM I like to have an idea of about what speed I should be around as a sanity check that way I know if something is off (wheel rub, pushing way to hard early, etc). Based upon my training rides I know where I want to be as far as pwr, hr, feel, etc. Speed is one of my sanity checks.docswim24 - 2009-05-18 3:43 PM For those of you that have done Eagleman and Columbia in the same year, what where your bike speeds? If you averaged x at Columbia, what did you do at Eagleman? I am not a big fan of comparing races like this. One is hilly and one is not. Each race brings a different conditions and factors to the table. At the 70.3 distance no matter what you do on the bike if you don't fuel properly your run is gonna be in the hopper. So the complexity of going fast on the bike at 70.3 in my opinion is exponentially different that at 40K. You can have kinda bad nutrition at the OLY distance and still run well over 10K. However the opposite is far from true. If you have been out doing race day simulations at or near the 70.3 distance you know where you should be. Try not to compare race to race. I don't train with power just speed. But it looks like you have enough metrics to know where you should be. Would you not want to ride at your goal Watts for the distance? Speed should take care of itself if you stay in those ranges, no? Lets just say for simplicity sake that your race simulation rides...you should be faster than those.... Yes power is my main metric and hopefully I will be faster than my race simulations. |
2009-05-19 9:51 AM in reply to: #2160464 |
Expert 1296 | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Daremo - 2009-05-19 10:42 AM Considering you 2 will be going head to head, this should be fun to watch!! Both of you will come out of the water about the same time and I expect similar bike splits. We'll just have to see if Dan can put up the sort of run that Mike can. You guys should put a beer bet on your swim splits! I love the idea of racing head to head but unfortunatly you must not have looked too closely at my logs recently. I have 6 miles of running in my legs YTD...that would indicate that I am one of three things: 1. The biggest sandbagger on the east coast. Likely, but I am not telling 2. The most well rested 70.3 runner in the field. 3. Not doing the race.... Sorry guys but I pulled out a few months ago as I simply lost motivation and have not returned to 100% physically. Maybe next year. Honestly, if Dan's nutrition is spot on I would expect him to rip it at Eagleman. The key is to get out fast on the swim...take the first 40K of the bike fast but controlled, fuel, fuel, fuel, survive the last 10-15 miles of headwind/cross and come off the bike ready to run. If you arrive it T2 in one piece with out your legs locking up...you have a very legit shot at placing Top 5 OA. I know a bunch of the top guys in 30-34 and if you would like to disucss how they race shoot me a PM... I'll show you who to look for while your out there... Maybe I'll ride down and watch.... |
2009-05-19 10:07 AM in reply to: #1869406 |
Cycling Guru 15134 Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Doh, didn't realize that Mike! I have perused your logs every now and then and I know you've been putting in the yards in the water, but it just didn't click that you weren't coming down. Ah well, you will be missed, that's for sure! Guess what Dan, your AG placing potential just went up a lot!! |
|
2009-05-19 10:27 AM in reply to: #1869406 |
Extreme Veteran 643 Connecticut | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Really Good discussion going on here.... I have been going back and fwd uin my head about my race wattage for EMan. Based on an approx. bike split of 2:30 and a 1 hour time trialling FTP of 276. My wattage numbers I am working towards are 220watts first 30mins and 230watts the remainder approx 80% of FTP for first 30mins and 83% for remainder. Sounds like from all of the above may make sense to extend the 220watts out a little longer and push a bigger number into the wind the last 15miles? Would be interested in hearing from the experts their recommended strategies? I guess the other option is hammer the first hour to get as far into the ride as possible before the wind builds 8-) But I am not a gambling man so I wont be going that route. Thxs and looking fwd to seeing you all there, my family and I are at the Days Inn Cambridge where ever that is?
JG
|
2009-05-19 10:34 AM in reply to: #1869406 |
Expert 1296 | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Ok so last year I was injured but did the race. From March up until the race I didn't put anything huge down on the bike or the run. As I said I don't train with power but here is what I got from the guy who won 30-34 last year. I am not going to get into a debate about if he was drafting me or not. A few folks who saw us thought that he was up my a$$ for most of the ride. But that's not why I am posting this. I have no clue what 200 watts is vs 300 watts. What I do know is that if you want to win on this course you have to put a killer ride and run together. Here is what I pulled off Adam Zucco's blog right after the race: "...I got passed 5 miles in by a guy who was flying. I had to maintain between 320-350 watts on average to follow him (not drafting). To use some motivation is absolutely an advantage, but nothing illegal about that. We went through the half way point after going back and forth with each other in 1:03! He eventually dropped off the pace and I could feel my stomach shutting down so I slowed up the last 10-15 miles as well to try to get ready for the very hot run. I ended up with a solid 2:16 bike split. I averaged just under 270 watts I believe." I eventually dropped off the pace because of a few things. #1 it was 110 degree out. #2 I simply didn't put the training in to ride like that. I think I pulled in at 2:18 for the ride. I no doubt with the proper training should ride in the 2:10-12 range. Draft legal. So for you power guys out there the winner of M30-34 last year rode avg 270 watts. Enjoy.... Edited by gadzinm 2009-05-19 10:46 AM |
2009-05-19 10:39 AM in reply to: #1869406 |
Pro 4054 yep, | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread This race should be pretty interesting to say the least. I'll totally enjoy seeing a good mass'em up bike race! |
2009-05-19 10:50 AM in reply to: #2160617 |
Master 1420 Reston, VA | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread gadzinm - 2009-05-19 11:34 AM Ok so last year I was injured but did the race. From March up until the race I didn't put anything huge down on the bike or the run. As I said I don't train with power but here is what I got from the guy who won 30-34 last year. I am not going to get into a debate about if he was drafting me or not. A few folks who saw us thought that he was up my a$$ for most of the ride. But that's not why I am posting this. I have no clue what 200 watts is vs 300 watts. What I do know is that if you want to win on this course you have to put a killer ride and run together. Here is what I pulled off Adam Zucco's blog right after the race: "...I got passed 5 miles in by a guy who was flying. I had to maintain between 320-350 watts on average to follow him (not drafting). To use some motivation is absolutely an advantage, but nothing illegal about that. We went through the half way point after going back and forth with each other in 1:03! He eventually dropped off the pace and I could feel my stomach shutting down so I slowed up the last 10-15 miles as well to try to get ready for the very hot run. I ended up with a solid 2:16 bike split. I averaged just under 270 watts I believe." I eventually dropped off the pace because of a few things. #1 it was 110 degree out. #2 I simply didn't put the training in to ride like that. I think I pulled in at 2:18 for the ride. I no doubt with the proper training should ride in the 2:10-12 range. Draft legal. So for you power guys out there the winner of M30-34 last year rode avg 270 watts. Enjoy.... Any idea how big Adam is? My plan is to avg around 255-260. 80-85% of my FTP. Good info Mike - thanks. |
2009-05-19 10:57 AM in reply to: #2160675 |
Expert 1296 | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread docswim24 - 2009-05-19 11:50 AM gadzinm - 2009-05-19 11:34 AM Any idea how big Adam is? My plan is to avg around 255-260. 80-85% of my FTP. Good info Mike - thanks.Ok so last year I was injured but did the race. From March up until the race I didn't put anything huge down on the bike or the run. As I said I don't train with power but here is what I got from the guy who won 30-34 last year. I am not going to get into a debate about if he was drafting me or not. A few folks who saw us thought that he was up my a$$ for most of the ride. But that's not why I am posting this. I have no clue what 200 watts is vs 300 watts. What I do know is that if you want to win on this course you have to put a killer ride and run together. Here is what I pulled off Adam Zucco's blog right after the race: "...I got passed 5 miles in by a guy who was flying. I had to maintain between 320-350 watts on average to follow him (not drafting). To use some motivation is absolutely an advantage, but nothing illegal about that. We went through the half way point after going back and forth with each other in 1:03! He eventually dropped off the pace and I could feel my stomach shutting down so I slowed up the last 10-15 miles as well to try to get ready for the very hot run. I ended up with a solid 2:16 bike split. I averaged just under 270 watts I believe." I eventually dropped off the pace because of a few things. #1 it was 110 degree out. #2 I simply didn't put the training in to ride like that. I think I pulled in at 2:18 for the ride. I no doubt with the proper training should ride in the 2:10-12 range. Draft legal. So for you power guys out there the winner of M30-34 last year rode avg 270 watts. Enjoy.... How big meaning how tall and his weight? I would guess he's an over 6' guy but on the lean side. Maybe low 180s upper 170s. But I don't know. I mean I am almost 6 foot and I am like 195. So weight can be deceiving. |
|
2009-05-19 11:15 AM in reply to: #1869406 |
Extreme Veteran 643 Connecticut | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Yes Mike good info indeed, damn that guy was strong you mention above. Trying to do the maths reverse wise with the info you gave: If he averaged 270odd racing at 85% of thresehold tells me his 1hour FTP about 320 or so and if low 80kgs he would have a weight to kilo ratio of about 4 watts per kilo. Damn nice. In all honesty given the heat you mention he probably had a declining power ratio over the course of the race so I am guessing he is probably up about 340watts or so..ouch and you hung with him you are a bad AS* I am 6'2 and about 183lbs so I race off about a 3.4watts per kilo. I am guessing in male M35-39 I am going to be on the edge of the top 20% which is pretty much what I did at Wisconsin and RI last year...
|
2009-05-19 4:22 PM in reply to: #2160274 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2009-05-19 4:23 PM in reply to: #1869406 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. Edited by PennState 2009-05-19 4:24 PM |
2009-05-20 1:07 PM in reply to: #2161695 |
Master 1420 Reston, VA | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread PennState - 2009-05-19 5:23 PM Also, Dan what beer is it that Rick and I are buying for you? btw, it looks like I will be in for Eagleman as long as things continue to improve for me. Should be fun. Great news about Eagleman Fred! A 6 pack of any of the following will work - bring it to Eagleman and we can have it after. Killians Red Molsen Canadian Labbat Blue Light Sam Adams Light Turbo Dog (#1 choice - available at world market) |
2009-05-20 2:20 PM in reply to: #1869406 |
Master 1524 Reston, VA | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread we need a bt tent. does such a thing exist? |
|
2009-05-20 2:37 PM in reply to: #2163691 |
Extreme Veteran 643 Connecticut | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread docswim24 - 2009-05-20 1:07 PM PennState - 2009-05-19 5:23 PM Great news about Eagleman Fred! A 6 pack of any of the following will work - bring it to Eagleman and we can have it after. Killians Red Molsen Canadian Labbat Blue Light Sam Adams Light Turbo Dog (#1 choice - available at world market) Also, Dan what beer is it that Rick and I are buying for you? btw, it looks like I will be in for Eagleman as long as things continue to improve for me. Should be fun. Let me just say you have exceptional taste in beer for an American...add some Sam Adams Summer Ale and some Stella and I would say first rate selection that!!!
|
2009-05-20 2:56 PM in reply to: #2163936 |
Pro 4054 yep, | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread hooslisa - 2009-05-20 3:20 PM we need a bt tent. does such a thing exist?
I agree with this. Does anyone have a little pop up tent at all? Trying to organize a small group area for some pictures and such. |
2009-05-20 3:36 PM in reply to: #2164009 |
Cycling Guru 15134 Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread jamesG - 2009-05-20 3:37 PM Let me just say you have exceptional taste in beer for an American...add some Sam Adams Summer Ale and some Stella and I would say first rate selection that!!! Sam Adams Summer blows. It is by far the worst of the seasonal selections (with the Oktoberfest being the best). And Killians and Molsen??? C'mon ..... not even on a list of decent beers!! Bass, Guinness, Sam Oktober/Winter, Fat Tire Amber, etc. are good beers. Edited by Daremo 2009-05-20 3:37 PM |
2009-05-20 3:42 PM in reply to: #2164205 |
Subject: RE: EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread Does Cambridge have a local beer? Why not go with that to celebrate both the race, the area, and finishing. Edited by eyeofthetiger2007 2009-05-20 3:43 PM |
General Discussion | Iron Distance Race Groups » EagleMan Ironman 70.3 Triathlon : Official Thread | Rss Feed |
|