40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? (Page 4)
-
No new posts
General Discussion | Triathlon Talk » 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? | Rss Feed |
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2010-10-07 7:17 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? I'm in your same age group - 38 years old. I've heard those type of comments my whole life. First, you're body will change when you hit puberty. Next, you'll gain the freshmen 15 when you go to college. Then, let's see if you can work full time and still have time to exercise. Then came wait until you have kids, you're body will never be the same. It gets annoying. Blah, blah, blah, none of that ever happened TO ME. My body didn't change at all during puberty, in fact I look like I've never hit puberty LOL. Didn't gain weight in college, continued running and started biking and swimming after college, and my kids are adopted so my body missed out on that one. I have finally stopped hearing comments about how or when my body is going to change. The truth is, those ladies can only tell you what happend to THEM! Don't listen, do what you love and embrace your age! I seriously doubt that you'll wake up on the morning you turn 40 and be sore from walking the dog - that sounds a little ridiculous. My mother is 70 and still swims and walks every day. |
|
2010-10-07 7:27 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Veteran 202 Wheaton, IL | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? This is a little more cycling related, but a funny article written in the UK about men + fitness + and mid-life issues. www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-10965608 |
2010-10-07 7:41 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Member 130 Bloomington | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? Ditto on everything already written here. I am a huge believer in the "if you don't use it - you loose it". Staying active at whatever level works for you will keep you young, regardless of the actual number. Seems like there are a lot of us in the mid 40 range who are in the best shape of our adults lives etc and loving it. Keep on going and just wait and see! I wouldn't trade being this age for anything. Sometimes I wish I had discovered the Tri world years ago but then I wonder would I have had the mental strength to push through and stick with the long long training plans - prob not. Being older and maturer really has advantages. Other than the wrinkles!!LOL |
2010-10-07 7:47 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Regular 136 | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? I just turned 50 in August. It's true that your body doesn't recover as fast as it used to but training for tri's has proven to be a great thing for both my mental and physical well being. I started doing tri's when I was 46. I can say at 50 that I am in better shape than when I was 46 and at 46 I was in better shape than when I was <40. You just need to be aware of your body and give yourself as much recovery as is needed. I tend to be in the BOP of my age group but I don't let that bother me. My head is in a better place than where it was in my 30's and being able to physically challenge my body still makes me thankful and I believe I will still be doing tri's for at least 20 more years and who knows after that |
2010-10-07 8:01 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Master 2210 Columbus, Ohio Coaching member | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? I was just running this morning with a guy who is 62 and I had to ask him to slow down the pace some. I am 34. I trained more than usual this year, and feel I am much better shape than I have ever been. Especially body composition-wise. I am back to a flat stomach after having two kids and thinking the flat stomach was something I would never get back. The women in 40-44 at my races always look sinewy and strong as they are passing me. Seems the primary group of people passing me on the run are 40-44 women. |
2010-10-07 8:11 AM in reply to: #3137780 |
Veteran 191 Husk, NC | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? Age is just a number! |
|
2010-10-07 8:33 AM in reply to: #3137840 |
Champion 10471 Dallas, TX | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? Ha! I call golf the "gut inducer". bighorsecreek - 2010-10-07 8:11 AM Age is just a number! |
2010-10-07 8:48 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
2010-10-07 8:49 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Expert 1358 Albuquerque, New Mexico | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? KSH - 2010-10-06 8:16 AM I will say that all 3 said that once you hit 40 you get a tummy pooch that will NOT go away no matter what you do. I'm 41 and the only reason I will ever have a "pooch" is if I get lazy and eat too much. I've had two kids. Personally I think you got ganged up on a bit...women do that to each other sometimes...I've seen it with childbirth stories too...Old Wives Tales. I would ignore and continue on exactly the way you are. Q |
2010-10-07 8:59 AM in reply to: #3137916 |
Veteran 191 Husk, NC | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? quincyf - 2010-10-07 9:49 AM KSH - 2010-10-06 8:16 AM I will say that all 3 said that once you hit 40 you get a tummy pooch that will NOT go away no matter what you do. I'm 41 and the only reason I will ever have a "pooch" is if I get lazy and eat too much. I've had two kids. Personally I think you got ganged up on a bit...women do that to each other sometimes...I've seen it with childbirth stories too...Old Wives Tales. I would ignore and continue on exactly the way you are. Q It that a picture of when you were 20??? |
2010-10-07 2:31 PM in reply to: #3135436 |
Regular 110 Toronto | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? There are really two sides to this coin. I am currently 43, recently had two children and was feeling decidedly old, tired and overweight. So, I took up training and did a sprint tri this summer and am now in better shape than I have been in about 20 years. So, yes, you can be in your 40s, 50s, 60s or whatever and continue to be in great shape. If you took up athletic endeavours later in life as I did, you will be in BETTER shape in your 40s than your 20s. |
|
2010-10-07 3:05 PM in reply to: #3135436 |
Master 1970 Somewhere on the Tennessee River | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? One accellerates the aging process when one doesn't eat right, doesn't workout, doesn't get enough sleep, etc. |
2010-10-07 5:11 PM in reply to: #3137882 |
Veteran 252 | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? KSH - 2010-10-07 8:33 AM Ha! I call golf the "gut inducer". bighorsecreek - 2010-10-07 8:11 AM Age is just a number! KSH, shhhhh..My tri girlfriends and I like to play golf too by the way..its not so bad..and we don't have pooches..LOL Patti |
2010-10-08 8:51 AM in reply to: #3139389 |
Champion 10471 Dallas, TX | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? 3leftys - 2010-10-07 5:11 PM KSH - 2010-10-07 8:33 AM Ha! I call golf the "gut inducer". bighorsecreek - 2010-10-07 8:11 AM Age is just a number! KSH, shhhhh..My tri girlfriends and I like to play golf too by the way..its not so bad..and we don't have pooches..LOL Patti Well yeah, but you ALSO do tri's. Thus the stomach has not been attacked by golf. |
2010-10-08 9:55 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Extreme Veteran 340 | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? Easy on the Golf bashing! It's not the sport that is "Gut enhancing" it's the fact that most people USE GOLF CARTS! It's actually quite a good "easy" workout to carry you 50lb. bag around for 6 or so miles a couple times a week. Unfortunately most golfers above a certain age would rather have a root canal than walk 18 holes. |
2010-10-08 10:03 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
Extreme Veteran 829 Tennessee | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? Thats crap. My eyesight went to heck at 40,,,,everything else still works great!!! |
|
2010-10-08 10:03 AM in reply to: #3140773 |
New Haven, CT | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? WaitingGuilty - 2010-10-08 10:55 AM Easy on the Golf bashing! It's not the sport that is "Gut enhancing" it's the fact that most people USE GOLF CARTS! It's actually quite a good "easy" workout to carry you 50lb. bag around for 6 or so miles a couple times a week. Unfortunately most golfers above a certain age would rather have a root canal than walk 18 holes. x2 - golf is a great game. you spend time outdoors with your friends. It is a very hard game too. Golf carts are the worst part of golf. they ruin the game. only reason for use is if you cannot walk for some legitimate reason. that's how it works at most british courses, you need a dr's note to ride. |
2010-10-08 4:22 PM in reply to: #3135544 |
Expert 828 | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? briderdt - 2010-10-06 9:41 AM Consider the source... At 47, I've found that I recover a little slower than 20 years ago when I do something I'm not used to, but we're talking 3 days instead of 2 for full recovery. But my recovery from normal workouts is pretty much the same. I'm not slower because of my age. You will only fall apart if you let yourself fall apart. Bodies implode from lack of use. Totally agree..esp w/ the last sentence. At 44 I can run a 5k faster than I could when i was active duty USAF in my early 20's...A 3 hour ride will make me tired the next day, but i'm still working in the yard, playing with the kids...etc. I feel a whole lot worse after 2 weeks of nothing compared to 2 weeks of daily, hard training.... |
2010-10-08 5:24 PM in reply to: #3135436 |
Expert 1148 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? I'll be 59 when I compete (good lord willing and the creeks don't rise) at Ironman Florida next month. The exciting thing is that when I work out I get stronger and faster. The body still responds to training. I'm not sure if it's because I'm training harder, or because of another year, but it seems I do need to rest a bit more, and some mornings the feet hurt when I put them on the floor. Injuries do seem to take longer to heal, but I've always been impatient with healing. It appears that cyclists continue to get faster as they age, some of the fastest cyclists in our club are in their fifties. (but look like they're in their 30"s) Thanks for starting this thread - I've been dreading that magic number 60. People over 60 are old. (except Madonna Buder) |
2010-10-08 8:10 PM in reply to: #3135436 |
Extreme Veteran 396 | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? This is me this summer, 3 weeks before I turned 41. I have always had a little pooch even before my 2 kids. (Punta Cana 0810.jpg) Attachments ---------------- Punta Cana 0810.jpg (77KB - 6 downloads) |
2010-10-09 12:37 PM in reply to: #3135436 |
Extreme Veteran 353 New York | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? 47 years old, have a six-year-old son and just did my first ironman last July. I have friends in their 20s who think they're "too old" to ever be in shape again. Pathetic! I also have a friend in her 80s who can pick up my 55 pound son and toss him in the air. I would much rather be like her, than my "just give up" pals who are in their 20s. |
|
2010-10-09 5:24 PM in reply to: #3135460 |
Elite 3067 Cheesehead, WI | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? well, heck, I didn't even start tri stuff til I was 43. I'm in a lot better shape now than 20 years ago. I quit smoking and drinking (although that isn't necessarily a life threatening thing for most, it was for me) and eat much better too. Sure, I don't bounce back like I did when I was in college but I just try to train smarter. Being in shape keeps me feeling younger, stronger and more agile and I'd much rather be this way than fat, frumpy and bitter because I'd feel 'old'. 40 ain't like your momma's 40! Woman have kids at 40, 'cougars' are 40+ and many top triathletes are over 40. And just wait, 50 is the new 30 |
2010-10-10 8:40 PM in reply to: #3135436 |
New user 246 madison, Wisconsin | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? I had major knee surgery a month before my 40th birthday. That kept me in a straight-leg cast for 6 weeks. I was amazed an how uncomfortable simple things, even just standing, were with one leg totally straight all of the time. So I spent most of that summer sitting on the couch. Gained 20 lbs (I've always been very thin) and felt generally like crap. So this last spring I started training again did my first three tris and am in the best shape of my life. In my case, it was MUCH harder to get back in shape but now that I'm there, I feel great. Yes, things slow down and don't work quite as smoothly as they did, but I'm REALLY looking forward to being that 70 year old guy at races and hearing people say, "Da$%, that old guy looks amazing." |
2010-10-10 10:54 PM in reply to: #3135436 |
Master 1686 Royersford, PA | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? Well when I turned 40 I absolutely fell apart. The day before my 40th birthday, I did an Olympic at Rev 3 Quazzy on a hilly course, hot and humid day. On my 40th birthday, I completed the Revolution and did a HIM on the same vicious course and hot and humid day and towards the end I started to fall apart. I know that was completely due to turning 40 . After turning 40 I set my IM PR by over 10 minutes this year on my 5th Ironman. I was in the best shape of my life my senior year of High School, but without a doubt I am in much better shape at 40 than I was at 25, or 30 years old and I feel alot stronger and faster this year and likely would have proved it across the board if it weren't for a wicked bike wreck right out of the gate this year. Age is just a number. Enjoy the ride but make sure the fire department is standing by when they light the candles on your cake! |
2010-10-11 8:34 AM in reply to: #3135436 |
100 | Subject: RE: 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? Things do change with age, but obvoiusly, YMMV. My wife was a competitive gymnast and coach. After we got married, she started running and lifting weights with me. We are also campers so we hiked quite a bit as well. So she has stayed relatively active from her 20's through her early 50's. She has always stayed lean and never been over-weight. I never really noticed her "slowing down" that much in her 40's. Her only real problem began with early-onset menopause at 49. That really gave her some issues (loss of sleep, bone density, muscle mass, etc.) that effected her training. She refused to take the meds and gutted it out. It was tough but I think it would have been tougher if she wasn't in such good shape to start with. So I think women can have a tougher time of it than men. It seems more women are injured than men (epsecially from all the pounding from running) to start with, and then you have to get through menopause. Now she has challenges from bone density loss and lack of some flexibility. Her hips get sore whens she ups the training mileage for half marys. So we are very careful with diet, stretching, and massage therapy. I guess this is a very individual thing. Genetics, lifestyle, mental attitiude, stress, etc. all get a vote in this deal. But overall, we are healthy, happy, and ready to start training for our first sprint tri next year. |
General Discussion | Triathlon Talk » 40+ers... how bad is it... really... if you are athletic? | Rss Feed |
|