Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2009-07-28 12:53 PM
in reply to: #2312947

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.



(popcorn.jpg)



(TK-promo1.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
popcorn.jpg (16KB - 17 downloads)
TK-promo1.jpg (85KB - 10 downloads)


2009-07-28 12:54 PM
in reply to: #2312958

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2009-07-28 12:59 PM
in reply to: #2312941

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
mrbbrad - 2009-07-28 1:47 PM
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 1:41 PM
ChrisM - 2009-07-28 12:30 PM

heh.  So now I am naive.  Not sure why you always go personal with me, but there it is I guess

Whatever.  LA was a better teammate on the road than AC was. 

 personal? really? last I check this is call a public forum in which we can exchange or debate opinions. If you think that by me stating that "IMO to believe LA was the ultimate team player is naive" is a personal attack, well, I don't know what to tell you. You said no one could argue bla bla bla, I just did and stated it why. Can't really see why is that personal but feel free to interpret it as it pleases you.


Since this is a public forum, and I never was good at minding my own business...I know what to tell you; arguing a point is one thing, calling someone naive is something else.


X2
2009-07-28 1:08 PM
in reply to: #2312941

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
mrbbrad - 2009-07-28 12:47 PM
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 1:41 PM
ChrisM - 2009-07-28 12:30 PM

heh.  So now I am naive.  Not sure why you always go personal with me, but there it is I guess

Whatever.  LA was a better teammate on the road than AC was. 

 personal? really? last I check this is call a public forum in which we can exchange or debate opinions. If you think that by me stating that "IMO to believe LA was the ultimate team player is naive" is a personal attack, well, I don't know what to tell you. You said no one could argue bla bla bla, I just did and stated it why. Can't really see why is that personal but feel free to interpret it as it pleases you.


Since this is a public forum, and I never was good at minding my own business...I know what to tell you; arguing a point is one thing, calling someone naive is something else.
alrighty, then help me out here; in his opinion "no one can argue LA played the role of supportive teammate brilliantly"; I replied I could and said why. Now how would you suggest I can state that "IMO it would be (or insert word here) that LA indeed was the ultimate team player". In particular when he was the one who created a leadership struggle on Astana, he was the one stating that the leader would be define on the road, he was the one making comments onr interviews or posting in twitter. Please tell me what word would be acceptable and I am really concerned I am hurting ChrisM feelings; he believes I am attacking him when I am just merely debating the statement made. Maybe I should have used the word optimistic, would that work?
2009-07-28 1:14 PM
in reply to: #2312835

Triathlete Nation ~ Texas!
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 12:16 PM
ChrisM - 2009-07-28 11:31 AM Meh, clash of egos.  The way it whould be for driven athletes at the top of their game.

I highly doubt that AC never had a rgeat admiration for LA when he was winning all his tours.  But, it's only for him to know.

BTW, I think the guy that has won the last four grand tours he's entered (arguably a feat near to LA's 7 TdFs) has the bona fides to bust some chops.

Should be a good 2010!  As if he needed any more, LA sure has the motiation for a killer training season

ETA - whatever LA did re: the team party, or in itnerviews, or took AC's seat on the bus, no one can argue that on the road, where it counted, he played the role of supportive teammate brilliantly and may have cost himself second place (certainly held Wiggins off) The same cannot be said of AC in certain stages.
I can argue that; he did, only after AC proved he was the stronger man and probably AC's only way to prove it was to do his race. I was hoping for LA take 2nd and pulling for him; still all his comments don't match with his actions on and off the road. To believe LA was the ultmiate team player and supported AC all along is naive. AC rode for himself cuz he didn't even have the support of his DS. LA would have done the exact same if he would have had the legs to challenge Alberto. 

The cool thing is that next year both of them will have the chance to battle it off; LA will use his $$ and connections to bring a strong team; AC will have the chance to once again be the only rider willing to stand up against LA and beat him on the road. I can only imagine and hope Garmin brings AC onto their team...


Seriously?  He can keep his skinny, mountain climbing & (TT'ing) a$$ on one of those other non-American teams.  Sorry, Jorge... but I think that would be a serious injustice to CV & now BW on Garmin.  I would like to see Columbia make some improvements in a GC contendor, but that list does not need to include AC. 

When AC is 37 yrs old, and still hanging with essentially all of the top dawgs in pro cycling, we'll chat.  LA couldn't match the accelerations of AC or AS ~ mano y mano... but put a well balanced team together, coached by Bruyhneel, and lead by LA, it is very possible that those two boys will have the hands full battling the relentless assault that will fall upon them.  And if they happen to come out victorious, then they will rightly be crowned king.

Edited by Trin2bfast 2009-07-28 1:29 PM
2009-07-28 1:14 PM
in reply to: #2312924

Elite
4504
20002000500
Columbus, Ohio
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
Spokes - 2009-07-28 1:40 PM

DougRob - 2009-07-28 10:28 AM A Spanish sponsored team is very different than a team of all Spanish riders. Yes, a handful of top riders in the world are Spanish. However, the drop off after them is steep. Even Phil and Paul commented during the TdF that the Spanish championship that AC held meant little because of the lack of depth. Furthermore, I doubt all of the Spanish riders are available as some have contracts with their teams.


x2 said it better than I did


'cause Iban Mayo and Roberto Herras were supposed to be the second coming and a GC contender against LA for years.

Sorry I had to stir the pot Jorge

To say that AC was not supported by LA and his team and that AC went out on his own is not true. This wasn't T-Mobile 2005, which I really thought we would see. LA did not attack, Leipheimer did not attack, Kloden did not attack... They supported. Did you see LA stick to the wheel of Wiggins and other GC men to not close gaps when he made a move(ie Vino, Ulrich & Kloden '05)? Astana rode an amazing TTT to put they hurt on all the GC. Without that effort we would have seen a completely different race in the Pyranese. Did you see Lance and Kloden offer bottles to AC more than a couple of times going up Mt Ventoux? Did you see Astana take the front of the peleton to close the gap on breaks even with AG2r in yellow?

I don't think we were watching the same race.

Edited by JChristoff 2009-07-28 1:18 PM


2009-07-28 1:16 PM
in reply to: #2312181

Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
not to worry, my feelings are quite intact

Carry on
2009-07-28 1:17 PM
in reply to: #2312810

Master
1404
1000100100100100
Eagle Mountain, Utah
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
Z-dog - 2009-07-28 11:10 AM

Contador is the bigger tool.....he proved it with his race strategy!! If he worked with the team Kloden could have rounded out the podium...





Do you mean Kloden in 3rd bumping Armstrong to 4th or an all Astana podium? Cause in my opinion neither one of those guys could have finished ahead of Andy Schleck much less both.
2009-07-28 1:26 PM
in reply to: #2313012

Pro
3932
2000100050010010010010025
Irvine, California
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 11:08 AM
mrbbrad - 2009-07-28 12:47 PM
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 1:41 PM
ChrisM - 2009-07-28 12:30 PM

heh.  So now I am naive.  Not sure why you always go personal with me, but there it is I guess

Whatever.  LA was a better teammate on the road than AC was. 

 personal? really? last I check this is call a public forum in which we can exchange or debate opinions. If you think that by me stating that "IMO to believe LA was the ultimate team player is naive" is a personal attack, well, I don't know what to tell you. You said no one could argue bla bla bla, I just did and stated it why. Can't really see why is that personal but feel free to interpret it as it pleases you.


Since this is a public forum, and I never was good at minding my own business...I know what to tell you; arguing a point is one thing, calling someone naive is something else.
alrighty, then help me out here; in his opinion "no one can argue LA played the role of supportive teammate brilliantly"; I replied I could and said why. Now how would you suggest I can state that "IMO it would be (or insert word here) that LA indeed was the ultimate team player". In particular when he was the one who created a leadership struggle on Astana, he was the one stating that the leader would be define on the road, he was the one making comments onr interviews or posting in twitter. Please tell me what word would be acceptable and I am really concerned I am hurting ChrisM feelings; he believes I am attacking him when I am just merely debating the statement made. Maybe I should have used the word optimistic, would that work?



It's best to avoid sentences where you assign some trait to the holder of an opinion (i.e., naivete, ignorance, etc.).  So instead of saying "it's naive/foolish to think x..." you could state "i simply don't believe x, for the following reasons...". 

(Note: I'm guilty of this too at times, as I think we all are.)
2009-07-28 1:28 PM
in reply to: #2312515

Master
1404
1000100100100100
Eagle Mountain, Utah
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 9:35 AM I replied to you is because you are criticizing Contador for running his mouth after the tour seemingly because of his frustration he experienced through the tour yet you make no critiques for LA who did took public jabs at Contador via twitter and on the TV interviews.

As I said I am a fan of both cyclists due to their sport achievements, and LA has done other great stuff in his fight against cancer. However I must say I am bit turn off about what went on this year with team Astana and LA attitude. He stated he was coming back (without pay) to be a team player and grow awarness for the livestrong foundation.

Some where along the way he went for "I'll just be part of the team and support the team leader" to "we'll see who the strong man is and let the roads decide the leader". He has publicly said in previous years when someone on his teams was not riding for the leader the athlete would have been kicked out of the team, yet this year he created that situation.
IOW he did stuff he aknowldge unacceptable on his tour wins in previuos years. Yes Alberto could have just be the better person, keep his mouth shut and enjoy the win, after all he did the talking with his legs, aperently with horrible team dynamics and still kicked everyone's azzes.

There are some things emerging as to what went on and it doesn't sound like Alberto is all that off. LA ditched the team celebratory party, took public jabs, apperently while LA was treated as leader and even taking the best sleeping arrengments usually given to the team leader, Brunyeel rode behind LA on the final individual time trial when the team director always rides behind te team leader not to mention the yellow jersey, Alberto was placed to share a room with his supposedly only team friend; apperently before the final individual time trial when Alberto got to the lobby for his ride to the race everyone was gone, he has to call his brother to pick him up to get to the race.

All this reports are coming out on international media outlets and while the information might be bias (same as reading about LA in any USA media) I think there is some truth to it hence I don't blame Alberto to vent his frustrations. LA is a competitor and maybe he tought he had a chance to win the tour until Alberto prove him there wasn't any chance. until then it is when he reluctantly assumed the team player role. Still, LA and Brunyeel created a dynamic they had openly criticized about other teams in the past. Maybe Contador did ride for himself but it was his only way to win as he was been alianated on his own team, he felt he couldnt; trust Brunyeel and LA and in the process made some poor choices but in the end the objetive for Astana was to win per Brunyeel words hence all this drama is just extra. 

In the end, LA will now have what he really wanted again (his own team) and instead of using the livestrong awarness angle he can just openly say: "I want to win an 8th tour". Contador hopefully will have the freedom to be in a team who fully sopports him and then let their legs do the talking at the TdF next year and let the best win.

For all we know Conta is correct, LA is correct or both are at fault but most will pick the side of who they think is right...


Gonna have to say I agree with Jorge's assessment above.
2009-07-28 1:34 PM
in reply to: #2313079

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
Tripolar - 2009-07-28 2:26 PM
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 11:08 AM
mrbbrad - 2009-07-28 12:47 PM
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 1:41 PM
ChrisM - 2009-07-28 12:30 PM

heh.  So now I am naive.  Not sure why you always go personal with me, but there it is I guess

Whatever.  LA was a better teammate on the road than AC was. 

 personal? really? last I check this is call a public forum in which we can exchange or debate opinions. If you think that by me stating that "IMO to believe LA was the ultimate team player is naive" is a personal attack, well, I don't know what to tell you. You said no one could argue bla bla bla, I just did and stated it why. Can't really see why is that personal but feel free to interpret it as it pleases you.


Since this is a public forum, and I never was good at minding my own business...I know what to tell you; arguing a point is one thing, calling someone naive is something else.
alrighty, then help me out here; in his opinion "no one can argue LA played the role of supportive teammate brilliantly"; I replied I could and said why. Now how would you suggest I can state that "IMO it would be (or insert word here) that LA indeed was the ultimate team player". In particular when he was the one who created a leadership struggle on Astana, he was the one stating that the leader would be define on the road, he was the one making comments onr interviews or posting in twitter. Please tell me what word would be acceptable and I am really concerned I am hurting ChrisM feelings; he believes I am attacking him when I am just merely debating the statement made. Maybe I should have used the word optimistic, would that work?



It's best to avoid sentences where you assign some trait to the holder of an opinion (i.e., naivete, ignorance, etc.).  So instead of saying "it's naive/foolish to think x..." you could state "i simply don't believe x, for the following reasons...". 

(Note: I'm guilty of this too at times, as I think we all are.)


Yup. Just state what you think about Lance and his qualities as a team mate. No need to assign some characteristic to another opinion.


2009-07-28 1:35 PM
in reply to: #2312653

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong

JorgeM - 2009-07-28 12:22 PM
merlin2375 - 2009-07-28 8:55 AM http://www.cnn.com/2009/SPORT/07/27/cycling.contador.armstrong/index.html

"My relationship with Lance Armstrong is non-existent. Even if he is a great champion, I have never had admiration for him and I never will," the 26-year-old Spaniard admitted.


By the way, here is the complete and correct translation for the interview: "My relationship with Armstrong is none, but apart from his personality, he's a great champion, has won 7 tours and done a great job in this one, but on a personal levelin terms of our relationship I don't have a great admiration towards his, and never will, but again as a rider, he's a great champion"

spanish version: http://www.rtve.es/...ng-nula/286686.shtml[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the translation.  This makes the quote and story very different than what's being reported on the U.S. sports pages.

I'm not a Contador fan.  Never really have been.  He's currently the top GC guy in the world.  I probably will never be a Contador fan.  During the tour he said all the right things.  I was shocked and disappointed by this story.  But really this translation isn't that big of a story to me.



Edited by Brock Samson 2009-07-28 1:36 PM
2009-07-28 2:38 PM
in reply to: #2312181

Triathlete Nation ~ Texas!
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
2009-07-28 3:05 PM
in reply to: #2312181

Master
2356
20001001001002525
Fenton, MI
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
merlin2375 - 2009-07-28 9:55 AM http://www.cnn.com/2009/SPORT/07/27/cycling.contador.armstrong/index.html

"My relationship with Lance Armstrong is non-existent. Even if he is a great champion, I have never had admiration for him and I never will," the 26-year-old Spaniard admitted.


I specifically remember hearing a translated interview with AC where he said that Lance was a big inspiration for him, when returning from his own injury in 2007.  So, he's a liar and a champion.    Not much different than most of our politicians.

editted to add:  whoa, I didn't realize this was  four page thread, I thought the end of page one was the end.  This is likely already stated.

Edited by matt3liv 2009-07-28 3:06 PM
2009-07-29 11:25 PM
in reply to: #2313035

Master
1404
1000100100100100
Eagle Mountain, Utah
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
Trin2bfast - 2009-07-28 12:14 PM
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 12:16 PM
ChrisM - 2009-07-28 11:31 AM Meh, clash of egos.  The way it whould be for driven athletes at the top of their game.

I highly doubt that AC never had a rgeat admiration for LA when he was winning all his tours.  But, it's only for him to know.

BTW, I think the guy that has won the last four grand tours he's entered (arguably a feat near to LA's 7 TdFs) has the bona fides to bust some chops.

Should be a good 2010!  As if he needed any more, LA sure has the motiation for a killer training season

ETA - whatever LA did re: the team party, or in itnerviews, or took AC's seat on the bus, no one can argue that on the road, where it counted, he played the role of supportive teammate brilliantly and may have cost himself second place (certainly held Wiggins off) The same cannot be said of AC in certain stages.
I can argue that; he did, only after AC proved he was the stronger man and probably AC's only way to prove it was to do his race. I was hoping for LA take 2nd and pulling for him; still all his comments don't match with his actions on and off the road. To believe LA was the ultmiate team player and supported AC all along is naive. AC rode for himself cuz he didn't even have the support of his DS. LA would have done the exact same if he would have had the legs to challenge Alberto. 

The cool thing is that next year both of them will have the chance to battle it off; LA will use his $$ and connections to bring a strong team; AC will have the chance to once again be the only rider willing to stand up against LA and beat him on the road. I can only imagine and hope Garmin brings AC onto their team...


Seriously?  He can keep his skinny, mountain climbing & (TT'ing) a$$ on one of those other non-American teams.  Sorry, Jorge... but I think that would be a serious injustice to CV & now BW on Garmin.  I would like to see Columbia make some improvements in a GC contendor, but that list does not need to include AC. 

When AC is 37 yrs old, and still hanging with essentially all of the top dawgs in pro cycling, we'll chat.  LA couldn't match the accelerations of AC or AS ~ mano y mano... but put a well balanced team together, coached by Bruyhneel, and lead by LA, it is very possible that those two boys will have the hands full battling the relentless assault that will fall upon them.  And if they happen to come out victorious, then they will rightly be crowned king.


Looks  like this may be a possibility.
http://www.denverpost.com/sports/ci_12919159
2009-07-30 8:05 AM
in reply to: #2316508

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
gerald12 - 2009-07-29 11:25 PM
Trin2bfast - 2009-07-28 12:14 PM
JorgeM - 2009-07-28 12:16 PM
ChrisM - 2009-07-28 11:31 AM Meh, clash of egos.  The way it whould be for driven athletes at the top of their game.

I highly doubt that AC never had a rgeat admiration for LA when he was winning all his tours.  But, it's only for him to know.

BTW, I think the guy that has won the last four grand tours he's entered (arguably a feat near to LA's 7 TdFs) has the bona fides to bust some chops.

Should be a good 2010!  As if he needed any more, LA sure has the motiation for a killer training season

ETA - whatever LA did re: the team party, or in itnerviews, or took AC's seat on the bus, no one can argue that on the road, where it counted, he played the role of supportive teammate brilliantly and may have cost himself second place (certainly held Wiggins off) The same cannot be said of AC in certain stages.
I can argue that; he did, only after AC proved he was the stronger man and probably AC's only way to prove it was to do his race. I was hoping for LA take 2nd and pulling for him; still all his comments don't match with his actions on and off the road. To believe LA was the ultmiate team player and supported AC all along is naive. AC rode for himself cuz he didn't even have the support of his DS. LA would have done the exact same if he would have had the legs to challenge Alberto. 

The cool thing is that next year both of them will have the chance to battle it off; LA will use his $$ and connections to bring a strong team; AC will have the chance to once again be the only rider willing to stand up against LA and beat him on the road. I can only imagine and hope Garmin brings AC onto their team...


Seriously?  He can keep his skinny, mountain climbing & (TT'ing) a$$ on one of those other non-American teams.  Sorry, Jorge... but I think that would be a serious injustice to CV & now BW on Garmin.  I would like to see Columbia make some improvements in a GC contendor, but that list does not need to include AC. 

When AC is 37 yrs old, and still hanging with essentially all of the top dawgs in pro cycling, we'll chat.  LA couldn't match the accelerations of AC or AS ~ mano y mano... but put a well balanced team together, coached by Bruyhneel, and lead by LA, it is very possible that those two boys will have the hands full battling the relentless assault that will fall upon them.  And if they happen to come out victorious, then they will rightly be crowned king.


Looks  like this may be a possibility.
http://www.denverpost.com/sports/ci_12919159
you are ruining my fun! I am waiting util it becomes oficial and then let trin2bfast know so we can 'chat'


2009-07-30 8:36 AM
in reply to: #2312181

Expert
878
500100100100252525
Tallahassee, FL
Subject: RE: Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong
I also think that Garmin being this open about pursuing AC is an injustice to Vande Velde and Wiggens, especially now that Wiggens has made both his intent to win the Tour and desire to stay with Garmin known.  I would have liked to see Garmin be a little more loyal to these two guys.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Contador: I will never Admire Armstrong Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3