TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity (Page 79)

2009-01-22 1:40 PM

in reply to: #1922892

Sensei

Sin City

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

aidana - 2009-01-22 11:39 AM

"Fluffing" would be an awesome job..........

.........and you're up, next.......now you are up, next.......you are hopeless, next.........what's that?, next.........

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Said it before and I will say it again...

Keeper...

2009-01-22 1:41 PM

in reply to: #1922889

Sensei

Sin City

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

1stTimeTri - 2009-01-22 11:37 AM

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:32 PM BTW, i heard that "fluffing" is actually not done, it's just a rumor...One must "fluff" himself if you must...

Supposedly was a "thing of the past" per this little wiki note -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer

I guess I should take it off the resume....

2009-01-22 1:42 PM

in reply to: #1922900

Champion

5171

Racine, WI

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

Aikidoman - 2009-01-22 1:41 PM

1stTimeTri - 2009-01-22 11:37 AM

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:32 PM BTW, i heard that "fluffing" is actually not done, it's just a rumor...One must "fluff" himself if you must...

Supposedly was a "thing of the past" per this little wiki note -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer

I guess I should take it off the resume....

Nah...the economy is going to get worse before it gets better.......which means people are going to seriously need FLUFFERS..........keep it!

1stTimeTri

2009-01-22 1:42 PM

in reply to: #1922900

Iron Donkey

38643

, Wisconsin

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

Aikidoman - 2009-01-22 1:41 PM

1stTimeTri - 2009-01-22 11:37 AM

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:32 PM BTW, i heard that "fluffing" is actually not done, it's just a rumor...One must "fluff" himself if you must...

Supposedly was a "thing of the past" per this little wiki note -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer

I guess I should take it off the resume....

Yep, a little outdated. That's why you haven't gotten that new job yet.

1stTimeTri

2009-01-22 1:42 PM

in reply to: #1922907

Iron Donkey

38643

, Wisconsin

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

aidana - 2009-01-22 1:42 PM

Aikidoman - 2009-01-22 1:41 PM

1stTimeTri - 2009-01-22 11:37 AM

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:32 PM BTW, i heard that "fluffing" is actually not done, it's just a rumor...One must "fluff" himself if you must...

Supposedly was a "thing of the past" per this little wiki note -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer

I guess I should take it off the resume....

Nah...the economy is going to get worse before it gets better.......which means people are going to seriously need FLUFFERS..........keep it UP!

Fixed.

2009-01-22 1:44 PM

in reply to: #1922911

Champion

5171

Racine, WI

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

1stTimeTri - 2009-01-22 1:42 PM

aidana - 2009-01-22 1:42 PM

Aikidoman - 2009-01-22 1:41 PM

1stTimeTri - 2009-01-22 11:37 AM

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:32 PM BTW, i heard that "fluffing" is actually not done, it's just a rumor...One must "fluff" himself if you must...

Supposedly was a "thing of the past" per this little wiki note -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer

I guess I should take it off the resume....

Nah...the economy is going to get worse before it gets better.......which means people are going to seriously need FLUFFERS..........keep it UP!

Fixed.

Thanks for having my back Phil!

trixie

2009-01-22 1:46 PM

in reply to: #1903286

Champion

5850

Michigan

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

I'm not so sure about that job though...It seems that it would be very similar to being rode hard and put away wet...always the bridesmaid never the bride...the early bird, but you can't finish the worm...

Edited by trixie 2009-01-22 1:46 PM

2009-01-22 1:48 PM

in reply to: #1922918

Champion

5171

Racine, WI

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:46 PM I'm not so sure about that job though...It seems that it would be very similar to being rode hard and put away wet...always the bridesmaid never the bride...the early bird, but you can't finish the worm...

Maybe we need fluffer finisher for the fluffers???

2009-01-22 1:50 PM

in reply to: #1922918

Champion

34263

Chicago

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:46 PM

I'm not so sure about that job though...It seems that it would be very similar to being rode hard and put away wet...always the bridesmaid never the bride...the early bird, but you can't finish the worm...

True. You'd never be able to get yours. Or even have the satisfaction of knowing you helped someone get theirs. Very sad.

trixie

2009-01-22 1:50 PM

in reply to: #1922925

Champion

5850

Michigan

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

aidana - 2009-01-22 2:48 PM

Maybe we need fluffer finisher for the fluffers???

maybe but then shouldn't they just be in the freaking porn??

these fluffers must be NASTY Looking as there are some porn stars that aren't so....hawt.

trixie

2009-01-22 1:51 PM

in reply to: #1903286

Champion

5850

Michigan

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

That's what I heard anyway....

1stTimeTri

2009-01-22 1:54 PM

in reply to: #1922926

Iron Donkey

38643

, Wisconsin

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

mr2tony - 2009-01-22 1:50 PM

True. You'd never be able to get yours. Or even have the satisfaction of knowing you helped someone get theirs. Very sad.

Unless they're a sadist and actually enjoy the tease torture perhaps?

Edited by 1stTimeTri 2009-01-22 1:55 PM

2009-01-22 1:54 PM

in reply to: #1922918

Sensei

Sin City

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

trixie - 2009-01-22 11:46 AM I'm not so sure about that job though...It seems that it would be very similar to being rode hard and put away wet...always the bridesmaid never the bride...the early bird, but you can't finish the worm...

Maybe for some it's about the jouney, not the destination.

Some might not like the special prize at the bottom of the box of cracker jax.

But top scores to those whos goal of eating, is to get to the prize...

2009-01-22 1:55 PM

in reply to: #1922927

Champion

5171

Racine, WI

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:50 PM

aidana - 2009-01-22 2:48 PM

Maybe we need fluffer finisher for the fluffers???

maybe but then shouldn't they just be in the freaking porn??

these fluffers must be NASTY Looking as there are some porn stars that aren't so....hawt.

well, maybe fluffers can pick their own Fluffer finishers and have a choice to be in the porn or not? Of course they would need a pay raise from "fluffer" to "actor".

2009-01-22 1:55 PM

in reply to: #1922927

Champion

34263

Chicago

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:50 PM

aidana - 2009-01-22 2:48 PM

Maybe we need fluffer finisher for the fluffers???

maybe but then shouldn't they just be in the freaking porn??

these fluffers must be NASTY Looking as there are some porn stars that aren't so....hawt.

Yeah. But some are actually not ugly. Of course we only see their faces at the very end, and tehy're usually obscured by something.

2009-01-22 1:57 PM

in reply to: #1922929

Champion

34263

Chicago

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:51 PM

That's what I heard anyway....

Hows come you hate chat?

2009-01-22 1:58 PM

in reply to: #1922936

Sensei

Sin City

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

mr2tony - 2009-01-22 11:55 AM

trixie - 2009-01-22 1:50 PM

aidana - 2009-01-22 2:48 PM

Maybe we need fluffer finisher for the fluffers???

maybe but then shouldn't they just be in the freaking porn??

these fluffers must be NASTY Looking as there are some porn stars that aren't so....hawt.

Yeah. But some are actually not ugly. Of course we only see their faces at the very end, and tehy're usually obscured by something.

It's sort of translucient though...

2009-01-22 2:00 PM

in reply to: #1922942

Sensei

Sin City

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

Damn. Convo gets good for the first time in forever, and I have to go tri train and do more work...

2009-01-22 2:02 PM

in reply to: #1922948

Sensei

Sin City

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

Later you fluffers and porn stars....

2009-01-22 2:03 PM

in reply to: #1903286

Champion

34263

Chicago

Subject: RE: TAN #64 - A Case of Temporary InTANity

I dont think I'd like to be a fluffer very much. I couldn't be a porn star, what with the tootsie roll and such, plus I'd be done in like 2 seconds every time.