Sub 20 minute 5k (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2009-09-27 10:42 PM in reply to: #2407094 |
Veteran 499 El Segundo, CA | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k I got a 19:45 in a 5k this morning- my first time breaking the 20-minute barrier. I went out a little fast (6:07 for the 1st mile), then settled into a more reasonable pace. I've been building up mileage, currently up to 20-25 mpw, with some tempo runs and hills here and there (no more than 1x per week). Just thought I'd brag share. |
|
2009-09-28 12:03 AM in reply to: #2410401 |
Champion 5781 Northridge, California | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k vikingmd - 2009-09-16 3:19 PM Rocket Man - 2009-09-16 12:40 PM I tried to break 20 min/5k and 40 min/10k for years and could never quite get under 20 (for about 2 years my 5k PR was 20:18) and then I started 1) Running more (~30 miles per week or so) and incorporating treadmill intervals once a week into my training plan. As a result not only did I break 20 min early this year I ran 19:15 on a very hilly course, proceeded to run 39:15 in the rain and cold for 10k a couple of months later and topped it all of with a 1:26 half marathon (7 minute PR on the same course one year later and again not a flat course by any means). For the treadmill intervals, start of with 20 min decending to 5k pace, then 3x3 min (3 min recoveries) faster than 5k pace. (for example my 5k pace is 6:18 so I do these at 6:03). Cool down for 20 min easy afterward. You can add one minute per interval (and also to the recovery time) every 3-4 weeks depending on your progression. Running fast is about running fast. I agree speed work and tempo runs are the key. Plus to put it bluntly you have to be willing to explore the pain cave. I'm not sure about the advice about running many miles per week. I think sub 20 minute 5k is easily doable on ~20-25 miles per week assuming triathlon training I'm not sure about "easily" but I did it this spring on less mileage than that (more like 18-23 mpw plus bike and swim). |
2009-09-28 12:34 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Master 2460 | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k While it's true that a lucky minority will be able to so sub-20 and even sub-18 on <25 mpw or even <10 mpw, the prescription for success for most runners trying to push to the next level is - more miles + a good intermittent speedwork session. Edited by agarose2000 2009-09-28 12:35 AM |
2009-09-28 7:42 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Master 1289 Franklin, TN | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k I could be interested in this challenge. My standalone 5k PR is a 23:31 and my sprint tri 5k is a 24:01. So yeah, I need some improvement for sure. |
2009-09-28 8:08 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Regular 87 Melbourne | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k Good Luck.. Deafinatly very doable Since everyone else is talking about their times I will do so as well. I run a 21min km but when training I do a 23 why? cause I just CBF'ed to push myself in training...which of course is very naughty, I normally try and find some bloke to shadow for as long as possible or put the treadmill on at the required pace. I found hillsprints mixed with medium/high intensity runs of about 9 kms (with two sets of five 20 second hillsprints) worked wonders. |
2009-09-28 8:31 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Veteran 196 Arlington, VA | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k I finally did it on Saturday! 19:43 on a certified, but very flat and fast course. My previous best was 20:03 on a hot evening in August on a course with 70 feet in elevation gain, so I don't know which was the better performance. Before thatt, my best was 20:57 8 years ago when I was 27. Wow, that was painful. Good luck everyone. |
|
2009-09-28 8:34 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Extreme Veteran 887 Lake Placid, NY | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k As a 5K lover I just have to jump in. |
2009-09-28 8:36 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Expert 1233 | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k Darn you guys! So I'm in my long distance base build phase for the next three months, and then I see this challenge! So now I'm in too! It's only been a few years since my last sub 20 5k, but I need to get my times down so I can beat my daughter, who is in CC in high school. For me this will be a track workout once per week. The book, 'Daniels' Running Formula', by Jack Daniels has always been my guide when my running needs improvement, but don't think I'll ever see sub 17 again. |
2009-09-28 9:22 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Veteran 274 Everett, WA | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k I haven't run a stand-alone 5k since mid-July (21:57), but seeing some 30-ish folks thinking they're too old to break 20:00 got me fired up for the challenge. I'm in! Dan 42y/o - not dead yet |
2009-09-28 9:23 AM in reply to: #2429318 |
Runner | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k vonschnapps - 2009-09-28 9:36 AM Darn you guys! So I'm in my long distance base build phase for the next three months, and then I see this challenge! So now I'm in too! It's only been a few years since my last sub 20 5k, but I need to get my times down so I can beat my daughter, who is in CC in high school. For me this will be a track workout once per week. The book, 'Daniels' Running Formula', by Jack Daniels has always been my guide when my running needs improvement, but don't think I'll ever see sub 17 again. Hey, I think you'll find that you'll have a faster 5k time after the long distance building. |
2009-09-29 10:17 AM in reply to: #2407094 |
Member 131 Long Island, NY | Subject: RE: Sub 20 minute 5k I know a sub 20 5k is still months away, it is a goal when I hit 50 in 6 months. That together with a sub 5:30 mile are my main goals in the next 6 -8 months. So my 21:05 5k yesterday was a benchpoint, knowing I have work to do. Probably went out a little too fast at 6:27. Have a few XC races in the coming months, but will try to increase my winter mileage to 35 - 40 mpw and hope it pays dividends in the spring. |
|
|